workshop is to equip students with multidisciplinarycutting-edge theories and technologies in GIS, remote sensing, biology, and water chemistry. Itfurther improves the students’ success in their academic study and future career. In the first twoweeks of the workshop, students participated in lectures, lab experiments, technologydemonstration, field trips, research lab visiting, and etc. Through these activities, studentparticipants had opportunities to develop hands-on experience on multiple novel technologiesand instrument, including ArcMap, ArcGIS Pro, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), GPS,Inducted Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS), and ASD spectroradiometer. In thethird week, participants were assigned with project tasks: select an Ohio
last number of years has therebeen a shift in the global mindset that sustainability thinking is not just a fringe idea, but that it plays animportant role in creating long-term economic health, the social stability of systems and protecting theecosystem services on which the world depends. According to the Association for the Advancement ofSustainability in Higher Education (AASHE), every college graduate today, regardless of major, will beimpacted by some aspect of sustainability in their future career [7]. Students of any major with someknowledge of sustainability principles will have an advantage in the job market.The job of universities is to educate and inspire students. The focus of the CUAS has been not to try tofix Houston
decision-making process or engaging in a task. Modern theories of motivation have been developed basedon beliefs, engagement, control, attribution, values, interest, goal-driven, and achievement-related choices [13]. Such theories have taken various approaches to understanding individuals’motivation.Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivationCurrently, the expectancy-value theory of motivation is one of the most used motivationalmodels to study students’ career choices in engineering [14]. Expectancy-value theory (Eccles etal., 1983) is considered the most influential theory for explaining students’ learning behavior andachievement-related choices [15]. The theory indicates that the students’ task choice and level ofengagement are driven by
theyprogress through the undergraduate curriculum [1-2]. This has direct implications for thediversity of engineering students and workforces. Research with civil, environmental, andmechanical engineering students also finds that student perceptions of the connection betweensocial responsibility and engineering shape their decisions to stay in their majors, and thatwomen are more likely to leave engineering when they view those connections to be lacking andencounter decontextualized technical courses and unsupportive environments [2-3]. Engineeringeducators frequently invoke research findings that women and racial/ethnic minorities are moresensitive to social justice concerns and more likely to pursue engineering careers with an explicitsense of
autoethnographies on female faculty in academia are limited [2, 11]. This researchgathered autoethnographic stories from three female faculty members in engineering, the authorsof this paper, who had also experienced gender bias in their teaching. This was then organizedinto a ”collective autoethnography”. The analysis and writing-up of the project were alsocompleted by the authors. According to Ellis’s autoethnographic principles [8], stories are centralto this paper. The literature presented and the emotions evoked after the stories are told is all doneto change the understanding of what it means to be a female instructor in the engineeringclassroom.The three authors of this paper are early-career faculty in small teaching-focused institutions.Two of the
response to identification of these systemic issues, in 2001 the National Science Foundationlaunched Institutional Transformation grants as a new initiative in the ADVANCE program.Research planning grants and career advancement grants supporting individual women werephased out, and greater emphasis was placed on systemic change within academic institutions[33]. From a review of 37 ADVANCE institutional transformation initiatives from 2001 to 2008,Morimoto and coauthors argued that creating equity in gendered organizations must go wellbeyond articulating policy, beyond attending to the needs of individuals, and beyond workingtoward balanced gender composition among the ranks of faculty, all of which they characterizedas surface-level work [5]. In
to succeed in a specific domain likeengineering [25]. Students who have reduced self-efficacy or do not exude confidence to otherscan also find themselves with more limited opportunities to productively work with others,which leads to a snowball effect and reduces confidence even further over the course of theundergraduate career. Low self-efficacy has been positively and significantly correlated to pooracademic performance and low persistence in a wide range of subjects and disciplines [26].Consistent feelings of being discouraged in a course are not simply about being in a bad mood,but instead are a handicap that, if not addressed, can carry over into other courses and into thestudent’s early career. As young professionals, these
proposals actually read as weaknesses (e.g., disseminationapproach was not clear), or were neutral in tone (e.g., the approach was “standard”). By contrast,reviewers tended to note unique aspects of dissemination approaches (e.g., will reach out toothers) and broader populations (e.g., students, community, other researchers) that would beaffected by the research in awarded proposals. Specifically, for the awarded proposals, broaderimpact strengths were primarily in the areas of the project’s reach beyond the program and/orinstitution involved, with others related to overcoming disparities to improve the success ofstudents from underrepresented groups and using career mentoring to enhance academic-industrypartnerships. Industry partnerships were
received a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineeringin 1993 from the University of Michigan. Joe began teaching at California State University, Chico in1998 after a 14-year career with General Motors Corporation in Detroit, Michigan. His research inter-ests include biobased and biodegradable polymers, recycled plastics, marine biodegradation testing, andanaerobic digestion. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Assessing a Summer Engineering Math and Projects Bootcamp to Improve Retention and Graduation Rates in Engineering and Computer ScienceThis complete Evidence-Based Practice paper discusses the efforts made to increase four-yearand six-year graduation rates of students
Award in 2015, and won the 2018 Graduate Student Mentor Award for the College of Engineering. Dr. Matusovich has gradu- ated 10 doctoral students since starting her research program in Spring 2009. Dr. Matusovich co-hosts the Dissertation Institute, a one-week workshop each summer funded by NSF, to help underrepresented students develop the skills and writing habits to complete doctorate degrees in engineering. Across all of her research avenues, Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 12 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award with her share of funding be ingnearly $2.3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 21 journal publications and more than 70 conference papers. She has won several Virginia
students being from rural communities, and ~36% being first-generation collegestudents. As has been discussed, all accepted students to the PTG program possessed a greatfinancial need as displayed by their eligibility for the Pell grant and/or the Subsidized StaffordLoan programs [1]. Each accepted student received scholarships of up to $4,500 for those who hadnot joined the HC, and up to $5,500 for those that did join the HC. Our success in recruitment hasbeen due to the implementation of the NSF-funded S-STEM program BreakingBarriers/Engineering Career Awareness Program (ECAP) [DUE1154146] fall recruitment bestpractices, as well as HC best practices. The Honors College has three Honors College recruiters,including one who now specializes in
of UN Sustainable Development GoalsOf the eight UN Sustainable Development goals selected by this group there was not an obviousdifference between males and females. Research has shown that females prefer careers whichfocus on communal values, benefiting others [6]. The career paths of this group have alreadybegun as they are all engineering majors in their senior year. The author wanted to see if addingthe UN Sustainable Development Goals would increase the motivation for the proposed designsto have an added communal component. As can be seen in figure 3 there was no specificpreference to any particular goal based on gender. Contrary to the research which states thatfemales prefer disciplines with communal goals of collaboration and the
Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering fos- ter or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning, to understand engineering stu- dents
safety and education (events will be designed according to MS weather season) 13 b. Visit with area schools to inform about careers in Emergency Management, Meteorology, and Psychology (focusing on Disaster Mental Preparedness) c. Host additional community-based workshops and events 2) Educational training for First Responders, Emergency Management Specialists (public and private sector), and other specialists related disciplines a. Conduct virtual reality simulation training and table-top interactive activities b. Provide Continuing Education Units (CEUs) and Certificate
: Ambassador Girls Empowering Girls in the Field (Evaluation)Background of the EngineerGirl Ambassadors programThe purpose of the Ambassadors program is to develop a cadre of young women currentlyenrolled in high school who are equipped to engage middle school youth in engineering. TheAmbassador program is an extension of the programming developed and disseminated throughthe EngineerGirl website. The website was developed in 2001 as a mechanism for engagingyoung women in engineering and for providing them resources for understanding how to followan educational and career path in engineering. It was originally developed (and, in 2012,upgraded) with guidance from a Girls Advisory Board. The website evolved by adding an
female enrollment intechnology education, Flowers surveyed 154 female ITEA members who expressed the need toimprove the enrollment and retention of female students by redefining the curriculum withoutsex bias, removing teachers who demonstrate gender bias, educating guidance counselors,changing school requirements, trying single-sex classes, and improving facilities to be moreattractive and dynamic [24]. In addition, the ITEA members suggested the establishment ofmentoring, promotion of active recruitment, and the dissemination of career information as ameans to improve awareness of a field that includes female students [24].In 1981, Dugger Jr. addressed the modification of industrial arts programs to serve special needsstudents by
departments from two colleges –Engineering and Engineering Technology, the Enrollment Management and Career ServicesDivision, and the Office of Financial Aid and Scholarships. Collectively, these eight departmentsoffer thirteen BS degree programs that are five-year programs with a mandatory cooperativeeducation component wherein students attend classes in Fall and Spring semesters in their firsttwo years. During the third and fourth years, students alternate between on-campus study andoff-campus co-op employment in industry. All students must complete at least 48 weeks of paidco-op employment. Each student finds co-op employment with help from an assigned co-opcoordinator in the Office of Cooperative Education and Career Services [2].Each scholar
current research literature, identity is constructed in differentways. In engineering contexts identity has primarily been studied in undergraduate students andadults, in the contexts of career choices and retention of students within programs [5]. Sfard andPrusak [6] propose an idea of identity that is shaped around narratives. They posit that identitiesare the stories individuals and the people around them tell about themselves. Identities havemany facets, authors, and audiences. Self-perpetuating narratives of success and failure shapeidentity. Institutional narratives, such as success and failure in the school setting, are particularlyinfluential over the way a student may think about their identity [6]. Often, youth have troubledefining what
author for the ”Dissertation House Model” (2016), published by CBE Life Sciences, which was acknowl- edged at the 2018 AGEP National Research Conference, ”Pathways to a Diverse Professoriate,” at the University of California, Berkeley. Dr. Carter-Veale co-authored ”Structured Interventions for Under- represented Students and Faculty Members in STEM” (2014), as part of the 2012 Conference Summary for ”Understanding interventions that broaden participation in research careers: Intervening to Critical Mass,” and she co-authored the book chapter, ”Successful Ph.D. Pathways to Advanced STEM Careers for Black Women” (2011). Carter-Veale is Co-PI on the Career Pathways project (Council of Graduate Schools), and she has had
especially crucial towards proper career development. The data attained fromlab assignments can remarkably improve students’ understanding of classroom concepts byallowing students to observe the strengths and weakness of various scientific theories.Compared to traditional engineering disciplines (civil, mechanical, etc.), biological engineering(BE) students have been found to have different motivations for entering the engineering field;therefore, it is paramount that the BE engineering education community capitalizes on thisdifference to address the systemically lackluster engineering student retention rate.[1] BE studentsare largely driven to the field for the opportunity to benefit society, which differs compared totraditional engineering majors
course has been predominatelylecture-based. In this project, the intervention course was redesigned to include predominatelyhands-on activities that connect to chemical engineering concepts, i.e. conservation of mass andsurface tension, and chemical engineering jobs. These activities were designed to engagestudents’ curiosity and connection to what chemical engineers do in the real world.In this study, approximately 70 students took the intervention section of this course, whichpredominately consisted of hands-on activities and connections to real-world chemicalengineering careers. The control section, which was predominately lecture-based, hadapproximately 90 students. Students in both sections were asked to take pre- and post-surveysthat
) majors report notablelevels of gender bias and sexual harassment within the context of their work [6]. Among womenin STEM majors, experiences of STEM-related gender bias have been found to be relatednegatively to their career aspiration and motivation to pursue vocational opportunities in STEM[6]. In addition to messages of being unwelcome in the field, women in STEM fields have alsobeen shown to encounter benevolent sexism (e.g., protective paternalism or genderdifferentiation) from their male peers [7]. This form of sexism has been linked with lower gradepoint averages (GPAs) in STEM courses [7]. These findings highlight the impact the academicclimate can have on underrepresented students pursuing careers in STEM fields. Because GPArepresents
Reasons for Pre-Course Pre-Course Determined to Pursue a Enrolling in Determined to Pursue a Determined to Pursue a Career in Nuclear EP 3D03 Career in Nuclear Sector (6 Career in Nuclear Sector (4 Sector (3 of 7) (open- of 14) of 8) Considering a Potential ended) Considering a Potential Considering a Potential Career in Nuclear Career in Nuclear Sector (3 Career in Nuclear Sector (4 Sector (0 of 7) of 14) of 8) Seeking Introductory Seeking Introductory Seeking Introductory
Paper ID #29685Work in Progress: Intersection of Race and Gender on Experiences ofUndergraduate Engineering Students of Color in Positional LeadershipRolesProf. Carmen M. Lilley, University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Lilley’s research interests in engineering education focus on professional development of engineering students at the undergraduate and graduate level. In particular, she is interested in the nuances of how the intersection of race/ethnicity with gender affects professional development in the area of leadership and the long term career trajectory of an individual. Her other research interests are focused on
challenge.Faculty at the high school where this study took place find themselves in a unique workingenvironment. The students in the high school, as opposed to traditional classroom techniques,typically thrive in hands-on and applied learning environments; with the expectation that thestudents are expected to pursue post-secondary careers [4, 5]. When considering the STEMfields and the level of hands-on involvement at the professional level, understanding thedifferences between the fields and the expectations during the post-secondary experience isimportant to the creation of a successful, impactful curriculum and learning environment. Figure1 shows the relationship of hands-on experiences both in the classroom and work environment ofthe STEM fields as
engineering program innovation and diverse STEM workforce development. Her recent research focuses on student veterans’ civilian acculturation through higher education.Ms. Rachel Saunders, UNC Charlotte Rachel Saunders is a doctoral candidate at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the Coun- selor Education and Supervision Program. Her research focuses primarily on culturally responsive school counseling, college and career readiness, and experiences of student veterans in higher education. She serves as a Research Assistant at UNC Charlotte as part of a Office of Naval Research grant supporting student veterans and engineering curriculum innovation.Dr. Peter Thomas Tkacik, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
, most crucially, an activedesign studio. The course set is taught under the aegis of an established cross-university, cross-disciplinary entity - the Coastal Community Design Collaborative. The overarching objective isto model effective trans-disciplinary collaborative research and design in teaching, learning, andproductivity.Specifically, the research asks: What pedagogic tools, curricular support, and teaching strategiescan foster trans-disciplinary collaboration among students from engineering, architecture, andscience programs? It seeks to evaluate impacts on students’ short- and long-term career interestsand it asks: What shifts in focus and methods are required for faculty toeffectively lead a trans-disciplinary design studio?The most
Paper ID #29282Community Building for the NSF PFE: RIEF Program: Year 1Prof. Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Karin Jensen, Ph.D. is a Teaching Assistant Professor in bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering stu- dent career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. She was awarded a CAREER award from the National Science Foundation for her research on undergraduate mental health in engineering programs. Before joining UIUC she completed a post-doctoral
assess the performance of the project, an instrument was developed withmultiple-choice problems and survey questions for the students. The results of a field test in asophomore manufacturing class are presented. The module is available at the ASME Dropboxand the developers are seeking other colleges to promote the project and participate in thefield test.1. IntroductionAfter surveying 2500 industry engineering supervisors, early career mechanical engineers andME Department Heads it was found that 46.9% of industry supervisors state a weakness inunderstanding of standards among ME/MET graduates and 48.3% of early career engineersstate their own weakness of standards understanding1. In addition, under the programcurriculum section in the self
Paper ID #30981Integration of C programming and IoT in a Raspberry Pi Controlled RobotCar in a Freshmen/Sophomore Engineering Core ClassDr. Shaghayegh Abbasi, University of San Diego Shaghayegh Abbasi received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Washington in 2011. In her thesis, titled ’Integrating top-down and bottom-up nanomanufacturing: Controlling the growth and composition of seeded nanostructures’, an innovative nanomanufacturing method is explored and optimized. Upon graduation, she started her career as Senior System Design Engineer at Lumedyne Technologies. She worked on design, simulation, and