viewers. Her primary research interest is science identity, STEM education, and participation in online communities.Mr. Matthew Bahnson, North Carolina State University Matthew Bahnson is a doctoral student at North Carolina State University in Applied Social and Com- munity Psychology. His research interests include engineering identity, diversity, bias, stereotypes, and STEM education. He works with Dr. Cheryl Cass at NCSU.Ms. Marissa A Tsugawa, University of Nevada, Reno Marissa Tsugawa is a graduate research assistant studying at the University of Nevada, Reno in the PRiDE Research Group. She is currently working towards a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. She expects to graduate May of 2019. Her research interests
in academia and research, broaden my knowledge base, engage in evidence-based practices to promote the quality of life, and ultimately be an avid contributor to the world of academia through research, peer reviews, and publications. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Negotiating Identity as a Response to Shame: A Study of Shame within an Experience as a Woman in EngineeringAbstract: This research paper presents the findings of an interpretative phenomenologicalanalysis (IPA) case study of the experience of shame in a woman engineering student. Ouroverarching research question that framed this study was: How do woman students with multiplesalient identities
requirecooperation among experts from many fields. Successful leaders must harness the diversecapabilities of teams composed of these experts and be technically skilled. Undergraduateengineering students can fill this need by learning how to be effective leaders during theirformation as engineers. Unfortunately, many engineering students graduate with littledevelopment of leadership skills; engineering educators do not currently have asufficient understanding of how engineering students develop into leaders.This NSF ECE supported project seeks to improve educators’ understanding of the interactionbetween leadership and engineering identities in the formation of undergraduate engineers. Thiswork postulates that a cohesive engineering leadership identity
Paper ID #27632Implications of Gamification in Learning Environments on Computer Sci-ence Students: A Comprehensive StudyMs. Leila Zahedi, Florida International University Leila Zahedi is a Ph.D. student in the School of Computing and Information Science (SCIS) at Florida International University. She has a Bachelor’s degree in Computer Engineering from the University of Is- fahan and two Master’s degrees in Information Technology Management from the University of Yazd and Computer Science from Florida International University. Her research interests include computer science education, quantitative data analysis, and data
Computing Identity and Persistence Across Multiple Groups Using Structural Equation ModelingAbstractDespite the projected growth of computer and information technology occupations, manycomputing students fail to graduate. Studying students’ self-beliefs is one way to understandpersistence in a school setting. This paper explores how students' disciplinary identity sub-constructs including competence/performance, recognition, interest, and sense of belongingcontribute to academic persistence. A survey of 1,640 students as part of an NSF grant wasconducted at three South Florida metropolitan public universities. A quantitative analysis wasperformed which included a structural equation model (SEM) and a multigroup SEM. The
collected during this study were both qualitative and quantitative, making this a mixedmethods study. The data we collected to extract creativity were mainly qualitative. Though therewere 11 instruments in total that we could use to extract data, and 13 graduate engineering studentsparticipating in the study (in 5 groups: G1 to G5), we had only nine complete sets for all 11instruments. As a result, we used a critical case study approach for our analysis.RQ1: How do engineering students perceive the importance of creativity in their leadershipdevelopment before and after creativity instruction?To answer our first research question, we examined the pre-course questionnaire and comparedthe participants’ ratings and reasons with their post-course self
enrollment and persistence in college STEM fields using an expanded P-E fit framework: A large-scale multilevel study.,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 915–947, 2014.[13] K. E. Winters and H. M. Matusovich, “Career goals and actions of early career engineering graduates,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1226–1238, 2015.[14] J. P. Martin, D. R. Simmons, and S. L. Yu, “Family roles in engineering undergraduates’ academic and career choices: Does parental educational attainment matter?,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 136–149, 2014.[15] R. L. Kajfez, K. M. Kecskemety, E. S. Miller, K. E. Gustafson, and K. L. Meyers, “First- year engineering students’ perceptions of engineering
answer the research question “What culturalfactors influence Muslim women’s occupational pursuit of computer science?”4. Methods This qualitative pilot study utilizes a case study approach through a small sample ofpeople’s experiences. Employing purposive sampling, four graduate Muslim female participantswere solicited from a large public university in Florida. All the participants were Ph.D. studentsmajoring in computer science and have been in the program for at least one year. Three out of fourstudents passed their qualification exams, two of them have also defended their proposals. Thefourth student was in her second year of the Ph.D. program and was taking courses to meet therequirements of the department for taking the qualifying
scorings facilitated by Author 1. Each facultymember brought a different disciplinary perspective to the scoring: one faculty member is basedin Civil and Environmental Engineering, another in Business Information Technology, and thethird in Urban Affairs and Planning. Given the pilot, exploratory nature of this study, thissecondary scoring helped validate the initial scoring categories and illuminate potentialdifferences in both assessment of student learning and understanding of DRRM acrossdisciplinary boundaries. Note, however, that because both the sample size (9 participants) andthe scorers (1 from each discipline) are small, the analysis cannot support conclusions bydiscipline; instead, it highlights potential differences that merit further
Paper ID #24617Understanding Undergraduate Engineering Student Information Access andNeeds: Results from a Scoping ReviewMs. Kate Mercer, University of Waterloo Kate Mercer is the liaison librarian for Systems Design Engineering, Electrical & Computer Engineering and Earth & Environmental Sciences at the University of Waterloo. Kate’s main duties include providing instruction and research services to students, faculty and staff. Kate graduated with a MI from the Univer- sity of Toronto in 2011, and in addition to her job as a liaison librarian is a PhD Candidate at the University of Waterloo’s School of
in Choice of Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,” Psychol. Sci., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 770–775, 2013.[10] B. L. Oo, S. Li, and L. Zhang, “Understanding Female Students ’ Choice of a Construction Management Undergraduate Degree Program : Case Study at an Australian University,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2018.[11] J. W. Elliott, M. K. Thevenin, and C. Lopez del Puerto, “Role of Gender and Industry Experience in Construction Management Student Self-efficacy, Motivation, and Planned Behavior,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2016.[12] R. Su and J. Rounds, “All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain
study ofLatino/a adolescent students in that “students’ funds of knowledge should be the starting point forengineering education” [p. 14]. Second, funds of knowledge can help guide the people whosupport and mentor first-generation college students—from student service staff to professors—toidentify opportunities to help these students excel.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported through funding by the National Science Foundation under EAGERGrant No. (1734044). Interview data of first-year engineering students came from fundingsupported by the National Science Foundation under CAREER Grant No. (1554057). Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect
-origin.With regards to the term “immigrant parentage,” it is used to distinguish between participantsborn to two immigrant parents and those born to one or no immigrant parents; this distinction isrelevant as the findings of past research suggests that the former group (individuals born to twoimmigrant parents) may possess a unique academic advantage (Thomas, 2009).Study LimitationsHere, we address a few limitations to our study. First, we do not take into account time period ofenrollment and its impact on the experiences of Black engineering students with faculty. So, forexample, we do not explore emergent differences in the responses of Blacks who graduated withengineering degrees in the 1970s and those who graduated in the 2000s. Second, given the
Paper ID #25209Student Designers’ Interactions with Users in Capstone Design Projects: AComparison Across TeamsMr. Robert P. Loweth, University of Michigan Robert P. Loweth is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. He earned a B.S. in Engineering Sciences from Yale University (2016), with a double major in East Asian Studies. He also holds a Graduate Certificate in Chinese and American Studies, jointly awarded by Johns Hopkins University and Nanjing University in China. His current research focuses on how undergraduate engineering students approach front-end design
, there were 442,273 international students in China in all, in which48,394 majored in engineering, ranking only below the numbers of students majored inthe traditional popular majors-Mandarin Chinese (169,093) and Western Medicine(49,022). In addition, with China joined the Washington Accord as a signatory countryand lots of engineering programs taught in English was developed for internationalgraduate students further increase of international engineering students can be expected. Existent studies have explored the motivation, social-cultural adjustment,learning experiences of international students in China. Nevertheless, few studies haveexplored their learning outcomes. Considering the shift towards outcome-basededucation in global
education. In addition, she has completed several graduate-level courses in the Department of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. Dr. Morrison’s public policy master’s thesis was a research study on diversity policy in the Center for Aviation Studies and whether or not that policy impacted students’ considerations for leaving the academic program. Her expertise is in curriculum de- velopment, especially as it pertains to women and underrepresented minorities in education. Dr. Morrison takes an interdisciplinary approach to research, using both qualitative and quantitative methods that were informed by her background in education and public policy. c American Society for Engineering Education
incorporating intersectionality into quantitative methodological approaches,” Review of Research in Education, vol. 42, no.1, pp. 72–92, 2018.[23] L. A. Clark and D. Watson, “Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development,” Psychological Assessment, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 309–319, 1995.[24] A. L. Griffith, “Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters?” Economics of Education Review, vol. 29, no. 6, 2010. pp. 911–922, 2010.[25] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, “An analysis of motivation constructs with first-year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans,” Journal of Engineering
engineering-based integrated STEM. Compulsorycoursework driven by a teacher’s need to address specific academic standards in science andassociated with grades for students is likely to create a different environment for studentinteractions than elective, non-graded, informal experiences. In addition, existing studies oftenuse quantitative analyses to investigate associations between motivation, context, andengagement [28]. With small group work ubiquitous with STEM, the affordances and limitationsof small group activities must be considered.This study addresses the gap in the literature to explore the following research questions: 1) What differences, if any, are seen in the engineering practices middle school girls and boys display during
. R. Thorndyke, “Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation: A Longitudinal and Cross-Institutional Study,” J. Eng. Educ., no. October, pp. 313–320, 2004.[8] C. P. Veenstra, E. L. Dey, and G. D. Herrin, “Is Modeling of Freshman Engineering Success Different from Modeling of Non-Engineering Success?,” J. Eng. Educ., no. October, pp. 467–479, 2008.[9] T. Nomi, “Faces of the Future: A Portrait of First-Generation Community College Students,” 2005.[10] J. Ma and S. Baum, “Trends in community colleges: enrollment, prices, student debt, and completion,” Coll. Board Res., pp. 1–23, 2016.[11] K. E. Gerdes, C. A. Lietz, and E. A. Segal, “Measuring empathy in the 21st century: Development
byextensive field testing, materials design, and a research program, of which this study is a part.The curriculum units foster opportunities for middle-school children in OST settings to becomeengineers and solve problems that are identified as “personally meaningful and globallyrelevant” [20]. Each unit has been developed to include fourteen Curricular Design Principles forInclusivity [21], identified through previous research studies to support student learning, in fouroverarching categories: Set learning in a real-world context, present design challenges that areauthentic to engineering practice, scaffold student work, and demonstrate that everyone canengineer. The Curricular Design Principles are detailed under Findings in Table 3. There
Innovative Intervention to Infuse Diversity and Inclusion in a Statics CourseAbstractEngineering educators strive to prepare their students for success in the engineering workforce.Increasingly, many career paths will require engineering graduates to work in multidisciplinaryteams with individuals possessing a diversity of skill sets, backgrounds, and identities. Therefore,it is important not only for future engineers to have the opportunity to work in teams as students,but also to have specific instruction that teaches them about teamwork skills and the valuediversity and inclusion bring to engineering practice. Furthermore, it is important that thisinstruction occurs throughout their engineering coursework, giving
the language is only a meansto social gains with very little interest in the culture or the community of people who speak thelanguage. On the contrary, the integrative orientation implies a personal involvement or desireto connect with the community that speaks the language, get access to its culture or evenbecome a member of the group. The former distinction is not supposed to be taken as amutually exclusive dichotomy since there is an element of instrumentality in the integrativeorientation [21] [22]. The remaining sections of this paper will present a study on language attitudes amongundergraduate students enrolled in an engineering public university. Before moving on to thenext section, a brief synthesis of the discussion up to this
. Doverspike, and R. P. Mawasha, “Predicting Success in a Minority Engineering Program,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 265–267, Jul. 1999.[42] T. E. Murphy, M. Gaughan, R. Hume, and S. G. Moore, “College Graduation Rates for Minority Students in a Selective Technical University: Will Participation in a Summer Bridge Program Contribute to Success?,” Educ. Eval. Policy Anal., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 70–83, Mar. 2010.[43] M. W. Ohland and G. Zhang, “A Study of the Impact of Minority Engineering Programs at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 435–440, Oct. 2002.[44] “Solórzano and Yosso - Critical Race Methodology Counter-Storytelling as.pdf.” .
how team dynamics affect undergraduate women’s confidence levels in engineering.Dr. Malinda S. Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder Malinda Zarske is a faculty member with the Engineering Plus program at the University of Colorado Boulder. She teaches undergraduate product design and core courses through Engineering Plus as well as STEM education courses for pre-service teachers through the CU Teach Engineering program. Her primary research interests include the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity - es- pecially women and nontraditional demographic groups in engineering - as well as pathways and retention to and through K-12 and undergraduate engineering, teacher education, and
from a UK professor ii) ENGAGE: Everyday Examples in Engineering - NSF funded resourceMotivation is necessary but not sufficient for engagement [3]. Engagement, or a student’sactive involvement in a task or activity, is important because (among other things) it is linked toretention and graduation rates [4]. Luckily for us, of the 11 engagement indicators used by theNSSE study [4], many of them can be addressed but supporting the 3 antecedents of motivationabove. Others, including effective teaching practices (e.g. clearly explaining learning objectives,using examples to explain difficult points) are addressed in other guides in this series.Cited References[1] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and Extrinsic
joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Ed- ucation and Outreach. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Exploring ‘Ways of Thinking’ of Interdisciplinary CollaboratorsAbstractCalls have been made for novel ways of thinking about engineering education research. Buildingon an earlier qualitative inquiry, this work in progress study examined the number and nature offactors underlying the constructs of futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking within thecontext of interdisciplinary engineering education research. Exploratory factor analysis of surveydata (n =111) supported a correlated
Group since 2010, working on a longitudinal study of over 200 graduate students in the life sciences.Her major research project, the National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded ”FIRSTS (Foundation for Increasing and Retaining STEM Students) Program: A Bridge Program to Study the Development of Science Identities,” examines mentoring relationships, identity development, and the role of outside-of-college commitments in persistence among students coming to STEM majors with limited financial support.Dr. Christopher Wagner, The College of New Jersey Dr. Wagner is currently Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering (BME) at The College of New Jersey (TCNJ), where he has taught students at all levels of the curriculum
® students are learning in this three-year program entail skills that engineering studentsare exposed to in college; however, the Femineer® students are able to learn the curriculum throughhands-on experience and become confident in these skills before entering college. A pilot quantitative study was completed with the Creative Robotics curriculum with eightschools, 173 participants, in the 2016-2017 academic year. Some of the findings from this studyshowed that 92% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that they “enjoyed participating in theFemineer® Program” and 81% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that they “learned to solveengineering problems in the Femineer® Program.” With the Creative Robotics curriculum, 78% ofrespondents
threads are cross-departmental pathways of classes and projects inareas that address the “new machines and systems” of the future and that are likely to play a major partin impacting the world when the students graduate. By participating in the pilot, students will earn an SBdegree from the department they are majoring in and a NEET Certificate naming the thread, within theusual four-year duration. NEET has launched two additional pilot threads in Fall 2018: AdvancedMaterials Machines (covering materials science and engineering and mechanical engineering) and CleanEnergy Systems (covering nuclear science and engineering, civil and environmental engineering andmechanical engineering).The NEET approach and curriculum developed over more than nine
, Salt LakeCity, Utah. Jun. 2018.[3] Yoritomo, J. Y., Turnipseed, N., Cooper, S. L., Elliott, C. M., Gallagher, J. R., Popovics, J.S., Prior, P., and Zilles, J. L. “Examining engineering writing instruction at a large researchuniversity through the lens of writing studies,” in Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE AnnualConference, Salt Lake City, Utah. Jun. 2018.[4] Hanson, A. J., Lindahl, P., Strasser, S. D., Takemura, A. F., Englund, D. R., and Goldstein, J.“Technical communication instruction for graduate students: The Communication Lab vs. acourse,” in Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, Ohio. Jun. 2017.[5] R. Day Babcock and T. Thonus, “A sample research question: What is a successful tutorial?”in Researching the Writing