Paper ID #25161Work in Progress: Career Ready... or Not? A Career-Readiness Activity forSenior Chemical Engineering StudentsDr. Daniel D. Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Daniel Anastasio is an assistant professor at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2009 and 2015, respectively. His primary areas of research are game-based learning in engineering courses and membrane separations for desalination and water purification.Elizabeth R. Morehouse, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Liz Morehouse is an assistant director in
Paper ID #25383Work in Progress: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a 1-creditChemical Engineering First-Year SeminarDr. Deborah S. Goldberg, University of Maryland, College Park Deborah S. Goldberg is a full-time lecturer in the Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is passionate about teaching and mentoring students to prepare them for diverse careers in chemical engineering and biotechnology.Mr. Jinwang Zou, University of Maryland, College Park Jinwang Zou is a Ph.D. candidate in the Measurement, Statistics, and Evaluation Program at the University
focuses on various aspects of students’ develop- ment from novice to expert, including development of engineering intuition, as well as critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work-in-Progress: “Training Chemical Engineers as Technical Communicators”IntroductionThe ability to communicate effectively is a critical skill for engineers. Strong communicationskills are necessary for high-functioning engineering teams, successful projects, promotiveworkplace interactions, and career advancement. Engineering practitioners, educators, andstudents recognize communication as one of the key skills for
time at Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Understanding the gap between communication in the classroom and communication during an industrial internshipAbstractWhile it
the undergrads to be creative and to share their experienceswith K-12 students. All of our undergrads are great role models, and this is a chance to introduce K-12 students to technical areas and careers that they might have not considered. It is also an exercisein problem-based learning. Undergrads must decide what they need to learn, then figure out how tolearn it and then how to teach the material. Our undergraduate students also have the opportunity topractice communication skills with people who possess little technical knowledge. In addition, theyalso have to work in a group setting, towards a common goal and they have to critically assess theirown performance, as well as the performance of others.The project has the following
is taught inschool so students have very little idea of what it entails until they formally start studying it atuniversity. Students can enter a variety of chemical industries, such as food and drink,biotechnology and environmental engineering, although a historical survey of internationalchemical engineering students has also revealed an interest in financial services, especiallyamong male students studying in the UK [9]. As a discipline, chemical engineering seems tosuffer from having too large a scope in terms of a future career pathway as opposed to toonarrow a one.ConclusionsAs this paper is a work-in-progress, we are unable to put forward concrete conclusions at thisstage. However, we are in a position to present some insights based on
past 22 years has focused on innovative pedagogy research as well as technical research in biotechnology. His 2007-2008 Fulbright exchange to Nigeria set the stage for him to receive the Marian Smith Award given annually to the most innovative teacher at WSU. He was also the recent recipient of the inaugural 2016 Innovation in Teaching Award given to one WSU faculty member per year. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Work-in-Progress: Improving Undergraduate Engineering Education Through Writing:Implementation in the Classroom Alongside a Hands-on Learning PedagogyAbstractAs undergraduate engineering students graduate and advance in their careers, they are facedwith multiple tasks
chemical engineering undergraduates.An important motivator for student’s participation in the workshops is the possibility to becomepart of the Chemical Engineering Design Team that will compete for the first time at AIChEnational conference.Quantitative assessment of student’s attitudesTo explore students’ attitudes toward chemical engineering, students were asked to complete amodified version of the PFEAS (Pittsburgh Freshman Engineering Attitude Survey) developedby Besterfield- Sacre et al. [12]. It was necessary to reword the original questions as appropriatedfor the context of chemical engineering students. For example, “I expect that engineering will bea rewarding career” was reworded as “I expect that chemical engineering will be a
mammalian cells before switching to teaching. Dr. Hillsley’s primary focus for the past 10 years has been teaching the Unit Operations Lab. Dr. Hillsley is married and has four children.Dr. Xueyi Zhang, Pennsylvania State University Zhang is the John J. and Jean M. Brennan Clean Energy Early Career Assistant Professor of Chemi- cal Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University. Zhang’s teaching interests include mass transfer, unit operations, and chemical engineering lab. Zhang’s research interests are porous materials synthe- sis, membrane for separation, and catalysis. Before joining the Pennsylvania State University in 2015, Zhang obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota in 2013 (with Michael Tsapatsis
, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum.Prof. Samira Azarin Samira Azarin is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at the University of Minnesota. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technol- ogy in 2006 and went
Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Using Active Learning and Group Design Activities to Increase Student Perceptions of a Course’s Educational ValueIntroductionIn the chemical engineering curriculum, courses in process economics and preliminary processdesign aim to introduce students to topics that will be crucial to their success in their seniorcapstone projects as well as in their future careers. At the study institution, this course, entitledProcess Economics and Green Design, has traditionally been offered in a lecture-only format andhas at times suffered from poor attendance and low participation in class discussions. Thestudents’ perception of the educational value of the course has been lower than expected(average
approximately half of students are first-time students and half are second-time students. • Experiments are categorized into three “focus areas”: Classical, Environmental, and Biological. Students complete a survey to identify their focus area preference based on their career interests. • Students are surveyed to identify other students with whom they prefer not to be grouped (based on past group work experiences or personal conflicts) and dates when they would prefer not to attend lab (e.g. due to job interviews or other personal commitments).A note on team assignment criteriaThe development of strategies for team assignment that maximize the performance and learningexperience of engineering students is an active area of
of the46 following four areas: academic and career advising, high school preparation, engineering structure and47 curriculum, and faculty relations[9]. This paper focuses on faculty relations because, historically, 148 universities have relegated retention issues to staff and advisors. The importance of faculty influence on49 student retention is an under-researched and under-explored area. Specifically, faculty relations can be50 shaped through specific teaching practices instructors can use to increase student retention. Research51 supports the claim that student-professor relationships are vital in promoting the success of engineering52 students [10], [11]. One
been shown to be very important in terms ofinterest [12] and overall achievement [13]. In the latter study, using data collected for ProjectTALENT, it was established that spatial ability measured in adolescence predicted career pathand achievement in higher education: “spatial ability added incremental validity (accounted for astatistically significant amount of additional variance) beyond SAT-Mathematical (measuringmathematical reasoning ability) and SAT-Verbal (measuring verbal reasoning ability) inpredicting these math–science criteria” [13]. With regard to particular aspects of the STEMcurriculum, spatial ability has been shown to be significantly related to achievement in variousaspects of mathematics [14], performance in reasoning about
served in engineering and management positions within Eastman Chem- ical Company from 1991-2000. A faculty member at NC State since 2000, Dr. Bullard has won numerous awards for both teaching and advising, including the ASEE Raymond W. Fahien Award, the John Wi- ley Premier Award for Engineering Education Courseware, NC State Faculty Advising Award, National Effective Teaching Institute Fellow, NC State Alumni Outstanding Teacher Award, George H. Blessis Out- standing Undergraduate Advisor Award, and the ASEE Southeastern Section Mid-Career Teacher Award. She is a member of the editorial board for Chemical Engineering Education and serves a Director of the Chemical Engineering Division of ASEE. She will be a co-author
. Her teaching interests focus on chemical reaction kinet- ics and computational science and engineering. She received an NSF CAREER Award in 2019. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An Interdisciplinary Elective Course to Build Computational Skills for Mathematical Modeling in Science and EngineeringAbstractA cross-listed upper division and graduate elective course for students in science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields has been developed to build computational skills inmathematical modeling. The course aims to fill a gap in the practical training of students startingcomputational research projects across various STEM disciplines who have inconsistent
and retention.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Post- doctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions
when used not just by an instructor who collaborated on the production of thecomic but also by other teachers. The results of these findings are more mixed. In implementing the comic, effort has occasionally been necessary to overcome some instructors’perception of comics as being ‘childish’, as directly quoted from another instructor; these instructorsmost commonly share traits of being older and already having taught throughout a long career. Whensharing the potential use of the comics at conferences and with some faculty directly, a few olderinstructors have directly challenged the potential of comics as a teaching tool, specifically citing theirage and experience and thus reluctance to trying something that was markedly different. It
industrial or consulting job. Annual alumni surveys include the question (which does not specifically mention the unit operations Laboratory): “Which aspects of your education at Mines were most valuable to you in your current career?” Selected responses from the most recent survey appear below: “Without a doubt, the unit ops lab. The ability to write a report that doesn’t need extensive editing or give a talk that doesn’t embarrass my boss goes a long way towards building job security.” “Professors could relate class material to real world experience. Field session was a great class which gave me a dose of what to expect