, G. (2001). A promising prospect for minority retention:Students becoming peer mentors. Journal of Negro Education, 69(4), 375-383.[26] Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate womenin engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, BLAH, 369-375.[27] Sandvall, E., & Calder, D., & Harper, M., & Jackson, Z. B., & Baker, B. J. (2017,August), Peer Mentoring in the First-Year Engineering Experience Paper presented at 2017FYEE Conference, Daytona Beach, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/29428[28] Tahmina, Q. (2018, June), Assessing the Impact of Peer Mentoring on Performance in aFundamentals of Engineering Course Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition
, DC, 2018.[3] Q. Bui, “40 Years Of Income Inequality In America, In Graphs,” Planet Money, National Public Radio, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2014/10/02/349863761/40-years-of-income- inequality-in-america-in-graphs. [Accessed: 12-Aug-2017].[4] M. S. McPherson and M. O. Schapiro, Keeping College Affordable: Government and Educational Opportunity. The Brookings Institution, 1991.[5] S. Kemp-King, “The Graduate Premium: manna, myth or plain mis-selling?”, Intergenerational Publications, London, 2016.[6] ibid p 11 for a list of digital learning formats and definitions. “Fully online programs conduct all courses-including class lectures and discussion sessions
, Eds., ed Oxford, England: Pergamon Press, 1963.[25] B. Trimmer, "A journal of soft robotics: Why now?," Soft Robotics, vol. 1, pp. 1-4, 2013.[26] B. Trimmer, R. H. Ewoldt, M. Kovac, H. Lipson, N. Lu, M. Shahinpoor, et al., "At the crossroads: Interdisciplinary paths to soft robots," Soft Robotics, vol. 1, pp. 63-69, 2014/03/01 2013.[27] G. Bao, H. Fang, L. Chen, Y. Wan, F. Xu, Q. Yang, et al., "Soft robotics: Academic insights and perspectives through bibliometric analysis," Soft Robotics, vol. 5, pp. 229- 241, 2018.[28] A. Jackson, J. Zhang, R. Kramer, and N. Mentzer, "Design-based research and soft robotics to broaden the STEM pipeline (work in progress)," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference &
their STEM majors. Introduction to Engineering Fields: The purpose of this component is to introduce the Scholars to different types of engineering including bioengineering, chemical engineering, industrial engineering, mechanical engineering, civil and materials engineering, electrical and computer engineering, and computer science - as disciplines and as major programs offered at University of Illinois at Chicago. It intends to familiarize the Scholars with career options, path to graduation, research areas (undergraduate and postgraduate), and future outlook. Each of these sessions is typically a 30- to 45-minute presentation followed by a lively Q&A
to examine student interdisciplinary learning in science and engineering in higher education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 761–774, 2017.[20] D. Michelfelder, B. Newberry, and Q. Zhu, “Philosophy and Egineering: An Unconventional Work in Progress,” Philos. Eng., vol. 26, pp. 1–12, 2017.[21] J. J. Duderstadt, “Engineering for a Changing World,” in Holistic Engineering Education: Beyond Technology, D. Grasso and M. B. Burkins, Eds. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2010, pp. 17–35.[22] C. Dym, A. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” J. Eng. Educ., no. January, pp. 103–120, 2005.[23] S. R. Daly, R. S. Adams, and A. M. Bodner, “What does it mean to
for Mathematics Identity,” Child Dev., vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1048–1062, Jul. 2015.[17] C. A. P. Cass, Z. Hazari, J. Cribbs, P. M. Sadler, and G. Sonnert, “Examining the impact of mathematics identity on the choice of engineering careers for male and female students,” in 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011, p. F2H–1–F2H–5.[18] J. E. Stets and P. J. Burke, “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory,” Soc. Psychol. Q., vol. 63, no. 3, p. 224, Sep. 2000.[19] J. E. Stets and R. T. Serpe, “Identity Theory,” Springer, Dordrecht, 2013, pp. 31–60.[20] R. Jenkins, Social identity. Routledge, 2014.[21] E. H. Erikson, “Autobiographic notes on the identity crisis,” Daedalus, 1970.[22] J. P. Gee, “Chapter 3 : Identity
3 3 M. Navigation skills 3 3 N. Hands-on skills 3 2 O. Working under pressure 3 2 P. Living independently 3 2 Q. Problem-solving skills 3 2 R. Organization skills 3 2 Attitudes A. Hard-working 11 5 B. Perception of Chinese people-friendly 8 5 C. Empathy 8 1 D. Perception of Chinese
. K. Brown, “Implementing Collaborative Learning across the Engineering Curriculum,” J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 89– 108, 2017.[26] R. K. Yin, “Case study research design and methods third edition,” Appl. Soc. Res. methods Ser., vol. 5, 2003.[27] M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, “Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills.” Ca: Sage, 1984.[28] R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications, 2017.[29] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and methods: Integrating theory and practice. London: Sage, 2015.[30] M. K. Smith, F. H. M. Jones, S. L. Gilbert, and C. E. Wieman, “The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): a
mark next to the SIX MOST IMPORTANT. a. Abstracting b. Brainstorming c. Building d. Communicating e. Decomposing f. Evaluating g. Generating alternatives h. Goal setting i. Identifying constraints j. Imaging k. Iterating l. Making decisions m. Making trade-offs n. Modeling o. Planning p. Prototyping q. Seeking information r. Sketching Synthesizing s. Testing t. Understanding the problem u. Visualizing v. I prefer not to answer24. What did you struggle with the most on your project?25. What did you enjoy the most about your project (what shouldn’t change)?26. What tools and resources would you have wanted
://48ba3m4eh2bf2sksp43rq8kk-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp- content/uploads/2018/12/UDHR70_AI.pdf [Accessed Jan. 30, 2019][50] H. Sloan, Human Rights and IoT: The Right to Fair and Decent Work. Dec. 13, 2018. Available at: https://medium.com/iotforall/human-rights-and-iot-the-right-to-fair-and-decent-work-23a97bab25d4 [Accessed Jan. 20, 2019][51] R. Rincon, “What’s the gender pay gap in engineering?” All Together - SWE Blog. April 20 2018. https://alltogether.swe.org/2018/04/pay-gap-in-engineering/ [Accessed October 20, 2018].[52] E.A. Cech, “Ideological wage inequalities?: the technical/social dualism and the gender wage gap in engineering,” Social Forces, vol. 91 (4), pp. 1147-1182, June 2013.[53] J.R. Mihelcic, C.C. Naughton, M.E. Verbyla, Q
, vol. 9, C. Harteis, A. Rausch, and J. Seifried, Eds. Springer Science, 2014, pp. 189–210.[22] W. C. Newstetter, E. Behravesh, N. J. Nersessian, and B. B. Fasse, “Design Principles for Problem-Driven Learning Laboratories in Biomedical Engineering Education,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 3257– 3267, 2010.[23] R. Razzouk and V. Shute, “What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 330–348, Aug. 2012.[24] D. D. Pratt, J. B. Collins, and S. J. Selinger, “Development and Use of The Teaching Perspectives Inventory ( TPI ),” pp. 1–9, 2001.[25] D. D. Pratt, “Conceptions of Teaching,” Adult Educ. Q., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 203–220, 1992.[26] G. Hall, S. Loucks, W
] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2002.[39] D. R. Thomas, A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 27, pp. 237-246, 2006.[40] J. C. Richard and S. Y. Yoon, “Impact of undergraduate research experiences on diverse national and international undergraduate researchers”. Proceedings of the 125th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018.
. Cherng, B. Q. Li, N. Natarajan, “Development of a senior mechatronics course for mechanical engineering student,” in Proc. of 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, https://peer.asee.org/19438, pp. 23.424.1 - 23.424.22, June 2013.22. N. Ghariban, A. Ansari, P. Leigh-Mack, “Design and development of a multidisciplinary industry supported course in mechatronics,” in Proc. of the 2018 ASEE Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, pp.1-12.23. M. E. Grimheden, “Can agile methods enhance mechatronics education? Experiences from basing a capstone course on SCRUM,” in Proc. of 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, https://peer.asee.org/21037, pp.25.279.1-25.279.14
integratestudent-centered strategies into their instruction. Together, the TPI, COPUS, and instructor profiles offer a multidimensional method for assessing anddiscussing teaching effectiveness. Based on the shortcomings of teaching evaluations, the benefits ofimplementing evidenced-based practices in teaching, and the opportunity to use such teaching practices asa proxy for evaluating the effectiveness of teaching, we set out to test the feasibility and effectiveness ofthis method of evaluation in a College of Engineering at a large research-intensive Midwestern university. III. PUPROSE & RESEARCH Q UESTIONSA. Purpose The purpose of this project was to evaluate the implementation of new approach to the
high attrition rates among science, mathematics & engineering undergraduate majors: final report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation on an ethnographic inquiry at seven institutions. Ethnography and Assessment Research, Bureau of Sociological Research, University of Colorado, 1994.[4] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving engineering: A multi‐year single institution study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6-27, January 2012.[5] J. Gill, M. Ayre and J. Mills, “Revisioning the Engineering Profession: How to Make It Happen!,” In Gender and Diversity: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, Vol. 1, IGI Global. 2019, pp. 427-442.[6] Q. Li, H. Swaminathan and J. Tang
] H. M. Matusovich, R.A Streveler, and R. L. Miller, “Why Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Student’s Motivational Values,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 289- 303, October 2010. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01064.x. [Accessed January 13, 2019].[7] Q. Li, D. B. McCoach, H. Swaminathan, and J. Tang, “Development of an Instrument to Measure Perspectives on Engineering Education Among College Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 47-56, January 2008. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00953.x. [Accessed January 13, 2019].[8] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein
.” [Online]. Available: https://learningassistantalliance.org/modules/about/about_laa.php.[29] V. Betihavas, H. Bridgman, R. Kornhaber, and M. Cross, “The evidence for ‘flipping out’: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 38, pp. 15–21, 2016.[30] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Understanding Student Differences,” no. January, 2005.[31] R. M. Felder, “Learning Styles and Strategies,” North Carolina State University, 2000. [Online]. Available: http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSdir/styles.pdf.[32] D. Bye, D. Pushkar, and M. Conway, “Motivation, interest, and positive affect in traditional and nontraditional undergraduate students,” Adult Educ. Q., vol
, S. Reeves, and B. Zierler, “Measuring the impact ofinterprofessional education on collaborative practice and patient outcomes,” Journal ofInterprofessional Care, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–3, Jan. 2016.[4] Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel, Core Competencies forInterprofessional Collaborative Practice. Washington, DC, pp. 1–56, 2011.[5] J. Fawcett, “Thoughts About Interprofessional Education,” Nurs Sci Q, vol. 27, no. 2, pp.178–179, Apr. 2014.[6] B. C. K. Choi and A. W. P. Pak, “Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity andtransdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives,and evidence of effectiveness,” Clinical and Investigative Medicine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 351–364,Dec. 2006
agentic perspective,” Asian J. Soc. Psychol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 21–41, 1999.[11] A. Bandura, “Toward a Psychology of Human Agency,” Perspect. Psychol. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 164–180, 2006.[12] G. H. Elder, “Time, Human Agency, and Social Change: Perspectives on the Life Course,” Soc. Psychol. Q., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 4–15, 1994.[13] A. Giddens, The constitution of society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, 1984.[14] A. Bandura, “The evolution of social cognitive theory,” in Great minds in management: The process of theory development, K. G. Smith and M. A. Hitt, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 9–35.[15] J. Martin, “Self-Regulated Learning, Social Cognitive Theory, and
; expand thecontent for more advanced research; and transfer the content into additional platforms anddistribution channels outside of the current NYU Classes.[1] L. Holman, "A comparison of computer-assisted instruction and classroom bibliographicinstruction," Reference & User Services Quarterly, v ol. 40, (1), p p. 53-60, 2000.[2] C. A. Germain, T. E. Jacobson and S. A. Kaczor, "A comparison of the effectiveness ofpresentation formats for instruction: teaching first-year students," College and ResearchLibraries, v ol. 61, (1), pp. 65-72, 2000.[3] Q. Zhang, M. Goodman and S. Xie, "Integrating Library Instruction into the CourseManagement System for a First-Year Engineering Class: An Evidence-Based Study Measuringthe Effectiveness of
might refer to the output of the circuit (O) as next state (Q+) revealing aconflation of the two ideas.We identified the emergent themes across the two datasets in two stages. First, we compared thethemes generated from the prior studies to each other to determine which themes were domain-general and which were domain-specific. Second, we compared each theme’s supportingevidence (constructed from comparisons amongst the three other granularities) to find similartrends in how each theme emerged from the data. Similar trends in each theme’s supportingevidence were grouped and renamed to describe the trend, which resulted in three themes.LimitationsWhile the goal of our work is to identify the patterns and nuances in students’ interactions
improvements with the appropriate support from all levels across the valuestream.References 1. Balzer, W.K. (2010). Lean higher education: Increasing the value and performance of university. CRC Press: New York. 2. Balzer, W.K., Francis, D., Krehbiel, T. & Shea, N. (2016). A review and perspective on Lean in higher education, Quality Assurance in Education, 24(4), 442-462. 3. Mazumder, Q. H. (2014). Applying six sigma in higher education quality improvement. Proceedings from 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN. 4. Francis, D.E. (2014). Lean and the learning organization in higher education. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 157, 1-23. 5
of the home work assignments, whichuses now obsolete Adobe Flash technology. However, at this time, the text book Engineering Me-chanics: Dynamics used in this class by Gray et al. uses the Connect platform only and thus abetter alternative is not available. This OL class uses Piazza [13], an web-based Wiki-style Q&A forum, where students canask questions and both the students and teaching team can contribute to an answer. The systemis designed to be intuitive and easy to use. For this class, which uses a lot of mathematics andequation writing, the support for LateX in the system is hugely beneficial. This is the single mostimportant reason for the author to use Piazza. It has been the author’s experience that Piazza hasmanaged to
. Ethics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 551–583, 2017.[17] J. Hess, L. Kisselburgh, C. Zoltowski, and A. Brightman, “The Development of Ethical Reasoning: A Comparison of Online versus Hybrid Delivery Modes of Ethics Instruction,” 2016.[18] R. S. Harichandran, M.-I. Carnasciali, N. O. Erdil, C. Q. Li, J. Nocito-Gobel, and S. D. Daniels, “Developing entrepreneurial thinking in engineering students by utilizing integrated online modules,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015, vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society.[19] S. Walesh, “Resolving Ethical Issues e-Learning Module.” University of New Haven, West Haven, CT., 2017.[20] Texas Tech University, “Guidelines
that influence faculty motivation of effective teaching practices in engineering,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013, https://peer.asee.org/19604[13] A. Furco, and B. E. Moely. “Using learning communities to build faculty support for pedagogical innovation: A multi-campus study,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 83, no. 1, 128-153, 2012.[14] H. M. Matusovich, M. C. Paretti, L. D. McNair, and C. Hixson. “Faculty motivation: A gateway to transforming engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 2, 302-330, 2014.[15] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Thousand Oaks
in science,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 669-685, 2010.[7] R. H. Tai, C. Q. Liu, A. V. Maltese, and X. Fan, “Planning early for careers in science,” Science, vol. 312, no. 5777, pp. 1143-1144, 2006.[8] L. Archer, J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong, “Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 881-908, 2012.[9] J. Dewitt, L. Archer, and J. Osborne, “Nerdy, brainy and normal: Children’s and parents’ constructions of those who are highly engaged with science,” Res Sci Educ, vol. 43, pp. 1455–1476, 2013.[10] A. Nick Chambers, E. T. Kashefpakdel, J
Same: A Look at Early Career Engineers Employed in Different Sub-Occupations,” in Proceedings for the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, June 23-26, 2013.[7] S. K. Gilmartin, H. L. Chen, M. F. Schar, Q. Jin, G. Toye, A. Harris, E. Cao, E. Costache, M. Reithmann, and S. D. Sheppard, “Designing a Longitudinal Study of Engineering Interests and Plans: The Engineering Majors Survey Project. EMS 1.0 and 2.0 Technical Report,” Designing Education Lab, Stanford University, Technical Report, Jan. 2017.[8] G. D. Kuh, in High-Impact Educational Practices. HIgh-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter, AAC&U
blind students,” in Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on July 18, 2007, pp. 917-918. [5] Gardner, John A. "Tactile graphics: an overview and resource guide," Information Technology and Disabilities, 3-4, Oct. 1996.[6] A. Mayerson, “The History of the Americans with Disabilities Act, A Movement Perspective,” 1992, [Online]. Available: http://dredf.org/news/publications/the-history-of-the-ada/. [Accessed June 8, 2017].[7] D. Leuchovius, “ADA Q & A: Section 504 & Postsecondary Education,” 1994, [Online]. Available: http://www.pacer.org/publications/adaqa/504.asp. [Accessed June 8, 2017].[8] C. Zaira, M. C. Fastame, T. Vecchi, and C. Cornoldi, “Working
into the project. These stakeholders included theMayor, City Engineer, President of prominent HOA, and the president of an environmentalaction group. Each of these fictional stakeholders had pre-described concerns with a power plantdesign as well as opinions about what a good power plant might do. These stakeholders weredesigned to have some points of commonality, but also points of disagreement on theirwants/needs for the power plant. Once the stakeholders were introduced to the project,documentation that described the requirements and criteria of the project were reducedsubstantially. The information they needed would now be determined by “interviewing” thestakeholders in a Q&A online forum. The instructional staff role-played as the