Asee peer logo
Displaying all 14 results
Conference Session
Engineering Management Division 4: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Yi-hsiang Isaac Chang, Illinois State University; Dave Yearwood, University of North Dakota
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
-dirty prototypes to gain quick feedback. Functionalprototypes are built for benchmarking purposes while at the same time verifying whether theproposed solutions actually resolve the issue(s). Through the design-build-test process, it isexpected that students would develop the knowledge and experience of the “subject matterexperts”, and thus various activities at the project planning stage will become more meaningful.Using the test result(s) of functional prototypes, the team(s) will revise their solution(s) anddevelop a project plan to scale up their proposed solution(s), either with a product productionline or a service model. The paper will conclude by discussing the outcome of this approach,identify possible limitations, and provide
Conference Session
Engineering Management Division 3: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Michael Sollitto, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi; Mehrube Mehrubeoglu, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
, J. M. Caputo, E. A. Ford, R. Fu, S. A. Leibowitz, T. Liu,…C. Wu, “Investigating workplace communication behaviors,” Journal of Business Communication, vol. 50, pp. 152-169, 2013[5] J. R. Meredith, S. M. Shafer, and S. J. Mantel, Project Management: A Strategic Managerial Approach, 10th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2018.CONFLICT NEGOTIATION TRAINING[6] ABET. (2020, Jan ). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. [online] Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/[7] A. L. Mello, and L. A. Delise, “Cognitive diversity to team outcomes: The roles of cohesion and conflict management,” Small Group Research, vol. 46, pp. 204-226, 2015.[8] J
Conference Session
Engineering Management Division 1: The Practice of EMD
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Christina McCoy P.E., Oklahoma State University; Carisa H. Ramming, Oklahoma State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
"[11] J. S. Russell, "Mentoring in Engineering" [8] The SE3 report goes beyond the topics of diversity and inclusion to address key issuesrelating to job satisfaction for all structural engineers. Indeed, work done to understand whywomen and minorities leave the profession will help bolster a declining talent pool, but it mayalso help to understand job satisfaction across the board. Results could be expected to be similaramong other engineering disciplines, but this has yet to be explored. This is one area of studythat could be expanded. Other areas that merit focused is best practices for addressing work-lifebalance, managerial communication strategies, and tactics used to prompt an employee’semotional investment into a company
Conference Session
Engineering Management Division 1: The Practice of EMD
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Lawrence M. Strenger, CATME; Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
.[6] C. K. De Dreu, “When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams,” J. Manage., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 83–107, 2006.[7] A. C. Amason, “Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams,” Management, 1996.[8] T. A. O’Neill, N. J. Allen, and S. E. Hastings, “Examining the ‘Pros’ and ‘Cons’ of Team Conflict: A Team-Level Meta-Analysis of Task, Relationship, and Process Conflict,” Hum. Perform., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 236–260, 2013.[9] K. A. Jehn and E. A. Mannix, “The Dynamic Nature of Conflict : A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Bradley James Schmid, University of Saskatchewan
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
, and S. Vanderby, “ENGINEERING ECONOMICS TASK FORCE - FINAL REPORT,” 2015.[4] V. Clinton and S. Khan, “Efficacy of Open Textbook Adoption on Learning Performance and Course Withdrawal Rates: A Meta-Analysis,” AERA Open, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–20, 2019.
Conference Session
EMD 2: Issues in Engineering Management Education
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Elizabeth Hart, University of Dayton; Andrea Mott, University of Dayton; Sandra L. Furterer, University of Dayton
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
assess whether the mentoringprogram increased the mentee’s confidence in STEM and a sense of belonging.References[1] Kloos, E. and Furterer, S., “Designing an Undergraduate Engineering Mentoring Program to Enhance Gender Diversity through Application of Lean Six Sigma Methods and Tools.” Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 2019, June. https://peer.asee.org/32615[2] No Author, "Female Peer Mentors Help Retain College Women in Engineering." Education Digest, vol. 86, no. 4, Dec. 2017, p. 30. EBSCOhost,libproxy.udayton.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/ login.aspx?direct= true&db=f5h& AN=125896865&site=eds-live. Accessed January 30, 2019.[3] No Author, "Women in
Conference Session
Engineering Management Division 4: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jena Shafai Asgarpoor, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
that were asked onthe trip. The expectation was for them to relate their answers to concepts learned in class whichwere reinforced on the trip. The instructor(s) teaching the course with the subject most alignedwith the trip had the responsibility of grading that assignment. To make this a manageableresponsibility for the instructor, a rubric was used in grading the field-trip reports (Appendix 1).Six Sigma DMAIC LabsThe curriculum included a course in Quality Management, which covered Six Sigmamethodology and tools, lean thinking practices and tools, process mapping, and applications forbusiness process improvement. Six Sigma is a method to reduce variation in business processes.DMAIC is a problem-solving technique integral to lean Six Sigma
Conference Session
Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Brian Aufderheide, Hampton University; Otsebele E. Nare, Hampton University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
with the students the more standard sensitivityanalysis: change in price of goods, change in price of key raw material(s), change in price ofutilities, change in price of labor. These are the ones sometimes discussed in design textbooks.Ask students if that is all there is to a Financial Operational Model? See what the students answerhere. Get them to understand the sheer power of having the engineering design melded to theeconomics. What does that truly mean? Start to get them to see other types of sensitivities that arenot simply linear changes in slope but can have actual minimum or maximum optimal values.Examples include key design specifications to the product, parameter uncertainty in the modelsfor a piece of equipment such as extent of
Conference Session
Engineering Management Division 1: The Practice of EMD
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Mustafa Shraim, Ohio University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
. External failure costs are themost significant since they are found by the customer and would likely impact their level ofsatisfaction. Their true impact in the long run is unknown or unknowable [1]. Overall, Juranestimated that unplanned quality-related costs could be as high as 20% of sales [4]Since their inception as a quality management concept in the 1950’s, research on quality costsensued with models developed for optimization. The PAF, which refers to prevention (P),appraisal (A), and failure (F) is the first of such models. The PAF model shows the total qualitycost function as the sum of costs of conformance (P and A) and costs of nonconformance (F) [5].The three functions (cost of conformance, cost of nonconformance and total quality
Conference Session
Engineering Management Division 3: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Marnie V. Jamieson, University of Alberta; Lianne M. Lefsrud P.Eng., University of Alberta; Fereshteh Sattari; John Donald, University of Guelph
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
Cross Cutting Aspects Learn from Understand Hazards Manage Risk Commit to ProcessFoundation (Part 1) Experience (Part 2) & Risks (Part 3) (Part 4) Safety (Part 5)RBPS Key Context: Workforce Incident Investigations, Hazard Identification Training, Safe Work, Process SafetyElement(s) Involvement, Process Auditing, Continuous and Risk Analysis Management of Competency and Safety Information, Improvement Change, Emergency Process Safety Culture Conduct of Operations Management &
Conference Session
Engineering Management Division 4: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Steven Hoak, United States Military Academy; John P. Richards, United States Military Academy
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
Conference Session
Engineering Management Division 4: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sandra L. Furterer, University of Dayton
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
Conference Session
EMD 2: Issues in Engineering Management Education
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Nicholas Jon Monacelli; Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
Publications, 1998.9. M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd, and T. S. Hall, “Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments,” Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), pp. 185-207, 2010.10. Terry Wrigley, "‘School effectiveness’: the problem of reductionism," British educational research journal, Vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 227-244, 2004.11. Daniel Katz and Robert L. Kahn, "Common characteristics of open systems," Systems thinking Vol. 2, pp. 86-104, 1969.12. Michael L. Tushman and Wendy Smith, "Organizational technology," Companion to organizations, Vol. 386, pp. 414, 2002.13. Ludwig Von Bertalanffy, General system theory: Foundations, development, applications, Georges Braziller
Conference Session
EMD 2: Issues in Engineering Management Education
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Tatiana A. Cardona, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Elizabeth A. Cudney, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Jennifer Snyder, Valencia College; Roger Wesley Hoerl, Union College
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
, Technical Report 110(1-12), pp. 24, 2004.[17] K. Millard and M. Richardson, “On the importance of training data sample selection in random forest image classification: A case study in peatland ecosystem mapping,” in Remote Sensing, vol. 7(7), pp. 8489-8515, 2015.[18] L. Breiman, “Random forests,” in Machine learning, vol. 45(1), pp. 5-32, 2001.[19] S. Chakrabarti, E. Cox, E. Frank, R. H. Güting, J. Han, X. Jiang, ... and D. PyleD. (2008). Data mining: know it all. Morgan Kaufmann.