Systems Group in Poughkeepsie, NY in z Systems Firmware Development. Her current interests include recruitment and retention of women and under-represented students in STEM, integrative training for graduate teaching assistants, and curriculum innovation for introductory programming courses.Hyun Hannah Choi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Hannah Choi is an assistant director of assessment and curriculum design at the Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning. She collaborates with faculty to conduct research, program evaluations, and learning outcomes assessments pertinent to innovative curriculum designs and educational technologies. She is responsible for fostering continuous improvement in teaching
with a variety of audiences. 2. To expose students to a diverse set of future career opportunities available to STEM PhD holders.With an immersive training experience in mind, the SciComm program integrated a variety ofknowledge-based learning activities about communication, practice with communicating, andpractical experience communicating with various audiences. Program participants also engagedwith peers, practitioners, and professionals throughout the program. The program curriculum included three primary components: a) bi-weekly seminarmeetings, b) communication challenges, and c) mentorship by University alumnus/a. The threecomponents were designed to integrate hands-on learning and practical application to helpstudents
Paper ID #26030The Professional Doctorate in Technology Leadership, Research & Innova-tionDr. Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kathy Newton is an Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and Faculty Success for the Purdue Poly- technic Institute at Purdue University. She is a Professor of Supply Chain Management Technology in the School of Engineering Technology. Her teaching and scholarly interests are in the areas of supply chain management, quality control, and graduate education. She served as Department Head of Industrial Technology from 2007 to 2010. Prior to her appointment at Purdue University in
studycreativity, design thinking, teaming, or problem solving in the context of Additive Manufacturingeither with respect to students or practicing engineers. The following sections review educationalefforts to date, summarize main directions for AM education, and promote areas for inclusion ofengineering education research within the emergence of AM education.Chronological Review of AM Education EffortsThe literature on Additive Manufacturing Education is scarce, likely due to the recent emergenceof both the disciplines of AM and Engineering Education. The first effort and suggestion ofincluding Rapid Prototyping into the engineering curriculum was proposed by Bohn in 1997 [6].The emphasis on the need for integrating aggressive prototyping into the
University of New York, Farmingdale c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Introducing a New Graduate Degree in Technology Management: Program Overview and Assessment PlanAbstractOffering a new graduate degree requires curriculum development, course scheduling anddeveloping an assessment plan. A proper assessment plan ensures program success andcontinuous improvement. This paper provides the initial assessment plan for a new master’sdegree. The timeline of the proposed assessment activities is shared and the initialimplementation of the assessment plan for the Spring 2019 semester is discussed. Datacollection techniques and assessment benchmarks for the course level and program
-baccalaureate degrees in engineering,including engineering education. The National Science Foundation’s annual solicitation for theNSF Research Traineeship (NRT) program, previously called the Integrative Graduate Educationand Research Traineeship (IGERT) program, was initiated in 1998 to catalyze cultural change inscience, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) graduate education. The NRT /IGERT program highlights a national need for innovation in the graduate space, and manyadvances have been funded by this program. However, after searching the literature and studyinggraduate curricula from other engineering education departments, the authors were unable find agraduate curriculum that had been designed following an outcomes-based, backward
Data Mining & Statistics Search Methods Figure 3: Proposed integrated modular course assignmentDataThis section investigates the effectiveness of the COT 706 course in meeting industry needs, from theperspectives of students and instructors. The methodology includes an analysis of student alumni survey,student grade book, and teaching evaluations.Student SurveyAll student alumni from the induction of COT 706 as a core course in the curriculum were contacted, i.e.,from Spring 2015 to Spring 2018. Students were requested to complete a Qualtrics survey administeredonline to provide feedback on their experience with the course, comment on the proposed changes in thecourse and the applicability of skills learned in the course to their
. Denning, “Evaluating Cybersecurity Education Interventions: Three Case Studies,” IEEE Secur. Priv., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 63– 69, May 2015.[17] M. A. . Harris and K. P. Patten, “Using Bloom’s and Webb’s Taxonomies to Integrate Emerging Cybersecurity Topics into a Computing Curriculum,” J. Inf. Syst. Educ., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 219–234, 2015.[18] T. Chothia and C. Novakovic, “An Offline Capture The Flag-Style Virtual Machine and an Assessment of Its Value for Cybersecurity Education.” 2015.[19] D. Fenton, T. Traylor, G. Hokanson, and J. Straub, “Integrating Cyber Range Technologies And Certification Programs To Improve Cybersecurity Training Programs,” in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference
curriculum design project that students deliver both as a written document and as aposter presentation.Two major challenges have arisen in converting this course for an online audience. Onechallenge lies with the content itself and the second challenge lies in a core aspect of the teachingphilosophy.What about the content is challenging to convey online? The essence of ENE 506 is the abilityto align various aspects of curricular design into one unified whole. The goal is for students tosee how aspects of what is learned (content) map to how to measure learning (assessment) andhow students practice that learning (pedagogy). This process, which is at the heart of the course,is a very holistic, integrated, iterative process. However, the learning
Research Associate at Texas A&M University’s Center for Teaching Excellence, Dr. Clint Patterson supports curriculum research, doctoral education, and academic grant writing. The goal of these efforts is to provide evidence-based information for the Center and Texas A&M academic lead- ership, as well as developing students. Clint graduated from Tarleton State University with a doctorate in educational leadership in 2018. This academic experience offered opportunities to be a researching practitioner in higher education, specifically within student affairs at Baylor University where he worked for twelve years. As an educator in student affairs, Clint developed skills to advocate, support, and lead areas of
; New York: Oxford University Press, 2012, p. 221.[19] J. Gilmore, D. Strickland, B. Timmerman, M. Maher, and D. Feldon, "Weeds in the flower garden: An exploration of plagiarism in graduate students’ research proposals and its connection to enculturation, ESL, and contextual factors," International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13-28, 2010.[20] J. C. Bean, Engaging ideas : The professor's guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom, 2nd ed. (The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2011, p. 360.[21] C. M. Anson, "In your own voice: Using recorded commentary to respond to writing.," in Writing to
Wilkinson is a lecturer in the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Toronto, where she coordinates communication in Chemical Engineering, and teaches core communication courses at the undergraduate and graduate level. Lydia’s current research investigates interdisciplinary skills trans- fer with a specific focus on humanities integration for engineers.Dr. Jonathan Turner, University of Toronto Jonathan Turner is a Career Educator who specializes in working with graduate students and postdoctoral fellows. He co-founded a Canadian community of practice for career and professional development prac- titioners, and as an executive he launched a monthly article series, effected changes to a national survey of
Japan and Norway. The results of this survey were then compared to the resultsof a similar survey taken by domestic engineering graduate students and international engineeringgraduate students studying in the U.S. Findings indicate that there are statistically significantdifferences between U.S. domestic engineering graduate students with international engineeringgraduate students for most of the engineering writing attitudinal factors studied, indicating thatinstructors should begin to tailor approaches differently for individual students. From a researchperspective, we will continue to use these findings to investigate and illuminate cultural variationsthat can influence the writing process.IntroductionWriting is an integral aspect of