338In 2000, 8 students (including 6 who filled out the ILS # 1 questionnaires) were disciplined forplagiarizing their project reports. Since their course grades were affected for reasons not relevantto the study, their data was removed from the study, as shown in Table 1. Two students in 2001and one in 2002 dropped the course before the official deadline, but after filling out the ILS # 1,and their data was also pulled from the study. Each year approximately 30% of the coursegraduates left for an Industrial Internship year, and thus the pool of respondents for the secondround of the ILS was always smaller, as seen in Table 1. In 2001-2002, this turnover has notsignificantly affected the overlap between the students who wrote the ILS # 1 and the
havesome familiarity with the classification systems. Occasionally, faculty, students, and staffseek assistance related to specific known patents. For example, a history professor mayseek Thomas Edison’s first patent to display to a class or use in a publication.Undergraduates tend to be light users of patent and trademark information. Occasionally,upper-level students might encounter references to patents in database searches andrequest these patents to use for a paper or for a senior design project. These students alsotend to have a reasonable level of computer proficiency, and their requests can usually beaddressed easily by all reference staff.The most challenging stakeholders to serve are the general public. Independent inventorshave complex
Session 2258 A Portable Mobile Robot Simulator for a World Wide Web Robotics Practicum Steven J. Perretta, John C. Gallagher Department of Computer Science and Engineering Wright State University {sperrett, jgallagh}@cs.wright.eduAbstractIn recent years, courses in the design and programming of mobile autonomous robotics havebeen introduced at a number of institutions. These activities provide experience in a number ofpractical areas, including computer programming, project management, and
opposed tousing technical publications as a primary measure of faculty excellence. This paper begins with abrief overview of ranking services, those who use those rankings and the benefits they derive,followed by a short literature review discourse of similar research projects. Ranking colleges and universities is a profitable business as indicated by the number ofnews magazines and publications that have jumped on the rankings bandwagon over the passseveral years.2-4 Some publications' interest in ranking colleges and universities has been openlysuspected as being financially motivated. Most educators would agree that ranking academicunits is a flawed complex process5-10 that will never be quantifiable to the point where thenumerical
, RutgersUniversity, Stevens Institute of Technology, and Princeton University.Students selected for the program spent the first summer after their senior year of collegeworking at the Labs under the guidance of a technical mentor who was a member of theR&D staff. Top researchers were selected as mentors. They worked closely withstudents, guiding the student's work in a research project and monitoring their progress.2 National Research Council, Minority Science Paths:National Science Foundation Minority GraduateFellows of 1979-81(Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press, 1995) p.1.3 National Research Council, Ford Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship Recipients (Office of Scientific andEngineering Personnel, Fellowship Programs Unit, October 1996), p.2
support from NSF Project Number DGE-0086420. Many thanks tothe administration, faculty, and students at Westlake High School. The cost of computer timewas underwritten by the Systems Realization Laboratory at the Georgia Institute of Technology.REFERENCES1. Borning, A., 1977, “ThingLab – An Object-Oriented System for Building Simulations Using Constraints,” IJCAI, Vol. 1, pp. 497-498.2. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., and Glaser, R., 1981, “Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices,” Cognitive Science, Vol. 5, pp. 121-152.3. diSessa, A. A., 1988, “Knowledge in Pieces,” Constructivism in the Computer Age, (Forman, G., and Pufall, P. B., eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 49-70.4
? Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), 1998.4. Silverthorn, Dee U. (1998), “Physiology Education Today: What Comes Next?” Advances in Physiology Education, December, 20(1): S1-3.5. Krajcik, J., C. Czerniak, and C. Berger (1999), Teaching Children Science: a Project-based Approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill College.6. “The design of learning environments,” in How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, Eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.7. Giorgio, T.D. and S.P. Brophy, “Challenge-based learning in biomedical engineering: A legacy cycle for biotechnology,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Washington, DC: American
on their offering time and peer-recommendations, not necessarily based on tie-ins with their civil engineering course.But how to educate contrarian leaders and thinkers, and how to incorporate the right amount of“gray” into a jam-packed curriculum? Engineering students are taking, on average, fewerengineering courses at a time when by almost universal estimation the complexity of the modernengineering project continues to mount (Allenby 2000/2001; Bordogna 1998; Clough 2000;TCFPD 2001). To confront the challenges of the 21st century, engineers need to polish their non-technical repertoire, and this includes developing closer ties with the liberal arts. As programsreform their curricula in response to ABET’s new outcome-oriented criteria, and
second quarter of the senior lab course(ChE 415) builds on the work done in UO Lab 1. The focus is on working independently,developing a project proposal, completing experimental work and writing a final technicalmemorandum that includes recommendations for future work.During 2001, in serving as a technical consultant for the microelectronics related labs in ChE415, and discussing the statistical analysis of the students throughout the year with the labinstructor, it was determined that the use of statistical methods needed to be enhanced. Reviewof the written reports confirmed this belief. Thus, two “refresher” lectures of ChE 302 wereincluded in ChE 414 during W 2002. One of the three experiments asked students to compare ifdifferent levels of
project the technological initiatives that can be found behind its principles. In effect, a goodgrasp of the concepts of science inherent to a particular engineering discipline provides a reliableand firm scaffold to engineering students for the practice of their profession. Quite often,however, the teaching of undergraduate physics in engineering programs emphasizes manipulationof formulas and numerical computation instead of deep understanding of inherent concepts. This“cookbook” approach seriously affects the strength of the scientific foundation that physicscourses need to provide to engineering students. The use of computer software in the classroomhelps to minimize this problem substantially. In effect, much of the tedious manipulative
receiving an engineering education to firstgeneration, minority students. For example, the Civil Engineering department hosts a two-weeksummer program for approximately 60 minority high school students (only) where students getthe opportunity to visit all of the engineering labs, perform various experiments, complete adesign project (such as a bridge), and spend time with the engineering faculty (other than thedepartment of Civil Engineering). This two-week program culminates with an award ceremonyattended by both parents and faculty. Data collected from this event shows that between 30-40%of those students end up matriculating at Manhattan College and entering the SOE. Because Manhattan College is located in the Bronx, most of its minority