research partnerships [1]. In support of this overall goal, the followingobjectives are addressed: 1. To provide underrepresented and financially needy undergraduate students with information on the benefits and opportunities associated with graduate education 2. To provide underrepresented and financially needy undergraduate students with enhanced financial support and career experiences to improve the likelihood of completing both a B.S. and an M.S. in engineering 3. To provide personalized integrated industry and academic mentoring and professional development that results in increased enrollment and completion of graduate engineering degrees involving industry beneficial research 4. To increase
instructor taught the course in both quarters covering the sametopics. Both quarters had approximately 120 students enrolled. Four students from the Winterquarter retook the course in the Spring. Surveys were completed by 50 and 78 students in theWinter and Spring quarters, respectively. Table 1 shows the breakdown of students by genderand year in the program.Table 1. The number of students and their college year. Quarter Total Female Male 1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th+ year Winter 117 15 112 0 13 68 36 Spring 122 18 104 0 17 69 36Course DesignIn the Winter quarter, the instructor lectured
?The focus of this paper is on experiences flipping an introductory database class. In particular,what are the best practices for holding students accountable for preparing for class? The authorhas employed online reading quizzes as well as guided study assignments. Examples ofassignments as well as multiple measures of student perceptions of learning are presented.1. Active LearningActive learning is constructivist rather than exposition-centered learning. Students areencouraged and supported in a learning process where they are directly engaged with and takeresponsibility for their own learning. The merits of active learning (as opposed to passivelylistening to a lecture) are well-documented. A meta-study by Freeman et al. (2014) examined225
designed to solve the same problemto compare the strengths and weaknesses of how each performs.1-PS4-1 Plan and conduct investigations to provide evidence that vibrating materials canmake sound and that sound can make materials vibrate.2-PS1-1 Plan and conduct an investigation to describe and classify different kinds ofmaterials by their observable properties.2-PS1-2 Analyze data obtained from testing different materials to determine whichmaterials have the properties that are best suited for an intended purpose.*4-PS4-3 Generate and compare multiple solutions that use patterns to transferinformation.5-PS1-3 Make observations and measurements to identify materials based on theirproperties.MATERIALS
consulting with nonprofits, museums, and summer programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Creation of an Engineering Epistemic Frame for K-12 Students (Fundamental)AbstractIn implementation of K-12 engineering education standards, in addition to the professionaldevelopment teachers need to be trained to prepare students for future engineering careers,assessments must evolve to reflect the various aspects of engineering. A previous researchproject investigated documentation methods using a variety of media with rising high schooljuniors in a summer session of a college preparatory program [1]. That study revealed thatalthough students had design
at Cal PolyPomona to gauge the impact of the video library on their academic career. Information wasgathered on awareness of the video resources, frequency of viewing, perceived usefulness, andother topics. The majority of students were aware of the video resources, felt the videos had apositive impact on their education, and felt the videos helped improve their grades in at least oneclass.1. IntroductionThe open courseware movement has grown significantly since the early 2000s. Today manyprestigious institutions with large endowments such as MIT [1] and Harvard [2] have developedextensive databases of videos and other free education resources, including complete self-pacedonline courses. These courses are sometimes created in partnerships
II) would beheld in the Engineering Education Garage (EG), which is the aforementioned (15,000 ft2)makerspace, and would focus on fundamental engineering skills application and integration.Seven different fundamental engineering topics were mandated by the committee as follows: 1. Engineering Professionalism (ethics, culture, and risk) 2. Basic Computational and Programming skills 3. Communication (graphical, oral and written) 4. Problem Solving 5. Design Analysis 6. Teamwork 7. Project ManagementIt is also pertinent to note the committee additionally mandated that the Paul-Elder CriticalThinking Framework [1-6] be taught and utilized throughout the sequence, and that diversityissues would be discussed as part of the
are highly valued in engineering are psychological or pseudo-cognitiverather than purely cognitive: self-efficacy, curiosity, and grit (perseverance). Creativity, apseudo-cognitive construct, is likewise cited as a desirable trait among engineers. In previouswork we showed that a project-based design course rich in brainstorming activities resulted in asemester-long improvement in certain aspects of creativity compared to a course that wasrelatively poor in brainstorming activities [1]. Not all design courses, however, are equal in thedegree to which they are project-based. This led us to question whether overt training increativity could yield even greater improvements in creativity than are already gained in a skills-based design course.A
improvements inCreativity Index scores compared to the controls. However, the statistical significance of thesefindings are not strong, presumably due to the small sample size. Therefore, the research willcontinue in subsequent years. In addition, evaluation of the design teams’ concepts byexperienced engineering design faculty indicated that the teams that participated in the creativityexercises exhibited greater innovation in their design process versus the control. Finally, studentsreported that the exercises are fun and help them expand their way of thinking to considerunexpected solutions to a diverse array of challenges.1. IntroductionThe capstone design experience is common in Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) accredited
Paper ID #25272Critical Approaches to CSR as a Strategy to Broaden Engineering Students’Views of StakeholdersDr. Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines Jessica M. Smith is Associate Professor in the Engineering, Design & Society Division at the Colorado School of Mines and Co-Director of Humanitarian Engineering. She is an anthropologist with two major research areas: 1) the sociocultural dynamics of extractive and energy industries, with a focus on corpo- rate social responsibility, social justice, labor, and gender and 2) engineering education, with a focus on socioeconomic class and social responsibility
Experiences within EngineeringAbstractThis theory paper continues an ongoing conversation about the use of critical theories to examinerace in engineering. Critical race theory was popularized in the 1980s for its use in legal studies[1] – and a decade later in education. Although three decades have passed since this movementof race research ignited, the engineering profession still lacks diversity. Whites are still themajority within engineering, which in turn culturally defines the field. In this setting, onepotential response from Blacks is that they hide their Black identity to blend into the dominantWhite workplace culture. To study this situation, we offer an extension to the work of WendyFaulkner and her concept of in/authenticity that women
, orcommunication [1].The introduction of this paper covers the necessary framework for engineering critical thinkingincluding intellectual traits necessary for understanding the subject and stages of the criticalthinking development, along with a literature review on its applications in engineering education.Multiple cases are used in presentation of analyzing engineering design including ego-centricand user-centric design examples, analyzing engineering documents including engineeringresearch work, and ethics.This paper focuses on applications of critical thinking in manufacturing engineering education ata midwestern institution. A series of undergraduate courses including Rapid Prototyping andReverse Engineering, Safety and Methods Engineering, and
Brass, St. Paul Academy and Summit School Director of Instructional Technology, St Paul Academy and Summit School K12 Collaboration Liaison, Center for Engineering Education, St. Thomas University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Cross Cutting Concepts in an Informal Engineering Setting (Fundamental)AbstractThe participation gap between men and women in the E - Engineering component of STEMsectors is persistent. This gap may be traced back to several complex issues including perceivedcultural concerns in engineering and young women self-selecting out of engineering career pathsearly in the middle school years [1]. Informal education settings may allow for a countermeasureto the
recently discussions in theTechnological Literacy Division of the American Society for Engineering Education have ledto the complementary promotion of the idea of engineering literacy. Technology consideredto be the product that results from the process of engineering. Unfortunately, there is littleagreement on what concepts and practices should be taught, or to whom they should betaught, or indeed the definitions themselves. Hence the symposium that is the subject of thiscommentary [1]. Cui Bono engineering and technological literacy?Krawitz’s wrote in response to the anchoring article that part of “ ‘liberal education’ beyondthe student’s major is delivered through the General Education portion of the curriculum, aseries of elective courses with
been recognized as resources for mathematics learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Culturally Responsive Pedagogy in a Summer Intervention Program (Research) IntroductionStructured informal (out-of-school) programming has been growing rapidly over the past twodecades, especially in the form of after-school science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) programs [1] and STEM intervention summer programs [2]. These structured out-of-school STEM learning experiences have been shown to play an important role in supportingSTEM engagement and learning [3], including developing children’s exposure to STEM basedexperiences and career
leaks. Many highly used hashtags representedcurrent threats and the overall sentiment of cybersecurity tweets are negative. Highly connected users onTwitter served as hubs across the three primary sub communities identified in the data. Insights from hisstudy can assist with improving workforce development by guiding professionals in getting pertinentinformation and keeping up to date with the latest security threats and news.1 IntroductionSecurity professionals are required to constantly learn in order to be successful at what they do. This learning is critical as thesecurity landscape constantly changes, with new threats and technologies being introduced on a daily basis. This dynamiclandscape means that professionals must be able to keep
and Environmental Engineering Director, Center for Sustainable Infrastructure The University of Alabama c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Curricular Changes Needed to Fulfill the CEBOK3: Three Case StudiesIntroductionAll civil engineering programs accredited by ABET must satisfy the requirements defined in theABET Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs [1], including the program criteria for“Civil and Similarly Named Engineering Programs” (also referred to as the civil engineeringprogram criteria, or CEPC). The CEPC was revised and is based, in part, on the 24 outcomes inthe Second Edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBOK2
[5] discusses how Data Mining is not just for computer science and should be offered inthe field of statistics. Romero and Ventura [2] studied an interdisciplinary field of educationalData Mining (EDM) and reviewed milestones, applications, tools and future insights within thisfield. Anderson et. al. proposed a four-year undergraduate program in predictive analytics,machine learning, and Data Mining implemented at the College of Charleston [4]. However, theydid not describe the details for any of these courses. Sanati-Mehrizy et. al., studied differentapproaches that have been taken by different institutions for integration of Data Mining conceptsinto undergraduate computer science program [1]. Their work motivated us to conduct our studyon
curiosity in exploring a topic supports learning that knowledge [1], building upon whatis taught in their academic program. Curiosity supports lifelong learning, one of the mostdesirable outcomes of higher education, by its role as an intrinsic reward [2]. Curiosity has alsobeen linked with workplace learning and job performance [3]. Given the short-term and long-term benefits curiosity can have on self-directed learning and job performance, it is important tobe able to identify whether students are exhibiting curiosity in the assignments that are submittedfor formative feedback.In recent years’ text mining has seen increasing focus on the investigation of sentiment [4],behavior analytics [5], linguistic understanding [6] improving product
, her research spans education and practice, working on the integration of community research into project based learning. Her work overlaps areas of GIS mapping, global sustainable urbanism, design and creativity.Dr. Andrew N Quicksall c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Deep Observation: Geo-Spatial Mapping as a Strategy for Site-Engagement and Problem-DesignAbstractWhile project-based learning powerfully brings students into real world economic andenvironmental contexts, a subject-oriented approach to such work means that they are often ableto remain aloof from real stakeholder engagement and participation, even when working on alocal site [1]. Given
Paper ID #27433Deepen Students’ Understanding of Computer Networking via a Project-orientedCooperative Learning StrategyDr. Guodong Wang, Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts Dr. Guodong Wang is currently an Assistant Professor in the Computer Science Department, Mas- sachusetts College of Liberal Arts (MCLA). His research topics include: (1) Big data transfer in high- speed networks; (2) Future Network Architecture, e.g., Software Defined Networking (SDN); (3) Future Smart Grid Architecture; and (4) Cyber Security in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) and Internet of Things (IoT). He has published over 30 research papers
behind the need to ask “why engineeringliteracy?” and outline some directions that might be taken in the future toward debating andclarifying the aims of engineering literacy.Legacy of Technically SpeakingIn 2002 the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) published Technically Speaking: Why AllAmericans Need to Know More about Technology. [1]” The document was significant inobtaining recognition for the role of engineering in developing modern technology and clarifyingthat creating technological systems was not the domain of scientists. After the release ofTechnically Speaking a workshop was held at the National Academy to define the research issuesrelated to the broader understanding of engineering and technology by the general public [2].That
National Architectural AccreditationBoard (NAAB) to investigate the nature in which CM programs are using this connection inaddressing SLO #9.Introduction and BackgroundConstruction education is seeing an increased emphasis in demonstrating student achievement oflearning outcomes. The recent move to outcomes-based accreditation by the American Councilfor Construction Education (ACCE) requires programs to utilize assessments to demonstratestudent achievement of specific student learning outcomes [1]. The standard dictates that at leastone of these must be a direct assessment. This has caused many construction programs toconsider different types of assessments to meet accreditation requirements. In order to executethe student learning outcomes for a
theseconcepts is best understood if all concepts are taught within a single course.History of the CourseThe Power Distribution Engineering and Smart Grids course was first taken over by Kerestes inthe summer of 2016. During that semester Kerestes used Electric Power DistributionEngineering by Turan Gonen as a textbook. The focus of this course was broken down into thefollowing four major sections: 1. Review of electric power systems 2. Distribution system planning, automation and load characteristics 3. Distribution transformers 4. Smart grids and microgridsHowever, indirect assessment results showed that students did not feel that they had gained atremendous amount of new knowledge, and the new knowledge that they had gained was noton
building of a training in keeping with current bestpractices for a minimal overhead cost, by engaging faculty. It has been found that the Instructional Skills Workshop(ISW) was able to improve faculty engagement in the learning process, address individual goals, inspire neweducators, and lead to the development of a culture and value set of teaching and learning at Innopolis University.IntroductionInnopolis was established on December 24, 2012 in the Republic of Tatarstan, Russia as atechnological hub city. As part of this development, Innopolis University (IU) was established in2012, in order to build a technological workforce for the surrounding industrial growth and hightechnology enterprise [1, 2]. Established as both an internationalizing
are presented in this paper.A survey addressing the BOK3 outcomes was developed using SurveyMonkey and deliveredthrough ASCE’s Department Head Collaborate online community. The intent of the survey wasto capture the perspectives of civil engineering educators and leaders as related to the BOK3 andthe CEPC. For each of the 21 outcomes listed in the BOK3 and individual curricular topicsincluded in the CEPC, respondents were asked to provide feedback on: 1. importance of the Outcome, and 2. ease of implementing an Outcome or curricular topic into their existing civil engineering curriculum.The survey collected demographic information to characterize the program and institution (e.g.,program size, public versus private, highest degree
itinto the Disney film The Lion King [1] or deconstructing a nerf gun and reconstructing it into adevice that can froth milk, this deconstruction and reconstruction process is integral toinnovation, since design examples are utilized heavily in the design process [2]. In order to guidethis discovery process in engineering education, academics have relied on product dissection orthe systematic disassembly and analysis of a product and all of its parts [3-6]. This method ofmechanical dissection was first introduced by Sherri Sheppard in the early 1990’s when sheidentified a formal educational process for taking apart a product to understand how it works,which provided the basis for the implementation of a course utilizing product dissection
beliefs and practices within the professionalculture of engineering as mechanisms of inequality retrenchment, and the ways those culturalbeliefs manifest within engineering departments. The results also have implications for helpingengineering departments understand and address persistent inequality within their ranks.KeywordsIdeology of depoliticization, culture of engineering, gender inequality, engineering facultyIntroductionWomen are persistently under-represented, marginalized, and devalued within the engineeringprofession and within engineering education [1-3]. These gender inequalities extend from K-12classrooms through the highest ranks of the profession [2-4]. Even among engineers who haveachieved faculty positions, women are often
some include the content within their analog circuits sequence.Since digital logic is typically offered in the first or second year of the program and does not havecalculus as a prerequisite, it is a course that usually has high enrollments with varied student preparednesslevels. These factors contribute to increased instructor time spent on helping students that don’t have astrong algebra background.Digital logic is a subject that is more amenable to online instruction compared to other engineeringcourses [1]. Without complex, calculus-based derivations, the foundation of digital logic can beeffectively taught using instructional videos. This characteristic opens opportunities to help strugglingstudents without consuming excessive instructor
enhance existing microelectronic courses that allow students to gain hands-onexperiences in mobile embedded system designs. Moreover, the customizability and portabilityof the embedded sensing platform can also be used for the unmanned aerial vehicles in the GPS-denied environments.Introduction In the past decades, microcontrollers/microelectronics have been played central roles inensuring safe and efficient operations of many modern large-scale infrastructures, such asintelligent transportation systems, smart power grids, and smart manufacturing systems [1]. Oneof the critical issues in applying existing microelectronic technologies to these modernengineering systems is their lack of modular portability, scalability, customizability