behaviours or conflicts listed and individually documents theirpersonal strategy for dealing with this situation, which can reflect an approach they have used inthe past, or a hypothetical approach. Eight common underlying causes of conflict are thenintroduced [23]: • Attitudes • Perceptions • Personal goals • Behaviours • Communication • Resources • Conflict styles • ValuesReferring to this list, students are asked to consider which cause(s) may have underpinned theconflict they described and to reflect on how their knowledge of the underlying cause(s) mightaffect or change their solution. Finally, students are introduced to the following concepts whichserve to establish a positive and supportive interaction [24
concept and getting itapproved by faculty advisors is one of the greatest challenges you will ever face as a collegestudent.In the final analysis, this research project was an unqualified success, despite the disappointmentof not having enough time to adequately test the final design.References[1] J. Gowda, "Design and Fabrication of Drone Based Pesticide Sprayer," VTU Belgaum, Karnataka, India, 2018.[2] N. Yogianandh, R. Stopforth and G. Bright, "Development of an UAV for Search & Rescue Applications," in IEEE, Livingstone, Zambia, 2011.[3] H. Vardhan, D. S, S. Arul and P. Aditya, "Development of Automated Aerial Pesticide Sprayers," International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 856 - 861
(Seppet al. 2015; Kim, Campbell, et al., 2019) due in part to the efforts of the Consortium to PromoteReflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, see www.cpree.uw.edu). In the context ofreflecting on experiences broadly, reflection has been defined as “an intentional and dialecticalthinking process where an individual revisits features of an experience with which he/she isaware and uses one or more lenses in order to assign meaning(s) to the experience that can guidefuture action (and thus future experience)” (Turns et al. 2014). This definition is consistent withour conception of skills and habits needed by reflective engineers, though we think it importantto emphasize extending the temporal view to include not only the past, but also the
. 14Dr. AC. Megri 2020 ASEE Annual Conference Figure 14: Outcome 3 from ABET 15Dr. AC. Megri 2020 ASEE Annual ConferenceReferences:[1] Abou Hashem, Y., Dayal, M., Savanah, S., & Strkalj, G. (2015). The application of 3D printing inanatomy education. Med Educ Online, 20, 29847.[2] Berry, R. Q., III, Bull, G., Browning, C., Thomas, C. D., Starkweather, K., & Aylor, J. H. (2010).Preliminary considerations regarding use of digital fabrication to incorporate engineering designprinciples in elementary mathematics education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and TeacherEducation, 10(2), 167-172.[3
. ReferencesAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs (2020). Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/11/E001-19-20-EAC-Criteria-11-24-18.pdfAmerican Management Association. (2012). AMA 2012 Critical Skills Survey. Retrieved from https://www.amanet.org/assets/1/6/2012-critical-skills-survey.pdf.Barker, R. T., Gilbreath, G. H., & Stone, W. S. (1998). The interdisciplinary needs of organizations. Journal of Management Development, 17(3), 219-232.Bers, M. U., & Portsmore, M. (2005). Teaching partnerships: Early childhood and engineering students teaching math and science through robotics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 59
95 R-Square 5.57% R-Square Adjusted 3.21% S (Pooled Standard Deviation) 1.454 Table 7. Analysis of Variance Results for Problem 1 ANOVA Source df SS MS F P Group 1 10.287 10.287 4.867 0.029* Grade on Exam 1 2 2.827 1.414 0.669 0.514 Error 120 253.64 2.114 Total 123 268.60 2.184 *5% significance level, ** 1
: If yes, what disadvantages did that introduce? o Free Response, only answered by students in multidisciplinary groups • Q9: Based on your experiences, what is the greatest challenge for effective communication between team members? o Free Response • Q10: I feel the collaboration within my team was successful when working together towards our learning objective(s). o 5-Point Likert Response (strongly agree to strongly disagree) • Q11: I feel that my groups learning objectives were achieved. o 5-Point Likert Response (strongly agree to strongly disagree) • Q12: I feel the deliverable(s) my team achieved are appropriate for our defined group learning objectives
] L. J. Virguez Barroso, “A Quantitative Analysis of First Year Engineering Students’ Courses Perceptions and Motivational Beliefs in Two Introductory Engineering Courses,” Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2017.[3] M. K. Orr, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and R. A. Long, “Engineering matriculation paths: Outcomes of direct matriculation, first-year engineering, and post-general education models,” in 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, 2012, pp. 1–5.[4] V. Tinto and A. Goodsell, “Freshman interest groups and the first-year experience: Constructing student communities in a large university,” Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7–28, 1994
. The biennial NSF digest “Women,Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering” gives a definition ofURM. The report states: “Women, persons with disabilities, and underrepresented minority groups—blacks or African Americans, Hispanics or Latinos, and American Indians or Alaska Natives—are underrepresented in science and engineering (S&E). That is, their representation in S&E education and S&E employment is smaller than their representation in the U.S. population” [4].Persons with disabilities are not included in the scope of this study. The survey instructions givenwere, “For the purposes of this study, we consider underrepresented minorities (URM) to beblacks or African
thefindings of the qualitative and quantitative research design developed and discussed in the workfollowing the completion of the semester.References[1] K. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Penguin Random House, 2017.[2] J. Manyika, S. Lund, M. Chui, J. Bughin, J. Woetzel, P. Batra, R. Ko, and S. Sanghvi, “Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: Workforce Transitions in a Time of Automation,” McKinsey Global Institute, Technical Report, Dec. 2017.[3] D. Garvin, A. B. Wagonfeld, and L. Kind, “Google’s Project Oxygen: Do Managers Matter?” Harvard Business School Case 313-110, April 2013.[4] C. Duhigg, “What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team,” The New York Times Magazine, February 25, 2016.[5] S. Schaffer, K. Lei, L
that the students’perception of their negotiation style in the pre-assessment survey does not match with thenegotiation style observed during the activity and self-reported in the post-assessment survey.Based on the feedback from industry and the prior research conducted on soft skills andnegotiations specifically, it appears that the need for an activity of this type is warranted.Reference List[1] V. Domal and J. Trevelayn, “An engineer’s typical day: lessons learned and implications forengineering education,” Proceedings, 20th Australasian Association for Engineering EducationConference, pp. 637-643, 2009.[2] S. M. Katz, “The entry-level engineer: Problems in transition from student to professional,”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 82
, tutorials and documentationdeveloped by MRE faculty can significantly help with widespread use and adoption of open-sourceplatforms in higher education institutions. 12References[1] Laurent, A. M. S. (2004). Understanding open source and free software licensing: guideto navigating licensing issues in existing & new software. "O'Reilly Media, Inc.".[2] Open Source Hardware Association (OSHWA). Brief History of Open Source Hardware:Organizations and Definitions. https://www.oshwa.org/research/brief-history-of-open-source-hardware-organizations-and-definitions/ [accessed December 2019][3] OpenSource.com. What are Open Hardware. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-hardware [accessed
initiative is the first, and currently the only one of its kind,which makes college credit available at scale, worldwide. It also provides a pathway toadmission to the university for students who may not otherwise qualify. The MOOC explores theNational Academy of Engineering (NAE)’s Grand Challenges for Engineering and related globalchallenges. This course, based on an on-ground counterpart offered at ASU, is designed to alsohelp students develop the necessary interdisciplinary systems perspective and entrepreneurialmindset to solve the complex global challenges presented. This course fuses engineering with thesocial sciences, asking students to explore the interactions between society and technology,including the influences of human behavior
more help with? Is there a team member, advisor, or other person who can help you with those things?3rd Term Questions:Backward-looking (before you started the project): 25. What process did you go through to produce this piece? 26. Does this work tell a story? 27. What area(s) of growth are you most proud of?Inward-looking (how you feel about it right now): 28. What were your standards for this piece of work? Do you feel you met those standards? 29. What does this piece of work reveal about you as a learner, or about how you learn? 30. What did you learn about yourself as you worked on this piece?Outward-looking (how you think others feel about it right now): 31. What grade would you give yourself for this work? 32. If
Mechatronics (REM), IEEE, pp. 69-74, 2018.[8] S. N. Cubero, "Developing the Creativity and Design Skills of Mechatronic Engineering Students with Labs and Robot Competitions," Machine Vision and Mechatronics in Practice, J. Billingsley and P. Brett, eds., pp. 287-306, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2015.[9] C. A. Berry, S. L. Remy, and T. E. Rogers, “Robotics for All Ages: A Standard Robotics Curriculum for K-16,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 40-46, 2016.[10] S. Nilsson, “Enhancing Individual Employability: The Perspective of Engineering Graduates,” Education + Training, vol. 52, no. 6/7, pp. 540-551, 2010.[11] C. Mohtadi, O. McAree, and J. Scholosser, “Bridging the Skills Gap in STEM
]. Computationalthinking (CT) as defined by Jeannette Wing, who first brought it to the attention of the computerscience education community in 2006 [2], and later refined the definition, “is the thought processesinvolved in formulating a problem and expressing its solution(s) in such a way that a computer-human or machine-can effectively carry out” [3]. In other words, is a methodology that can beemployed to plan and formulate the solution to a problem so that the steps necessary can be carriedout by either a computer or a person. One characterization that is used to define the CT involvesthe following four core cornerstones: 1) decomposition, 2) pattern recognition, 3) abstraction, and4) algorithms [4]. Decomposition involves breaking the original problem into
less often. In contrast, the IEEE articles had thegreatest author presence, with personal pronouns appearing at the greatest frequency of the threedisciplines. While one IEEE paper made use of no pronouns whatsoever, on average the sample setemployed the use of pronouns at a rate 50% than that used in the ASME papers.In the development analysis, it was found that ASCE and ASME articles were similar in terms of their useof charts and figures—about one-third of total article space—and also employed a similar number ofequations: a value in the high teens for ASCE and in the low 20’s for ASME. This slight deficit in thenumber of equations in the ASCE papers is roughly offset by the presence of additional space devoted tocharts and figures, making
. 1836504. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] S. M. Lord and J. C. Chen, “Curriculum design in the middle years,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER), B. Olds and A. Johri, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 181–200.[2] J. C. Lucena and J. A. Leydens, “From Sacred Cow to Dairy Cow: Challenges and Opportunities in Integrating of Social Justice in Engineering Science Courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2015.[3] R. L. Lehrman, “Energy Is Not The Ability To Do Work,” Phys. Teach., 1973.[4] R. A. Lancor, “Using Student
required to make three presentationsthroughout the process. The first is a simple poster board presentation on the problem andpossible solutions. The second presentation is a professional poster at Methodist University’sannual Center for Research and Creativity (CRC) Symposium where they talk about the problem,their top solution(s), and implementation, if possible, to individuals from all across campus,including the President, Provost, several of their professors, and fellow students. The lastpresentation accompanies the technical paper and adds the evaluation step of the engineeringdesign process. As this is the third paper written in their engineering classes, students are nowexpected to follow format guidelines, use references and cite
," IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 89-99, 1997.[4] D. Bradley, "What is mechatronics and why teach it?," International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 275-291, 2004.[5] S. Boverie, D. D. Cho, H. Hashimoto, M. Tomizuka, W. Wei and D. Zühlke, "Mechatronics, robotics and components for automation and control: IFAC milestone report," in 17th IFAC World Congress (IFAC'08), 2008.[6] C. F. Auerbach and L. B. Silverstein, Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis, New York: New York University Press, 2003.[7] N. L. Ramo, A. Huang-Saad and B. Belmont, "What is Biomedical Engineering? Insights from Qualitative Analysis of Definitions Written by Undergraduate Students," in ASEE
to create a repository with the results of thisand all subsequent projects and the ongoing test data to enable future teams of students to confidentlydevelop solutions and to enable faculty to organize and manage such projects.13References1. S. Murugesan, and I. Bojanova, "Encyclopedia of Cloud Computing", ISBN:9781118821978, Wiley,2016.2. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Trends, 2017-2022 White Paper,https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/white-paper-c11-741490.html3. S. T. Faraj Al-Janabi, A. Shehab, "Edge Computing: Review and Future Trends", ResearchGate (2019)https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335858067_Edge_Computing_Review_and_Future_Directions4. B. Varghese, R
,supported by the Helmsley Charitable Trust. The meeting was attended by fourteen institutions,including four with existing programs. Meeting attendees identified elements key to the VIPmodel [6]: 1. Projects are based on faculty mentor’s scholarship and exploration. 2. Projects are long-term and large-scale, continuing for many years, even decades. 3. Program is curricular and all participating students are graded (A-F; not P/F or S/U). 4. Students can participate and earn credits toward their degrees for at least two years. 5. Learning outcomes focus on the development of both disciplinary and professional skills. 6. Multi-disciplinary teams are encouraged but not required. 7. Dedicated classroom
process is as follows: • Early-stage discussion between faculty and university/school leaders with the objective of encouraging the free-flow of ideas at this early stage. • Decision process communicated by leaders to faculty with clarity around expected processes of decision making. For example, which groups are active participants in the decision-making process? Which groups will be consulted and will serve in an advisory capacity? What will the feedback loop look like after the decision is made? • Follow-up report after decision making provided by leaders to faculty to explain the rationale for the decision(s) made.Further, the idea of Town Hall is grounded in the principles
Mechatronics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–9, 1996. [2] A. Birk, “What is robotics? an interdisciplinary field is getting even more diverse,” IEEE robotics & automation magazine, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 94–95, 2011. [3] S. E. Lyshevski, “Mechatronic curriculum–retrospect and prospect,” Mechatronics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 195–205, 2002. [4] D. G. Alciatore and M. B. Histand, “Integrating mechatronics into a mechanical engineering curriculum,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 35–38, 2001. [5] R. Manseur, “Development of an undergraduate robotics course,” in Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change, vol. 2. IEEE, 1997, pp. 610–612. [6] T.-R. Hsu
.[6] S. Mirzaei, A. C. Cadavid, V. A. Pedone, W. Horn and H. Rich, “Collaborativeinterdisciplinary research through projects from concept to completion,“ in Proceeding of theASEE 125th Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA,June 24‐27, 2018.
Institutions, Washington D.C., 2013. [2] “Built Environment and Health Initiative”, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2015. [3] W. Perdue, L. Stone, L. Gostin, “The Built Environment and Its Relationship to the Public’s Health: The Legal Framework” American Public Health Association, September 2003. [4] J. Kent and S. Thompson, “Health and the Built Environment: Exploring Foundations for a New Interdisciplinary Profession”, Journal of Environmental and Public Health, Volume 2012. APPENDIX A – SWOT Analysis for Bush Hills Neighborhood Meeting Strengths WeaknessesNeighborhood
benefit of the new program, majorintrinsic benefits were gained in the areas of community-building and creating transparent andinclusive processes, which will hopefully translate to trust and open communication regardingfuture resources, staffing, and course sharing. Although the launch of the program feels like amajor accomplishment after a long arduous journey, of course the work is really just beginning.The program chair and advisory committee are currently developing an assessment plan andmarketing materials and working with existing departments and programs to staff upcomingcourses.References[1] Lafayette College Special Collections and College Archives[2] K. L. Sanford Bernhardt and J. S. Rossman, “An Integrative Education in Engineering
-programs-2019–2020/#outcomes[6] E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, D. R. Brodeur, and K. Edström, "The CDIO approach." In Rethinking Engineering Education, pp. 11-45. Springer, Cham, 2014.[7] E. Crawley, A. Hosoi and A. Mitra, “Redesigning Undergraduate Engineering Education at MIT – the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) initiative”. Paper presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 2018. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/30923[8] E. Crawley, A. Hosoi, G. Long, T. Kassis, W. Dickson, and A. Mitra, “Moving Forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) program at MIT - Building Community, Developing Projects, and Connecting with Industry”. Paper