• New typical wall sections • New building cross section. • Building code analysisLater on this paper we will see some examples of student reflection as they talk about how theassignments may have helped them be effective in their deliverables, or in some cases where they would like to see improvements in this course to better assist them in future assignments.Community partners can play a vital role in high impact practice courses that utilize servicelearning, and during the pre-course development I conducted several meetings to clarify, wants& needs of the partner. These meetings also help to set the groundwork for expectations
thoughts about the newteaching dynamics and all of them only cover the experience of teaching one course. The present exploratory paper proposes to add to the previous team-teaching literature inconstruction higher education by providing reflections and lessons learned from two faculty fromthe School of Construction Management Technology at Purdue University, who have teamtaught together two courses and two modules in another two courses focusing on design andconstruction integration topics during Fall of 2019. Previous studies focused on team teaching ofone module or one course, so the authors will provide a unique point of view by sharingexperiences of teaching team across multiple courses during one semester. The paper uses a
technologies improve theengagement and learning of engineering students?” As an educational technology, a cloud-basedstudent response system (SRS), Poll Everywhere, was the focus of the current study.Multiple definitions of learning have been proposed in literature. Bingham and Conner3 defined“learning as the transformative process of taking in information that – when internalized andmixed with what we have experience – changes what we know and builds on what we do. It’sbased on input, process, and reflection.” Brown et al.4 defined learning as “acquiring knowledgeand skills and having them readily available from memory so you can make sense of futureproblems and opportunities.” Adopting these definitions and for the purpose and scope of thisstudy
observations of the instructor in class and the reflection reportswritten by the students that the Arch E students were working in teams more effectively than thestudents in the other programs. As reported in their reflection reports, the Arch E already knewhow to work well together and resolve conflicts, as they have been doing this since Day 1 withtheir studio course and the Arch E Design Days event they all undertake in the first week of class(Mui et al., 2019). Teamwork being one of the twelve outcomes that need to be addressed foraccreditation of an engineering program according to the Canadian engineering accreditationboard (CEAB, 2018), it is important to identify that this outcome is being addressed in theprogram. As the first years of all
learning, and collaborative learning [3]. The skills gained by incorporatingthese approaches are critical for students looking to pursue a career in the construction industry.Felder et al. reinforced the notion that active learning is more effective than lecturing as studentscan gain a deeper understanding of the material [4]. They also stressed the importance of practiceand reflection in the learning process. Freeman et al. compared studies focused on undergraduatestudents in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) that used active learningtechniques and those that used traditional approaches [5]. Average examination scores increasedby 6% in the active learning sections, thus highlighting the importance of active learning inSTEM
primary difference was beams were previously unreinforced.Additionally, students previously constructed their own forms as opposed to using the lab-provided molds. The shift to this new exercise was made in order to put more focus on theinteraction between concrete and steel reinforcement. In addition, the lab report component wasadded to prompt students to reflect and understand what went on during fabrication and testing.Process – beam fabrication, testing, and report The entire “lab” consisted of three parts, utilizing two class days. Students had two“Beam Days”; one was fabrication and the other was testing. The final part was a report, thatwas generated by each student group. Students were divided into groups of three. Prior to
perceptions may reflect the same. Otherfactors may include feedback from peers.A survey instrument was developed to determine how students and industry members perceivetheir major courses and if their attitude correlates with their self-reported grades. A positivecorrelation would indicate that attitude is a factor in learning. Further by measuring industryperceptions, additional insight will be provided into whether these courses are used aftergraduation. There were no questions as to how the perceptions were formed, although this couldbe the focus of a future study.MethodologyThe study utilized a survey method to identify the importance of structural design coursework andcompared with humanities, writing, calculus, English literature coursework
Means Online, MS Project, Synchro, Bluebeam, and Recap.The hands-on portion of the course is currently divided into four modules: (1) model-based costestimating, (2) scheduling and 4D simulation, (3) design coordination, and (4) as-built modeling.Each module takes four classes to complete, which include: an introductory lecture on that topic,two hands-on lab classes, and a reflection class where two (out of eight) student teams presenttheir work for that specific module. The longest hands-on module of the course is designcoordination as it includes an industry-led, mock-design coordination session as well asdiscussions on BIM Project Execution Planning. In addition to the hands-on portion of thecourse, the students are also exposed to industry
matriculate, but had completed the requirements, as they now were forced tomatriculate to continue their studies. Since Fall 2017, the percentage of pre-construction majorshas been steady in the 60-65% range of the total construction student population. Thispercentage is still much higher than what was anticipated based upon academic requirements.BackgroundThe two needs identified in the self-study (retention and academic support) lead to the theoreticalunderpinning of this proposed study, Tinto’s theory of student engagement and retention [1975,1993]. The theory identifies the pre-academic individual’s identity, educational and socialexperiences, and family influence as both “predictors of and reflections… in that collegiateenvironment” (Tinto, 1975
reflect and are associated by theinfluence of the VR training on the students’ professional growth. The future stage of thisstudy will conduct social media activities that will further engage and nurture these students’presentation skills.CONCLUSIONTo become competent engineers and construction managers, STEM students must invest indeveloping their professional skills, such as communication and presentation skills. Based onthe benchmark survey, it is found that female, first generation and undergraduate students areless likely to possess proficient communication skills and thus require targeted trainingactivities to embrace underrepresented student’s growth. Additionally, through peer-evaluations, results indicate that the main weaknesses that CM
. Students write about their experience during the last ten (10) minutes of class. Students wrote they felt “refreshed” after the meditation experience and were going to try to add reflective time to focus on stress management into their schedules. Many students were very concerned about their Life Stressors Index and wrote about coping mechanisms they plan to employ in order to improve their own lives. They also wrote about how they will look for signs of distress in their construction crews and work to improve work-life balance for themselves and their subordinates.Week 4 – Leadership, Personality, and Learning Styles The module begins by juxtaposing the definitions of leadership and management. For this first class in the
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology under GrantNo.1001814551. Any opinions, findings or conclusions expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Transportation.The authors are greatly thankful to the students who participated in this study.References[1] Federal Highway Administration. (2009). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (Issue May).[2] National Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse. (2017). 2017 National Work Zone Fatal Crashes and Fatalities. Retrieved from https://www.workzonesafety.org/crash- information/work-zone-fatal-crashes-fatalities/#national[3] Brame, C., (2007). Active learning
overhangs to prevent the direct sunlight, shade the windows, andsupport diffusing the daylight inside the space. Another supporting action ca be using a designedceiling geometry configuration that can help to diffuse daylight instead of the conventional flatceilings.The mixed overhang/light shelf became as one horizontal surface, as shown in Fig.11. Oneachievable method to tackle this issue is to take advantage of a white reflective coating on thetop layer of the light shelf finish material. By implementing this strategy, 50% of the floor areaachieved adequate daylighting, which means an additional 30% of the spaces have sufficientdaylighting. In addition, high efficiency LED lights, are added for the rest of the spaces to evenlydistribute light
hands-on immersion experience at FERL (describedpreviously) and co-enrollment in numerous course offerings. This knowledge helps createsbalanced teams which is critical to ensuring healthy competition in the fourth phase. During the competition, teams assume the identity of a design-build firm, dividing upindividual roles by sub-discipline as outlined previously. Team leaders are charged withproviding overall guidance and ensuring the final products reflect a fully coordinated design andconstruction plan between sub-disciplines. Teams compete to “win” the job by having the mosttechnically sound approach and best integrated design. Examining Table 1 highlights a few important similarities between The Crucible and theASC design-build
, configuring and designing structural elements and systems for abuilding from beginning to end of the design. Figures 4 - 8 provide one example of the design,review, and resubmittal process that occurred between the faculty and student team duringARCE 226. The submittals reflect the conceptual development of a building design and itsstructural solution refined over advancing stages of a project. Figure 4: Submittal 1a – 3D drawing of original building formFigure 5: Submittal 1a – Representative Framing plans for 3D structure shown aboveFigure 6: Submittal 3a – Refined Framing plans Figure 7: Final Submittal – 3D Framing Figure 8: Final Submittal – Representative Framing PlansThe noted advantages of using Bluebeam for the