Paper ID #26355Board 19: Impacts of Engineering Justice Curriculum: A Survey of StudentAttitudesDr. Tina Lee, University of Wisconsin-Stout Dr. Tina Lee is an Associate Professor of Anthropology and the Program Director for the Applied Social Science Program at the University of Wisconsin-Stout.Dr. Elizabeth Anne Buchanan, University of Wisconsin-Stout Elizabeth Buchanan is Endowed Chair in Ethics and Acting Director, Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, at the University of Wisconsin-Stout.Dr. Devin R. Berg, University of Wisconsin-Stout Devin Berg is an Associate Professor and Program Director of the B.S. Mechanical
, Louisville, KY, June, 2010.[5] Vesilind, A. and Morgan, S. (2004). Introduction to Environmental Engineering,2nd Ed. Brooks/Cole - Thomson, Belmont, California.[6] Riley, K., Davis, M., Cox, A. and Maciukenas, J. (2007). “Ethics in the details: an NSF project to integrate ethics into the graduate engineering curriculum.” Proceedings of the Professional Communication Conference, IEEE International. October 1-3, 2007 Seattle, Washington.[7] Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175-184.[8] Kisselburgh L, Zoltowski CB, Beever J, Hess JL, Iliadis AJ, Brightman AO. (2014) “Effectively engaging engineers in ethical reasoning about
career fields for technical warrant officers in the United States Army. Warrantofficers enjoy the privileges of an officer, and according to the Army’s website, “technical warrantofficers are the Army’s mechanical experts”. Qualification training for warrant officers is generallyseveral months to a year in duration of fulltime study, but many warrant officers do not have four-yearcollege degrees.The American Council on Education (ACE), based out of Washington, D.C., reviews military trainingcourses, including Army warrant officer courses, and makes credit recommendations of equivalentcollege credits based upon training durations, content and scope. Technical warrant officer trainingincludes the types of curriculum often found in four-year
Paper ID #25402Board 4: Leveraging Undergraduate Curriculum Reform to Impact Gradu-ate Education: a Case StudyDr. Jennifer R Amos, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr Amos joined the Bioengineering Department at the University of Illinois in 2009 and is currently a Teaching Associate Professor in Bioengineering and an Adjunct Associate Professor in Educational Psychology. She received her B.S. in Chemical Engineering at Texas Tech and Ph.D. in Chemical En- gineering from University of South Carolina. She completed a Fulbright Program at Ecole Centrale de Lille in France to benchmark and help create a new hybrid
Engineers. In his fi- nal year of academia, Nicholas worked with Professor Kaw as an undergraduate research and learning assistant for a numerical methods course to study the effectiveness of flipped classrooms with adaptive learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Integrating adaptive learning lessons in a flipped STEM course: development, outcomes, and data analyticsIntroductionThe flipped classroom is currently a popular pedagogy [1] as it is believed to improve studentengagement, create self-regulation of learning, and establish habits for life-long learning [2]. Inaddition, the increased amount of in-class active learning created by the implementation of
Paper ID #26235Computer Security Activities for a Middle School Classroom or OutreachEvent (P12 Resource/Curriculum Exchange)Dr. Stephany Coffman-Wolph, University of Texas, Austin Dr. Stephany Coffman-Wolph is an Assistant Professor of Instruction at The University of Texas at Austin in the Department of Computer Science. Research interests include: Artificial Intelligence, Fuzzy Logic, Game Theory, Teaching Computer Science, Outreach of STEM, Women in STEM, and Software Engi- neering.Dr. Kimberlyn Gray, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Dr. Kimberlyn Gray is an Assistant Professor at West Virginia University
Paper ID #27251Board 69: Integrating Computational Thinking, Engineering Design, andEnvironmental Science through Smart GreenhousesDavid W Jackson, Boston College, Lasell College, and Waltham (MA) Public Schools David W. Jackson is a PhD student in Curriculum & Instruction at Boston College, an Adjunct Professor with Lasell College, and an After-School STEM Coordinator with Waltham (MA) Public Schools.Helen Zhang, Boston College Helen Zhang is a senior research associate working at the Lynch School of Education, Boston College. Her research interest includes science education, design thinking, and learning from failure.Prof
: engineering (of many types); business, marketing, finance, accounting,manufacturing, supply chain, sales, and management; industrial design, architecture, science,service and support; and, an understanding of business customers and users – from first-yearthrough to capstone.Translating this into pedagogy and curriculum means innovation-based or innovation-infusedcourses, problem-based and active learning-based, real-world experiences in partnership with theinnovation ecosystem and a progression based on gaining knowledge, skills, and experience.And, to match the real-world, these courses need to be interdisciplinary, multi-disciplinary, trans-disciplinary, and multi-college / multi-school (engineering, business, arts & sciences,architecture, etc
children’s awareness and motivations and preventingmisconceptions with a constructively designed curriculum. A real-life implementation ofcurriculum integration of sustainability in the K-12 setting plays a key role in validating andevaluating the feasibility of this approach. In this study, a module of sustainability was designedfor 12 one-hour sessions over 3 months with a focus on the recycling of electronics and wasimplemented in an industrial-oriented class. We use instructor reflections to provide preliminaryinsights for addressing difficulties associated with sustainability education, i.e., whether middleschool youth can relate the societal and economic aspects to the sustainability concept.Purpose of StudyThe purpose of the study is to
are not well-studied in the engineering education literature.In related work, in order to facilitate the integration of ethics into the engineering curriculum,Nair and Bulleit [13] propose identifying ethical philosophies that are compatible with theexisting “engineering way of thinking” (EWT). Though we see engineering ethics as related butdistinct from our interests in sociotechnical integration, we look to this work as an example ofbringing together historically disparate considerations such as ethics and the technical side ofengineering work.Engineering ways of thinking were also analyzed in a case study by Godfrey on engineeringculture in an Australian university that had previously undergone a curriculum and culturaloverhaul. Godfrey
laboratory curriculum should be a balance of expository and inquiry instruction and,if possible, an introduction to independent research techniques (Svinicki and McKeachie, 2014;Tomasik, et al. 2013; Galloway, et al., 2016). Fourth, the laboratory program must be feasiblewithin available resources, which included time, costs, instrumentation, physical facilities, andsupport personnel (Larsen, et al. 2013). Fifth, we developed the laboratory curriculum topromote a more complex affective learning environment. Galloway et al. showed that accessingfeelings beyond interest about the laboratory experience encourages students to make aconscious choice to more actively participate in the laboratory learning environment (2016).2. Course Description and
experiments, the wiring of sensors to amicrocontroller board and the open source program coding were all valuable learningexperience to students. As a result of the success of this activity, in supporting STEMeducation, made the local government initiate the process to include Space Education aspart of the curriculum initiatives. Keywords—HAB, STEM, Space Education, Open Source Hardware, Low Cost)I. INTRODUCTION In spite of the early creation of the Paraguayan Space Agency by congress in 2014, Law5151/14, [1] it didn’t start office up until 2017 by executive order Act 6466/17 and Act 7364/17.During this period of time, by initiative of academia, i.e. Facultad Politecnica UniversidadNacional de Asuncion (FPUNA), an attempt to conduct a near
discuss the implications ofPLM systems in classroom dynamics, curriculum and grading.IntroductionThis paper builds on the idea that the implementation of a Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)system in an introductory level freshman course can provide students with key competencies tosucceed in today’s complex design engineering environments. Being exposed to PLM systemsearly and in the context of entry level modeling courses allows students to become familiar withPLM concepts and how PLM systems are an integral part of modern design processes. Studentsentering the workforce will have a firm understanding of the various stages and changes aproduct goes through during its lifecycle and how PLM and CAD are not mutually exclusive, butcomplementary to
Paper ID #24757Developing a Request for Qualifications Activity to Integrate ConstructionTopics at the Sophomore LevelDr. Luciana Debs, Purdue University Luciana Debs, is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management in the School Construction Manage- ment Technology at Purdue University. She received her PhD from Purdue University Main Campus. Her previous degrees include a MS from the Technical Research Institute of Sao Paulo (IPT-SP), and BArch from the University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Prior to her current position she worked in design coordination in construction and real estate development
. Contemporaneously, this lab has also hosted an NSF/REU sitesince 2011 [1, 3, 13].Professional Development ReviewProfessional development (PD) is required of many teachers. Teacher PD has been shown toimprove student achievement in science [14], and PD is considered imperative to the realizationof standards in curriculum [15]. Teachers are typically required to earn a certain number ofcontinuing education credits (CEUs) as part of their work contract. CEUs may be earned anumber of ways, including workshops and courses at nearby institutions, however this can beproblematic. One-shot workshops designed for teacher enrichment can be useful, howeverlonger-term PD programs are required to support standards which reach all students [15]. Thelimitations of the
launched the Technology, Research, and Communication (TRAC) Writing Fellows Program, which has grown into an organization of 80 discipline-based peer writing tutors who, in total, work with more than 1,300 students at Lehigh each semester. His research interests include topics in writing across the curriculum, composition theory, argument theory, and peer learning with a special focus on writing fellows programs.Dr. Siddha Pimputkar, Lehigh University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019WIP: Integration of Peer Communication Fellows into Introductory Materials Science CoursesAbstractThis study is a work in progress. The purpose of this project was to enhance the
Paper ID #26165TQM Applied to an Educational OrganizationDr. Mysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional , national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several conferences for Miami
students within COSE, which supplied the funding for this study.BackgroundTheoretical FrameworkThe framework of Astin’s, Swail’s, and Tinto’s models are, in their simplest interpretation, aboutstudent involvement in their chosen college and program. Astin’s involvement model shows thatthe academic performance of a student is directly correlated to their involvement level within theircollege or program [2, 3]. Tinto theorizes that poor integration into the many facets of college life,including academically and socially, is an early indication of a student having a higher risk ofdropping out [4-6]. Finally, Swail et al.’s analysis of minority retention in institutions of higherlearning yields the Geometric Model of Student Persistence and
. His research interests include wireless sensor networks, distributed systems, computer security, and most recently, software quality met- rics. Dr. Omari is involved in computer science curriculum development and computing-related program accreditation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Designing an ABET- Ready Computer Engineering Program in a Medium-Sized Liberal Arts CollegeAbstractWhile most engineering students aspire to graduate from a top engineering university, manychoose to attend small to mid-size liberal arts colleges for various reasons, including financial,location and learning needs. It is essential that these engineering students are given
University (USA) and was 2014-15 Fulbright Scholar in Engineering Education at Dublin Institute of Technology (Ireland).Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and Development
whilestudents completed an engineering design challenge and attempted to apply epistemic frames toassess student ways of being an engineer.Creation of Engineering Epistemic Frame for K-12 Engineering (EEFK12) The engineering epistemic frame for K-12 (EEFK12) was created by synthesizing localframeworks[9], higher education goals, policy directives[33, 34], and relevant literature. Thedevelopment of the frame occurred using a similar process used by Chesler and colleagues [32]in the development of an online professional practice simulator for freshman undergraduates andArastoopour and colleagues’ virtual internship[29] where they used ABET Criterion 3 as afoundation. Local standards from Massachusetts were used because the curriculum for thesummer
curriculum for our Engineering programs. Here is aflowchart of the sequence of courses explaining relations of these courses with other coreEngineering courses (Figure 1): Figure 1: Flowchart of courses with the newly designed Physics and Engineering Math courses (highlighted in yellow) along with their relations with some core Engineering courses. The arrows show the prerequisite structure.In the first semester, a declared Engineering major is advised to register for Introductory Mathfor Engineering Applications I (ENGR 121L) and Physics for Engineers I (ENGR 215) coursesalong with other Freshman Engineering and General Education courses. ENGR 121L is offeredas an eight-week course during the first half
time at Rowan and UMass, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Understanding the gap between communication in the classroom and communication during an industrial internshipAbstractWhile it
teaching strategies for K-12 STEM educators integrating engineering design and the development of engineering skills of K-12 learners. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Becoming in Action: An Autoethnography of My Professional Identity Development During the Rising Engineering Education Faculty Experience (Research)AbstractOn the road to obtaining a graduate degree in engineering education, graduate students havelimited opportunities to develop a comprehensive toolbox required for a future career as anengineering education faculty member. The current professional development trajectory focuseson acquiring technical knowledge through required courses and research
documented various aspects of the program over its first 9 years. The purpose of thispaper is to describe the current state of the integrated teaching and learning strategies that theprogram uses to facilitate engineering design learning with an entrepreneurial mindset in a PBLmodel.Awareness of the IRE program has increased recently with the program being recognized as theABET 2017 Innovation award winner and in the top ten emerging leaders in engineeringeducation in the “Global state of the art in engineering education” report by Dr. Ruth Grahamreleased in 2018 [1].Purpose of researchThe purpose of this paper is to describe how the Iron Range Engineering (IRE) program leadsstudent engineers to ”become the engineer they want to be” by working with
studies investigated curriculum integration where softskills teaching is included in most of the academic program courses.27,28,29 Integrated Teaching FrameworkCurriculum integration was practiced and proven as an effective approach to teachinginterdisciplinary skills.27,28,29 The integration was considered as a common theme in a set ofcourses, or as an application of knowledge from one course to teach another course in anacademic program, or as an industry based projects such as internship or capstone projects. Theapplication of industry teaching approaches used to train employees versus teaching in anacademic setting was also described in the literature.30,31 In this research we propose an integration as a
theimportance of engineering ethics. Educators have begun incorporating engineering ethics incurricula in a variety of formats: as a component in introductory or capstone courses, a centralelement in stand-alone courses, and/or through deliberate integration across curriculum [1], [2].The main approaches in teaching of ethics continue to use case studies or case-based discussionssupplemented by moral theory and/or professional codes of ethics. Service learning is anotherapproach that has increasingly been used and reported as an effective pedagogical strategy ininstruction of engineering ethics [3]-[5]. In the U.S., the main driver in incorporating ethics inengineering curriculum was the changes in ABET engineering criteria requirements on
group. Adding unexpected ethical twists requires further innovation.Background This paper builds on a paper presented at the 2011 Vancouver ASEE conference entitled A FirstCourse to Expose Disparate Students to the BmE Field.1 This present paper expands on animportant didactic element of that course, namely an emphasis on story writing and reflection,but with an added ethics twist. This inclusion arose from the author’s participation in a Consor-tium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE) workshop at the 2016 ASEEConference in New Orleans.2 That participation led to the publication of a short CPREE activityguide on the topic of story writing as a tool for enhancing engineering education.3 Story writingwas also employed as a core
the software design project also plays a role. Students who demonstrated excellentcommunication skills in addition to technical and programming skills are best fit to mentorfreshman. The time requirement is selected such that the mentors are thorough in the content.Since the First-Year Engineering curriculum is revised continuously to improve the quality andrigor, it is critical to have mentors who know the material well. Once the prospective candidatesfor mentoring are determined, an email invitation is sent to all the qualified students prior to thebeginning of the semester. Interested students respond back with their interests and availabilityand are then hired as peer mentors. Usually, the mentors are compensated for the mentoringwork
great asset to the institution, however, the lack of effectiveways of integrating faculty into the college has presented a significant barrier to the establishmentof an inclusive and supportive faculty community. In addition, in a unionized environment,bargaining unit rules may make it difficult to require adjunct faculty to attend professionaldevelopment meetings.In 2015, Inside Higher Ed conducted a Survey of College and University Faculty WorkplaceEngagement in conjunction with researchers from Gallup [2]. The survey results found that onlyabout 34% of faculty are engaged in their workplace, meaning that they felt their opinions werevalued, their work was meaningful and rewarding, and they had good interactions with colleagues.Among the