Paper ID #25285Designing Robotics-based Science Lessons Aligned with the Three Dimen-sions of NGSS-plus-5E Model: A Content Analysis (Fundamental)Dr. Hye Sun You, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Hye Sun You received a Ph.D. from a STEM education program at the University of Texas at Austin. She earned her master’s degree in science education and bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Yonsei University in South Korea. Prior to entering academia, she spent several years teaching middle school science. Her research interests center upon interdisciplinary learning and teaching, and technology-integrated teaching practices in
it be? 7. What do you wish those who influenced you had done differently to prepare for higher education leadership, knowing what you know now? 8. Please review the proposed Model of Faculty Leadership Relationships and provide any feedback that comes to mind (can be on content or layout or if there is something that causes you to recall a situation in your development). 6 Appendix B ENGINEERING MODEL OF FACULTY LEADERSHIP RELATIONSHIPSFUNCTION DEFINITION BEHAVIORS (HOW TO BEHAVIORS (HOW TO RECEIVE
Paper ID #26707Engineering Identity across the Mechanical Engineering MajorDr. Kathleen E. Cook, Seattle University Kathleen Cook, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor in and Chair of the Psychology Department at Seattle University. Dr. Cook received her doctorate in Social and Personality Psychology from the University of Washington, with a minor in quantitative methods and emphases in cognitive and educational psychology. Her research has included classroom learning, person perception, identity, and health perceptions.Dr. Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University Yen-Lin Han is an Assistant Professor in the department of Mechanical
Paper ID #26823Deep Observation: Geo-spatial Mapping as a Strategy for Site Engagementand Problem DesignDr. Jessie Marshall Zarazaga, SMU Lyle School of Engineering Jessie Zarazaga teaches GIS and Sustainability and Development in the Lyle School of Engineering at SMU. Working across the boundaries of urbanism, landscape mapping, infrastructure design and public engagement, Zarazaga explores ways to connect culture and community to place. Using GIS and partici- patory community mapping, she explores the impact of civil and environmental choices on the design of the sustainable city. Trained in architecture and urban design
Paper ID #24631Construction Engineering Students Cognitive Apprenticeship ApproachMr. Brandon M. Fulk P.E., Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Mr. Fulk is the Director of Internship for the Division of Construction Engineering and Management (CEM) at Purdue University. His responsibilities not only include the internship program for the Division but in addition he is the academic advisor and lecturer for a host of core CEM courses including Capstone. He received his Bachelor of Science in Construction Engineering in 1998, Professional Engineering Li- cense in 2003, and is currently
technologydesigns. As with the engineering education researchers, both groups see a dearth of intentionalefforts to change dominant discourses in the rhetoric and practice of technology cultures, andwere working to establish alternative spaces, practices, and cultures to counteract the dominantframe. A lesson for engineering education researchers to take from this recurring narrative thatsurfaced in interviews, might be to celebrate collectivist instincts, the need and desire forcommunity, and to revisit the passion that brought them to the field of engineering education inthe first place. Further, as the discipline and its researchers establish their own dominantdiscourses and practices, we should be mindful not to lose the connection to doing what
Paper ID #25287Board 51: An Initial Step Towards Measuring First-Generation College Stu-dents’ Personal Agency: A Scale ValidationMs. Dina Verd´ın, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Dina Verd´ın is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She completed her M.S. in Industrial Engineering at Purdue University and B.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering at San Jos´e State University. Dina is a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Re- search Fellowship and an Honorable Mention for the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program. Her research
read andreflected on the co-operative inquiry method before and was keen to explore the inquiry domain:experiences of ESL students in the engineering education discipline. Then, the initiatorresearcher called for collaborators who were likely to share the keenness of the topic. After the collaborators responded to the initiator’s call, the initiator talked to eachindividual separately and discussed the goal in mind and asked for their insights and feedback.The first meeting was then scheduled and all the researchers participated. We talked about theindividual’s interest in this topic, the detail of what this co-operative inquiry is in terms ofdefining the phases of experiencing and reflecting and the procedures for conducting the
Category Summary Example responses responses 12 Surprised that • “I found it interesting that technical writing was engineering is not only mentioned as an important skill. When I think about math, but about engineering it would never come to mind” communication and • “That writing was an important skill in becoming writing skills are also a Civil Engineer. I had always thought that important engineering had nothing to do with writing” • “Communication and writing stills are as important as
mind [57]. Perhaps the rocket project reported here failed to have amore positive impact on its student participants because it was not properly adapted and evolvedfor a high school environment.ConclusionThis paper summarizes the practical implementation of “doing the ‘E’ in STEM” for high school9th and 10th graders at Saint Francis Catholic Academy using model rockets as the educationalplatform. The project is unique because it melded the following five attributes into an open-ended hands-on engineering design-and-build high school project: 1) DBT pedagogy; 2) theengineering design process; 3) comprehensive technical coverage of rocket systems; 4) the sevenaxes of engineering practice; and 5) enabling computer simulations and micro-sensor
Paper ID #27412Investigating Children with Autism’s Engagement in Engineering Practices:Problem Scoping (Fundamental)Ms. Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Hoda is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in me- chanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing informal setting for engineering learning, and promoting engineering
greater differentiation between grade boundaries will give more motivation to study harder and I will have more opportunities to improve where I have fallen behind. (Agree/ Disagree) 12. I believe that I will have a better GPA were a continuous GPA system used rather than a discrete one. (Agree/Disagree)For the following questions, keep in mind your current feelings about engineering and thecourses that you are currently enrolled in or have been enrolled in for your current academicstanding (Strongly Agree/Agree/Somewhat Agree/Neither Agree nor Disagree/SomewhatDisagree/Disagree/Strongly Disagree) a) While in my engineering courses, I thought about how much I enjoyed the those that I were enrolled in. b) Engineering
considerations etc. are always present. One solution for these conflicts has always been suppressions through violence. Someone is going to be severely hurt by the innovation and development in the weaponry technologies. The example above might be extreme. Another good example is the e-waste issue we had talked about in the beginning of this semester. People in the first world are always attracted to more advanced electronics. But the technological development in the electronic industry driven by this consumerism will lead to more e-waste that has to been dealt with by the third country. The decision-making process based only on opinions from scientists and engineers seemed a little single-minded and lacked a flavor of humanity
Paper ID #26852Board 85: Engineering Prosocial Engagement in Electrical & Computer En-gineeringDr. Brock J. LaMeres, Montana State University Dr. Brock J. LaMeres is a Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Mon- tana State University (MSU) and the Director of the Montana Engineering Education Research Center (MEERC). LaMeres is also the Boeing Professor at MSU where he is responsible for initiatives to im- prove the professional skills of engineering graduates. LaMeres teaches and conducts research in the area of computer engineering. LaMeres is currently studying the effectiveness of
] suggests that to master the SMC course content, besides physics and mathematicalskills, students need to have a strong spatial ability to retrieve and interpret spatial informationfrom engineering structures and produce efficient spatial reasoning for solving problems. Spatialability is the cognitive capability that helps people to apprehend, maintain, and manipulate 3Dobjects in their mind and is considered as a set of several spatial ability factors [2, 3, 4].References [2, 4, 5, 6] cite spatial visualization, mental rotation, spatial orientation, spatialperception, and cross-sectioning abilities among spatial ability factors. Some of the references inthe literature [4, 7, 8] consider spatial ability as a narrowed concept of spatial thinking
proponentsof this initiative. Much has been learned from the experiences of the past – and these hard-learned experiences should guide the preparation of future editions of the CEBOK. A relevantquotation (from Adlai E. Stevenson) comes to mind: “We can chart our future clearly and wiselyonly when we know the path which has led to the present.”As the CEBOK has evolved, numerous papers have been published discussing various aspects ofits three different editions. A new paper titled “The Role of the Civil Engineering Body ofKnowledge in ASCE’s Raise the Bar Effort” is also being published and presented at the 2019ASEE Annual Conference [1].Planting the Seeds (1995-2001)Although the origins of maintaining a current and relevant engineering education
Paper ID #26912A Case Study of Discussion Forums in Two Programming MOOCs on Differ-ent PlatformsMr. David Ray Waller, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) David Waller is a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests are in the field of educational measurement and assessment in engineering, particularly measure- ment and assessment in the context of engineering design. David earned a Bachelor of Engineering in Aerospace Engineering from Ryerson University in Toronto, Ontario and a Master of Applied Science in Mechanical Engineering at
Paper ID #26594Sustainability Competencies in STEM Education at Secondary Schools: ASystematized Literature ReviewJenny Patricia Quintana-Cifuentes, Purdue University Jenny Quintana is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Ms. Quintana com- pleted her undergraduate studies on Technological Design in , Colombia. The degree focuses on prepar- ing teachers in technology education for K-12 settings. After her graduation, she worked as a technology teacher for six years. It helped her to gain experience in teaching as well as develop curricula in her field, Technology Education. However, Ms
Paper ID #25712Sustainable Senior Design: MVP EngineDr. Anthony Ferrar, Temple University Tony Ferrar is obsessed with student success. He focuses on preparing students for rewarding careers through pedagogical innovation and incorporating professional development into educational experiences. Anthony received his BS, MS, and PhD in mechanical engineering from Virginia Tech, where his research revolved around air-breathing propulsion. As a graduate student he contributed to Virginia Tech’s Gradu- ate Education Development Institute, Faculty Development Institute, and Networked Learning Initiatives. After graduating in
processes, we can prevent more errors.ConclusionsBased on the literature survey, and the experiences from the authors including the projectspresented in this paper, it is clear that engineering education has a fair share of critical thinkingcontent. However, there is a lack in addressing the subject in manufacturing education as well asutilizing the tools for gathering information, organizing and presenting it, along withidentification of what is taking place – analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. With this in mind, aproject-based manufacturing product design course relating not only to the engineering designand to development process, but also to critical thinking and its critical pieces need to bedeveloped. This course will also have strong
Paper ID #26152Learning Outcomes for Engineering Education ProgramsDr. Kseniya Zaitseva, Tomsk Polytechnic University/ Association for Engineering Education of Russia Associate professor at Tomsk Polytechnic University faculty member, Accreditation Center director in As- sociation for Engineering Education of Russia. PhD in Pedagogical Sciences, graduate degree in ”Math- ematical Methods in Economics”. Also holds a Management degree. Her research focus is in Quality Assurance, active learning and international academic mobility. Has experience in coordinating several TEMPUS, Erasmus+ projects as well as organizing joint
Paper ID #28129Board 21: Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineer-ing Division: Technological Literacy, Engineering Literacy, Engineers, PublicOfficials and the PublicDr. John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin John Heywood is professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. he is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. research and development in Curriculum and Instruction
creatively than we typically would.” Interconnected Learning The findings reported above showing differences in perception of how reading the bookexpanded their understanding, seem to suggest barriers in the students minds between learningabout different aspects of society. To say that your view of ethics is expanded, but not yourunderstanding of society or of engineering seems disconnected. This disconnect in types oflearning and understanding could be seen in other results as well. Student Comment: “The main disadvantage was the time spent reading took away from other time learning.” Student Comment: “Taking time to read the book took time away that could have been used learning other things. It was difficult to
Paper ID #27595Board 110: Elementary Students’ Disciplinary Talk in a Classroom with anExplicit Engineering Decision-making Scaffold (Work in Progress)Ms. Nicole Alexandra Batrouny, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach PhD candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Tufts University. Interests: upper elementary engineering education, integrated science and engineering, collaboration in engineering, decision making in engineer- ing.Ms. Karen Miel, Tufts University Karen Miel is a PhD student in STEM Education at Tufts University. Karen served as the Director of Research and Innovation at the science center
Paper ID #27157Balancing Student Learning and Community Relations in Software-BasedService LearningNusaybah Abu-Mulaweh, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nusaybah Abu-Mulaweh is a Continuing Lecturer in the EPICS Program at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. She received her Bachelors of Science in Computer Engineering from Purdue Univer- sity Fort Wayne, and received her Master of Science in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. She is currently pursuing her PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana.Dr. William ”Bill” C. Oakes
college: Creating conditions that matter”. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005.. [3] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, & M.K. Norman, “How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching,” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010. [4] National Research Council, “Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering.” Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012. [5] Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds). “How People Learn. Brain, Mind, Experience and School.” Washington DC: National Academy Press, 2008. [6] N. Kober, “Reaching Students
., & Zajicek, J.M. (2005). Growing minds: The effects of a one-year school garden program on six constructs of life skills of elementary school children. HortTechnology, 15(3), 453-457.[16] Townsend, C.D., & Carter, R.I. (1983). The relationship of participation in FFA activities and leadership, citizenship, and cooperation. Journal of the American Association of Teacher Educators in Agricultural, 24(1), 20-25.[17] Hynes, M., Maxey, K. (2018). Investigating the Fit Between Students? Personal Interests and Their Perceptions of Engineering in a National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) Pre-college Summer Workshop. Proceedings of the 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and
and dynamic. Our findings suggest that almost half of theteachers—including those new to and experienced in teaching engineering—expressed changesin how they understood the nature of the EDP. For instance, Alma, a long-time elementaryscience specialist, had taught engineering in her classroom for several years and attendedmultiple engineering professional developments. At the start of the course, however, she hadpresented a depiction of the design process as a set of linear steps. Her final representation of herdesign process with the fish feeder challenge showed how she “was jumping from one stage tothe next.” She reflected that by doing this project, she “changed my mind of how the processactually works. It can skip from one step to another
Paper ID #26708Design Decision Processes of First Grade Students during an EngineeringDesign-based STEM Unit (Fundamental)Miss Amanda C. Johnston, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Amanda Johnston is a PhD candidate in engineering education at Purdue University.Mr. Ruben Dario Lopez-Parra, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Ruben D. Lopez-Parra is a graduate research assistant at Purdue University pursuing a Ph.D. in Engi- neering Education. Previously, he worked as a Natural Science teacher in High School where he, as a scholarly teacher, constantly
Computing and Engineering Student Success) to collect data onstudents’ non-cognitive and affective (NCA) factors. This survey, which is the first of its kind tobe launched on a national scale, measures 28 NCA factors that may contribute to student successincluding personality, grit, identity, mindset, motivation, stress, gratitude, mindfulness, andbelongingness. Many engineering and computing students have strong incoming academicrecords and standardized test scores that indicate potential for success in their programs;nonetheless, many struggle when they reach university. Cognitive measures like SAT/ACT areweak predictors of academic success, and NCA measures may form the constellation ofcharacteristics that offer further predictive power. In this