Validation of an Instrument in a Research Technical University,” Journal of Education and Culture Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, p. p19, 2019.[5] H. G. Murzi Escobar, “Understanding Dimensions of Disciplinary Engineering Culture in Undergraduate Students,” PhD Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2016.[6] H. Murzi, T. Martin, L. McNair, and M. Parerti, “A pilot study of the dimensions of disciplinary culture among engineering students,” in 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, 2014, pp. 1–4.[7] A. Agrawal, C. J. Groen, and A. L. Hermundstad, “Overriding tradition?: An initial exploration of the intersection of institutional and disciplinary cultures from the student perspective,” in 125th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition
, semiconductor technology has improved at anexponential rate following the self-fulfilling prophecy of Moore’s Law. Improvements insemiconductor technology have in turn enabled remarkable improvements in communication andinformation technology, leading to major changes in the way people communicate, compute,acquire and use information, and seek entertainment.This paper describes a First-Year Seminar taught in 2017 and 2019 in which students from arange of different majors explore the history and societal impact of semiconductor and relatedtechnologies throughout the semiconductor era. The goals of the seminar are to provide studentswith a qualitative understanding of how semiconductors are designed and manufactured, anappreciation for how the technology
Science Foundation.Dr. Gaillardon and Kelly have financial interest in the company Tetrad: Sensor NetworkSolutions, LLC, which commercializes air quality sensing solutions and provided engineeringserviceReferences[1] World Health Organization, “How air pollution is destroying our health,” https://www. who.int/air-pollution/news-and-events/how-air-pollution-is-destroying-our-health, January 2019, online; accessed 17 January 2019.[2] American Lung Association, “State of the Air 2018 - Most Polluted Cities,” https: //www.lung.org/our-initiatives/healthy-air/sota/city-rankings/most-polluted-cities. html, 2019, online; accessed 17 January 2019.[3] “AQ & U,” http://aqandu.org/, January 2018, online; accessed 24 January 2019.[4] A
. Falchikov and J. Goldfinch, "Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks," Review of Educational Research, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 287-322, 2000.[3] T. Wanner and E. Palmer, "Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1032-1047, 2018.[4] Sunny Designs, LLC, "CATME: Smarter Teamwork," [Online]. Available: https://www.catme.org. [Accessed February 2019].[5] C. Pung and J. Ferris, "Assessment of the CATME Peer Evaluation Tool Effectiveness," in Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, 2011.[6
Senior Member of the IEEE, a Member of the ASEE, and is a licensed Professional Engineer (P.E.) in the state of Florida.Mr. Jorge Luis Portillo RodriguezRebeca Feregrino Rodriguez, Kennesaw State University Electrical engineering technology graduate from Kennesaw State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Industrial Wire Cutting Machine: A Senior Capstone Design Project Austin B. Asgill, Jorge Portillo-Rodriguez, Rebeca Feregrino Rodriguez Eric Fernandez, Red Hayes Kennesaw State University – Marietta CampusAbstractManual wire cutting with poorly designed manual
V. Carrillo-Marquez, “Effectiveness of Cybersecurity Competitions,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Management, 2012.[29] J. Straub, “Experiential Research Education: A Report on the First Year of an NSF- sponsored Cyber-physical System Cybersecurity Research Experience for Un- dergraduates Program Experiential Research Education: A Report on the First Year of a NSF-sponsored Cyber-physical System Cybersecurity Research Experience for Undergraduates Program,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.
Design Seminar (2006), and is the current Amer- ican Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) campus representative for the University of Calgary. Dr. Brennan also served as one of the founding members of the Engineering Graduate Attributes Develop- ment (EGAD) group, and has been an active participant and contributor to both Canadian and international engineering education conferences since 2001. He has published papers in Learning and Individual Differ- ences, the Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, the International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, and Advances in Engineering Education; and has published over 30 conference papers in national and international
. Golub, T.G. Dube, J. Zhang, “Integration of 3-D Printed Drone Project in General Engineering Curriculum,” In ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2019. 6. A. Stern, Y. Rosenthal, N. Dresler, D. Ashkenazi, “Additive manufacturing: An education strategy for engineering students,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 27, 2019, pp. 503-514.7. Oppliger, Doug. "Using first Lego league to enhance engineering education and to increase the pool of future engineering students (work in progress)." In 32nd annual frontiers in education, vol. 3, pp. S4D-S4D. IEEE, 2002.8. Bubbar, Kush, Alexandros Dimopolous, Roslyn Gaetz, Peter Wild, and Michael McWilliam. "Evolution of the Design Engineering Mentorship Program." Proceedings of the Canadian
, SensePublishers, Rotterdam, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-980-7_2[2] (Available Online) https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/globalhighered/global-citizenship-%E2%80%93-what-are-we-talking-about-and-why-does-it-matter[3] Warrington, R.O., Kulacki, F.A., and Warrington, A. (2011), “Vision 2030 : A Time for Engineering Leadership”, Proceedings, 2011 INEER Conference, Belfast.[4] Urbina, J., Oliden, J. F., Tunno, P., Lakhtakia, A., Rodriguez, J., Estrada, M. L., Obonyo, E., Zappe, S. E., Masters, C. B., and Fonseca Pacheco, F. (2019, June), “Experience-Based Learning: Global Engineering Culture and Society”, Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32789[5] (Available Online
after class. Both were made available usingthelearning management system, Instructure Canvas, throughout the semesterIn the subsequent semester offering (Spring 2019), the course was taught in a flipped-classroom50:50 mixed-mode format. The course material delivered remained exactly the same as that ofthe face-to-face semester, except roughly 50% was delivered online. The students attended 1weekly 75 minute session in the mixed-mode model, as opposed to 150 minute (three 50 min),weekly sessions in the face-to-face format. The course was structured into weekly modules(Figure 2). For the online content, instructional videos were created by the instructor for weeklytopics. Three different types of videos were created by the instructor for the
Dakota State University and PhD from the University of Missouri-Columbia, all in electrical engineering. Dur- ing 2001-2016 he was the Dean of the College of Engineering and Computer Science at California State University, Fullerton. Prior to that he was the Head of the Electrical Engineering Department at RIT in Rochester, NY. Fullerton Chamber of Commerce recognized him in 2015 as the ”Educator of the Year.” In 2016 he received ASEE’s ”Distinguished Educator Award” from the ECE Division. Dr. Unnikrishnan was a member of the Accreditation Committee for American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). He was a Commissioner of the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET during 2008-13 and chaired the
evaluate the effectiveness of the inquiry learning strategy outlined above, we conductedPost-Course Surveys and in-depth interviews in 2017, 2018, and 2019. This paper focuses on the 5findings from our surveys. The survey was conducted online through a secure platform providedby the institution (Office of Research Ethics), completed outside the class time. The researchassistant (Racette) made the announcements in class and on the learning management system, andwas the only person with access to the raw data. There was a bonus mark of 1% for completion ofeach survey, and the research assistant (Racette) directly arranged with the course TAs to applythe bonus marks to the final grades. The anonymized
editor. Chin has also served as the Engineering Design Graphics Division’s annual and mid-year conference program chair, and he has served as a review board member for several journals including the EDGJ. He has been a program chair for the Southeast- ern Section and has served as its Engineering Design Graphics Division’s vice chair and chair and as its Instructional Unit’s secretary, vice chair, and chair. His ongoing involvement with ASEE has focused on annual conference paper presentation themes associated with the Engineering Design Graphics, Engineer- ing Libraries, Engineering Technology, New Engineering Educators, and the Two-Year College Divisions and their educational and instructional agendas.Dr. Ranjeet
-institute-and-deloitte-skills-gap-in-manufacturing-study.pdf.Giffi, Craig, Michelle Drew Rodriguez, and Sandeepan Mondal. “A Look Ahead: How ModernManufacturers Can Create Positive Perceptions with the US Public,” 2017, 24.http://www.themanufacturinginstitute.org/~/media/9607397D3AFC423AB68133505EE2C348/2017_US_Public_Perception_Manufacturing_Study.pdf.Krause, Liesl, and Greg J Strimel. “The Next Generation for Manufacturing Competitiveness?Children’ s Perceptions as Shown Through Drawings the Next Generation for ManufacturingCompetitiveness? Children’s Perceptions as Shown Through Drawings.” In 126TH AnnualConfrence & Exposition. Tampa, Florida: ASEE, 2019.https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/140/papers/26206/view.Rosendin, Nadine, and Anne
ofindividual units that use a project-based inquiry approach to teach science to middle schoolstudents. Real-world design challenges are provided for students to develop and present solutionsto their teacher and peers[11]. TeachEngineering.org is an NSF-funded collaboration betweenfive universities and the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). TheTeachEngineering.org website offers a collection of K-12 engineering curricula aligned withstandards that are free for teachers to download and use in their classrooms [12]. Engineering is Elementary (EiE) is a curriculum developed through the Museum ofScience Boston for grades 1-5[13]. EiE has simplified the process of engineering design into afive-steps to provide early education
removed and changed. The rims were rotated, brushes applied, and cleaning solvent sprayed. VTA expects to install the machine in the maintenance shop resulting in labor savings. o Team 2: Students completed a device to measure the brake pad thickness on the outer and inner pads to avoid removal of the wheels and brake components to manually measure the pad thicknesses. Again, reducing labor costs will result. • 2019/20: This year two teams are partnering with a Lexus dealership on two projects: o Team 1: Students are designing an apparatus to lift and remove a 200-pound high voltage battery from Lexus hybrid vehicles. The removal requires
,” American Institutes for Research, 2007.[3] A. Andrews, and J. Brown, “The effects of math anxiety,” Education, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 362-370, 2015.[4] K. W. Choe, J. B. Jenifer, C. Rozek, M. Berman, and S. L. Beilock, “Calculated Avoidance: Math Anxiety Predicts Math Avoidance in Effort-based Decision-making,” 2019.[5] G. Ramirez, E. A. Gunderson, S. C. Levine, and S. L. Beilock, “Math anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary school,” Journal of Cognition and Development, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 187-202, 2013.[6] C. Holden, “Female math anxiety on the wane,” Science, vol. 236, pp. 660-662, 1987.[7] S. L. Beilock, E. A. Gunderson, G. Ramirez, and S. C
manners”. ASEE Prism. American Society for Engineering Education. 2005. vol. 15. no. 4. pp. 45.[10] B. Horn. “A reflection on leadership: A comparative analysis of military and civilian approaches,” 2014, Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, vol 15. No. 3.[11] Y. Xue, R. Larson. “STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes and yes”. 2015. Website. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800410/ (Accessed November 7, 2019)[12] A. Barr, A. “From the battlefield to the schoolyard: The short-term impact of the Post-9/11 G.I. Bill”. The Journal of Human Resources, 2015. vol. 50. no. 3. pp. 580-613.[13] A. W. Radford, A. Bentz, R. Dekker, J. Paslov, J. “After the Post-9/11 G.I. Bill: A profile of military service
Paper ID #29657Evaluation of Disaster Resilience Preparation in the ConstructionEducation CurriculumDr. Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University Dr. Sanjeev Adhikari is faculty from Kennesaw State University. Previously he was faculty at Morehead State University from 2009 to 2016 and faculty at Purdue University – Indianapolis from 2016 to 2019. He has completed Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with a total of 18 years academic experience at five different universities. He has always been
Point)’s unique faculty composition consists of professionalmilitary faculty, permanent military faculty, and civilian faculty is known as the “blend ofexcellence”. The majority of West Point faculty (~55%) are military officers serving for a two-to-three-year period. These military faculty are professional faculty members serving in acapacity similar to adjunct faculty or non-tenured teaching faculty at other universities. Eachtype of faculty member brings unique skills and talents to the faculty team that contribute to theoverall development of West Point’s undergraduates who serve as military officers upongraduation. In spring 2019, West Point faculty members were asked to share their thoughts andperspectives on the faculty development of
, "Engineering by the Numbers: ASEE Retention and Time-to-Graduation Benchmarks for Undergraduate," Brian L. Yoder, Washington, 2016.[7] C. P. Veenstra, E. L. Dey and G. D. Herrin, "A Model for Freshman Engineering Retention," AEE, vol. 1, no. 3, 2009.[8] M. Johnsoni and S. Sheppard, "Students entering and exiting the engineering pipeline-identifying key," 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education, vol. 3, pp. S3C-13- S3C-19, 2002.[9] M. Kopparla, Experiences of Freshmen Enrolled in Math-Intensive STEM Majors, Texas A&M University: Doctoral dissertation,, 2019.[10] J. Zhao and P. Xianbo, "Factors Influencing Student Progression in Built Environment and Engineering Programs: Case of Central Queensland
focused topics that couldbe on the weekly quiz. Information presented in lecture was then primarily via lecture andboard writing, progressing through the study guide list. Through 2017, 2018 and 2019, all ofthe information presented in lectures was converted into PowerPoint slides, some of whichwere simply highlighted parts of the text or other references. The slides are made available tostudents through Blackboard. Also posted on Blackboard are listed of “Helpful Videos”,usually 4 or 5 per week that have been ‘discovered’ on YouTube, which present portions of theweek’s content. When appropriate, the students are asked to view a video prior to class, butonly a few ever seem to have the time to view these before class. Many do comment that
specifically for female students. The workshopwas offered during the summer of 2019 and is a modification of an already developed cross-disciplinary EGGN 122 Early Research Experiences in Biomechanics and Bioengineeringundergraduate program [7].The main objective of the IDEAL program was to explore enhancing middle and high-schoolfemale students self-confidence and motivation in pursuing future STEM careers by providingthem with team cross-disciplinary research experiences that enhance critical thinking andcollaboration skills. Entry and exit summer IDEAL program surveys used to assess the IDEALprogram impact showed that the students enhanced their knowledge/skills the most inunderstanding STEM research papers, as well as in working collaboratively on
Engineering Education within the College of Engineering at the PennsylvaniaState University.References[1] M. W. Ohland, A. G. Yuhasz, and B. L. Sill, “Identifying and Removing a Calculus Prerequisite as a Bottleneck in Clemson’s General Engineering Curriculum,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 253–257, Jul. 2004.[2] J. J. Pembridge and M. A. Verleger, “First-year math and physics courses and their role in predicting academic success in subsequent courses,” in 120nd American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013.[3] E. Schott and C. Orndoff, “Engineering Prerequisites at Florida Universities,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[4] R. E. Efimba and T. R. Smith
Engineering? Insights from Qualitative Analysis of Definitions Written by Undergraduate Students,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2019.[19] R. A. Linsenmeier and D. W. Gatchell, “Core elements of an undergraduate biomedical engineering curriculum – State of the art and recommendations,” 9th Int. Conf. Eng. Educ., pp. 22–24, 2006.[20] D. W. Gatchell, R. A. Linsenmeier, and T. R. Harris, “Biomedical engineering key content survey - The 1 st step in a delphi study to determine the core undergraduate BME curriculum,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., pp. 1209–1213, 2004.[21] R. F. Kirsch, M. LaBerge, E. J. Perreault, and M. R. King, “Announcing the Fourth Biomedical Engineering Education Summit Meeting,” Cell. Mol. Bioeng., vol. 12, no. 2
Proc. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, Seattle, WA, 2015.[3] H.L. Coates, J. Carlson, R. Clement, M. Henderson, L.R. Johnston, Y. Shorish, “How are we measuring up? Evaluating research data services in academic libraries,” Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication. 6, pp. 1-33, 2018. Available: doi:10.7710/2162-3309.2226.[4] A. Goben, T. Griffin. “In Aggregate: Trends, needs, and opportunities from research data management surveys,” College & Research Libraries. 80(7), pp.903-924, 2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.7.903. Accessed January 22, 2020.[5] L. Perrier, L. Barnes, “Developing research data management services and support
%considered hands on learning important to engineering education, which was consistent with thestudent perspectives captured in the ASEE TUUE Phase II Report [2]. Students were asked forsuggestions on how to improve the project, and they responded with several constructivesuggestions and a strong preference for more hands on projects. Based on these encouragingresults, an expanded semester-long version of the project was implemented the next year (2019).2019 Semester-long Project with Makerspace Engagement: “Teams Teaching Aerospace”Goals for 2019 Semester Project. One major goal for the expanded “Teams TeachingAerospace” project was to help students taking IAE (mostly first-year students) to become morefamiliar with the making facilities on campus
, “Computational Thinking in K-2 Classrooms: Evidence from Student Artifacts (Fundamental),” 2017 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., p. 22, 2017.[5] C. Wilson and M. Guzdial, “How to make progress in computing education,” Commun. ACM, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 35–37, 2010.[6] J. J. Lu and G. H. L. Fletcher, “Thinking about computational thinking,” SIGCSE Bull. Inroads, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 260–264, 2009.[7] M. U. Bers, “Coding as another language: a pedagogical approach for teaching computer science in early childhood,” J. Comput. Educ. J. Comput. Educ., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 499–528, 2019.[8] H. Ehsan, T. M. Dandridge, I. H. Yeter, and M. E. Cardella, “K-2 students’ computational thinking engagement in formal and informal learning settings: A case study (fundamental
from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. New York: Nation Books, 2016.[3] A. L. Pawley, J. A. Meija, and R. A. Revelo, “Translating Theory on Color-blind Racism to an Engineering Education Context: Illustrations from the Field of Engineering Education,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[4] Data USA, “Engineering | Data USA,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://datausa.io/profile/cip/engineering#employment. [Accessed: 13-Dec-2019].[5] D. E. Chubin, G. S. May, and E. L. Babco, “Diversifying the Engineering Workforce,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 73–86, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00830.x.[6] A. E. Slaton, Race, Rigor, and Selectivity in U. S
for Global Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp.1–15, 2007.[2] K.A. Davis, Y. Jalali, D.B. Knight, V. Lohani, & R. Müller, Student learning in international research programs: A comparison across cultural contexts, 20 18 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 24-27, 2018, Salt Lake City, UT.[3] L.M. Hatfield, C.T. Amelink, N.P. Sanderlin, H.E. Lyne, & B.K. Jesiek, Student outcomes of participating in an international research experience, 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 25-28, 2017, Columbus, OH.[4] B.K. Jesiek, Y. Haller, & J. Thompson, “Developing globally competent engineering researchers: Outcomes-based instructional and assessment strategies from the IREE 2010 China