Conference Session

Projects to promote eng.; teamwork,K-12

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Philip Henning

; Exposition Copyright ©2002, American Society of Engineering Education” Fuel Cell - http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/j/a/jab470/nsf1.htm Lego Flywheel Car - http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/s/k/skw121/The undergraduate fellows were given the following guidelines for their “kit” designs: · Low or minimal cost per kit, with simple but effective learning · Safety · Exposure to the fundamental science, chemistry or mechanics of an HEV technology · Curriculum and assembly instructions in easy-to-use format for teachers, as done in the NSF-supported Teaching Science with Toys books1) · Support for at least three Pennsylvania Department of Education Science and Technology

Conference Session

New Programs and Textbooks in BME

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Robin Adams; Mary Lidstrom; Kjell Nelson; Jeffrey Bonadio; David Stahl; Cynthia Atman

/291/5507/1224 www.nap.edu/books/0309073197/html/index.html www.cellsalive.com www.cbs.dtu.dk/dave/DNA_CenDog.html http://campus.northpark.edu/biology/cell/basiccell.html[9] Atman, C. J., R. S. Adams, et al. (2000). Using Multiple Methods to Evaluate a FreshmanDesign Course. 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Kansas City, MO.[10] McGourty, J. (1999). “Four Strategies to Integrate Assessment into the EngineeringEducational Environment.” Journal of Engineering Education 88(4): 391-395.[11] Turns, J., Atman, C.J., & Adams, R., “Concept maps

Conference Session

Collaborations with Engineering Technology

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Albert Koller

kinds.The purpose of this paper is to describe existing and future programmatic needs foreducational activities and the approaches being developed to utilize partnerships withbusiness and industry, NASA and DOD facilities, educational institutions, andgovernment organizations such as state spaceport authorities for aerospace programactivities that will link K-12, community college, and university systems to sustain aqualified and technically competent workforce.The Case for PartnershipsSince at least the early 1980’s, perhaps in conjunction with the management movementsof Total Quality Management and Continuous Quality Improvement, partnerships haveincreasingly occupied strategic planning activities and deployment strategies of majororganizations

Conference Session

International Engineering Education

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Bahadur Khan Khpolwak; Mohammad Saleh Keshawarz

joint efforts of theRoyal Government of Afghanistan and the United States Government. United States Agency forDevelopment provided the funds for the infrastructure and faculty development.During the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the early parts of 1980’s, the college wasstamped as an American institution and was targeted for elimination and was finally was shutdown in 1984. By that time, a large number of the professors had migrated to foreign countries.In 1984, a small group of these professors through funds provided by USAID, established aconstruction-related program in Peshawar, Pakistan, which lasted until USAID funds dried up in1994.Coordination of Humanitarian Assistance, CHA an Afghan non-governmental organization(NGO), with

Conference Session

International Engineering Education II

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Waddah Akili

© 2002, American Society for Engineering Education · a common year of engineering science presented to all majors during the second year, covering in an integrated way: mechanics, materials, circuits and electronics, energy and its manifestations, fluid flow and thermodynamics; · field-specific introductory and follow up courses (for each major)embodying: analysis, design, synthesis, and computer applications; offered largely during third year; and · electives and capstone courses properly integrated with design project(s) commensurate with students’ interests; offered during fourth year.The specialized, discipline-specific courses, during the latter years, must be

Conference Session

Multi-disciplinary Design

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Byron Newberry

in the freshman course). Students are then assigned, individually, to produce and submit a specified engineering drawing (practice drawing unrelated to projects). · Phase 1 Concept Description: This document requires CAD assembly drawing(s) of the proposed design concept. · Phase 2 Conceptual Design Proposal: This document requires CAD assembly drawing of the proposed design concept. In addition, the implementation plan requires graphical documents such as Gantt charts and organization flow charts, about which instruction is provided. · Phase 2 Preliminary Design Progress Report: In addition to the types of graphical documents contained in the conceptual design proposal, this report would

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Zheng Min; Robert Weber; Feng Chen; Ben Graubard; Julie Dickerson; Carolina Cruz-neira; Diane Rover

. Lwakabamba, R. J. Weber, D. Rover, C. Cruz-Neira, and J. A. Dickerson, "Lessons Learned: Installing a Wireless System in the C6 Virtual Reality Environment," presented at IEEE Virtual Reality 2002, Immersive Projection Technology Symposium, Orlando, FL, 2002.[2] R. Stuart, Design of Virtual Environments: Barricade Books, 2001.[3] M. M. Wloka, "Lag in Multiprocessor Virtual Reality," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 4, pp. 50-63, 1996.[4] K. Park and R. Kenyon, "Effects of Network Characteristics on Human Performance in a Collaborative Virtual Environment," presented at IEEE VR `99, Houston, TX, 1999.[5] K. M. Stanney, R. R. Mourant, and R. S. Kennedy, "Human Factors Issues in Virtual

Conference Session

Engineering Management Curriculum

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Jeffrey Short

a useful and necessary purpose in an organization’stechnical function.The performance appraisal of scientists, engineers, and technologists is a mainstay ofengineering management and of such courses. It is hoped this paper has provided some insightand much need course material where little is to be found and where great controversy can exist.Bibliography[1] Booz, Allen, Hamilton, Inc., Study of Performance Management Systems Compatible with Total Quality Management (TQM). Washington, D.C.:Department of the Navy, 1990[2] Cohen, S. “Reviewing the review: critics charge that employee evaluations are outdated, ineffective, and a waste of time.” The Tampa Tribune., 19 June, p. 1, 1994.[3] Raelin, J. A. “The basis for the

Conference Session

Managing and Funding Design Projects

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

David W. Miller; Doris Brodeur

Senior Level Design Course", ", Proceedings of the 2001 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Available at http://www.asee.org/conferences/search/02625_2001.pdf· Seebauer, E. G., and R. L. Barry, Fundamentals of Ethics for Scientists and Engineers, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.· Butler, S., "Catalysing Student Autonomy Through Action Research in a Problem -Centered Learning Environment, Research in Science Education, vol. 29, no. 1, 1999, pp. 127-140.· Reference 3.DAVID W. M ILLERDavid W. Miller is Assistant Professor and Director of the Space Systems Laboratory in the Department ofAeronautics and Astronautics at MIT. He is currently a member of NASA ORIGINS Technology Working Group

Conference Session

Ethics across the Curriculum

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

William J. Frey; Halley D. Sánchez; Jose Cruz-Cruz

stands for the National Society of Professional Engineers.3 Michael Pritchard & Mark Holtzapple (1997) Responsible Engineering: Gilbane Gold Revisited Science andEngineering Ethics 3; 217-2304 Michael Davis (1999) Ethics and the University, Routledge, London, 128, 157.5 Michael J. Rabins, Edwin Harris Jr., &Jeremy E. Hanzlik (1996) An NSF /Bovay Endowment SupportedWorkshop to Develop Numerical Problems Associated with Ethics Caswes for Use in Required UndergraduateEngineering Courses. Proceedings of the 1996 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conferenceand Exposition: session 3332. See also http://ethics.tamu.edu/.6 C. E. Harris, M. S. Pritchard, & M. J. Rabins (2000) Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases

Conference Session

Classroom Innovations

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Marny Lawton; Donald Wroblewski

. Twigg, Carol A., Innovations in Online Learning: Moving Beyond No Significant Difference. Publication of the Pew Learning and Technology Program, Pew Charitable Trusts, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute’s Center for Academic Transformation, 2001.16. Hergenhahn, B. and Olson, M., An introduction to theories of learning, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall, Inc., 1997.17. Klein, S., Learning: principles and application, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1996.18. Dupagne, M., How to Set up a Video Streaming Operation: Lessons from a University of Miami Project. [On- Line], 2000, Available: http://www.miami.edu/com/c_handout.htm.Biographic InformationDONALD E. WROBLEWSKIDonald Wroblewski is an Associate Professor of Aerospace and

Conference Session

New Computer ET Course Development

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Kyle Hebsch; Jefferey Stevens; Andrew Gilchrist IV; Joel Weinstein

will be included in the priceSystem Functionality ?? The system will present customer information and the corresponding delivery information for each individual pickup as entered by one of the office staff. ?? If the customer is a repeat user, entering his or her name or the customer id will automatically bring up their location, telephone number(s), and billing information (credit card, etc.). ?? Data can be entered at any time of the day as well as be outputted any time of day on either the screen or to the printer. ?? The organization of data is a vast improvement over the existing system. ?? The program will provide detailed reporting of the customer base at different intervals and real-time. These

Conference Session

Assessment and Its Implications in IE

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Richard Storch; Catherine Scott; Cynthia Atman

Conference Session

Engineering Management Curriculum

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Ken Vickers; Ronna Turner; Greg Salamo

Conference Session

ET Graduate Education

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

James Gray

the Line: Benchmarks for Success inInternet-Based Distance Education. Washington, DC: The Institute. Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance Education: A Systems View. Belmont, CA: WadsworthPublishing. Lucent Technologies Center for Excellence in Distance Learning. (2000). Factors in the Success ofDistance Education Programs [online]. Available: www.lucent.com/cedl/factors.html. (October 6, 2000). Innovations in Distance Education. (1998). An Emerging Set of Guiding Principles and Practices for theDesign and Development of Distance Education [online]. Available: www.outreach.psu.edu/de/ide. (November 20,2000). McIntyre, S. R. & Hollon, R. E. (1998). An Effective Model for Creating Virtual Learning

Conference Session

Course Assessment in ET

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Wayne Hager; Ronald Land

. Louis, MO, 2000.[3] Addington, J. S. and Johnson, R., “Incorporating the Design and Use of Surveys with Other Engineering Assessment Methods under Criteria 2000 Guidelines,” Proceedings of the 1999 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Charlotte, NC, 1999.[4] Pintar, A.; Aller, B.; Rogers, T.; Schulz, K.; and Shonnard, R.; “Developing an Assessment Plan to Meet ABET EC2000,” Proceedings of the 1999 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Charlotte, NC, 1999.[5] Morell de Ramirez, L.; Zayas-Castro, J.; and Velez-Arocho, J., “Some Assessment Tools for Evaluating Curricular Innovations Outcomes,” Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, 1998.[6] Corum, C.; “Evolution of