Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyle Alexander Toth, Purdue University Northwest; John Moreland, Purdue University Northwest; Chenn Q. Zhou, Purdue University Northwest; Anusree Balachandran, Center for Innovation through Visualization and Simulation, Purdue University; Fangzhou Zhang, Purdue University Northwest; John Claude Roudebush, Ivy Tech Community College

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

systems, computer science, and applied mathematics.Mr. John Moreland, Purdue University Northwest John Moreland is Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Innovation through Visualization and Sim- ulation at Purdue University Northwest. He has over 50 technical publications in the areas of simulation and visualization for education and design.Prof. Chenn Q. Zhou, CIVS, Purdue University Northwest Dr. Chenn Zhou is the founding Director of the Steel Manufacturing Simulation (SMSVC) and Visualiza- tion Consortium and the Center for Innovation through Visualization and Simulation (CIVS), Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University Northwest, and Professor by Courtesy at Purdue University West

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Summerville, Miami University; Jennifer Blue; Brian P. Kirkmeyer, Miami University; Brielle Nikole Johnson

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Dyczewski and K. D. Markman, “General attainability beliefs moderate the motivational effects of counterfactual thinking,” ​J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.​, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1217–1220, Sep. 2012.[16] M. W. Morris and P. C. Moore, “The Lessons We (Don’t) Learn: Counterfactual Thinking and Organizational Accountability after a Close Call,” ​Adm. Sci. Q.,​ vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 737–765, Dec. 2000.[17] T. Gilovich and V. H. Medvec, “The experience of regret: what, when, and why,” ​Psychol. Rev.,​ vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 379–395, Apr. 1995.[18] N. J. Roese ​et al.​, “Repetitive Regret, Depression, and Anxiety: Findings from a Nationally Representative Survey,” ​J. Soc. Clin. Psychol.,​ vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 671–688, Jun. 2009.[19] A. G

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Indira Chatterjee, University of Nevada, Reno; Tim Robinson, University of Nevada Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Jennifer R. Amos, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Conference &Exposition, Tampa, June 16 – 19, 2019.13. J.T. Downer, L.M. Booren, O.K. Lima, A.E. Luckner and R.C. Pianta, “The individualizedclassroom assessment scoring system (inCLASS): Preliminary reliability and validity of a systemfor observing preschoolers’ competence in classroom interactions”, Early Childhood Research Q,Vol. 25, 2010, pp. 1 -16.14. J.T. DeCuir-Gunby, P.L. Marshall and A.W. McCulloch, “Developing and using a codebookfor the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project”,Field Methods, Vol 23, pp. 136-155, 2011.15. J. M. Saldaña. The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 3rd edition, Sage Publications,Thousand Oaks, CA, 201516. Changing the Conversation, National Academy of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel D. Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Brittany Lynn Butler; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Thoma. “A neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT andschema theory.” ​Educational Psychology Review,​ vol. 11, pp. 291-324, 1999.[13] Q. Zhu, C.B. Zoltowski, M.K. Feister, P.M Buzzanell, W.C. Oakes, & A.D. Mead. “TheDevelopment of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decision-making in Project-baseDesign Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods.” in ​Proceedings of the 2014ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN,​ 2014.[14] J. Borenstein, M.J. Drake, R. Kirkman, & J.L. Swann. “The Engineering and Science IssuesTest (ESIT): A Discipline-Specific Approach to Assessing Moral Judgement.” ​Science &Engineering Ethics,​ vol. 16, pp. 387-407, 2010.[15] L. Kohlberg & R.H. Hersh. “Moral Development: A

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noemi V. Mendoza Diaz, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University; Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

://www.engineeringchallenges.org/National Science Foundation (2018). National Science Foundation’s 10 big ideas. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/big_ideas/Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Richard, J. C., Mendoza Diaz, N. V., Wickliff, T. D., & Yoon, S. Y. (2016). Enculturation of diverse students to the engineering practices through first-year engineering college experiences. Proceedings of the 123rd American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA.Reynolds, P. D. (1971). A primer in theory construction. New York: Macmillan.Shavelson

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Rahouti, University of South Florida

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Applying software-defined networking to minimize the end-to-end delay of network services. ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review 18, 30–40 (2018). 3. Topham, L., Kifayat, K., Younis, Y. A., Shi, Q. & Askwith, B. Cyber security teaching and learning laboratories: A survey. Information & Security 35, 51 (2016). 4. Sharma, S. K. & Sefchek, J. Teaching information systems security courses: A hands-on approach. Computers & Security 26, 290–299 (2007). 5. Willems, C. & Meinel, C. Online assessment for hands-on cyber security training in a virtual lab. In Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2012 IEEE, 1–10 (IEEE, 2012). 6. Xiong, K. & Pan, Y. Understanding protogeni in networking courses for research and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Lauren Summers, University of Washington; Joanna Wright, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tobin N. Walton, North Carolina A&T State University; Stephen B. Knisley PhD, North Carolina A&T State University; Matthew B. A. McCullough, North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

] Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. OnlineReadings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116[16] Ponton, M.K. (2002). Motivating students by building self-efficacy. Journal of ProfessionalIssues in Engineering Education and Practice, 128(2): 54-57. 20[17] Li, Q., McCoach, D.B., Swaminathan, H., & Tang, J. (2008). Development of an instrumentto measure perspectives of engineering education among college students. Journal ofEngineering Education, 97(1): 45-55.[18] Campbell, A. G., Skvirsky, R., Wortis, H., Thomas, S., Kawachi, I., & Hohmann, C. (2014).NEST 2014: Views from the Trainees—Talking About What Matters in Efforts to Diversify

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Nidhal Carla Bouaynaya, Rowan University; Ravi P. Ramachandran, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

tweet. If you manage a brand orpolitical campaign, for example, it may be important to keep track of your popularity, andsentiment analysis provides a convenient way to take the pulse of the tweeting public.Final Project Format I. Introduction to Big Data Analytics in general. Discuss importance, applications (e.g., politics, health, industry, etc.) and perspectives. In a second paragraph, discuss importance of sentiment analysis from Twitter data as a special application of big data. Check out some examples from this search result from PLOS ONE that list various papers that used Twitter for their study: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/search?from=globalSimpleSearch&filterJournals=PLo SONE&q

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Merredith D. Portsmore, Tufts University; Adam V. Maltese, Indiana University; Karen Miel, Tufts University; Kelli Paul, Indiana University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

-2192, 2015.[7] R. H. Tai, C. Q. Liu, A. V. Maltese, and X. Fan, “Planning early for careers in science,” Science, vol 312, no. 5777, pp. 1143-1144, 2006.[8] A. V. Maltese and R. H. Tai, “Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 669-685, 2010.[9] A. V. Maltese, C. S. Melki, and H. L. Wiebke, “The nature of experiences responsible for the generation and maintenance of interest in STEM,” Sci. Educ., vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 937- 962, 2014.[10] C. Murphy and J. Beggs, “Children’s perceptions of school science A study of 8–11 year- old children indicates a progressive decline in their enjoyment of school science,” Sch. Sci. Rev., vol. 84, no. 308

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Students’ Access to Graduate Schools. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, 2005[18] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2002.[19] D. R. Thomas, A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 27, pp. 237-246, 2006.[20] J. C. Richard and S. Y. Yoon, “Impact of undergraduate research experiences on diverse national and international undergraduate researchers”. Proceedings of the 125th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert C. Martin, Texas A&M University; Cynthia Lang, Texas A&M University; Sin-Ning Cindy Liu, Texas A&M University; Carolyn L Sandoval, University of California, San Diego; Mindy Bergman, Texas A&M University; Jeffrey E. Froyd, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

high attrition rates among science, mathematics & engineering undergraduate majors: final report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation on an ethnographic inquiry at seven institutions. Ethnography and Assessment Research, Bureau of Sociological Research, University of Colorado, 1994.[4] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving engineering: A multi‐year single institution study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6-27, January 2012.[5] J. Gill, M. Ayre and J. Mills, “Revisioning the Engineering Profession: How to Make It Happen!,” In Gender and Diversity: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, Vol. 1, IGI Global. 2019, pp. 427-442.[6] Q. Li, H. Swaminathan and J. Tang

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicole Johnson-Glauch, California Polytechnic State University; Geoffrey L. Herman, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

might refer to the output of the circuit (O) as next state (Q+) revealing aconflation of the two ideas.We identified the emergent themes across the two datasets in two stages. First, we compared thethemes generated from the prior studies to each other to determine which themes were domain-general and which were domain-specific. Second, we compared each theme’s supportingevidence (constructed from comparisons amongst the three other granularities) to find similartrends in how each theme emerged from the data. Similar trends in each theme’s supportingevidence were grouped and renamed to describe the trend, which resulted in three themes.LimitationsWhile the goal of our work is to identify the patterns and nuances in students’ interactions

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rohini N. Abhyankar, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University; Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology; Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

that influence faculty motivation of effective teaching practices in engineering,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013, https://peer.asee.org/19604[13] A. Furco, and B. E. Moely. “Using learning communities to build faculty support for pedagogical innovation: A multi-campus study,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 83, no. 1, 128-153, 2012.[14] H. M. Matusovich, M. C. Paretti, L. D. McNair, and C. Hixson. “Faculty motivation: A gateway to transforming engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 2, 302-330, 2014.[15] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Thousand Oaks

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Yanbing Wang, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

autonomy in a changing policy environment,” High. Educ., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 155–176, 2005.[23] S. L. Christenson, T. Rounds, and D. Gorney, “Family factors and student achievement: An avenue to increase students’ success.,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 7, no. 3, p. 178, 1992.[24] K. E. Winters, H. M. Matusovich, and S. R. Brunhaver, “Recent engineering graduates making career choices: Family matters,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 20, no. 4, 2014.[25] A. E. Austin, “Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career,” J. Higher Educ., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 94–122, 2002.[26] M. Roach and H. Sauermann, “A taste for science? {PhD} scientists’ academic orientation and self