that participants were screened in an attempt to work withfaculty who may feel overwhelmed or believe they could be performing more optimally. Thework was also similar in that the PI followed up with participants over the term of the project tohelp participants keep the training in mind.McKenna, Johnson, Yoder, Guerra and Pimmel [2] evaluated the efficacy of virtual facultydevelopment. Their work also assumed that faculty development works best when it is timedistributed and since travel to a meeting is prohibitive in terms of time and money theyimplemented a virtual format for faculty development. The development focus was on creatingand maintaining communities of practice for the adoption of research based teaching practices.The work being
Western Washington University where I have been faculty in the Plastics and Composites Engineering Program for the past 13 years. My research interests are in composite manufacturing.David Frye, Western Washington University David has worked for Western Washington University in their Plastics and Composites Engineering (PCE) program for five years. As the PCE Lab Technician he helps develop curriculum and teaches many of the lab portions of courses that the program offers. David is a graduate of the University of Washington with a B.S. in Environmental Science. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Teaching Composites Manufacturing Through Tooling Western
cognitive and affectivedomains, which did not appear in CEBOK2, namely: Post Graduate Education (PG) - a replacement for the Master’s or plus 30 designation in CEBOK2 and indicates formal education beyond the baccalaureate degree; Mentored Experience (ME) - experience gained under the mentorship of an engineer who has already satisfied the BOK requirements for entry into professional practice; and Self Directed (SD) - a program of learning initiated and pursued by the individual.Two of these new pathways, in addition to the existing Undergraduate Education (UG) pathwayappear in Tables 6-12. It should be noted that the listed pathways in these tables are only typicalpathways and are not the
Paper ID #26456SISTEM: Increasing High School Students’ Engineering Career Awareness(Evaluation, Diversity)Dr. Schetema Nealy, University of Nevada, Las VegasDr. Erica J. Marti, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Erica Marti completed her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV). She holds a Master of Science in Engineering and Master of Education from UNLV and a Bachelor of Science in chemistry from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to graduate studies, Erica joined Teach for America and taught high school chemistry in Las Vegas. While her primary research
be due to a number of factors such as how TSE influences teacher classroom practices,instructional strategies, and climate of the learning setting [29].In comparison to K-12 settings, research on the impact of instructor TSE on students in highereducation is more limited, especially for TAs. Most research on TA TSE in higher education hasfocused on measuring levels of TSE and identifying contributors to TSE, such as professionaldevelopment, previous teaching experience, and background characteristics [30]–[36]. Shannonet al. [37] measured student ratings of TAs and found that prior teaching experience, but notdepartmental TA training, was significantly associated with higher student ratings of TAefficacy. Shannon et al. [37] suggest that
and the overallgrade of the student which serves as a factor to determine student’s success in a classroom.First year engineering curriculum includes two semester course sequence: Fundamentals ofEngineering I (offered in the first semester) and Fundamentals of Engineering II (offered in thesecond semester). Data is presented from the first semester course offered at the regional campusof a large, research institution. Fundamentals of Engineering I course include the followingsections as three main components of the coursework. a) Introduction to data analysis tool suchas Microsoft Excel, b) Computer programming in MATLAB, and c) Design project. Teamworkand collaboration are heavily weighted for the assessment of student performance in the
, Department of Civil Engineering and Coastal Engineering. He has published and presented more than 300 refereed publications. He has received numerous awards including a Senior Fulbright scholar- ship award, teaching awards, best paper awards, community service awards, and admission as an Eminent Engineer into Tau Beta Pi. His research on passive radon-resistant new residential building construction adapted in HB1647 building code of Florida Legislature. Najafi is a member of numerous professional so- cieties and has served on many committees and programs, and continuously attends and presents refereed papers at international, national, and local professional meetings and conferences. Lastly, Najafi attends courses
to research directed to improve engineering education.Dr. Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Tucker holds a joint appointment as Assistant Professor in Engineering Design and Industrial En- gineering at The Pennsylvania State University. He is also affiliate faculty in Computer Science and Engineering. He teaches Introduction to Engineering Design (EDSGN 100) at the undergraduate level and developed and taught a graduate-level course titled Data Mining–Driven Design (EDSGN 561). As part of the Engineering Design Program’s ”Summers by Design” (SBD) program, Dr. Tucker supervises students from Penn State during the summer semester in a two-week engineering design program at the
, and B. F. Bigelow, “Factors Impacting Hispanic High School Students and How to Best Reach Them for the Careers in the Construction Industry,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 82–98, 2016.[3] C. L. Menches and D. M. Abraham, “Women in Construction—Tapping the Untapped Resource to Meet Future Demands,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 133, no. 9, pp. 701–707, 2007.[4] V. Francis, “What influences professional women’s career advancement in construction?,” Constr. Manag. Econ., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 254–275, 2017.[5] V. Francis and A. Prosser, “Career Counselors’ Perceptions of Construction as an Occupational Choice,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 59–71, 2012.[6] W. Ahmed
. Which technology-enhanced learning methods can address these challenges effectively? 2. What is the best way to properly structure a blended course design for STEM courses?This exploration has led to aset of vetted best practices forblended instruction in STEMcourses which are identified indetail herein.3. STEM Blended Delivery Protocol (STEM-BDP)An overview of the deliverymechanisms utilized in STEM- Figure 3.1: Components of STEM-BDP Protocol. The rightmost image showsBDP is shown in Figure 3.1. hierarchical coverage relationship. The leftmost indented lists identify the student-The three main steps of this facing activities within each of the three componentsdelivery method are OnlineComponents, Face-to-Face Components and
Engineering (EE) from the Virginia Military Institute, Master’s Degree in EE from the George Washington University, and Ph.D. from the University of Louisville in Computer Engineering. He is also a graduate of the Signal Officer Basic Course, Signal Captain’s Career Course, and the Army Command and General Staff College. At West Point, LTC Lowrance also serves as a senior researcher in the Robotics Research Center. He has led multiple research projects related to robotics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. His research has led to over 25 peer-reviewed journal and conference papers, several of which have won best paper awards.Major Eric M. Sturzinger, United States Military Academy MAJ Eric Sturzinger is a
for the innovation Studio in the Engineering department.Luke G. Grzech, Wartburg College Luke is a Student in the Engineering Science Department at Wartburg College. He is getting his major in Engineering Science and Minors in Mathematics and Leadership. Research interests include recruitment into STEM and diversity in STEM.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects exploring engineering
. 4 Practice HW #2 covered Inventory Management concepts. This HW was designed to give the students an idea of how they should be thinking in terms of inventory for the large-scale operation. When they originally baked cookies in the pilot kitchen, the instructor had planned for all the necessary raw materials of 1 batch of cookies to be in front of them (not measured). After that, the students had to think about the material requirements planning for baking approximately 1,200 cookies in a day. The instructor gave an approximation of some costs and her thought process, using the eggs needed for the recipe as an example. The students had to determine the need per day, the need per year, the order size, and the floor
a visiting professor and received Alexander von Humboldt stipends for research at the Technical Uni- versity of Darmstadt, Germany in 1996 and 2002 and he served as a visiting professor at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia in 2003. He is a Fellow of the American Ceramic Society and has held several division and society-wide positions. Awards at Purdue University include receiving the MSE Best Teaching Award and Purdue’s highest teaching award, the Charles Murphy Undergraduate Teaching Award. Professor Bowman’s name is also listed in the Purdue Book of Great Teachers. In 2007, he received the Purdue College of Engineering Mentoring Award and he became the first Professor of Engineering
Transformation Institute, earned a doctoral degree in Engineering Education from Purdue University. She has a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering from Elizabethtown College, a Master’s degree in Computer Science and Software Engineering from Auburn University, eleven years of experience in industry as a software engineer. Her research focus is on broadening participation in engineering and computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity and 2) computer science education research in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women and minorities in computer-related engineering fields. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in
, 2000.[4] E. Seat, J. R. Parsons, and W. A. Poppen, “Enabling Engineering Performance Skills: A Program to Teach Communication, Leadership, and Teamwork*,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2001.[5] C. D. Grant and B. R. Dickson, “Personal Skills in Chemical Engineering Graduates: The Development of Skills Within Degree Programmes to Meet the Needs of Employers,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–29, Jan. 2006.[6] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Cooperative Learning,” in Active Learning, vol. 970, 0 vols., American Chemical Society, 2007, pp. 34–53.[7] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, 2003.[8] P. M. Boynton and T. Greenhalgh, “Selecting
helping companies attract innovators.Carolyn Breden Voter, University of Wisconsin-Madison Carolyn Voter is a Ph.D. candidate in Civil and Environmental Engineering at University of Wisconsin- Madison where she focuses on urban hydroecology as part of the Hydroecology Lab with Dr. Steven P. Loheide II. She also currently serves as the project assistant for Water@UW-Madison, an umbrella organization which connects water scholars on the UW-Madison campus and beyond. As a certified instructor for the Software Carpentry Foundation, Voter regularly teaches scientists and engineers best practices for scientific computing by live-coding in a two-day, learner-centered workshop. She completed her Delta Certificate in Teaching
Paper ID #26059Development of Curriculum in Technology-related Supply Chain Manage-ment ProgramsMs. Panteha Alipour, Purdue University Panteha Alipour is a PhD student at Purdue University. Her background is in industrial engineering with a focus on supply network analysis. Her research interests are optimization, network analysis, data analysis and predictive modelling.Dr. Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kathy Newton is an Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and Faculty Success for the Purdue Poly- technic Institute at Purdue University. She is a Professor of Supply Chain Management Technology in the
assessing graduate attributes at the department to target areas for improvement in the curriculum. This resulted in several publications in this educational research areas. Dr. Al-Hammoud won the ”Ameet and Meena Chakma award for exceptional teaching by a student” in 2014 and the ”Engineering Society Teaching Award” in 2016 and the ”Outstanding Performance Award” in 2018 from University of Waterloo. Her students regard her as an innovative teacher who continuously introduces new ideas to the classroom that increases their engagement.Chloe Gibson c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assessing Improvement of Student Mechanics Understanding through
dominated engineering culture. Wyss et al. [15]examined the impact of informing middle school students about STEM careers through the use ofvideo interviews with STEM professionals. Results showed that making students aware of STEMcareers by providing knowledge about STEM professions increased their interest in pursuing theirown STEM careers.STEM Outreach and EducationLevine et al. [16] designed and deployed a one week long STEM outreach camp for middleschool girls at the University of Rhode Island that featured chemistry activities. The campincluded interactions with female science faculty from the sponsoring institution, as well asmeetings with female undergraduate and graduate students. Surveying methodology was used toevaluate the effectiveness