Gummadi, and Maveeth Nallapeta., “Game mechanics and social networking for co-production of course materials,” Frontiers in Education 2009, paper 2009-1426. 2. Edward F. Gehringer, Abhishek Gummadi, Reejesh Kadanjoth, and Yvonne Marie Andrés, “Motivating effective peer review with extra credit and leaderboards,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville, KY, June 20–23, 2010, paper #2010-1154. 3. Edward Gehringer, Ferry Pramudianto, Abhinav Medhekar, Chandrasekar Rajasekar, and Zhongcan Xiao, "Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Assessment," 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, June 25, 2018. 4. Sudipto Biswas, Edward F. Gehringer
[1] P. McLaren, Che Guevara, Paulo Freire, and the Pedagogy of Revolution. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2000. [10] G. A. Dietz, E. P. Douglas, and E. D. McCray, “Critical Theories for Unmasking the Personal and Structural Racialized Experiences ofoppression. Thus, education actually reproduces the inequalities it is said to be fighting. [2] P. McLaren and R. Farahmandpur, “Teaching Against Globalization and the New Imperialism: Toward a Revolutionary Pedagogy,” J. Teach. Engineers,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019
facilitate learning laboratory skills while practicing social distancing.references[1] D. D. Burkey, D. D. Anastasio, and A. Suresh, “Improving Student Attitudes Toward the Capstone Laboratory Course Using Gamification,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Exhib., vol. June 23-26, no. Atlanta, GA, 2013.[2] A. Antonaci, R. Klemke, and M. Specht, “The Effects of Gamification in Online Learning Environments : A Systematic Literature Review,” Informatics, vol. 6, no. 32, pp. 1–22, 2019.[3] R. Alsawaier, “The Effect of Gamification on Motivation and Engagement,” Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol., 2017.[4] M. R. N. Gari, G. S. Walia, and A. D. Radermacher, “Gamification in Computer Science Education: a Systematic Literature Review,” ASEE
and Technology (IJEMST), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 254-265, 2018, doi:10.18404/ijemst.428182.[3] D. A. Major, S. D. Burleson, X. Hu, & K. Shryock, “Engineering identity as a predictor of undergraduate students’ persistence in engineering,” presented at the 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, Jun. 16-19, 2019.[4] C. H. Wasilewski, "Men and women in engineering: Professional identity and factors influencing workforce retention," Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, WA, 2015.[5] M. Eliot, & J. Turns, “Constructing professional portfolios: Sense-making and professional identity development for engineering undergraduates
education and professional development are for preparing students to succeed in the workplace. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Developing and Applying Knowledge and Skills in Ethics and Professional Morality Don Winiecki, Ed.D., Ph.D. (presenting author) Lynn Catlin, P.E. Gus Engstrom, Ph.D., P.E. Harold Ackler, Ph.D. Boise State University, College of Engineering Boise, Idaho USA Accepted for presentation in the “Engineering Ethics” track at American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) 2020(Originally scheduled for 21-24 June, Montreal, QC, Canada
process rather than from any one individual.References[1] Utschig, T. and Khalid, A. (2020). Fostering Institutional Innovation through an Engineering Education Ideas Forum. American Society for Engineering Education Southeastern Section Conference, March 8-10, Auburn, AL.[2] ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation (2017). ASEE Interdivisional Town Hall Meetings. https://aseetownhall.wordpress.com/virtual-conference/2017- virtual-conference/ .[3] Shared Governance Committee, “Shared Governance at Vanderbilt University”, Vanderbilt University, 2018, available at https://cdn.vanderbilt.edu/vu-wp0/wp- content/uploads/sites/305/2019/08/06202610/Shared-Governance-Final-Report.pdf[4
Mai. A. (2014, June), Synchronized Robot: A PID Control Project with the LEGOMindstorm NXT, 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana.[3] Alavi, Z. and Meehan, K. (2019 June), Enhancing a Control Systems Design Course by UsingExperiential Learning Model, 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.[4] Dunne, B., Parikh, C. and Sterian, A. (2009 June), Introducing Sophomore Engineering Students ToControl Theory Using Mobile Robots, 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas.[5] Y. Kim (2011 August), Control Systems Lab Using a LEGO Mindstorms NXT Motor System, in IEEETransactions on Education, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 452-461.[6] A. Valera, M. Valles, J. Tornero (2001), Real-Time Robot
. and B.S. all in industrial engineering from the University of Arkansas. She has a variety of research interests including quality & reliability, engineering education, and community-based OR. She is a member of ASEE and IIE.Dr. Leanne Petry, Central State University Dr. Leanne Petry is an Associate Professor in the College of Engineering, Science, Technology, and Agriculture at Central State University. Her expertise is in analytical and materials characterization tech- niques, including microscopy, spectroscopy, chromatography, and electrochemistry. Her research interests include oxidation-reduction reactions at the surface of electrodes for sensor applications, corrosion mech- anisms of materials, as well as
., Atadero, R.A., Rambo-Hernandez, K.E., and Francis, J. “Creating InclusiveEnvironments in First-Year Engineering Classes to Support Student Retention and Learning.”ASEE Annual Conference 2015. Seattle, WA, USA. June 14-17, 2015.[2] Rambo-Hernandez, K.E., Roy, A., Morris, M., Hensel, R., Schwartz, J., Hasemi, M.,Atadero, R. & Paguyo, C. “Using Interactive Theater to Promote Inclusive Behaviors in Teamsfor First-Year Engineering Students: A Sustainable Approach” ASEE CoNECD Conference.Washington, D.C. April 29-May 2, 2018.[3] Hedayati, A., Atadero, R.A., Baker, D. and Casper, A. “Analyzing the Effects of anInnovative Intervention to Infuse Diversity and Inclusion in a Statics Course.” ASEE AnnualConference, Tampa, FL, USA. June 16-19, 2019.[4
society, including the development in practice of concepts such as grassroots engineering and solidarity economy and technology.However, there are some limitations too. As far as we can see, Soltec faces two significantchallenges for the students’ education: funding and evaluation. In the first case, the problem getsmore evident with administrations less sympathetic to left-wing projects, which is the case ofBrazil and both the State and city of Rio de Janeiro, currently in the hand of far-right politicians.This situation is new to Soltec, after thirteen years of the leftist Worker’s Party’s federaladministrations. However, after far-right Jair Bolsonaro came into power (2019), FederalUniversities (such as UFRJ), social movements, and
1504618). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The author would also like to thank thestatistical consulting resources provided by the Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences,University of Washington.References[1] U.S. Census Bureau, “QuickFacts: United States,” 2019. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/LFE046218 (accessed Jan. 28, 2020).[2] National Science Foundation, “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities Report,” 2019. https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=297944 (accessed Jan. 28, 2020).[3] National Science Foundation, “Women, Minorities, and
College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University, 2011.[4] F. Castronovo, P. N. Van Meter, S. E. Zappe, R. M. Leicht, and J. I. Messner, “Developing Problem-Solving Skills in Construction Education with the Virtual Construction Simulator,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 831–846, 2017.[5] K. Squire and S. Barab, “Replaying history: Engaging urban underserved students in learning world history through computer simulation games,” in Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Learning sciences, 2004, pp. 505–512.[6] F. Castronovo et al., “Design and Development of a Virtual Reality Educational Game for Architectural and Construction Reviews,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings
final group pairing. The robot design is a tradition in ECE3873 thatinvolves the design of an analog robot from scratch that competes against the other students’robots in the course. This robot project is so well thought of that the vast majority of the ECEjuniors that take the course respond positively (4 or 5 response on a 5 point Likert scale) tothe following anonymous course evaluation statement: “The robot project was the bestlearning experience I have had so far at OU.” Specifically, in the Fall 2019 semester, 71.4%of the 28 students that completed the evaluations responded positively to this statement.Table I – ECE3873 Schedule Group # Week # Lab 1 Introduction Lab 1 2
on by the engineering students inthe spring 2019 section of ME 450 Aircraft Design. The new motors were researched, procured,and installed on the Stewart platform during the spring of 2019. However, testing of the largermotors by these students was severely limited due to the moving of the new School ofEngineering to new facilities (including all new laboratories) during the summer of 2019. Besides the changing of student team members from the original group, this movebrought additional challenges to the project since the simulator and all the associated equipmenthad to be disassembled and boxed up for the relocation to the new lab space. But the move hasrecently been completed, and now a new multidisciplinary team of five
., Honeycutt, C. F., Judson, E., Krause, S. J., Middleton, J. A., Hjelmstad, K. D., Hjelmstad, K. A., Mayled, L., & Culbertson, R. J. (2019, June). Examining effects of an evidence-based professional development program on student achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) conference, Tampa, FL.[14] Mayled, L., Ross, L., Krause, S. J., Hjelmstad, K. D., Judson, E., Middleton, J. A., Culbertson, R. J., Hjelmstad, K. L., & Glassmeyer, K. (2019, June). Impact of evidence- based active learning faculty development on low-SES engineering students’ achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE
Construction Engineering and Management,” Proc. 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[4] Maryam Tabibzadeh and S. Jimmy Gandhi, “Comprehensive analysis of current engineering risk management curriculum,” Proc. 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[5] W. Robison, Ethics Within Engineering. NY, USA: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017.[6] ASME Policies, Section 15.7 Ethics[7] IEEE Policies, Section 7.8 IEEE Code of Ethics[8] https://riskinnovation.org/think-differently/orphan-risks/[9] S. Hearn, “Outcome Mapping”, http://www.theoryofchange.org/wp-content/uploads/ toco_library/pdf/2001-Hearn-Presentation-Outcome-Mapping-Building-Learning.pdf (accessed August 6, 2019).[10] E. DeBartolo
of College Science Teaching, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 14-20, 2007.[8] M. Prince and R. Felder, "Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases," ed: Journal of Engineering Education, 2006, pp. 123- 138.[9] M. Nelson, B. Ahn, and C. Nelson, "Make to Innovate: Blending of Project-based Learning and Flipped Classroom Pedagogies to Provide Real-world Engineering Experiences to Engineering Students ", 126th Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019: ASEE, pp. 1-21.[10] H. L. Tuan *, C. C. Chin, and S. H. Shieh, "The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 27, no. 6
Paper ID #29565Effects of High School Dual Credit Introduction to Engineering Course onFirst-Year Engineering Student Self-Efficacy and the Freshman Experience(Evaluation)Ms. J. Jill Rogers, University of Arizona J. Jill Rogers is the assistant director for ENGR 102 HS at the University of Arizona. ENGR 102 HS is an AP-type, dual credit college level, introductory engineering course offered to high school students. In 2014, the ENGR 102 HS program won the ASEE best practices in K-12 and University partnerships award. Over the years Rogers has developed K-12 science summer camps, conducted K-12 educational re- search
sharing presentations are an instructional tool that can be utilized by otherengineering educators at the university level to provide holistic benefits to students.References[1] E.A. Stephan, L. Whisler, and A. Stephan, “Work in progress: Strategic, translational retention initiatives to promote engineering success,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June 2018.[2] L. Whisler, A. Stephan, and E.A. Stephan, “Promoting metacognitive awareness in a first-year learning strategies course for cohorted general engineering students,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2019, Tampa, Florida, USA, June 2019.[3] E. Kjolsing, and L.V. Den Einde, “Peer instruction: Using isomorphic
Engineering Stress Culture," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[9] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, "An analysis of motivation constructs with first‐year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans," Journal of engineering education, vol. 99, pp. 319-336, 2010.[10] Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane, Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2006. 5(1): p: 80-92.[11] MacQueen, K. M., E. McLellan, K. Kay, and B. Milstein, B, Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cam
,evaluative data are reported from the participants’ end-of-year survey results and an analysis ofthe faculty members student ratings of instruction compared to non-program participants.BackgroundFaculty development in higher education has seen great growth over the last 30 years [1]. Itmakes sense, why hire new faculty if you are not going to train them to be successful? Since1998, first-year faculty members in the Grainger College of Engineering at the University ofIllinois have participated in a multifaceted program designed to help them succeed in theirinstructional responsibilities. We call this program the “Collins Scholars” in honor of W.Leighton Collins, a former executive director of ASEE and long-time faculty member at theUniversity of
. Garwood, B. R. Hughes, M. R. Oates, D. O’connor, and R. Hughes, “A review of energy simulation tools for the manufacturing sector,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 81, no. P1, pp. 895–911, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.063.[3] M. Niazkar and S. H. Afzali, “Application of Excel spreadsheet in engineering education,” in Proc. of the First International & Fourth National Conference on Engineering Education, 2015, pp. 10–12.[4] S. Navaee, “Utilization of EXCEL in solving structural analysis problems,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2003, pp. 12629–12641.[5] J. Marques Melo, “Optimization of Combined Heat and Power based Distributed Energy Systems with Thermal Storage to
throughout due to the team-based nature of the course. One example of cooperativelearning present in ENGR 111 is periodic peer evaluations amongst team members with respect toteamwork effectiveness. The ENGR 111 Cornerstone project is an example of project-basedlearning, where students work toward completion of a fully realized project. Finally, discovery-based learning is employed throughout ENGR 111 course lesson plans.In the Spring 2019 iteration of ENGR 111, students were surveyed a ten-point Likert scale on theirintentions to continue pursuing an engineering major. Students were then instructed to answer afollow-up question that asked the degree of impact their ENGR 111 experience had on their answerto the previous question. Out of the 440
for Architecture," in ASEE 2019 Annual Conference, Tampa , 2019.[2] M. P. a. R. Felder, "Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 04, pp. 123-137, 2006.[3] B. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, New York: David McKay Company, 1956.[4] B. Duch, S. E. Groh and D. E. Allen, The Power of Problem-Based Learning, Sterling, Virginia: Stylus, 2001.[5] S. o. C. Environment, "Parsons Street Seat," Design Build, Parsons School of Design, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.parsonsstreetseats.com/.[6] T. H. Line, "The High Line," The High Line, [Online]. Available: https://www.thehighline.org/.[7
Engineering Students Change the WorldAbstractAs part of the ongoing work described in “Work in Progress: Transformation through LiberalArts-Focused Grand Challenges Scholars Programs” (from the ASEE 2019 Annual Conferenceand Exposition), a professor of environmental engineering and a professor of the history ofscience and technology collaborated to add a new liberal arts course to the engineeringcurriculum at Olin College of Engineering in spring 2019. That work suggested that studentslearn new ways of thinking, knowing, doing, and being through participation in a transformativeliberal-arts infused Grand Challenges Scholars Program. This project-based course was createdwith learning objectives of communication
of ASEE, IEEE, and ACM, and a member of several honor societies, including Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Phi Kappa Phi, and Golden Key. Rabih has a passion for both teaching and research; he has been teaching since he was a teenager, and his research interests include wearable computing, activity recognition, and engineering education. For more information, refer to his website: www.rabihyounes.com.Cecil´e Sadler, Duke University Cecil´e Sadler is a first-year graduate student in Computer Engineering at Duke University and 2019 GEM Fellow. She is from Charlotte, NC and received a B.S. in computer engineering from North Carolina State University. In addition to her master’s coursework, Cecil´e assists her faculty
the past 30 years. Professor Zilouchian is currently an associate editor of the International Journal of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering out of Oxford, UK. Professor Zilouchian is senior member of several professional societies including Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Xi, Phi Kappa Phi, ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Nancy Romance , Florida Atlantic University Dr. Romance is Professor of Science Education in the College of Education at Florida Atlantic Univer- sity (FAU) and a graduate faculty member in both the College of Engineering and Computer Science and the College of Science at FAU.Her research interests address meaningful learning in complex STEM do- mains, applying a learning sciences lens in addressing issues ranging from
and on‐demand,” Collect. Build., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 20–28, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1108/01604950510576092[10] K. A. Kozak, “Standards, standards: Where might you be?” in 2014 ASEE North Midwest Section Conf., pp. 1–8, 2014, doi: 10.17077/aseenmw2014.1039[11] P. Melgoza, “A study of ILI Standards database cost savings at Texas A&M University,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., pp. 9445–9451, 2002. Available: https://peer.asee.org/10431[12] J. Cusker, “Adding individual technical standards to a library collection: A case study and a proposed workflow,” Collect. Manag., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 124-138, 2019, doi: 10.1080/01462679.2019.1650864[13] L. K. Dunn and S. Xie, “Standards collection development and management in an academic
Education, pp. 319-336, October 2010.[18] M. Morris, R. Hensel, and J. Dygert, “Why Do Students Leave? An Investigation Into Why Well-Supported Students Leave a First-Year Engineering Program,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Tampa, Florida, June 2019.[19] Changing the Conversation Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering. National Academy of Sciences, 2008.
discovery of needs, the students get involved in proposing a feasibleand viable solution to the problem by adopting the engineering design process, prototypebuilding, testing, and final implementation of the design. Since the courses provide acomprehensive engineering design experience, it covers three of the five ABET student outcomecriteria for the year 2019-2020, i.e., outcomes 2, 3, and 5 [14].The capstone course models may range from need-based product designs to basic research. Froman engineering technology perspective, the need-based product design approach, in general, isadopted for the course. It is well known that teaching capstone design courses is different fromother traditional courses. Solving an open-ended design project involves