approach of face-to-face class time as well as online classmeetups. Through the use of technology, hybrid learning courses allow students to learn newconcepts on their own outside of the classroom and then physically come to class to get theirquestions answered and engage in various discussions [4]. Furthermore, there is additionalstudent engagement as they are able to actually meet with the instructors of the course as well astheir peers in the class. Webb et. al. [5] studied the hybrid teaching model and found thatstudents in the hybrid class performed just as well as their peers in a traditional classroom. Webbconcluded that hybrid teaching can provide the benefits of both online and face-to-face classes.3. CS1 course detailsOur CS1 course is
, reading reference material and maintaining a laboratorynotebook. To supplement students’ research experience, YSs participated in weekly meetings, inworkshops geared to teach students technical writing, poster creation and presentation skills, andin technical and career development seminars where faculty members and guest speakers gavespecial interest talks around nanotechnology and manufacturing (See Table 2 for a sample ofdaily schedule).Table 2: Sample of daily schedule week 2 to 6 9am Arrive at Research Center, check in with mentors and begin research 12pm Lunch at the cafeteria 1pm Workshop on technical writing skills 3pm Begin scientific poster creation using skills learned in workshop 5pm Depart for the
Consultant c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Development and Teacher Perceptions of an Avatar-Based Performance Task for Elementary Teachers to Practice Post- Testing Argumentation Discussions in Engineering Design (RTP)AbstractThis work aims to help elementary teachers practice one very important discussion withinengineering design: post-testing argumentation discussions. These discussions occur after eachdesign team has created and tested their designs and considered how their designs performed andcould be improved. The discussion goal is for each team to re-consider their design performanceand improvement ideas in light of their peers’ designs, critiques, and suggestions. By
systems design, development, and consultation firm. She joined the faculty of the School of Engineering and Computer Science at Baylor University in 1997, where she teaches a variety of engineering and computer science classes, she is the Faculty Advisor for the Women in Computer Science (WiCS), the Director of the Computer Science Fellows program, and is a KEEN Fellow. She has authored and co- authored over fifty peer-reviewed papers. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Challenge of Preparing iGen Students for Engineering and Computer ScienceAbstractA recent suicide by an engineering student began
participant shared that his drive to be successful in this environment, through increasing hispublication record, created strife within his lab and led to a misunderstanding among his peers: It was kind of reported to the supervisor that I was not helpful, or I was pushy, and I was demanding papers . . . if I did not have that pressure, I would not have run into the trouble with my colleagues and my supervisor. So, I feel they're interconnected. They [colleagues] may not have understood that I was driven to write papers because of the requirement from faculty hiring committees.This individual believed his career goals and relationships with his peers were at cross-purposes,which resulted in a competitive
thoughtful andreasoned with respect to hydrodynamics. We believe that this approach of collaborative lectureswith small groups will be beneficial to others needing to teach high-level concepts to studentswho do not yet have the background knowledge required for more formal teaching.IntroductionIn a first-year engineering course at a large Midwestern research university, remotely operatedvehicles (ROVs) are used as a design project topic to teach fundamental engineering andcommunication skills. The course utilizes a design-build-test-communicate framework with theuse of peer mentors [1, 2] to coach students through what is often their first team-based course intheir post-secondary education [3, 4].In the design of ROVs, the science of hydrodynamics
graduates from the 22 years that the instructorhas taught the class, and obtained 184 responses (21 % response rate of all enrolled students),with yearly percent of total enrollments responding and cumulative responses plotted in Figure 3.Of the respondents, 42.4 percent (78 respondents) indicated that they have designed steelstructures in their career. Student’s self-perception of preparedness in structural steel design forthe workforce and graduate school are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Average ratings(on a 1 to 4 scale, with 4 being better prepared than peers) were 3.3 for both questions, indicatingstudent self-perception as being overall better prepared than their peers from other institutions.Results were similar whether the alumni
), GradingScheme and Structure (deliverables, weighting of deliverables, use of peer evaluations), StudentTeams (number of students per team, which disciplines, how teams are formed), Mentors(external mentors, other faculty involvement, technical advisors), Projects (how many teamswork on each project, how projects are solicited, nature of projects), Industry (involvement andfunding), ASCE BOK Readiness.Once the survey instrument was created in Qualtrics, two faculty members from otherinstitutions were asked to take the survey and provide feedback on ways to improve theinstrument. After comments from the two survey testers were addressed, the survey waslaunched through Qualtrics to the individuals identified to those on the survey distribution list.The
artifact that may not behaveexactly as they predicted on paper. Due to their effectiveness, hands-on design projects areimplemented in numerous design courses across the world [3].Using 3D printing as an option allows students a technical method to prototype that is moreadvanced than simple low-fidelity models, but also safer and more accessible than constructingprototypes in a machine shop. As a result, 3D printing is used in a variety of design coursesincluding high school, undergraduate, and graduate levels of STEM education [4-6].Incorporating 3D printing into a course allows students to build upon critical thinking andproblem solving, as well as increasing writing and speaking skills [4]. However, as with mostnew technologies, teaching
, numerical and experimental methods. He has participated in many research projects and has published several peer-reviewed journal papers since 2004.Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko, Morgan State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #31691 Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko is currently a Doctoral student and Research Associate in the Department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University (MSU) in Baltimore Maryland. Prior to joining the department in January of 2019, Ms. Sotonye Ikiriko was a Graduate Research Assistant (GRA) at Tennessee State University (TSU) in Tennessee State, where she
semester to the second semester. One of the essential institutional supports thatencouraged both professor and student engagement in the project was the funding used toemploy a teaching assistant (TA) familiar with the content of the course as well as themakerspace. From Spring 2019 to Fall 2019, Dr. Cook had thought that an overhaul of herproject would be necessary to generate more engagement and output from students. Instead ofthese large changes, researchers alongside Dr. Cook found that familiarity with the makerspace,prior experience with an open-ended project, and peer support for students seemed to producesuperior student engagement and output without vast pedagogical shifts.BackgroundIn recent years, substantial educational resources have
best strategies their peers are using. As noted by researchers in [6-8], awareness ofmetacognitive processes can help in ways of improving understanding of a topic. By deliberatelydiscussing these and other learning strategies as part of in-class activities, students areencouraged to monitor their understanding as they read or apply it for working through technicalscenarios.Figure 3. Student-suggested strategies for the effective reading of technical textsFollowing the in-class discussions on reading strategies, students reviewed the strategies listedon the MARSI and rank-ordered the ones they prefer to use regularly. Fifteen students (n=15) inNetwork Switches & Routers class in Fall 2019 and eleven students (n=11) from the Spring
both subtle and overt discrimination[6] - [10]. Several strategies have been implemented to improve this culture, for example byestablishing peer mentoring programs [11] - [15] or creating more inclusive classroomenvironments [16] - [20]. In contrast to undergraduate engineering students who predominantlytake classes, however, senior doctoral and post-doctoral engineering students spend the majorityof their time in a “lab” environment—i.e., the environment of the research group, whethercomputational or experimental. Therefore, to create a warmer climate for these students andmitigate the drastic drop-off of women from doctoral programs to faculty positions, here wefocus on promoting a more inclusive lab culture.The pervasiveness of sexual
allow either the reflect on something, and write about that or instructor or the student to gain even say something about it. I taught an insight into student learning and online class this summer and as part of that I progress. This does not include had students record themselves explaining a instances where the participant solution to the problem. And so that seemed discusses the creation or design of to be a really good
alpha (α)EFFECTS OF STEM CLIMATE ON MENTAL HEALTH 4 Lack of interpersonal Participant describes feeling 0.796 0.006 support in academic unsupported by their professors, setting mentors/advisors, peers/friends, colleagues, or general program climate within the academic setting Difficult interpersonal Participant describes difficult 0.885 0.003 interactions with peers, interpersonal interactions with staff, post-doc, etc. program staff
&I intheir everyday teaching.In this research paper, we present the journeys of 12 college level educators who have beenidentified by peers in the engineering education community as individuals practicing inclusiveteaching. These stories are intended to complement a) research that identifies issues of Diversityand Inclusion in engineering and b) research that documents efforts to address these issues.Although there are many studies that seek to understand the issues and explore potentialsolutions to different D&I concerns, these open-ended interviews highlight stories from the threesub-themes. These sub-themes show that doing work to support D&I requires communitysupport, requires learning from experiences, either one’s own or from
in engineering education for their students. One way to address such challenges isto team up with peer MSIs or larger R1 institutions in mutually beneficial collaborative researchand educational programs.IEC is developing the infrastructure and programs to facilitate collaborations between faculty,students and staff in its member departments, based largely on lessons learned from the successfulECP educational program. It is also addressing how best to build a different type of team with R1schools, industry, and other external constituencies. For each type of partner, a process is beingdefined and tools, such as evaluation rubrics to assess the quality and productivity ofcollaborations, are being addressed. A pilot process and rubric now
builds a framework for grading based on motivating students to develop thesepractices as their study habits.The method was developed and tested over a 3.5-year period in a Mechanics of Materials course.The results were very promising, with student improvements of at least one standard deviationwhen compared to their peers in traditional courses. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate thatthe method can be applied to more than just the original course. For this study the authors haveadopted and implemented the SMART method for a different course, Introduction to Dynamics.While the course is still part of the engineering mechanics curriculum, it has several importantfeatures that make it worthwhile to demonstrate the versatility of the SMART
college awareness. endeavors. Applicants Skill- set Is dependable and Relates well to reliable/Has good peers/Commun attendance, icates openly punctuality, and with school record. staff Cooperates with school staff
subjects learned throughout a student’s college career and applies them to a realisticsituation or problem [1]. This method of teaching is known as Project-Based Learning or PBL.Research on this teaching method, as well as experiences from educators, has shown that PBLcan dramatically benefit students in a range of areas. In 2007, the NSSE found that “studentswho do a capstone seminar that requires a final product or performance gain more in desiredareas compared with their peers whose capstones do not require a final product or performance”[1]. Rachelle Poth, a high school teacher in Pennsylvania, shared her personal experience withhow PBL benefits students. For example, Poth brings up the point that since many students arenot good test-takers
-weekresearch project. The scholars and their mentors participated in a weekly WebEx meeting withcoordinators from all CISTAR institutions. The graduate student mentors led these sessions, andsite education coordinators reviewed the assignments. The students created a literature review,followed by a research abstract, and finally a poster to share in a poster session at their institutionand a five-minute WebEx presentation to their peers and graduate mentors. Finally, each scholarwas required to plan and execute one or more outreach activities at a local school, library orscience center and submit a summary of the activity and a reflection on their own experience.The YS program was a successful collaborative effort by Fellows and staff at all
. Traditional office hours are often utilized for assistance with the solvingprocess. Although important, this one-on-one interaction is inefficient. One-to-one environmentcan be replicated with demonstrative VOH, using video chatting software to hold office hours.The professor can write out problems and show diagrams to the students. Instructors can interactwith every student simultaneously. With multiple students are able to participate, others canbenefit from passive participation and professors only have to answer questions once. Recordingthe sessions has additional benefits. First, students who were unable to attend the online meetingcould still gain knowledge from watching the videos. Secondly, students can watch the sessionand follow the
checkpoint for how the teams are performing. The questions in this survey include “How have your understandings about other disciplines changed?” “Overall, what can you and the team do together to ensure you meet your goals?” 4. Reflect and what’s next survey – This survey is intended for students to reflect on their business pitch presentation. The questions in this survey include “How did you feel you did in giving the team’s pitch?” “How confident are you about your team’s success? Why or why not?" 5. Letter to me – This assignment is intended for students to write a “Letter to Me.” In it, students will write to their previous self, the person they were on the first day of the semester. Students will
particularly important within increasingly international and multicultural societiesthroughout the world. Therefore, the present study randomly assigned partners to students forparticipation in pair programming, which involves close collaboration to complete a computerscience coding task. Within a sample of 819 responses from 369 undergraduates in the UnitedStates (US), non-US citizens benefitted from having a partner from another country (primarilythe US) in terms of the amount of lab assignment completed, belief that the assignment wasvirtually error-free, and confidence in quality of the submitted assignment; however, thesestudents were also less involved in writing code during pair programming when they had apartner from a different nation than
sandwich (cooperative) principle of integrated periods of study and trainingin industry. The most popular was six months in industry followed by six months in collegein each of four successive years [4].A requirement of the NCTA was that all students for their diplomas should have participatedin programs of liberal study. This was reinforced in 1957 by a government edict that extendedthe idea of compulsory liberal studies to all levels of technical education even though muchof it was part time study [5]. By 1962 it was seen that the development of literacy, that is theability to read and write, was essential for the general education of all students. Thus, it wasthat in those colleges the term Liberal Studies came to be substituted by General
interesting in both Teresa and Christine’s narratives are what is omitted from the pitch.Christine was not singularly focused on chemistry or engineering, as her narrative suggests. Infact, she also enjoyed writing – so much so that she actually dual majored in Technical Writing.She tells me that the reason she didn’t pursue writing as a career is because she couldn’t see anyviable career options, whereas in engineering, there were plenty of job opportunities. WhereasTeresa felt the need to resolve her competing interests in the elevator pitch itself, Christine omitsthem entirely, perhaps feeling that her writing interests confuse the narrative too much or areirrelevant because they are not practical.One factor Teresa omitted was an admission later
interdisciplinary courses.Change the World: Olin’s First GCSP CourseOlin’s GCSP redesign culminated in the creation of a new course, Change the World: PersonalValues, Global Impacts, and Making an Olin GCSP. It was co-designed by Assistant Professor ofEnvironmental Engineering Alison Wood (who is also Olin’s GCSP Director) and Professor ofthe History of Science and Technology Robert Martello to serve as the cornerstone of theprogram. The main goal of the course is to provide structured support for a culminating reflectivesynthesis. As mentioned above, in the early years of Olin’s GCSP, graduating seniorsaccomplished their reflection through mentored writing outside of any course, which workedwell for students in the early years of the program but less so
Mathcad. 7. Discover the best techniques to perform curve fitting in Excel and Mathcad. 8. Efficiently use Excel for statistical analysis. 9. Solve nonlinear equations using iterative solution methods in Excel and Mathcad. 10. Solve optimization problems using Excel Solver and using Solve Blocks in Mathcad. 11. Identify the basic elements of programming and write user defined functions in Excel and simple codes in Mathcad. 12. Recognize the advantages and disadvantages of the software, Excel or Mathcad, in the solution of different engineering problems.Course Components:CGN 2420 - Computer Tools in Engineering- has two major units: ● Unit I: Excel Tool and Applications. This unit is divided in five modules distributed in
helpful in refining this specific OEMP assignment and developing generalguidelines for writing OEMPs on any topic. If multiple students are not making reasonable, well-justified assumptions, this suggests that the problem should be redesigned to provide morescaffolding that helps students make more realistic assumptions or more explicitly prompts themto write out their justifications. Second, having students metacognitively reflect on their ownassumptions is an important factor in their development of engineering judgment. Byunderstanding what assumptions students are making and the impact these have on design,instructors can highlight productive beginnings of engineering judgment and help studentsunderstand when they have made assumptions that
Paper ID #29200A First Year Engineering Information Literacy Workshop to IncreaseStudent Awareness of Research DatabasesMs. Evie Cordell MSLIS, Northeastern University Evie Cordell is the First Year Experience and Undergraduate Engagement Librarian at Northeastern Uni- versity. She is the liaison to the Writing Program, General Studies Program, Explore Program, ContiNUe Program, NUi.n. and several other First Year Programs at Northeastern University. She also serves on the First Pages (Northeastern University’s common reads program) committee and is a member of the FUNL (First Generation, Undocumented, Low-Income) Network