career in information technology to developadditional cybersecurity skills to use in their current position or to prepare them for advancementinto a new position. Alternately, it could serve as a way to demonstrate the knowledge andexperience required to allow someone to switch from a career in a completely different field intoinformation technology and cybersecurity.The suggested completion plan for the certificate is: • CSCI 603 – Defensive Network Security • CSCI 604 – Ethical Hacking • CSCI 609 – Cybersecurity Law and Policy • One additional courseThere are a number of options for the final course. These include, at NDSU: • CSCI 610 – Computer Crime and Forensics • CSCI 669 – Network Security • A computer science
literature relevant to their new project. Course 1 culminates in a written literaturereview. The second course, taken in year 2 of graduate study, is for students who have generatedsome findings and are preparing to disseminate their work in a professional venue. Course 2focuses on writing in the standards of the discipline, using CT to guide the writing process. Itculminates in a major but flexible writing assignment proposed by the student and advisor.Course development began in 2010 after UofSC established a graduate program in BiomedicalEngineering. The graduate curriculum specified coursework under the general heading ofprofessional development and ethics, from which the subject courses evolved. While the coursesare required for graduate
• Track II: Construction Management”MS in Technology Management program outcomes [15] are listed as: 1. “Graduates will have knowledge and competency in the field of technology management with an emphasis on engineering technologies. 2. Graduates will have the knowledge and skills necessary to be imaginative, critical thinkers who are able to discover problems and questions, develop logical answers, and apply effective solutions in the practice of technology management. 3. Graduates will have knowledge of ethical behavior in professional positions in all aspects of technology management. 4. Graduates will have competency in the management and leadership of technology in global
, interdisciplinary collaboration, ethical behavior, andorganization/management skills), whereas the writing community focuses on improvingacademic and professional writing skills. Figure 1 presents a student’s development of anePortfolio aligned with their programmatic and education experiences. Figure 1: ePortfolio developmentThe ePortfolio platform students used was Google Sites. To minimize the tediousness of creatinga website completely on their own, students were provided with an ePortfolio template, as wellas detailed instructions on how to navigate and develop their Google Sites. Two majorcomponents of the ePortfolio include the personal profiles and learning portfolio (see Table 1).These sections allowed gave students
articles in compu- tational complexity theory, in professional ethics, and in engineering education research. He currently serves on the Advisory Group for the Online Ethics Center at the National Academy of Engineering. He is a Carnegie Scholar, a Fellow of the IEEE, and a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Edu- cation. Professor Loui was the editor of the Journal of Engineering Education from 2012 to 2017 and the executive editor of College Teaching from 2006 to 2012. He was Associate Dean of the Graduate Col- lege at Illinois from 1996 to 2000. He directed the theory of computing program at the National Science Foundation from 1990 to 1991. He earned the Ph.D. at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dr. Linda Naimi is Associate Professor in Technology Leadership and Innovation at Purdue University and an Attorney at law. Her research interests include ethics and law for leaders in engineering and technology; global technology leadership; innovation and commercialization; and intellectual property. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Professional Doctorate in Technology Leadership, Research & Innovation K. Newton Professor & Associate Dean for Graduate Programs Purdue Polytechnic
provides enrichment activities geared towardcreating awareness plus developing interest and providing logistical information about graduateschool. For example, workshops include topics on developing research skills, general graduateschool information, the Graduate Record Examination (GRE), research ethics andprofessionalism, and communicating research. Additional workshops are geared towardundergraduate student retention for expanding the pool of potential graduate students. Facultymentor the students in developing graduate school applications their senior year. Students arealso provided tools to help them obtain internships and undergraduate research experiences. AllSIIRE students have financial need, and scholarships are provided through an NSF
studies as an instructional tool when possibleThe advisory board realized not every skill would require a dedicated course, but highly recommendedcritical skills are embedded, and essential principles (ethics, teamwork, communication, etc.) arereinforced across multiple core courses in the curriculum.Table 1: Advisory Board feedback. (The portions in bold justify advisory board recommendationsadopted for the PMT program at KSP) Professional Skills NA 2(low) 3 5(High) Comments 1. Critical Thinking/Decision Making 7X 2. Leadership/ Management Training 2X 5X /Organizational Behavior/Change Management/Negotiation/Conflict Resolution 3. Product
socialization;presentation skills; leadership and management; career management; writing and publishing;teaching and mentoring; professionalism and ethics; and wellness and life balance. PEGS21scholars participate in at least two (2) professional development GradPathways workshops eachquarter. Participants are then asked to reflect on the value of each workshop on their learning.PEGS21 participants self-select the workshops they attended.For each of the graduate pathways workshops attended, participants complete a post-workshopreflection assignment on why they selected the workshop topic and what they learned from theworkshop. Reflections are submitted electronically for review and comment based on a completeand thorough exposition of the writer’s
(Purdue ’15). Her team, Beliefs in Engineering Re- search Group (BERG) utilizes qualitative methods to explore beliefs in engineering. Her research has an overarching goal of leveraging engineering education research to shift the culture of engineering to be more realistic and inclusive. Dr. Dringenberg is also interested in neuroscience, growth mindset, engi- neering ethics, and race and gender in engineering. In general, she is always excited to learn new things and work with motivated individuals from diverse backgrounds to improve the experiences of people at any level in engineering education.Dr. Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department
improvements and our desire to capture information we heard in conversations withparticipants. The evaluation was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the University ofToronto as a quality improvement project. Findings presented in this paper were not gainedthrough research but rather a quality improvement project for The OPTIONS Program.The pre-evaluation included demographic and information gathering questions (e.g., degree-related work experience, extra-curricular/professional development activities). We do not presentsuch data in this paper. The post-evaluation had four open-ended questions including: “What didyou like about the program” and “What did you not like about the program?”. The post-evaluation also assessed the usefulness of
Paper ID #26740Analysis of Student Engagement Data from U.S. News & World Report Re-garding Online Graduate Engineering ProgramsPeter Wesley Odom, Purdue University Wesley is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His primary research interests surround assessment technologies, the psychology of student learning of STEM subjects, ethics, and international community development.Hillary Elizabeth Merzdorf, Purdue University College of EngineeringFrancisco J. Montalvo, Purdue UniversityJason Marion Davis c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Analysis of Student