Asee peer logo
Displaying results 61 - 90 of 247 in total
Conference Session
Continuous improvement of programs, practices and people.
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Emily Nutwell, Ohio State University; Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions
Continuing Professional Development
. Resour. Dev. Rev., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 263–296, 2007.[24] M. M. Jameson and B. R. Fusco, “Math anxiety, math self-concept, and math self-efficacy in adult learners compared to traditional undergraduate students,” Adult Educ. Q., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 306–322, 2014.[25] C. E. Kasworm, “Emotional challenges of adult learners in higher educaiton,” New Dir. Adult Contin. Educ., vol. 2008, no. 120, pp. 27–34, 2008.[26] M. Ambrose, S. Bridges, M, DiPietro, M., Lovett, M., Norman, How learning works. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint, 2010.[27] B. D. Jones, “Motivating Students to Engage in Learning : The MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation,” Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 272–285, 2009.[28] M
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 11
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Edward H. Currie, Hofstra University; Kevin C. Craig, Hofstra University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
at all joints can be determined. Thesystem equation of motion is directly obtained by the application of Lagrange’s Equation d T T V − + = Q using the generalized coordinate θ, where V is the system potential dt   energy, i.e., V = 12 m 2 g r sin  , T is the system kinetic energy, i.e.,   d  2   1  d  2 1 T =  12  +  2 I2   + 2 m 2 v2  + ( 12 m3 v3 ) , and Qθ is the generalized torque due to 2 2 I1     dt   dt     torques that do work, i.e., Q
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Charles E. Baukal Jr. P.E., John Zink Co. LLC; Wes Ryan Bussman, John Zink Co. LLC
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
.) A1 (m2) D2 (in.) A2 (m2) (in.) s2) Q (ml) t (s) (m3/s) CD (ave.) SD 1 A 1 1.029 0.00054 0.078125 3.0927E‐06 13.75 3426 500 55.1 9.07E‐06 1.12 2 1.029 0.00054 0.078125 3.0927E‐06 13.75 3426 500 54.5 9.17E‐06 1.13 3 1.029 0.00054 0.078125 3.0927E‐06 13.75 3426 500 54.4 9.19E‐06 1.14 1.13 0.0078 B 1 1.029 0.00054 0.09375 4.4535E‐06 13.75 3426 500 37.1 1.35E‐05 1.16 2 1.029 0.00054 0.09375 4.4535E‐06 13.75 3426 500 36.1 1.39E‐05 1.19 3 1.029 0.00054 0.09375 4.4535E‐06 13.75 3426 500
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jingyu Wang, University of Oklahoma; Noah C. Golly, University of Oklahoma; Blake Herren, University of Oklahoma; James Ian Macdonald, University of Oklahoma; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma; Yingtao Liu, University of Oklahoma
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
transition: An exploration of emerging adulthood, Journal of Counseling & Development, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 174-181, 2010.[3] T. D. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K. T. Nguyen, and D. Hui, Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges, Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018.[4] Q. Gao et al., Fabrication of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds with 3D controllable geometric shapes, Materials & Design, vol. 157, pp. 159-169, 2018.[5] Z. X. Khoo et al., 3D printing of smart materials: A review on recent progresses in 4D printing, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 103-122, 2015.[6] M. Abshirini, M. Charara, Y. Liu, M. Saha, and M. C
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education in the Formal Classroom
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Meera N.K. Singh, University of Calgary; Qiao Sun, University of Calgary
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
. 3, pp. 243-257, 1995.[7] Canvas. Instructure, 2019. https://www.canvaslms.com/about-us/[8] M. Singh, Q. Sun, and C. Weber, “An Evaluation of a Digital Learning Management System in High School Physics Classrooms.” In Proc. of the ASEE 123rd Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper 17350. New Orleans, LA, 2016.[9] R. M. Felder and L. K. Silverman, “Learning and teaching styles in engineering education,” Engineering Education, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 674–681, 1988. Available as of March 3, 2012 from http://winbev.pbworks.com/f/LS-1988.pdf[10] R. S. Dunn and K.J. Dunn, Teaching Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles. London, U.K.: Pearson College Division, 1978, 336 pp.[11] D. Kolb, Experiential Learning
Conference Session
Mechanics Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hamed Samandari, Miami University; Banafsheh Seyed-Aghazadeh, Miami University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics
significantly. Thestudents were surveyed on the following questions regarding agile practices: Q-A1: “Working in pairs on this project was challenging.” Q-A2: “Having bi-weekly gate presentations to briefly discuss the progress in team project helped me to be more engaged in the group's progress and makes team work and communication between the students and the instructor more transparent.”The survey results show that only 20% of students found working in pair to be challenging,which was previously pointed out by students as a main challenge during the second yearimplementation of the design project (only PBL). This was complemented by the results of thesecond question where 80% of students found the bi-weekly gate presentations
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lei Wang P.E., University of the District of Columbia; Pradeep K. Behera P.E., University of the District of Columbia; Sasan Haghani, University of the District of Columbia; Jiajun Xu, University of the District of Columbia
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
International Symposium for NextGeneration Infrastructure Conference, pp. 131-135. London, UK.[13] Huang, H. W., and Zhang, D. M. (2016). Resilience analysis of shield tunnel lining underextreme surcharge: Characterization and field application. Tunnelling and Underground SpaceTechnology, 51, 301-312.[14] Wu, D., Liu, H., Yuan, C., and Wei, D. (2016). A quantitative assessment framework for post-earthquake transportation network resilience using fuzzy logic. In Transportation Research Board95th Annual Meeting (No. 16-3864).[15] Zimmerman, R., Zhu, Q., de Leon, F., and Guo, Z. (2017). Conceptual modeling frameworkto integrate resilient and interdependent infrastructure in extreme weather. Journal of InfrastructureSystems, 23(4), 04017034.[16] Wang, L
Conference Session
FOCUS ON EXHIBITS: Welcome Reception & NEW THIS YEAR! 2018 Best Division Paper Nominee Poster Session Sponsored by Engineering Unleashed
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Margaret Phillips, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics
ASEE Headquarters
Division, part 1 - 1893 to 1960,” in 2016 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2016. https://peer.asee.org/26170.[7] M. Borrego, M. J. Foster, and J. E. Froyd, “Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 45–76, Jan. 2014.[8] A. Brettle, “Information skills training: a systematic review of the literature,” Health Info. Libr. J., vol. 20, no. s1, pp. 3–9, Jun. 2003.[9] R. J. Jacobs, J. Q. Lou, R. L. Ownby, and J. Caballero, “A systematic review of eHealth interventions to improve health literacy,” Health Informatics J., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 81–98, Jun. 2016.[10] A. M. Fiegen, “Systematic review of research methods: the
Conference Session
Mechanics Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeffrey C. Hayen, Oregon Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics
horizontal direction. Develop the standardequations of motion for this system. Also, in the special case with Fa  0 , determine the natural(undamped) frequency n for small-amplitude oscillations of the system due to gravity alone.Constraints and RelationsBased upon the rolling-without-slipping condition for the disk on the support surface, it is foundthat the kinematics and relative positions of various points on the system are governed by xP  rd   vP  rd   aP  rd  (31) rQ/P   12 lb [sin  i  cos  j] , rC/P   rd j (32)where points P and Q identify the respective mass centers of the disk and bar, and C identifiesthe point of contact
Conference Session
New ECE laboratories
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cory J. Prust, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) Complex-envelope representations for AM systems MATLAB/Simulink Simulation – I/Q and Complex Envelope for AM 4 Introduction to angle modulation Concepts of frequency and phase modulation; modulators and demodulators Spectrum/Bandwidth of FM waveforms, Carson’s Rule MATLAB/Simulink Simulation – FM Systems 5 Complex envelope representations for FM/PM Case Study: Broadcast FM Radio Midterm Exam MATLAB/Simulink Simulation – I/Q and Complex Envelope for FM/PM 6 Introduction to digital communications Digital carrier modulation: ASK
Conference Session
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tejita Rajbhandari, Gannon University; Mark Blair, Gannon University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
incapable of learning or discerningfact from fiction without the assistance of an intellectually superior individual to teach them ordumb-down the material through parables or simplified rules. Patrick Quin describes Aquinas’Super de Trin.2.4 “that theological truth is best transmitted to the faithful in parabolic form… itmight, he thinks, confuse the uneducated who would misunderstand it and be ridiculed byunbelievers who detest it anyway” [10]. Aquinas states: “…it is said in Luke 8:10, ‘To you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God, but to the rest in parables.’ Therefore one ought by obscurity in speech conceal the sacred truths from the multitude” (Pars 1 q. 2 a. 4 s. c. 3). “…the words of a teacher ought
Conference Session
Best In DEED
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert P. Loweth, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan; Amy Hortop, University of Michigan; Elizabeth Ann Strehl, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Conference Session
ConstDiv Technical Session 4 - Pedagogy & Accreditation I
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Luciana Debs, Purdue University; Jiansong Zhang, Purdue University; Yunfeng Chen, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
nospelling and grammar mistakes, and professionally formatted. The final submittal was worth 10points. Then, on Tuesday, December 3rd, students were asked to provide a 10 minutepresentation to a panel of industry professionals. The small group meeting on that Tuesdaystarted one hour later than the usual meeting, to allow students’ further preparation, and theremaining 120 minutes were allocated for presentation and questions and answers (Q&A). Toprovide more authenticity to the task, course managers invited industry professionals toparticipate in an evaluation panel of the students’ presentation. They were recruited from theprogram’s industry partners (industry advisory board). In the call for industry professionals,instructors indicated
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christian Schnell, Stanford University; Johann Elmar Nordhus gen Westarp, Technical University of Munich (TUM); Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
Conference Session
It's All About the Student: Integration, Problem Solving, Critical Thinking, and Self-Efficacy
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sean Lyle Gestson, Oregon State University; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Matthew Stephen Barner, Oregon State University; Masoud Ghodrat Abadi, California State University, Sacramento; David S. Hurwitz, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
carry water at a rate of 550 gpm (1.21 ft3/s). What is the total headloss for this length of pipe? 2 Which 8-inch pipe with a length of 500 feet A. friction factor, fd = .015; would have the greatest headloss? Assume: Q = roughness coefficient, C = 160 550 gpm (1.21 ft3/s), each pipe is made of new B. friction factor, fd = .02; unlined Schedule 40 steel, turbulent flow, each roughness coefficient, C = 140 pipe is flowing full, and there is no change in C. friction factor, fd = .025; elevation between point A and point B. roughness coefficient, C = 120
Conference Session
Curriculum and Assessment I
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Peter J. Clarke, Florida International University; Debra Lee Davis, Florida International University; Ingrid A. Buckley, Florida Gulf Coast University; Geoff Potvin, Florida International University; Mandayam Thirunarayanan, Florida International University; Edward L. Jones, Florida A&M University/Florida State University
Tagged Divisions
Computing and Information Technology
opportunityfor schema construction (germane load) is possible. Note that although our model currently showsonly 4 LESs, we expect that this number will increase over time as more pedagogical approachesare integrated.The main objective of the proposed model is through research find the values of a, b, c, d, e, q, r, s,and t in the equations F2FA (aCL + bGA + cPBL + dSI + eLS) and OA(qCL + rGA + sPBL + tSI)that maximizes student learning and engagement. Where F2FA and OA are the face-to-face andonline activities respectively. CL - collaborative learning, GA - gamification, PBL - problem-basedlearning and SI - social interaction are the LESs, and LS - lecture style the traditional approach.You may think of a, b, c, d, e, q, r, s, and t as the percentage of
Conference Session
Liberal Education Division Technical Session 11
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
.[13] J. Cha and Y. He, Zhongguo gongcheng jiaoyu gaige san da zhanlue (Three Straetgies in Chinese Engineering Education Reform), Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2009.[14] Q. Gu, "The work, lives and professional development of teachers in China," Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 235-238, 2013.[15] Y. Wei, "Yingjie jiaoyu yanjiu de xin fanshi: Shenjing jiaoyuxue [Embracing a new paradigm for educational research: Neuroeducation]," 19 December 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.cae.cn/cae/html/main/col35/2012-12/27/20121227152437045647584_1.html. [Accessed 4 February 2019].[16] D. Starr, "China and the Confucian education model," Universitas, vol. 21, pp. 1-27, 2012.[17] R. L
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 22: Perspectives and Evaluation of Engineering Design Education
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lori C. Bland, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University; Anastasia P. Samaras, George Mason University; Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
deepening? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.19 Cousins, J. B., & Earl, L. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 397-418.20 Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation, (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.21 Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. (2005). Evaluation theory, models, & applications, (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.22 Patton, M. Q. (2010). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: Guilford.23 Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011). Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Prateek Shekhar, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan; Julie Libarkin, Michigan State University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
. Eng. Entrep., vol. 4, pp. 55–78, 2013.[8] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes,” Int. J. Eng. Educ, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 425–435, 2012.[9] Q. Jin et al., “Entrepreneurial Career Choice and Characteristics of Engineering and Business Students,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 598–613, 2016.[10] M. W. Ohland, S. A. Frillman, G. Zhang, C. E. Brawner, and T. K. Miller, “The effect of an entrepreneurship program on GPA and retention,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 293–301, 2004.[11] P. Shekhar, A. Huang-Saad, J. Libarkin, R. Cummings, and V. Tafurt, “Assessment of student learning in an
Conference Session
STEM Issues
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University; Karina Arcaute, Old Dominion University; Anthony W. Dean, Old Dominion University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
, but to also introduce them along the way to some basictheoretical knowledge needed to understand the complexity of the final product. The researchteam’s expectation was that exposing the participants to an introductory level of knowledge fromvarious fields will stimulate their interest and will help them identify engineering areas that areof specific interest to each of them. The workshops activities were split between hands-on, Q&Aand presentations, with the latest starting with a brief introduction to the theory of bio-inspiredrobot mechanisms, 3D modeling, animation, STL generation, slicing, G code generation, printingof the robot segments, and concluding with the prototype. The workshops focus was on theconnection between 3D computer
Conference Session
FOCUS ON EXHIBITS: Welcome Reception & NEW THIS YEAR! 2018 Best Division Paper Nominee Poster Session Sponsored by Engineering Unleashed
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico
Tagged Topics
ASEE Headquarters
; Exposition, 2017.[36] D. J. Wilde, “Team Creativity,” in Education that Works: The NCIIA 8th Annual Meeting, 2004, pp. 77–80.[37] M. S. Kim and Y. S. Kim, “Analysis of perceived creativity and design team interaction,” in ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2007, pp. 559–568.[38] Z. Qian, Y. Lan, J. Feng, and Q. Yiping, “Teamwork approach for senior research projects for college undergraduates,” in 2012 7th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 2012, pp. 1999–2001.[39] N. Gonzalez, L. Moll, and C. Amanti, Funds of Knowledge : Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Conference Session
ECE Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Branimir Pejcinovic, Portland State University; Phillip Wong, Portland State University; Robert Bass, Portland State University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
(Q) are shown in Table 1 foreach of the three courses in the capstone sequence. We consider 1-5 scores greater than 4 and 5-1scores less than 2 to be exceeding expectations. The results in Table 1 show students meet orexceed expectations in these metrics. Tracking these results through the academic year providesinsights in how perceptions of team satisfaction and task conflict change over time. For example,we observe that Team Satisfaction scores degrade by about 12 to 15% and Task Conflict scoresincrease by 14 to 18% during the capstone period.Table 1. Results of the CATME peer-assessment tool showing results from six survey questions for each of the three terms of the capstone sequence. Scale range is 1-5. For (Q
Conference Session
ECE Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Craig J. Scott, Morgan State University; Joi D. Aybar, Morgan State University; Shiny Abraham, Seattle University; Sacharia Albin, Norfolk State University; Petru Andrei, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; John Okyere Attia P.E., Prairie View A&M University; Mohamed F. Chouikha, Prairie View A&M University; Shonda L. Bernadin, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; Kenneth A. Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Ibibia K. Dabipi, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; Abdelnasser A Eldek, Jackson State University; Demetris Geddis, Hampton University; Petronella A. James-Okeke, Morgan State University; John Carey Kelly Jr., North Carolina A&T State University; Pamela Leigh-Mack, Virginia State University; Juan C. Morales, Universidad del Turabo; Mandoye Ndoye, Tuskegee University; Kofi Nyarko, Morgan State University; Ben O. Oni, Tuskegee University; Stella A. Quinones, University of Texas, El Paso; Michel A. Reece, Morgan State University; Lei Zhang, University of Maryland, Eastern Shore; Saleh Zein-Sabatto, Tennessee State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
UMI Workshop June 18-20, 2018 Monday, June 18th 6:00 pm Welcome Reception & Dinner The Alexandrian Hotel Tuesday, June 19th 7:30 am Breakfast 8:00 am Welcome and Introduction 8:05 am Introduction of Potential New Partners 8:15 am Overview of Status of the Project 8:30 am Q&A 10:15 am Morning Break 10:30 am Session – Mega/REU/RET 12:00 pm Working Lunch 1:30 pm
Conference Session
Teaching Engineering Students and Library Staff: New Ideas and Best Practices
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeanine Mary Williamson, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Natalie Rice, University of Tennessee ; Carol Tenopir, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Jordan Kaufman; Courtney June Faber, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Rachel McCord Ellestad, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Libraries
, Thailand, August 20 - August 28, 1999[7] R. Ali, N. Abu-Hassan, M. Y. M. Daud, and K. Jusoff, "Information literacy skills ofengineering students," International Journal of Recent Research and Applied Studies vol. 5, no.3, pp. 264-270, 2010.[8] Q. Q. Zhang, M. Goodman, and S. Y. Xie, "Integrating library instruction into the coursemanagement system for a first-year engineering class: An evidence-based study measuring theeffectiveness of blended learning on students' information literacy levels," College & ResearchLibraries, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 934-958, Nov 2015.[9] P. Ramamurthy and E. Siridevi, "Information literacy search skills of students in fiveselected engineering colleges in Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh: A
Conference Session
ECCD Technical Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alamgir A. Choudhury, Western Michigan University; Jorge Rodriguez P.E., Western Michigan University; Awilma Paola Ventura Lugo, Western Michigan University
Tagged Divisions
Energy Conversion and Conservation
). 𝑃𝑄 𝑒= = 𝐹1 (𝑃, 𝑄, 𝜏, 𝜔) … . (2) 𝜏𝜔To determine the variables that affect pump efficiency of the fluid system the variables that affectequation (2) were defined. Identifying that flow rate 𝑄 is a function of q = displacement volume,ω = angular velocity, µ = fluid viscosity, and T = temperature. In addition, the overall efficiencyfunction shown in equation (3) was determined by knowing that output pressure P is a function ofτ = torque, 𝑄 = flow rate, µ = fluid viscosity, and T = temperature. 𝑒 = 𝐹(𝑞, 𝜔, 𝑃, 𝑄, 𝜏, 𝜇, 𝑇) … . (3)In general, the efficiency of any pump system is a function of many independent variables
Conference Session
Mathematics Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University
Tagged Divisions
Mathematics
functions: Inflating a balloon The change in the volume of a constantly inflated / deflated balloon depends on thechange in its radius which changes as a function of time (Figure 10). Figure 10: Inflating a balloonQuestion: What is the change in volume of the balloon as a function of the incoming air flowq(t)?Assuming a spherical balloon, its volume V is 4 𝑉 = 𝜋 𝑟3 3If the radius changes with time due to the incoming air rate, q(t), then according to the ChainRule 𝑑𝑉 𝑑𝑉 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑞
Conference Session
Wireless Technology
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Afsaneh Minaie, Utah Valley University; Reza Sanati-Mehrizy, Utah Valley University; Kyle Joseph Wheelhouse, Utah Valley University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computing and Information Technology
. Groza, and S. Bixwas, “Sensor Based Home Automation and Security System”, February 5, 2018 6. H. Huang, S. Xiao, X. Meng, and Y. Xiong, “A Remote Home Security System Based on Wireless Sensor Network and GSM Technology”, February 5, 2018 7. “Safer. Smarter. Z-Wave”, Z-Wave, Silicon Laboratories, http://www.z-wave.com/, February 5, 2018. 8. Blynk. Retrieved April 08, 2018, from http:docs.blynk.cc/ . 9. https://www.geekstips.com/temperature-sensor-dht22-ds18b20-arduino-tutorial/, Accessed on April 2018.10. https://www.google.com/search?q=arduino+light+sensor&safe=active&source=lnms&tb m=shop&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiCm43PqLraAhVjx1QKHeIwBpsQ_AUICigB&biw=16 82&bih=921#spd=0, accessed on April
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 8: Survey and Instrument Development
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adurangba Victor Oje, University of Georgia; Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia; Peter H. Carnell, University of Georgia; Nicola W. Sochacka, University of Georgia
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
factors. We will examine the multi-dimensionality of the academic resilience construct by testing the three-factor model against afour or five factor model. Future studies will explore diversity of participants, examine genderdifferences among different samples and explore other demographics. Lastly, we intend to usethe validated instrument as a tool to examine causal relationships between academic resilience,students’ school engagement, and other motivational factors that influence academicachievement, especially for students who are most vulnerable to high academic stress.References[1] G. Windle, K. M. Bennett, J. J. H. Noyes, and q. o. l. outcomes, "A methodological review of resilience measurement scales," vol. 9, no. 1, p. 8, 2011
Conference Session
Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Ethics in the First Year
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard T Cimino, Rowan University; Scott Duplicate Streiner, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
/64/papers/14871/view​.[Accessed: March 29, 2018].[7] J. R. Rest, D. Navaez, S. J. Thoma, M. J. Bebeau, “DIT-2: Devising and testing a revisedinstrument of moral judgement,” ​J. Ed. Psych​., vol. 91, pp. 644-659, Dec. 1999.[8] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. Kenny Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, A. D Mead, “Thedevelopment of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-baseddesign teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods,” in ​121st ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014, ​[Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/23130​. [Accessed: Mar. 29, 2018].[9] L. Kohlberg, R. H. Hersh, “Stages of moral development,” ​Theory Pract.,​ vol. 16, pp.53-59,Apr. 1977.[10
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 11: Leadership and Collaborations in Engineering
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
learned at various stages of the project h) Applying strategies that seek to strengthen your interdisciplinary collaboration i) Developing strategies that contribute to your professional growth (e.g., diversifying for broader learning, relationship building, etc.)Q. 9 Please select all the programs you are associated with at your institution from the choices below. __Engineering __Education __Learning Sciences __Psychology __Engineering Education __Other ______Q. 10 For how many years have you been teaching in higher education? ______Q. 11 For how many years have you been involved with interdisciplinary engineering education research? ______Q. 12 Please select the job or title that best