-centered design principles, agilemanagement principles, and engineering design tools for engineering decision making as well asintroductory CAD and MatLab. Sophomores who enrolled in these studies were completingtheir first formal engineering design course and would have completed modules covering designteaming, interviewing, listening, ethics, design objectives, constraints, and functional modeling.The senior engineering students who participated in these studies would have completed nearlyall of their engineering course work which includes: statics and dynamics, circuits andinstrumentation, two courses in thermo-fluids, mechanics and materials, two courses inengineering management, and thus far, four courses in engineering design. Students would
. Scott Streiner, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded research explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has published papers and given
notanalyzed quantitatively.Example Fall 2018 Projects All OEPs participated in a presentation competition at the end of the semester toshowcase their project. Each member of the top two teams won an award of $200 for theirefforts. Predefined projects also compete in a separate competition so that those students have asimilar incentive for not just completing their project but to go above and beyond in creativityand work ethic. The first OEP team was “PepperPet,” a holographic digital pet that acts as atalking companion. The team designed all the pets themselves and used a free API to helpgenerate the animation from the static images. These images would be displayed based on howthe user interacted with the display and buttons
improvements and our desire to capture information we heard in conversations withparticipants. The evaluation was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the University ofToronto as a quality improvement project. Findings presented in this paper were not gainedthrough research but rather a quality improvement project for The OPTIONS Program.The pre-evaluation included demographic and information gathering questions (e.g., degree-related work experience, extra-curricular/professional development activities). We do not presentsuch data in this paper. The post-evaluation had four open-ended questions including: “What didyou like about the program” and “What did you not like about the program?”. The post-evaluation also assessed the usefulness of
to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors. Table 1. A portion of rubric for ABET-EAC Student Outcome (2) (4). An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts. Table 2. A portion of rubric for ABET-EAC Student Outcome (4) Data also indicate that because of this assignment, among others, some students in the course choose hands-on electric vehicle-related design projects for their Senior Design I and Senior
(Quantitative, Qualitative, and Psychometrics Program), the Department of Anthropology, and the De- partment of Sociology at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL).. He also serves as Dean’s Fellow of the College of Arts and Sciences Teaching Academy at UNL and as a Research Associate for the Kala- hari Peoples Fund of southern Africa. As a research methodologist, he teaches and conducts research on the history, epistemology, application, and instruction of qualitative research across disciplines, research ethics, grounded theory, ethnography, grounded ethnography, and mixed methods. He is also involved in several other research tracks including faculty teaching and evaluation strategies, interdisciplinary collab- oration
overwhelmed by theworkload, learning engineering theory, and social adjustment to campus life. Many of thesestudents encounter additional challenges such as differences in ethic/cultural values andsocialization, chilly classroom environments, perceived lack of faculty/advisor support,internalization of negative racial and gender stereotypes, and socio-economically disadvantagedbackground [2], [3], [4].Typically, postsecondary educational research focuses on one element of engineering studentssuch as gender or ethnicity; and fails to recognize the intersectionality of women of color. Thisis compounded by the fact that due to low participation, women of color in engineering areunderrepresented in research [2]. Qualitative research can provide a means
. We viewed this as a way to focusstudents on their teammates’ strengths, rather than focusing on deficits. We additionally askedthem to explain what interests and experiences drove them to become an engineer.In the following class session, they conducted a team gap analysis, placing a tick mark for eachperson who had each specific professional skill (additional areas focused on lifelong learning,ethics, problem solving, and technical competence). Students self-assessed whether theypossessed each skill, making this a binary choice (present/absent) for each member. For ourpurposes in this paper, we narrow our scope to the areas below, which were well covered by sub-topics:Professional Communications Skills Technical writing (technical
didactic instruction regarding FDA regulation and the Agency’s expectations fordocumentation associated with design of a new medical device via the development andmaintenance of a risk-based design history file. FDA quality system regulation is presented tothe Nursing students in the context of the “Joint Commission” requirements, with a comparisonof the similarities and differences of these two quality systems. Additionally, students thinkthrough and address ethical areas that may pose risk to a patient or healthcare worker and gain anunderstanding of HIPPA rules and regulations when working in the healthcare setting.Nursing students select a bioengineering team to participate on following a networking event atthe start of the fall semester. At
Knowledge and Knowing, B. K. Hofer and P. R. Pintrich, Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002, pp. 261-275.[6] W. G. Perry, Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1970.[7] B. White, A. Elby, J. Frederiksen, and C. Schwarz, “The epistemological beliefs assessment for physical science,” presented at Annual Conference on American Education Research Association, 1999, Montreal, Québec, Canada, 1999.[8] G. Qian and D. Alyermann, “Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students’ learning science concepts from text,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 87, pp. 282-292, May. 1995.[9] C. Faber and L. C
, no. 6, pp. 1976–1986, 2018.[27] T. P. Seager and E. Selinger, “Experiential teaching strategies for ethical reasoning skills relevant to sustainability,” in IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology, Phoenix, Arizona, 2009.[28] D. Braun, “Teaching Sustainability Analysis in Electrical Engineering Lab Courses,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 243–247, May 2010.[29] R. Roberts, “Evaluating Psychographic Measures among Undergraduates: Relevance to Marketing of Sustainable Tourism,” M.S. Thesis, University of Washington, 2015.[30] R. Roberts and D. Wilson, “Cross-Validation of a Global Citizenship Scale: Constructs for Evaluating Undergraduate Engineering Perspectives,” in Proc., ASEE Annual
coordinator for the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. She teaches at the graduate and undergraduate level, using both face-to-face and blended online learning instruction. She is an Adjunct Faculty for the Transportation Systems and, the City & Regional Planning programs at MSU. Her research interests include engineering education, student success, online engineering pedagogy and program assessment solutions, transportation planning, transportation impact on quality of life issues, bicycle access, and ethics in engineering. She has several published works in engineering education and online learning. Dr. Petronella James earned her Doctor of Engineering (Transportation) and Masters of City &
firms,” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 95–110, 2018.[19] W. Faulkner, “Becoming and belonging: Gendered processes in engineering,” in The Gender Politics of ICT, J. Archibald, J. Emms, F. Grundy, J. Payne, and E. Turner, Eds. London: Middlesex University Press, 2005, pp. 15–26.[20] N. Pless and T. Maak, “Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 129-147, 2004.[21] J. W. Smith and S. Joseph, “Workplace challenges in corporate America: Differences in black and white,” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 743-765, 2010.[22] D. Riley, A. E. Slaton, and A. L
● Practice Run Hint List Sample Homework Performance ● Exam Review Session Questions ● AIP/Ethics Training and ● Lead a Lecture ● Discussion Board - Lesson ● Hashtag War TEDTalk ● 4-Year Plan Draft ● Guest Speaker Interview ● Discussion Board - ● Prototype Part for Class ● Peer Review Lab Report Relevant Journal Article Lesson/Purpose ● Conflict Resolution ● Discussion Board - ● Instructor Chosen Practices Relevant Engineering Assignment TechnologyCommon to Gehringer’s [8] list of faculty
. Report was to be written to executive leadership. An ability to recognize -Staffing Final Report: Reasonable ethical and professional conversions and expectation for responsibilities in employees. engineering situations -Ingredient Final Report: Identification of and make informed suppliers alternative suppliers for items that judgements which must including the were at risk of not being delivered consider the impact of Madagascar consistently? 4 engineering solutions in vanilla shortage
. Full participation in this pedagogical study wasencouraged (but not required) for the students enrolled in the module; appropriate processes werefollowed to obtain ethical (IRB) approval from LJMU before the study began. We have groupedthe participants into 5 categories (G1, G2, G3, G4 and G5) based on their backgrounds.The Professional and Leadership Skills module contains a 3-hour creativity lecture sessioncomposed of two parts: (1) entrepreneurship and (2) creativity. The entrepreneurship portionfocuses on the definition of entrepreneurship, the characteristics and competencies ofentrepreneurs, and examples of local entrepreneurs. The creativity portion of the session (theportion of greatest interest here) focuses on creativity identity
,yet, it is clear the model is applicable among many disciplines. Part 1 of the model specifies thefive-core components of interdisciplinary collaboration: 1) interdependence, 2) newly createdprofessional activities, 3) flexibility, 4) collective ownership of goals, and 5) reflection on theprocess [17]. Part 2 outlines the influences on interdisciplinary collaboration: professional role,structural characteristics, personal characteristics, and a history of collaboration [17]. Figure 1describes Bronstein’s [17] model and serves as the framework for the remainder of this paper. Professional Role Structural Characterisics - Holding values and ethics specific to each - Manageable
Paper ID #26740Analysis of Student Engagement Data from U.S. News & World Report Re-garding Online Graduate Engineering ProgramsPeter Wesley Odom, Purdue University Wesley is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His primary research interests surround assessment technologies, the psychology of student learning of STEM subjects, ethics, and international community development.Hillary Elizabeth Merzdorf, Purdue University College of EngineeringFrancisco J. Montalvo, Purdue UniversityJason Marion Davis c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Analysis of Student
and visual media • Evaluate images and their sources • Use images and visual media effectively • Design and create meaningful images and visual media • Understand many of the ethical, legal, social, and economic issues surrounding the creation and use of images and visual media, and access and use visual materials ethicallyAcross disciplines, students engage with images and visual materials throughout the course oftheir education. Although students are expected to understand, use, and create images inacademic work, they are not always prepared to do so. Scholarly work with images requiresresearch, interpretation, analysis, and evaluation skills specific to visual materials. These abilitiescannot be taken for granted and
supportive engineering skills and mindsetsDuring this process the committee looked to see how well the outcomes in the onion mapped toinstitutional learning outcomes. Communication and cooperation were both part of the “basicengineering skills” whereas ethics, leadership, and culture and global awareness were allsubcategories of “multiple perspectives on role of engineers and engineering work.” We alsolooked at the mapping of the current ME learning outcomes to the onion in Figure 1. Ourdepartment outcomes include the following: our graduates will be successful in their careers, ourgraduates set and meet their own goals for career fulfillment, our graduates will continueprofessional development, our
project manager on projects through- out the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, non- verbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics.Shawn Griffiths, University of Wyoming Shawn Griffiths is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Wyoming. Shawn holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Utah State University (2009), M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Arkansas (2011) and
. Solicit (at least 3) and answer questions at the Town hall meeting 10 Judges Rubric of Final Project and Presentation expectations high/ low/ neutral / moderate Missing excelle poor fair /good ntClarity of Theme 0 1 2 3 4(addresses ethics/3Ps)Educational Quality of Exhibit 0 1 2 3 4(clear take away objective )Overall Quality of
on ethical, economic, anddesign method issues.As might be expected, some students resisted the design processes described here as “a completewaste of time”. Students argued that designers are “born, not created”. Many examples from theliterature to support quantitatively the effectiveness of development process were given incounter argument. Students are asked to follow the prescribed procedure for a few weeks. Apromise to discuss, evaluate, and incorporate any suggested improvements usually swaysstalwart resistors (this is an excellent way to give students ownership and responsibility of theirown learning). After the first design milestone during one semester, an elated team gave a class-time testimonial about how the design process and
industry expertratings for each dimension (ordered from highest rating to lowest rating): Appreciate othercultures (understanding and avoiding ethnocentrism); Work in teams of ethnic and culturaldiversity; Communicate across cultures (understand cultural differences); Practice engineeringin global context (international internship, service learning, virtual global engineering project,etc.); Deal with ethical issues that arise from cultural or national differences; View as citizens ofthe world (appreciate challenges facing mankind: sustainability, environmental protection,poverty, security, and public health); Understand connectedness of the world, global economy;Understand cultural issues on product design, manufacture, and use (understanding of
Paper ID #25598Counting Past Two: Engineers’ Leadership Learning TrajectoriesDr. Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto Cindy Rottmann is the Associate Director of Research at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering, University of Toronto. Her research interests include engineering leadership in university and workplace settings as well as ethics and equity in engineering education.Dr. Doug Reeve, University of Toronto Dr. Reeve is the founding Director of the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering (Troost ILead) (2010-2018) at the University of Toronto. After a lengthy career as a
Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making Systems Engineering I Systems Engineering II Electrical Engineering Capstone Table 1: Courses for MSEE Master’s ProgramThe EML approach using the KEEN framework will help provide further relevance andmotivation for the student in coming up with entrepreneurial ideas for their projects.Capstone Course DescriptionThe capstone course offers the student the opportunity to integrate skills developed throughoutthe graduate program by completing a project that focuses on a current issue or need requiring anengineering solution. Since the program has two system engineering courses, the capstonecourse was used
engineering to be more realistic and inclusive. Dr. Dringenberg is also interested in neuroscience, growth mindset, engi- neering ethics, and race and gender in engineering. In general, she is always excited to learn new things and work with motivated individuals from diverse backgrounds to improve the experiences of people at any level in engineering education.Dr. Stephen Secules, Purdue University, West Lafayette Stephen received a PhD in education at the University of Maryland researching engineering education. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught an introduction to engineering to undergraduate engineers and to
in1995 as a means of providing students with academic credit through participation in long-termservice-learning projects. Student teams are vertically-integrated multidisciplinary teams,comprised of students of all years of undergraduate study and multiple majors [1]. Studentoutcomes are often summarized to include technical skills, communication skills, organizationalskills, teamwork experiences, resourcefulness, resource management, sponsor awareness throughcustomer and client interaction, expanded community awareness, and professional ethics [1].Over 30 institutions across the US have an EPICS program, as well as multiple institutionsabroad. The EPICS program was implemented at Arizona State University in 2009 and has sincegrown to
practical domains such as engineering design. Limitations caused bythe bivalence principle (i.e., that truth-value of statements is a true-false binary) for example inscenarios where truth-values need to attain true, false, or indeterminate while conducting a three-valued logical calculus, has been a motivation, inter alia, to formalize multi-valued or probabilisticvarieties of logic.In this category we only mention one example which has a potential to offer an alternative perspec-tive for reasoning and decision making in design. Consider having a set of goals, specifications,constraints, priorities (financial, ethical, aesthetic, etc.), and statements (or formulae) encoding de-signers’ knowledge and degree of uncertainty. Next, suppose designers