, theresearchers will explore how individual students learn and become self-employed, or learn to usetheir local knowledge assets on behalf of their employers; that is, do students see themselves as acontributor to a company and enjoying a career dedicated to helping a firm remain competitive ina global market.Research Questions and DesignThe overarching goal of this project is to improve rural manufacturing capacity by betterunderstanding the relationship between NW Florida employers, employees, and curriculum viathe following research questions:RQ1. How do the AM competencies graduates gain through Associate’s level AM programscompare to the needs of employers?RQ2. How do the AM competencies graduates gain through Associate’s level AM programscompare to
, group learning, etc. However, one type of PL, group-to-group peer learning(GGPL) is not addressed in literature. GGPL can be defined as a learning method where two ormore peer groups interact to increase the knowledge of all members. Here, the scope of the workis limited to only classmates working in pairs on their lab design projects and receiving help onlyfrom other classmate pairs. This pair-to-pair peer learning (PPPL) represents the simplest form ofGGPL where group size includes only two members per group.This paper mainly addresses students’ experiences with a novel PPPL method as it is implementedin a lab setting during a lab design project encompassing two different engineering programs,mechatronics and industrial engineering. The lab
earn a Master of Science in Engineering in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, while working with the Austin chapter of Engineers Without Borders as a volunteer and project lead for a project in Peru. She has published and presented on incentivizing decentralized sanitation and wastewater treatment, on sustainability of coastal community water and sanitation service options, as well as on integrating liberal arts and STEM education, currently through the vehicle of the Grand Challenges Scholars Program. She has co-designed workshops oriented toward educational change for Olin’s Summer Institute and the joint Olin College-Emerson
and never having two assignments due on one day, usinga new learning management tool that enables students to submit their projects as often as they canand get instant feedback about their assignments, using a new scheduling tool to make it easier forstudents to schedule appointments with the instructor, using an always-active anonymousfeedback survey for students to constantly provide feedback about different aspects of the course,providing some additional resources, and removing some barriers. Furthermore, these smallchanges had a surprisingly positive impact on the standards of the course. Students’ raw grades –i.e., grades before final raise/curve – significantly improved and the class’ final projects reachedhigher standards.1
populations, i.e. students who tend to be first generation, minorities, and/orcommuters. These universities encounter similar challenges in first-year retention and graduationrates, especially in the STEM disciplines. As they strive to improve the first year engineeringand/or mathematics student experience at their campuses, they have engaged in differentapproaches; including Peer Led Team Learning (PLTL), formation of an Engineering LearningCommunity (ELC), and engaging students in outreach as STEM Ambassadors. Incorporatingthese individual strengths with new activities that will be shared across institutions, the team iscurrently embarking on a multi-year research project to uncover how students develop STEMidentity in an urban context, identify
Research Center (SSRC) since its inception in 1998 - most recently as center Director. She has more than 20 years of experience with survey research, data collection, data analysis, program evaluation, report writing, and general grant/contract management. She is responsible for the day-to-day management of the SSRC’s operations, as well as serving as project manager/principal investigator for most of the SSRC’s projects. She has taught undergraduate courses in criminal justice and graduate courses in public policy and survey research. She has managed research and evaluation activities on a variety of topics including: the effectiveness of early intervention services, im- plementation fidelity of positive behavioral
prior research experience. In total 20 students(ten per year) participated in the program and worked on individual project topics under theguidance of faculty and graduate student mentors. Unlike a typical REU program, theCybermanufacturing REU involved a few unique activities, such as a 48-hour intense design andprototype build experience (also known as Aggies Invent), industry seminars, and industry visits.Overall, the REU students demonstrated significant gains in all of the twelve research-relatedcompetencies that were assessed as a part of formative and summative evaluation process. Whilealmost all of them wanted to pursue a career in advanced manufacturing, includingCybermanufacturing, the majority of the participants preferred industry
University of DenverAbstractTo broaden participation of Latinx in engineering, we conducted the largest scale, longitudinalretention study of an underrepresented minority group in engineering to date. Here, we presentquantitative and qualitative findings of the first 3 years of this 5-year project, which investigatedthe temporal effects of social cognitive, personal, and contextual factors on engineering students’persistence decisions as posited by Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) [1, 2]. We presentthemes that emerged from individual interviews with 32 Latinx and White engineering students[3]. Using a large sample of over 800 Latinx engineering students from 6 Hispanic ServingInstitutions and 5 Predominantly White Institutions, we found that
considering writing a Faculty Early CareerDevelopment (CAREER) proposal for the National Science Foundation. The paper focuses onthree topics that could be considered part of the “hidden curriculum” of successful proposalwriting for this program: situating your project within your vision for your academic career,communicating effectively with program officers, and developing a support network for yourproposal writing. Examples of career visions are included from Engineering Education CAREERawardees. Writing prompts are included to help prospective investigators develop their owncareer visison.Keywords: NSF CAREER, proposal writing, program officer, career visionIntroductionThe Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) competition is a unique program
(e.g. sameinstitution or different institution), the style of mentorship preferred by mentor and mentee, theability for mentees to network within the EER community, the academic rank of the mentor andmentee, and the interpersonal relationships between RIEF grantee pairings. The aim of thepresent work is to illuminate the ways in which these findings resonate within the EERcommunity, as well as to move towards impactful distribution of future results. The outcomes ofthe study are related to a larger project which will fuse our team’s experience hostingworkshops, networking with RIEF grantees, and developing training materials for faculty joiningthe EER community. Developing an understanding of best practices for faculty-faculty peermentorship
built by carefully designingventure development projects. Here, the students are asked to generate a business idea and wouldneed to conduct all the necessary investigation and evaluation involved in generating a realisticventure concept and taking it through to the point of commencement of operations [4]. Since manyof these investigation and evaluation tasks are relatively new for the students, certain trainingmaterials should be provided by the instructor. However, this should not be to the extent that theprocess be dominated by input from the instructor. Instead, the students should be given room toexplore, make mistakes, learn from those mistakes and try something new. Another importantaspect here is to ensure that the overall goal is not
technology, and readings in diverse canonical and non-canonical works of sciencefiction. This humanistic course concluded with a summative group project, which requiredstudents to draw upon all aspects of the diverse curriculum in order to fulfill assignment goals.The project, which was designed to activate both creative and critical thinking abilities, directedstudents to create utopian societies. In order to imagine visionary alternative societies, studentsemployed ethical principles, invoked themes and ideas from literature, and utilized new and evenspeculative technologies. In designing planned "perfect" communities, the students examined ourmost pressing social, scientific, and cultural challenges, responding to these problems byenvisioning new
theirinspiration for a design project. We created a case study for each scenario, where we tried to set-up the situation and teach students the correct or Instructor-expected response. We created threeethics related assignments.2.1 Assignment 1 and Quiz 1In the first assignment, the students were asked to read the Academic Integrity Policy for ouruniversity. The policy is available in the ATU Student Handbook and we created a link to it inBlackboard for the students. The policy lists types of academic integrity violations and includesdefinitions and examples for cheating, plagiarism, collusion, impersonation, fabrication, andforgery. The students were asked to read the policy and then answer 5 questions. The completeassignment is given in figure 1
disciplines, the structure and coursework of the classallow students to explore varied perspectives and approaches to addressing global problems.This paper argues that engineering students need to engage with the SDGs in the context ofengineering problems to equip them as innovative problem solvers. Further, evaluatingengineering projects and processes simultaneously through social, political, and environmentallenses expands the context and considerations taken in the problem-solving process.The proposed course will be piloted through the Civil and Environmental EngineeringDepartment at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly). Toencourage collaboration between students from diverse disciplines, the course will be offered
on projects and activities inmakerspaces.Growth MindsetGrowth mindset has been defined as, the extent to which learners keep an open mind to considertheir ability to learn or perform [27], [28]. People who consider their current limitations predictstheir limitations in the future (e.g., “I am bad at math”), hold a fixed mindset. In contrast, peoplewho consider their current limitations can be overcome with effort or opportunity, hold a growthmindset. We posit that work in makerspaces increases the potential for students to develop agrowth mindset due to the ability to experiment with solutions and engagement in multipleattempts with no real single and correct solution. In addition, the ability to modify and createnew prototypes is relatively
course and the students that are working within the boundaries of thecourse [4]. Therefore, work is being done to design assessment that allows for student freedomwith strategies like project-based learning and learning portfolios [5]. These forms of assessmentderive from work on open-ended learning environments and self-regulated learning. Open-endedlearning is a pedagogical approach that harnesses students’ intrinsic motivation to learn [6], andself-regulated learning is when students make goals and evaluate their learning in order topractice metacognition [7]. Many researchers have found benefits when implementing moreopportunities for student-directed learning both in higher education [8–11] and the K-12system [12]. Giving students ownership
need to learn embeddeddevelopment comes up repeatedly in the context of our capstone senior design experience, and hasresulted in the individual instruction of many students at our institution, over many years, often in theform of guided tutorials. While effective enough to support the capstone course, this approach does notexpose every student that wants to acquire this skill set with the opportunity to do so; such instruction islimited to those students that need to learn the skills to support a project. It also lacks the efficiency of aclassroom approach.Microcontroller skills can be acquired today without formal instruction. Students can learn much of thismaterial on their own through the “Maker Movement” [2], in which makers learn through
co-decision makers, instead of beingtreated as commoditized instruments [7] of the business machinery.Simultaneously, we pay attention to the engineers’ privileged position – e.g. as experts and high-income earners, with greater proximity to large-scale project decisions – and its role in the unequalinfluence relations engineers have with other knowledge disciplines and/or communitystakeholders. Engineers can be important mediators or gatekeepers for the input of diversestakeholders on the technology development (e.g. machine learning bias). Therefore, our workingvision for engineering ethics education is two-fold: (1) to empower students as moral agents whoeffectively negotiate for social and ethical responsibility in the technology
involved in develop- ing and facilitating the first-year engineering program at ONU. He earned his PhD from the University of Colorado Boulder where his research focused on pre-engineering education and project-based learning.Mr. Bruce Wellman, Olathe Northwest High School Bruce Wellman is a National Board Certified Teacher (NBCT, Chemistry) who teaches Engineering Chemistry as part of Engineering Academy at Olathe Northwest High School in Olathe, KS and serves as a Co-Principal Investigator on an NSF funded (DR K-12) research project entitled ”Building Informed Designers”. Wellman is a member of ASEE’s Board of Directors’ Committee on P-12 Engineering Educa- tion. Wellman completed his B.S. degree in general science
,and evaluate the effectiveness of a set of vertically integrated online modules that will employ aconvergent science approach along with innovative pedagogies to teach model-based systemsengineering (MBSE) to current and future practitioners. The team will collaborate with industrypartners, faculty at community colleges, and faculty at 4-year colleges to prepare online modulesfor three different audiences: practicing engineers, undergraduates at 4-year institutions, andstudents pursuing 2-year degrees. The project began on January 1, 2020. The team of systemsengineers, manufacturing engineers, instructional designers, computer graphics technologists,and engineering educators, some with expertise in learning assessment, will share the
Graduate Student in the Secondary Education Master’s of Education (MEd) program through the Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services. Research interests include argumentation in science and engineering and the benefit they play in developing literacy in specific content areas. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Learning from Engineers to Develop a Model of Disciplinary Literacy in Engineering (Year 3)Project OverviewTo broaden participation in engineering and improve the accessibility of high quality curricularmaterials that reflect the authentic nature of the engineering discipline, new approaches toteaching engineering at the K-12 and
Washington State he was an application engineer for Hawk Ridge Systems, a SOLIDWORKS reseller. His research areas include engineering education focused on engineering graphics and design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Effective teaching for dimensioning and tolerancing in MechanicalEngineering Application with a visual aid and an experimental set up.Abstract:This project addresses a pedagogical problem related to dimensioning and tolerancing ofcomponents and an innovative approach to solve that problem in a Mechanical Engineeringfreshman level Computer Aided Design and Visualization class. In this class, students learn howto dimension and tolerance a drawing for a part using a set of rules
Heavy Maintenance Representative for ASERCA airlines in Venezuela. In August 2002, Carlos received his Masters in Aeronautical Science, with a Management and Safety Specialization, from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Carlos joined the Embry-Riddle NEAR Lab team in June 2003 as a Simulation Analyst, specializing in the Total Airspace and Airport Modeler (TAAM) simulation soft- ware. Carlos is currently the NEAR lab Project Manager. His duties include project lead and simulation support for different projects. He also is a simulation specialist for software such as TARGETS, SDAT, and TAAM. In addition to his NEAR Lab duties, Carlos is an Airport Planning and Design instructor for the College of Business at ERAU
service and engineering. He has written texts in design, general engineering and digital electronics, including the text used by Project Lead the Way.Rachel Rosenbaum, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Rachel Rosenbaum is a junior in Industrial and Systems Engineering with passions in project management and engineering education. She was in the Galipatia LLC freshman year, a CEED Peer Mentor sophomore year, and has recently started research with the ECLIPS team. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 First-year engineering program evaluation: Understanding senior students’ perceptions about their first-year experienceAbstractThis Complete Research paper
as continuing to trackstudent outcomes over multiple years (as few studies include information beyond the first-year ofengineering study). The project studies how students perceive, select, and utilize academicopportunities and experiences (during their initial years of engineering study) with respect totheir long-term career goals through the major selection process. The primary research objectiveswere to: 1. Identify specific parameters (e.g., FYE course content, technical engineering electives, inside and outside the classroom major exploration opportunities) that influence major discernment using both quantitative and open-ended qualitative data. 2. Monitor major changes of students through the completion of sophomore year
autonomy could begin making certain vessels unmanned in thenear future [1]. Many of these projects are currently in the demonstration phase, such as theFalco, an unmanned ferry from Finferries [2]. However, many in the maritime community feelthat there are certain applications, such as non-electric vessels, that will require a trained crewonboard [3].This uncertainty means that academic institutions are hesitant to fund new advanced trainingprograms until they are certain what they should look like. For example, as autonomy increaseson vessels, mariners could either focus on traditional computer engineering skills such as codingand data management of the digital twin – a virtual simulation of a vessel used for increasingefficiency and early fault
game design mechanicswere also taught via weekly board game sessions conducted inside and outside of class wherestudents both played and deconstructed the mechanics of the games experienced. In the latterpart of the course, a major course project was assigned in which four teams of students inconjunction with graphic design students developed unique games meant to teach others aboutclimate change and civilization collapse. Specific game mechanics were not prescribed; instead,student teams were encouraged to explore a variety of mechanics and design elements that bestsuited their chosen audience and game theme. In addition to this final board game product,students wrote a reflective paper to (a) explain how the board game accomplished the goal
Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Evaluating the impacts of project-based service learning on students through the EPICS programAbstractProject-based service learning (PBSL) is an innovative approach to education that is beingincreasingly adopted by many engineering programs. Yet while PBSL itself is becoming moreprevalent, the body of research behind service learning is lacking in some areas. Previousresearch has identified a wide range of positive outcomes that have been attributed to servicelearning including increased social responsibility, teamwork skills, communication skills, criticalthinking skills, understanding of societal context, and many more. However, this research iscomposed primarily of self
students.Existing data gives reason to believe that enrollment and retention of female students at X University maybe linked to certain perceptions about a particular major or profession. Perceptions of a major beinghuman-centric and enabling an individual to make a difference were shown to be significant factorsamong those identified in a research study. Literature will be presented to show the connection betweenhumanitarian efforts undertaken in an engineering context, and the impact that it has had on femalestudent participation. This paper will attempt to shows the trends of female enrollment and retentionamong various majors at X University, and compare them to programs, organizations and projects whichhave a humanitarian aspect.It is important that
Paper ID #30565Work-In-Progress: A Mixed Method Longitudinal Study to Assess MindsetDevelopment in an Entrepreneurial Engineering CurriculumProf. Heidi Morano, Lawrence Technological University Graduated from U of Michigan 1995 with a Masters in Engineering - Applied Mechanics. Taught as an adjunct instructor in the ME department at Lawrence Technological University for 11 years. Hired in 2015 as full-time as a Project Engineer (with teaching responsibilities) for the Studio for Entrepreneurial Engineering Design. Promoted in 2018 to Director of Entrepreneurial Engineering Design Curriculum.Prof. Susan Henson, Lawrence