Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremy A. Magruder Waisome, University of Florida; Kyla McMullen, University of Florida; Tiffanie R. Smith, University of Florida; Simone A. Smarr, University of Florida; Juan E. Gilbert, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

data was collected across three instruments. Thedemographic questionnaire collected data about participants’ demographic information andacademic background. The Doctoral Student and Development and Outcomes Survey, createdusing the research of Nettles and Millet (2006) and Lovitts (2001), was used to assess thesatisfaction and scholarly engagement of the students’ academic experience20,21. The CareerDecision Self-Efficacy Scale (CDSEC), which was originally derived from the Competence Testportion of the Career Maturity Inventory, included five sub-scales measuring self-appraisal(knowing yourself), occupational information (knowing about careers), goal selection (selectinga job), planning (looking ahead to the future) and problem solving (what

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicole M. Colston, Oklahoma State University; Sherri L. Turner, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Gale Mason Chagil, Culture Inquiry Consulting, LLC; Sue C. Jacobs Ph.D., Oklahoma State University; Sarah Johnson, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

activities” (CareerExploration Skills).The SCDI has been used in studies of adolescent, college student, and post-high school youngadult career development [e.g., 27, 28, 29], including studies of the career development of NativeAmerican young people. Career exploration, as measured by the SCDI, has been positivelyrelated to interests and efficacy among Native American young people [30].The Career-Related Parent Support Scale [31] is a 27-item instrument that was used to measurestudents’ self-reports of their parents’ support in the four areas of self-efficacy information(Instrumental Assistance (IA), Career-Related Role Modeling (CM), Emotional Support (ES),and Verbal Encouragement (VE)) identified by Bandura [32]. IA is the tangible help provided

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie R. Gurganus, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Liang Zhu, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Charles D. Eggleton, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Shuyan Sun

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

administered to both S-STEM scholar and non-affiliated S-STEM mechanical engineering students. Using a 6-itemLikert survey, students were asked to assed their perceptions and attitudes regarding each of theconstructs. At the end of the Spring 2019 semester, a post-survey will be administered to thepopulation for comparison.Survey Instrument In partnership with the psychology department, a survey was developed containingmeasurable items regarding their attitudes, perspectives, science/engineering identity, andresearch self-efficacy. Below are the measurable constructs and their items showing reliability. 1. Research Self- Efficacy: Measured by six items from the Scientific Self-Efficacy Scale [10] that assesses students’ ability to

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware; Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware; Tia Navelene Barnes, University of Delaware; Rachel Davidson, University of Delaware

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

conducting mixed methodsresearch. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.[14] Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [15] D. Chachra and D. Kilgore, “Exploring gender and self-confidence in engineering students:A multi-method approach,” Cent. Adv. Eng. Educ., Washington, USA, Tech Rep. Apr. 2009.[16] H. Chen, K. Donaldson, O. Eriş, D. Chachra, G. Lichtenstein, S. D. Sheppard, and G. Toye,“From PIE to APPLES: The evolution of a survey instrument to explore engineering studentpathways,” in 2008 ASEE Proceedings.[17] D. Baker, S. Krause, and S. Y. Purzer, “Developing an instrument to measure tinkering andtechnical self-efficacy in engineering,” presented at the 2008 ASEE

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Aldridge, Ohio State University; So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University; Monica Farmer Cox, Ohio State University; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Ebony Omotola McGee, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

, 2015.[36] S. Cheryan, S. A. Ziegler, A. K. Montoya, and L. Jiang, “Why are Some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 1-35, 2017.[37] E. Yost, D. M. Handley, S. R. Cotten, and V. Winstead, “Understanding the links between mentoring and self-efficacy in the new generation of women STEM scholars,” In Women in engineering, science and technology: Education and career challenges. IGI Global, 2010.[38] J. Owens, C. Kottwitz, J. Tiedt, and J. Ramirez, “Strategies to attain faculty work-life balance,” Building Healthy Academic Communities Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 58-73, 2018.[39] E. M. Lee, “ ‘Where people like me don’t belong’: Faculty members from low

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Marcos Miranda, Ohio State University ; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Marianne T. Johnson, University of Delaware; Michael L. Vaughan, University of Delaware; Tasha Zephirin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Darryl Dickerson, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Rachel A. Davidson, University of Delaware

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

student retention andsuccess (4-13). A whitepaper study conducted by the National Society of Black Engineers(NSBE) (4) studied four top-ranked MEP programs and recommended nine interventions forinstitutions to boost minority enrollment and retention. Six of the nine interventions traditionallyfall in the purview of MEPs, namely, summer bridge programs, living-learning communities,facilitated study groups, scholarships, and positive development of self-efficacy and engineeringidentity. The success of these interventions in boosting minority enrollment and retention inengineering programs of study has been proven repeatedly in the literature (5, 10-13), withparticularly strong evidence to support summer bridge programs (12) and intensive

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Felicia James Onuma, University of Maryland, College Park; Bruk T. Berhane, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

classroom or workplace is not measured by a deepattention to issues of race, ethnicity, gender, etc. Conceivably, many Clark School alumnirepresented in the study were trained in more of a traditional engineering pedagogical tradition,and therefore did not explicitly need to grapple with issues of race in order to persist in theircourses. Foregrounded by these prior studies and the implications described here, it may not beespecially surprising that some study participants did not respond strongly to the idea that therewas any type of negative treatment based upon their race or gender identity. At the same time,the lack of attention to identity based on race may have allowed these alumni to see faculty in amore positive manner.Notwithstanding

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beata Johnson, Purdue University; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

average, higherGPAs and are more likely to graduate in engineering than students who do not participate in co-ops [8], [11]. Furthermore, co-op students experience positive gains in employment outcomes,including positive mentoring relationships, socialization into the engineering profession, andhigher post-graduation starting salaries than students who do not participate in co-ops [7], [8],[12], [13]. Studies measuring outcomes related to co-op participation consistently affirm thevalue of this experience.Qualitative studies of students’ perceived co-op experiences also confirm the positive effects ofco-ops. One study of underrepresented minority engineering students who completed either co-ops or internships found that these students reported