: • System dynamicsRequirements & • Develop Business • SIPOC (behavior, systemArchitecture requirements • Value Chain & Functional Decomposition elements) • Develop system requirements • Use Case Diagram • Cybernetics • Develop measurement plan Requirements: (information flow) • Develop a quality • Customer requirements • Systems thinking
even in the worse winter weather, and enjoys camping. Dave also served in the US Air Force. Dr. Yearwood continues to research and collaborate with colleagues. He can be reached at Yearwood@und.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 An Innovative Project-based Learning Approach to Teach Project ManagementAbstract Project-based learning often asks students to create a project plan for a real or imaginaryclient that is built upon what is learned in one or more courses. However, while the project-basedlearning pedagogical approach appears to be a useful candidate for providing students withhands-on experiences, how can we as educators create meaningful project planning
outcomesaddressed include the following: 3. an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 5. an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives This paper will look at key issues of the report as they are presented by NCSEA and fromthe perspective of engineering educators. The conclusion of this paper proposes a “short course”or workshop outline in order to facilitate implementation in a curriculum at a small scale. It willcover SE3 topics relating to management and organizational leadership and consider theirapplicability to students in both engineering management and
at the same pace as the collection [5]. There needs to be a method allowing fordata utilization and timely implementation to improve student retention. For instance, thecreation of predictive models that allow for the recognition of students at risk for attrition willenable timely interventions. By identifying the factors through a prediction model, universitiesand college can provide intentional student advising and planning. Further, higher educationinstitutions can develop retention strategies that focus on identified student needs that meet theirspecific campus needs [6].According to the literature, machine learning techniques have been applied to predict studentsuccess with high confidence [7]. [8] conducted several studies to compare
Chair on the Board for the Nebraska Section of the American Society for Quality (ASQ). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 An Integrated Platform of Active Learning Techniques in a Supply Chain Management ProgramAbstractActive and experiential learning have gained much popularity in recent years, but their originsdate back to long before the advent of formal schooling and books. From the beginning of time,humans have learned by doing, trying, and failing, until they found a solution. Wurdinger andAllison say this type of learning is a cognitive process, which must include planning, testing, andreflecting all in the same learning experience [1]. A number of such
, there islittle research regarding effective ways of introducing blockchain concepts into higher educationcourses. This paper will show the effectiveness of using a paper-based supply chain simulationas a pedagogical tool for introducing blockchain, distributed ledger technology, and creatingopportunities to change how business transactions and processes are taught in higher education.IntroductionThis paper introduces a paper-based simulation game to introduce students to blockchaintechnology, with specific applicability for an enterprise resource planning or information andcomputer technology course. This is accomplished by modifying the “Paper Game” simulationoriginally developed by the ERPsim Lab at HEC Montreal (https://erpsim.hec.ca
understand that only their imagination limits them to using this flexible toolto develop scenarios to test the worthiness of the design project. Stress over and over again thepurpose is not to make a Financial Operational Model to get a value for the Internal Rate of Return,Net Present Value, and Payback time in years. It is to develop scenarios to test the project’sviability, to see potential weaknesses that must be studied further before moving ahead with theproject, and to plan for success. And that is not all. A good Financial Operational Model is a livingdocument. Once the design is built and put in practice, it still has use. It can be modified todetermine upgrades to potential equipment, changes to feed stocks, issues with labor wages
. • Internal Failure Costs: Costs associated activities when product or process fail internally (before and product / service has not been experienced by the customer). Examples include scrap, rework, equipment unscheduled downtime, etc. • External Failure Costs: Costs associated with activities resulting from product or service not conforming to requirements after being experienced by to the customer. Examples include processing and replacement of customer returns, warranty charges, etc.The above costs can be divided into conformance (prevention and appraisal) andnonconformance (internal and external failures). The conformance costs are associated withactivities that are normally planned while the failure costs are not
courses did not appear to deteriorate over the semester and 80% of thestudents planned to take the next course in the physics sequence. Additionally, more than half ofthe students could see themselves as an engineer or scientist. [13]In another peer mentoring program, the Women in Science and Engineering (WISE) program atSyracuse University implemented a mentoring program focused on helping women graduatestudents in engineering and computer science and Arts and Sciences, designed to address thedrop-off of women in engineering at the graduate level. The program helped address barriers ofisolation and the lack of successful women role models at the graduate level. [14]Another graduate peer mentoring program was implemented in a research-oriented
students to confront theincident from a complex perspective and engage with the engineering tools used toidentify hazards, consequences, and risks used in practice to prevent incidents using theplan/do/check/act (PDCA) cycle. Incident case studies afford opportunities for studentsto engage in redesign, release modeling, procedural analysis, layers of protectionanalysis, and emergency response planning while they examine the leadership,management, and ethical implications of the incident. The case study experience withreflection can lead to an examination of their personal values and beliefs aboutengineering, sustainability, and their responsibilities in the context of engineeringpractice, leadership, and management.Lac Mégantic and MGPI Processing
outcomes require the engineering graduates todemonstrate: an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences (Student Outcome3); and an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership,create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks and meet objectives(Student Outcome 5) [6].CONFLICT NEGOTIATION TRAINING The need for constructively negotiating conflict is especially salient among engineers, asengineers spend time developing projects requiring input from multiple and diverse stakeholders,offering feedback and corrections to ideas and plans, negotiating functional roles andresponsibilities, in addition to navigating the complexities of distinct personalities
has been official Technical Teacher at Ministry of Education in Iran from 2007 to 2018, and received many certificate in education such as Educational Planning, Developing Research Report, and Understanding School Culture. Mr. Beigpourian currently works in the CATME project, which is NSF funding project, on optimizing teamwork skills and assessing the quality of Peer Evaluations.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of
successful engineering managers and systems engineers. Specific methods andtechniques taught and applied are operations strategy, product design and selection, total qualitymanagement, capacity planning, facility location, facility layout, work system design, leansystems, and scheduling. This course is required for those pursuing the Engineering Managementmajor and an elective for other engineering and non-engineering majors. The students in thecourse represent a diverse academic cross-section consisting of Engineering Management to non-engineering majors, honor students academically excelling to low-GPA at-risk students, andfrom sophomores (second year) to seniors (graduating). The three-credit hour course meets for75 minutes every other day on a 1