courseenrollment is usually around 25 students. While most students are PhD students in chemicalengineering, there are sometimes a small number of MS or PhD students from allied disciplines inthe course. Since 2012, the course has included modules on course design, teaching methods,assessment of student learning, evaluation of teaching effectiveness, ABET accreditation,facilitating groupwork, and preventing and reporting academic integrity violations.In early 2019, the course instructor was awarded an Instructional Improvement Grant through theUC Berkeley Center for Teaching and Learning. The instructional improvement project, titled,“Inclusive Teaching and Active Learning Upgrades to Chemical Engineering Pedagogy Course,”centered on general updates to
the curriculum, computer engineering-related electives, and senior design, his focus in the classroom is to ignite passion in his students for engineering and design through his own enthusiasm, open-ended student-selected projects, and connecting engineering to the world around them. He spends a great deal of time looking for ways to break out of the traditional engineering mold and to make engineering more broadly accessible to students. His research interest is the application of mobile computing to interesting, human-focused problems. He holds three degrees in computer engineering including graduate degrees from Virginia Tech and an undergraduate degree from NC State University. c
Paper ID #29608The role of the co-curricular spaces in Engagement and success ofminority studentsDr. Hamidreza Sharifan, Texas A&M University He is a postdoctoral researcher, working on the source tracking of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) chemicals in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Colorado State Univer- sity. He received his Ph.D. in Biological and Agricultural Engineering from Texas A and M University, College Station.Dr. Janie M Moore, Texas A&M University Dr. Janie McClurkin Moore is an Assistant Professor in the Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department at
professional engineer’s license to teach upper level engineeringcourses. This study concludes that there are no uniform state licensure laws and civilengineering faculty who teach the same upper level courses in different states are subject todifferent licensure requirements. Unlicensed faculty with significant design experience whoteach design courses do not comply with licensure laws in Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Missouri,Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, West Virginia, and Wyoming.Two recommendations are offered to resolve the inconsistencies in the professional societypolicy statements, accreditation criteria, and state licensure statutes.IntroductionProfessional engineering (PE) licensure is an integral part of the
].Viewing Engineering Education Through Our LensesIn order to demonstrate how each of the four lenses applies to engineering education, we haveselected the example scenario where practicing faculty within an engineering program are notadopting new educational change provided by theoretical research [5, 9, 24]. The contextualinterplay in which we apply our theoretical lenses is directly related to types of practice andinnovation to emerge [25, 26]. Further, integrating our context of practice and theoretical basis atthe outset supports the decision-making processes of individuals working in the field [5, 26].Thus, this section begins by illustrating the use of each of our four lenses in the context ofengineering education. This is followed by
Paper ID #30973Learning from Engineers to Develop a Model of Disciplinary Literacy inEngineering (Year 3)Theresa Green, Utah State University - Engineering Education Theresa Green is a graduate student at Utah State University pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education. Her research interests include K-12 STEM integration and improving diversity and inclusion in engineer- ing.Dr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela Minichiello is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University (USU) and a registered professional mechanical engineer. Her research examines issues of
the sciences.Dr. Jean S Larson, Arizona State University Jean Larson, Ph.D., is the Educational Director for the NSF-funded Engineering Research Center for Bio- mediated and Bio-inspired Geotechnics (CBBG), and Assistant Research Professor in both the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment and the Division of Educational Leadership and Innovation at Arizona State University. She has a Ph.D. in Educational Technology, postgraduate training in Computer Systems Engineering, and many years of experience teaching and developing curriculum in various learning environments. She has taught technology integration and teacher training to undergrad- uate and graduate students at Arizona State University
resources to promote the academic success of students from marginalized backgrounds.Dr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Tech Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State University. London is a mixed methods researcher with interests in research impact, cyberlearning, and instructional change in STEM Education. Prior to being a faculty member, London worked at the National Science Foundation, GE Healthcare, and Anheuser-Busch. She earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Ms. Taylor Lightner, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Taylor Lightner is a 2nd
Paper ID #31362Gender Differences in Gifted Elementary Students’ Decision-Making aboutRenewable Energy: Social Relationships, Values, and Authority (RTP)Prof. Younkyeong Nam, Pusan National University Dr. Younkyeong Nam is an Associate Professor at Pusan National University in Busan, South Korea. Her research focuses on science and engineering integration in secondary science classrooms and envi- ronmental education in STEM. Dr. Younkyeong Nam is interested in designing engineering design-based science instruction that is more suitable for the educational context of South Korea. She is also interested in developing
Paper ID #30458Is High School GPA a useful tool for identifying at-risk students inFirst-Year Engineering?Dr. Aysa Galbraith, University of Arkansas Dr. Aysa Galbraith is a Teaching Assistant Professor and Academic Advisor of First-Year Engineering Program at University of Arkansas. She received her PhD in Chemical Engineering from Chemical and Biomolecular Department at North Carolina State University. She is responsible from teaching Introduc- tion to Engineering classes, developing course material, and advising first-year engineering students.Mrs. Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas Leslie Massey is an
Evaluation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Student Attitudes When Solving Homework Problems that Reverse Engineer YouTube VideosAbstractProblem solving is a vital skill required to be successful in many engineering industries. One wayfor students to practice problem solving is through solving homework problems. However,solutions manuals for textbook problems are usually available online, and students can easilydefault to copying from solution manual. To address the solution manual dilemma and promotebetter problem-solving ability, this study utilizes novel homework problems that integrate a videocomponent as an alternative to text-only, textbook problems. Building
Nevada, Reno Tara C. Langus is a Ph.D. student pursuing her degree in STEM Education at the University of Nevada, Reno. Her research interests include the integration of socioscientific and sociopolitical issues in the college STEM classroom and increasing the representation and retention of underrepresented minorities in STEM. Prior to graduate school, she completed Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Biology in which she studied insect immunology and chemical ecology.Mr. Nelson S Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno Nelson Pearson is an Ph.D. student at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research interest includes, social networks and the integration of diverse populations, engineering culture as well as engineering
communitydevelopment. Using artisanal and small-scale gold mining (ASGM) as an area of application forengineering students involved in community development, the paper first describes thecharacteristics that communities should exhibit and what they should expect of engineers inorder to achieve community resiliency. Second, it outlines criteria that engineering studentsshould adopt as behavioral guidelines in order to act in a socially responsible way. Third, itdescribes criteria that engineering projects should have in order to contribute to sustainablecommunity development. Fourth, it describes the integration of these two set of criteria in theengineering curriculum in order to develop conceptual understanding and practical skills thatengineering students
Engineers Canada. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Outcomes-Based Assessment Instrument for Engineering Problem-Solving Skills Bahar Memarian, Susan McCahan Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada bahar.memarian@utoronto.ca, susan.mccahan@utoronto.caAbstractThis poster paper provides an in-depth analysis of the design of a new assessment instrument.The instrument, Constructive Alignment Integrated Rating (CAIR), is a formative feedbackscheme that facilitates the assessment of engineering problem-solving skills. Importantly, thisinstrument is designed to provide
in which to integrate newcontent in an effective manner. The total class time required for all three interventions ranges from 1-2 hourswhich equates, on the higher end, to one class session per quarter. The researchers and instructors of the courseagreed that the number of interventions and required time is reasonable without interfering with the core classmaterial. These interventions are hypothesized to improve engineering students’ sense of belonging and self-efficacy in their majors [14, 15].After considering course assignments and scheduling, the researchers chose a selection of ENGR 104 coursesin which to embed the interventions: Fall 17, Spring 18, and Fall 19. Each course was taught by a differentinstructor however, the content of
Paper ID #30556Quality Assurance of Capstone Senior Design Projects: A Case StudyMr. AHMED ABUL HUSSAIN, Prince Mohammad bin Fahd University AHMED A. HUSSAIN is a Lecturer in the department of Electrical Engineering at Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University. He earned his MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Florida, Gainesville, in the year 1998. Mr. Ahmed has more than 19 years of university teaching expe- rience in Electrical Engineering. He has also worked for Motorola as an Embedded Software Engineer. His research interests include Wireless Communications, Array Signal Processing, Digital and
Paper ID #28894From Q&A to Norm & Adapt: The Roles of Peers in Changing Faculty Be-liefsand PracticeAmber Gallup, University of New MexicoDr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and associate professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutionizing Engineering Departments
teaching & learning research. Her disciplinary background is in experimental psychology as well as curriculum & instruction with a focus on higher education.Prof. Ronaldo Luna, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Engineering Ronaldo Luna is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Saint Louis University. He received his Ph.D. from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1995. His research interests include: engineering education, geotech- nical earthquake engineering, GIS, and hazard mitigation. Address: Parks College, 3450 LIndell Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri 63103 Telephone: (+1) 314-977-8372; Email: rluna@slu.eduDr. John Aidoo, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Aidoo is currently an Professor of Civil
Paper ID #31395Everybody Needs Some Body to Teach: Embodiment, TelecommunicationandTelepresence in STEM LearningMr. Glen Hordemann, Texas A & M University Glen Hordemann is a Computer Science PhD student at Texas A&M University. He is part of the Em- bodied Interaction Lab (TEILab) and The Institute of Technology-Infused Learning (TITIL). His current research focuses on telepresence robots and AR/VR enhancements to improve the embodiment of remote users. He has a B.S. in Computer Science from Gonzaga University and an M.S. in Computer Science from Bowling Green State University. His research interests also
engineering matters. This joint interest hasled to a significant, but still small number of courses being developed and offered across thecountry. The American Society for Engineering Education, through the work of Tobias,maintains an archive of some of these courses [4]. In short, although the university structure isconducive for cross-disciplinary experiences in the curriculum, such experiences are notcommon.In 2019, a team of faculty at West Virginia University received a grant from the NationalScience Foundation to initiate a cross-disciplinary learning initiative to expose engineeringstudents to key concepts and skills in the social sciences and to provide an orientation toengineering principles and practices to social science students. After
Paper ID #28904Examining the Effectiveness of Short, Voluntary On-Line Tutorials in aLarge Undergraduate ClassProf. Alison Cupples, Michigan State University Dr. Cupples is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Michigan State University. She obtained her PHD from Stanford University and was a Postdoctoral Fellow with the USDA. Her research focuses on the biodegradation of environmental contaminants. She was a Lilly Teaching Fellow in 2011-2012. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Examining the Effectiveness of Short, Voluntary On-Line
below)revealed some interesting results. In the entry surveys, all five participants had scattered answersfor questions 1 and 2 and “Yes” on question 3. At the end of the outreach program all thestudents answered “Very Well” on the first and “Yes” on the second and third questions. Thisalso shows the impact of the outreach program on the students’ self-confidence and motivation.Table 3. S-STEM Survey “About Yourself” Questions [8]ImpactThe authors have combined the NRC strategies with the California Life Sciences Institute callsfor authentic collaborative cross-disciplinary experiences by integrating research-based high-impact practices into an outreach workshop on Increasing Diversity in Engineering And Labor(IDEAL) force, involving middle and
, Teaching, and Agency. Her background as a graphic designer inspired her interest in the design of learning environments. Her research focuses on the affordances of educational technology in formal and informal spaces and how researchers use the design process to facilitate and scaffold interdisciplinary work.Dr. Emma Mercier, University of Illinios Emma Mercier is an associate professor in Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Illinois Urbana- Champaign. Her work focuses on collaborative learning in classrooms, and in particular, the use of technology for teachers and students during collaborative learning. Most recently Mercier’s projects have focused on collaborative learning in required undergraduate
include recruitment and retention of under-represented students in STEM, integrative training for graduate teaching assistants, and curriculum innovation for introductory programming courses.Dr. Jena Shafai Asgarpoor, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Jena Asgarpoor has been on the faculty at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln since August 2017, as an Associate Professor of Practice and Director for the Master of Engineering Management Program in the College of Engineering. Dr. Asgarpoor received her Ph. D. and M.S. in Industrial Engineering, specializ- ing in Engineering Management, from Texas A&M University, College Station, where she had previously earned a B.A. in Political Science, Summa Cum Laude. Her interests
needs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Addressing Math Readiness for STEM ProgramsAbstractDuring the 2016 academic year, Methodist University found that our math sequence requiredsome curriculum modifications in order to better support our growing Engineering Program. Tomeet the needs of incoming students, we created an Integrated Precalculus I course inconjunction with a new placement grid that incorporates both ACT/SAT math scores and thehigh school GPA for placement into the first semester mathematics course. This integratedcourse combines the College Algebra and Precalculus I courses so that students are on track forPrecalculus II in the spring semester. Students are then
Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 87 - 101, 2005.[11] H. A. Aglan and S. F. Ali, "Hands-on experiences: an integral part of engineering curriculum reform," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, 1996.[12] F. Giralt, J. Herrero, F. Grau, J. Alabart and M. Medir, "Two way integration of engineering education through a design project," Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 219 - 229, 2000.[13] s. Cronk, D. Hall and J. Nelson, "Living with the lab: a project-based curriculum for first- year egnineering students," in ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, 2009.[14] E. Etkina and A. Van Heuvelen, "Investigate science learning environment - a science process approach to learning physics," Research-based reform of university
with the ChemE major than those who did not. Campattendees also reported a larger network of potential study partners than non-attendees andperformed better in the Material and Energy Balances (MEB) course. To explain these observedeffects, we enlisted the help of an engineering education researcher. After review of the relevantliterature in learning theories, we decided to focus on the constructs of self-efficacy and socialsupport. We then improved the design and rigor of our study and refined our surveys byintroducing subscales from validated instruments of self-efficacy and social integration.Preliminary results suggest that the camp is having a positive effect on the self-efficacy, socialand academic integration, and intent to persist of
literacy among STEM majors," in 2014 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference, 2014: IEEE, pp. 1-7.[24] R. Borchardt, T. Salcedo, and M. Bentley, "Little intervention, big results: intentional integration of information literacy into an introductory-level biology lab course," Journal of Biological Education, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 450-462, 2019.[25] W. Holliday et al., "An information literacy snapshot: Authentic assessment across the curriculum," College & Research Libraries, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 170-187, 2015.[26] A. A. J. van Helvoort, "How Adult Students in Information Studies Use a Scoring Rubric for the Development of Their Information Literacy Skills," The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 38
to theproper selection of an engineering/math model. Engineering/math models are often the primaryfocus of the formal classroom. These models are quantitative and lead to numerical predictionsof various outcomes. However, engineering/math models, by nature, require simplification; themental model must make and check the assumptions required to build a solvableengineering/math model. The engineering/math model is usually expressed using logic andmathematics; often computers facilitate numerical predictions. Active integration of the mentalmodel and engineering/math model equips the engineer to properly shape reality.NoteThis paper is being submitted to the Civil Engineering Divisions “Best in 5 Minutes:Demonstrating Interactive Teaching
specialized engineering knowledge and skills combined with engineeringleadership and management skills in the organizational context. This requires thatprograms develop integrated learning activities across these graduate attributes, which canbe challenging given an already hectic curriculum. We further argue that employingintegrative case-based learning activities can be an effective and efficient mechanism toeffectively fulfill these requirements and support ongoing fundamental technical skilldevelopment. Finally, to provide a context for constructing case study learning activities,we define a structured case study model grounded in the key frameworks of sustainability,safety and risk management.Historically, engineering leadership curricula tend