STEM professions and begin to see a career/workforce pathway.Empowerments such as these have shown to increase student retention within a major and havepositive self-efficacy impacts [29], [30]. Based on the shifting trends in STEM studentdemographics (Figure 1), changes in STEM education and specifically, engineering education,will be required to ensure the retention of underrepresented minorities and women in these fields.References[1] S. Garcia-Otero and E. O. Sheybani, "Retaining minority students in engineering:Undergraduate research in partnership with NASA," in American Society for EngineeringEducation, 2012,.[2] Sarah Zappe, Irene Mena and Thomas Litzinger, "Creativity is Not a Purple Dragon,"National Collegiate Inventors and
Mendenhallprovided feedback on the interview protocol. The authors wish to acknowledge Nicole Jacksonfor scheduling and conducting interviews. Lastly, the authors wish to thank the studentparticipants for sharing their experiences.References[1] E. Godfrey and L. Parker, "Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, pp. 5-22, 2010.[2] E. Godfrey, "Cultures within cultures: Welcoming or unwelcoming for women?," American Society of Engineering Education Conference Proceedings, 2007.[3] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, "“I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group:” Achieving individual diversity," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, pp
, 13(1), 75-84.[9] Reges, S. (2003). Using undergraduates as teaching assistants at a state university. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(1),103-107.[10] Becker, M. K., & Neuwirth, J. M. (2002). Teaching strategy to maximize clinical experience with beginningnursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 41(2), 89-91.[11] Herrman, J. W., & Waterhouse, J. K. (2010). Benefits of using undergraduate teaching assistants throughout abaccalaureate nursing curriculum. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(2), 72-77.[12] Born, D. G., & Herbert, E. W. (1971). A further study of personalized instruction for students in largeuniversity classes. The Journal of Experimental Education, 40(1), 6-11.[13] Fremouw, W. J., Millard, W. J., & Donahoe, J. W
context. Most field studies have abroadly ethnographic goal, namely to adequately and thickly describe the specific qualities ofpractices, to understand and represent the meaning of those practices for people who participatein them, and to understand unique and locally situated forms of work culture and socialorganization. In the context of engineering practices, field studies have largely been conducted inthe workplace using observations and interviews. These include studies across both disciplinesand time, beginning with pioneering works such as Barnes’ comparative, observational study oftechnical groups in industry [5], and Youngman et al.’s in-depth, multi-modal analysis ofengineering job roles and work activities [6]. The 1980s and 1990s saw
of career preparation.SignificanceURM students will increase their self of belonging to STEM professions and begin to see acareer/workforce pathway. Empowerments such as these have shown to increase studentretention within a major and have positive self-efficacy impacts [31], [32]. Based on the shiftingtrends in STEM student demographics (Error! Reference source not found.), changes in STEMeducation and specifically, engineering education, will be required to ensure the retention ofunderrepresented minorities and women in these fields. Based on the results of this three-yearstudy, best-practices will be identified and presented to allow for implementation at otheruniversities.References[1] S. Garcia-Otero and E. O. Sheybani, "Retaining
and improved identification with the mechanical engineeringprofession. These findings suggest that capstone educators consider multidisciplinary projectseven when facilitating traditionally single-discipline disciplinary capstone courses.AcknowledgementsWe are grateful to the members of the horse lung functioning project team for their time andeffort in this study.References[1] F. Bornasal, S. Brown, N. Perova-Mello, and K. Beddoes, “Conceptual Growth in Engineering Practice,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 318–348, 2018, doi: 10.1002/jee.20196.[2] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T. McGlamery, T. M. Nathans-Kelly, and C. G. Nicometo, “Understanding engineering work and identity: a cross-case analysis of
,questionnaires and surveys, content analysis of text, secondary analysis of existing data, quasi-experiments (e.g., comparison of two sections of the same course), observational research, andcase studies” [13]. In addition, Lee S. Shulman, president emeritus of the Carnegie Foundationfor the Advancement of Teaching, has long encouraged teaching faculty to engage in scholarlysystematic research in the practice of teaching and learning. He argues that it is “only when westep back and reflect systematically on the teaching we have done, in a form that can be publiclyreviewed and built upon by our peers, that we have moved from scholarly teaching to thescholarship of teaching” [15, p. 1].Active learning exercises emphasizing the design process as a
cannotcapture.References[1] L. Bottomley, K. Titus-Becker, and H. Smolensky-Lewis. Escape To Engineering: A SummerBridge Program For Women In Engineering: 2009 Annual Conference & Exposition, June 2009,Austin, Texas. Available: https://peer.asee.org/5254 [Accessed February 5, 2018].[2] Lavelle, Jerome P. and Richard F. Keltie, “Calculus Intervention for First-SemesterEngineering Students,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering EducationAnnual Conference and Exposition.[3] Bauer, K., and Liang, Q., (2003) “The Effect of Personality and Precollege Characteristics onFirst-Year Activities and Academic Performance,” Journal of College Student Development,Vol. 44, No. 3, p. 277-290.[4] Hurtado, S., Carter, D. & Spuler, A. (1996). “Latino
received the 2015 Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentoring.Miss Dana Corrina Dimitriu Dana Dimitriu is a third-year mechanical engineering student at the University of Texas at San Antonio. She is currently working on receiving her bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering with a minor in Psychology. She has interests in biomechatronics, prosthetics, 3D visualization, and graphic design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Simple Method to Help Students Improve 3-D Visualization SkillsAbstractSpatial visualization skills and attention to detail can be effectively improved using variousspecialized methods. Starting in the 1990’s multiple
as an adjunct Professor. Prof. Dasgupta worked for Wentworth University for more than 19 years in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. He taught various courses at Wentworth which includes. Motors and Controls, Power Systems, Analog and Digital Control Systems, Analog and Digital Communications, Digital Signal Processing, Electrome- chanical Systems etc. Major achievements during Prof. Dasgupta ’s tenure at Wentworth are as follows: developments of Motors and controls lab, introduction of Power Systems course as an elective, develop- ment of Feedback and Controls lab, development of Digital signal processing lab, development of Analog and Digital Communication lab and introduction of PIC
, Atlanta, GA, 2013.[5]. “Technologically Literate Citizens - Why The Study of Technology Should Be Mandatory”, [6]. "Front Matter." National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. 2002. Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[7]. M. W. Bauer, N. Allum, and S. Miller, “What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research?”, Public Understanding of Science, 16, 79-95, SAGE Publication, 2007.[8]. International Technology Education Association. Standards for Technological Literacy, International Technology Education Association, Reston, VA (2000).[9]. < https://www.sahcc.org/programs/core-4-stem/ >[10]. <
projects andlarge number of students. In future, we will conduct more projects in the upcoming semester toassert the effectiveness of this approach.REFERENCES[1] R. Graham, "The global state of the art in engineering education," Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Massachusetts, 2018.[2] K. Zhou, T. Liu and L. Zhou, "Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges," in IEEE, 12th International conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery (FSKD)., 2015.[3] I. Jawahir, F. Badurdeen and K. Rouch, "Innovation in Sustainable Manufacturing Education," in 11th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, Berlin-Germany, 2013.[4] C. E. S. da Silva, E. G. Salgado, C. H. P. Mello, E. d. S. Oliveria and
scheme,”JEE, vol.89, no.1, pp.39-45, Jan. 2000.[7] M. J. Pavelich and W. S. Moore, “Measuring the effect of experiential educationusing the Perry model,” JEE, vol.85, no.4, pp. 287-292, Oct.1996.[8] L. Potter, S.E. Daniel, D.F. Popejoy-Sheriff and K.J. Min, “ABET outcomeassessment and improvement through the capstone design course in an industrialengineering curriculum,” Industrial and Manufacturing Systems EngineeringConference Proceedings and Posters, no. 17, Jun. 2006.[9] M. Marques, S. F. Ochoa, M.C. Bastarrica and F.J. Gutierrez, “Enhancing thestudent learning experience in software engineering project courses,” IEEETransactions on Education, vol.61, no.1, pp.63-73, Feb.2018.[10] J. Vanhanen, T. O.A. Lehtinen and C. Lassenius, “Teaching
toparticipate at the national and international level.References[1] S. Foroudastan, “Mechanical engineering education: Not just about the math,” IMECE Conference Proceedings, November 2004.[2] National Academy of Engineers, “Make solar energy economical,” in Grand Challenges for Engineering, May 2011. http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/8996/9082.aspx[3] S. Foroudastan, Engineering Technology Department Exit Survey, MTSU, 2015.[4] S. Foroudastan, “Enhancing undergraduate performance through peer-led, team-learning (PL-TL),” ASEE Conference Proceedings, 2009.[5] S. Foroudastan, R. Klapper, and S. Hyde, “Intercollegiate design competitions and Middle Tennessee State University’s machine shop: Kindling
course can beplaced into an engineering curriculum to address the advanced topics. While we are planning anew full course on PLCs, we will continue placing the PLC module into the Introduction toProjects and Tools course.References[1] S. He, H. Rahemi, K. Mouaouya, “Teaching PLC Programming and Industrial Automation in MechatronicsEngineering,” 122nd ASEE annual conference and exposition, Seattle, WA 2015.[2] R, Liu, “Global PLC market returns to growth in 2017, after two-year contraction”,IHSMarkit, https://technology.ihs.com/584279/global-plc-market-returns-to-growth-in-2017-after-two-year-contraction, 2018.[3] GlobeNewsWire,” Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) - Worldwide Market Outlook to 2023, Driven by theIncreased Need to Reduce
Future DirectionsIn this brief review of literature relating to Industry 4.0’s implications for South Korea, it is clearthat Industry 4.0 has the potential to transform South Korea’s future workforce. This developingphenomenon offers several opportunities for researchers. Promising areas for explorationinclude:1. What sorts of competency skills would be required for advanced manufacturing workers tosurvive in Industry 4.0?McKinsey Global Institute [9] recommended that workers seek additional education and trainingto adapt to an automated workplace. In the context of South Korea’s two-year technical collegeprograms, researchers may wish to investigate the extent to which current curricula containsadvanced manufacturing topics and reflects
conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities,” Top. Cogn. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73–105, 2009.[2] K. P. Cross, “Not can, butwill college teaching be improved?,” New Dir. High. Educ., vol. 1977, no. 17, pp. 1–15, 1977, doi: 10.1002/he.36919771703.[3] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? A review of the research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. July, pp. 223–231, 2004, doi: 10.1038/nature02568.[4] C. C. Bonwell and J. A. Eison, Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC, 1991.[5] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410
. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–58, 2014.[2] L. Deslauriers, E. Schelew, and C. Wieman, “Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class,” Science, vol. 332, no. 6031, pp. 862–864, 2011.[3] P. S. Shaffer and L. C. Mcdermott, “A research-based approach to improving student understanding of the vector nature of kinematical concepts: vectors and operational definitions,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 921–931, 2005.[4] Zavala, G., & Martinez-Torteya, C. E., “Students’ Abilities to Solve RC Circuits with Research-based Educational Strategies,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June, 2019. https://peer.asee.org/33312[5] M. A. McDaniel, S. M. Stoen, R
study abroad opportunitiesin Mechanics at PUWL and at our fellow engineering institutions both here, and abroad.AcknowledgementsThis study is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under GrantNo. DUE-1525671. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. This workwas conducted with oversight provided by the PUWL Institutional Review Board.References[1] Steif, P. S. and Dantzler, J. A. (2005). A statics concept inventory: Development and psychometric analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 363-371.[2] Vasquez, H., Fuentes, A. A., Kypuros, J. A. and Azarbayejani, M. (2015). Early
traditionalstudents to leave school in their first year; 1) much less likely to earn a degree within five years;2) far more likely to have leave school without returning than their traditional counterparts.Why we need to examine nontraditional student experiences in STEM In the United States, STEM education at all levels remains a significant national priority basedupon concerns ranging from global competitiveness, national security, 21st century workforceneeds, and equal access. In 2018, U.S. science and engineering (S&E) bachelor’s degreescomprised only 10% of the global total, while India and China together produced almost half ofthe world’s S&E bachelor degrees during the same time period. The U.S. demand for graduateswith STEM degrees continues
N. Cristianini, "Automating News Content Analysis: An Application to Gender Bias and Readability," 2010.[6] D. Citron and F. Pasquale, "The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions," Faculty Scholarship, 1 1 2014.[7] T. Bolukbasi, K.-W. Chang, J. Zou, V. Saligrama and A. Kalai, "Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings," in Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings, 2016.[8] S. Leavy, "Gender bias in artificial intelligence: The need for diversity and gender theory in machine learning," in Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering, 2018.[9] "Global Gender Gap
Paper ID #29057The Design and Impact of a Combined Makerspace, Wet Lab, andInstructional Design Studio for Chemical Engineering CurriculumProf. Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Associate Professor (Lecturer) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory, capstone laboratory, first year design laboratory, and the introduction to chemical engineering. His research interests focus
. Grinder, and R. J. Ross, “A paradigm shift! The internet, the web, browsers, Java, and the future of computer science education,” SIGCSE Bull. (Association Comput. Mach. Spec. Interes. Gr. Comput. Sci. Educ., 1998.[3] J. MIRO-JULIA, “Dangers of the Paradigm Shift.”[4] D. Veisz, E. Z. Namouz, S. Joshi, and J. D. Summers, “Computer-aided design versus sketching: An exploratory case study,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. AIEDAM, 2012.[5] M. Karima, K. Sadhal, and T. McNeil, “From paper drawings to computer-aided design,” IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., no. 2, pp. 27–39, 1985.[6] M. Katajamaki, “Knowledge-Based CAD,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 277–287, 1991.[7] A. K. Goel, S. Vattam, B
unique to Duke?," Duke Chronicle, 24 October 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.dukechronicle.com/article/2017/10/with-large-classes-and-waitlists-compsci- feels-growing-pains-but-are-those-pains-unique-to-duke. [Accessed 1 January 2020].[5] G. V. Glass and M. L. Smith, "Meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement," Educational evaluation and policy analysis, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2-16, 1979.[6] L. E. Winslow, "Programming pedagogy - a psychological overview," SIGCSE Bull., p. 17–22, 1996.[7] N. Bosch, S. D’Mello and C. Mills, "What emotions do novices experience during their first computer programming learning session?," in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2013.[8] E. J. Kim and K
Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2013.[3] President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Report to the President: Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) for America’s Future. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, 2010.[4] S. Brophy, S. Klein, M. Portsmore, and C. Rogers, “Advancing engineering education in P- 12 classrooms,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, pp. 369-387, July 2008.[5] E. A. Ring, E. A. Dare, E. A. Crotty, and G. H. Roehrig, “The evolution of teacher conceptions of STEM education throughout an intensive professional development
],and several other metacognitive measures (see Section 1).In both simulation activities, students build the car toy according to a set of customer requirementsshown in Table 1. The simulation activities also require that all the tasks are performed by onestudent for the individual activity (craft production) and by four students for the group activity(mass production). The student(s) need to minimize the total cost of producing the car toy whilesatisfying the requirements of the customer. Hence, there are four main functions: design, sourcing,manufacturing, and inspection. The simulation also involves a customer and a supplier (see Figure2). The descriptions of the four jobs are as follows: (1) Design Engineer: the design engineer
like to acknowledge the support from Leonhard Center for Enhancement ofEngineering Education at College of Engineering in Penn State.References[1] Ohland, M. W., Giurintano, D., Novoselich, B., Brackin, P., & Sangelkar, S. (2015). Supporting capstone teams: Lessons from research on motivation. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6), 1748-1759.[2] Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.[3] Passow, H. J. (2012). Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work?. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 95-118.[4] ABET, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs,” 2018