• Requires access to • 3Doodler.com• Lightweight power • scribbler3dpen.com• Various color options • Takes practice • OfficialRainbowGirl.com• Durable and long- • Device can jam lasting• Affordable• ConvenientCitationsBada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70. Balletti, C., Ballarin, M., & Guerra, F. (2017). 3D printing: State of the art and future perspectives. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 26, 172-182.n.d. (2020). The engineering design process
, dynamic vibration absorbers are frequently implemented with ahydraulic or frictional component in order to transform kinetic energy of vibration into heat.Figure 2 shows the frequency response s of the main mass m1 as a function of normalizedfrequency, i.e., the driving frequency divided by the resonance frequency (ω/ωc) of thedamped primary system. The blue curve shows the displacement of the primary systemwithout absorber. The red curve represents the response function of the main mass after thetuned dynamic absorber (m2 ≈ 0.14 m1) has been attached. Two new resonance frequencieshave been created, located above and below the original resonance frequency. Figure 2: Primary mass displacement (blue: without absorber, red: with absorber)The
administration as a Mathematician and Computer Systems Analyst for the U. S. Department of Energy as well as more than 25 years of experience teaching mathematics, statistics, computer science, and freshman engineering courses in higher education institutions. Currently, she leads a team of faculty who are dedicated to providing first year engineering students with a high- quality, challenging, and engaging educational experience with the necessary advising, mentoring, and academic support to facilitate their transition to university life and to prepare them for success in their engineering discipline majors and future careers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020How Do Student
second modification to the alterative assessment scheme is the integration of more evaluationsessions throughout the semester (e.g., category three), which will allow students to know theiracademic standing in the course early in the course. For this particular accommodation, the authorsare planning to include a thorough evaluation session regarding the comprehension of lecturematerial and assignments for each student. As such, the integration of these two modifications willbe implemented and evaluated in subsequent semesters.REFERENCES[1] Balaji, N., Murthy, P., Kumar, D., Chaudhury, S. Perceived stress, anxiety, and coping statesin medical and engineering students during examinations. Industrial Psychiatry Journal. Jan-Jun2019, Vol. 28 Issue 1
faculty react to, adapt to, andaccommodate those challenges, often in the words of the respective researchers themselves. Thisreport then concludes with possible recommendations for academic libraries, and researchuniversity campuses with an AE presence.BackgroundIn 2019, librarians at the Georgia Institute of Technology (Georgia Tech) conducted interviewswith faculty in the institute’s School of Aerospace Engineering to examine practices of academicresearch faculty with regards to the data used and produced in the course of their research. Thiswork built on a project conducted in 2017-18, when librarians at Georgia Tech joined withlibrarians at 10 other research institutions, coordinated by Ithaka S+R, in order to examine thebroader research
Experiences for Undergraduates Program: Experiences and Recommendations,” Teach. Psychol., vol. 31, no. 4, 2004.[3] “The Program – International Research Experience for Undergraduates.” [Online]. Available: https://reu.chem.ufl.edu/the-program/. [Accessed: 03-Feb-2020].[4] D. R. Economy, J. P. Martin, and M. S. Kennedy, “Factors influencing participants’ selection of individual REU sites,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2013, pp. 1257–1259.[5] M. West, W. Cross, S. Kellogg, and A. Boysen, “A novel REU program to develop the skills of the engineer of 2020,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2011.[6] J. Straub, J. Berk, A. Nervold, and D. Whalen
identity. Cambridge university press, 1998.[12] A. W. Chickering and L. Reisser, Education and Identity. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. ERIC, 1993.[13] P. M. King and K. S. Kitchener, "Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood," Educational psychologist, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 5-18, 2004.[14] P. M. King and K. S. Kitchener, Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey- Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. ERIC, 1994.[15] A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Cambridge handbook of engineering
devices. Therefore, eachproposed topic was coded as either a Device or Non-Device. Then each topic was codedaccording to the most applicable BMES track(s). When the Device code was applied, a thirdcode was applied using the 14 subtracks for the Device Technologies and Biomedical Robotics(DTBR).Table 3. Biomedical Engineering Society’s (BMES’s) 2019 Annual Meeting paper tracksused in coding scheme Track No. of Subtracks Bioinformatics, Computational and Systems Biology 13 Biomanufacturing 11 Biomaterials 12 Biomechanics 23 Biomedical Imaging
Paper ID #28670Brazilian Grassroots Engineer’s Education: Achievements, Flaws, andChallengesDr. Cristiano Cordeiro Cruz, Aeronautics Technological Institute I currently develop a post-doctorate research at the Aeronautics Technological Institute (ITA) with a schol- arship from FAPESP (#2018/20563-3). I hold a PhD degree in Philosophy (University of S˜ao Paulo, 2017), a bachelor degree in Philosophy (Jesuit Faculty of Philosophy and Theology, 2008), a master degree in Electrical Engineering (University of Campinas, 2002), and a bachelor degree in Electrical Engineering (University of Campinas, 1999). My research area
Structures throughObjects, 7th Edition.Table 1. Cyber Security Modules with Lessons and Chapters to Cover Modules. Chapter to Module#. Implementation Approach Cover Module Lesson(s) Ch. 2. Java 4.1 Secure Variable Understanding how to write secure variable declarations is Fundamentals Declarations critical to producing overall secure code. Ch. 2. Java 1 Integer Errors Introduced with arithmetic operations. Students must be made Fundamentals familiar with how integer/floating-point division is handled. Ch. 3. Decision 5.1 Secure Division Similar to type conversion, while dividing by zero is primarily Structures a topic to be addressed
Credentialing toRaise the Bar—subsequently renamed the Task Committee on Credentialing (TCC). The TCCwas charged to “Develop a plan identifying how ASCE can best utilize an internal credentialingprogram to validate fulfillment of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBOK),including a timeline for implementation, an estimated budget, and a marketing plan to promote acredentialing program(s) to members and owners [3][6].”The TCC began its work in July 2018. Also starting in July 2018 but working independently ofthe TCC, the authors of this paper supported the TCC’s work by (1) analyzing the credentialingsystem used in the medical profession and (2) using this model as the basis for a proposed civilengineering credentialing system. A draft of the
they prioritize their competing career goals? What are some actions that the candidate(s) can take to negotiate for a better offer? 4 Please share your experience or suggestions on how to achieve work-life balance. What are some strategies to achieve equal partnership at home when you are in a dual- career relationship? How should one entice, encourage, or even “train” a partner to become an equal partner at home? From your personal experience, can you offer any tips on starting/expanding a family in regard to the tenure clock? 5 In general, what is the climate that one may expect to experience from colleagues when in a dual-career relationship? More often than not, the partner hire is perceived by colleagues as
potentially sensitive nature of the interview subject, as most participants were stillactively involved with the D3EM program. This ensured participants' privacy, while allowingthem to freely express their viewpoints. The interviews lasted between 10 to 40 minutes inlength. A similar protocol has been repeated annually since 2017; focused questions about careerpreparation were added in 2019. Interview protocol questions are listed below. 1. Currently, what are your career plans for after completing your PhD? 2. How do you think your D3EM training is preparing you for that career path? 3. When you were not on D3EM funding, were you completing a research assistantship or other funding? Did that experience(s) provide
mentioned areas that allowed opportunities to be inclusive. Inside theclassroom, there were opportunities to create an inclusive environment by how the educatorsinteracted with students and how they conducted themselves when students were present andteaching was in action. Finally, educators also talked about what things they thought about orconsidered (mindsets), similar to Integrity of practice, in that educators had a reason for theirpractices [4] when doing any preparation or working with students. Practices are found in Table1 with the following codes: ● CS- Inside Classroom- with Students ● CE- Inside Classroom- by Educators ● OC- Outside the Classroom ● IP- Integrity
administered. Each survey took approximately 15 minutes tocomplete. Validated constructs were used when possible. Specifically, the “teamwork andcollaboration skills” and “intent to persist” constructs demonstrated good internal consistencywhen previously validated in middle school samples, with Cronbach’s alphas of 0.88 and 0.86,respectively [7], [21]. Table 1 provides further information on the subscales used in the pre-postsurvey.Table 1: Pre-Post Survey Subscales Number Subscale Source of Items Example Item(s) Response Format “How confident do you feel designing a prototype 4
effectiveness.[1] R. Averill, G. Recktenwald and S. Roccabianca, “Effect of Assessment Methods onPerformance in Mechanics of Materials,” in Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 24-27, 2018, Paper ID #23572, American Society forEngineering Education, 2018.[2] Turns, S. R. (2012, June), Best Paper PIC I: Applying Knowledge from EducationalPsychology and Cognitive Science to a First Course in Thermodynamics Paper presented at 2012ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/23332[3] Karimi, A., & Manteufel, R. D. (2012, June), Assessment of Student Knowledge in anIntroductory Thermodynamics Course Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition
Business Value of BIM in Australiaand New Zealand: How Building Information Modeling is Transforming the Design and ConstructionIndustry.” McGraw-Hill Construction.[3] Jin, R., Zou, P. X., Li, B., Piroozfar, P., and Painting, N. (2019). Comparisons of students’ perceptionson BIM practice among Australia, China and UK. Engineering, Construction and ArchitecturalManagement.[4] Woo, J. H. (2006). BIM (building information modeling) and pedagogical challenges. In Proceedingsof the 43rd ASC national annual conference (pp. 12-14).[5] Clevenger, C., Ozbek, M., Glick, S., and Porter, D. (2010). Integrating BIM into constructionmanagement education, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.[6] Azhar, S., Sattineni, A., and Hein, M. (2010). BIM
of laboratory notebooks. While notebooks are common place in manyfields, the use of notebooks is less common in education settings. To that end, projects involvingindividuals from the social sciences may need to be particularly introduced to the use oflaboratory notebooks. Finally, it is critical that participants understand how the notebooks will beused after the fact, and ensure that training covers expectations. In our project, there would havebeen room for participants to include iterations of lesson plans into the notebooks, but it shouldnot be assumed that participants would do so on their own.References1. S. Y. Nussbeck, P. Weil, J. Menzel, B. Marzec, K. Lorberg, and B. Schwappach. “The laboratory notebook in the 21st century”. EMBO
. Klassen and J. Donald, “Using an Academic Plan Model to Analyze Canadian Engineering Leadership Curriculum,” Proc. Can. Eng. Educ. Assoc. CEEA, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.12981.[11] M. V. Jamieson and J. M. Shaw, “A Continual Improvement Process for Teaching Leadership and Innovation Within a Community of Practice,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019,[12] D. B. D. Lutz, C. P. S. University, S. L. Obispo, D. M. C. Paretti, and V. Tech, “Development and Implementation of a Reflective Journaling Method for Qualitative Research,” p. 15.[13] I. L. Densten and J. H. Gray, “Leadership development and reflection: what is the connection?,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., vol. 15, no. 3, pp
community college: Ivy Tech Community College ofIndiana. Ivy Tech started as a vocational school during the 1960’s, but over the decades hasbecome a system of approximately 40 campuses offering more than 150 programs includingcertificates, associate degrees, and apprenticeship programs. [1]In 2013, the Indiana state legislature enacted Senate Enrolled Act 182. This bill required statecolleges to create a single articulation pathway (commonly known as the Transfer SingleArticulation Pathway or TSAP) for programs with significant numbers of students who firstachieve an associate of science or arts degree with the intent of obtaining a related baccalaureatedegree. The Statewide Leadership Team identified Electrical Engineering Technology (EET)and
score: 147.00 / 205 (71.71%) 139.00 / 195 (71.28%) Mode score: occurred 22 time(s) occurred 20 time(s) Standard deviation: 23.15 25.48 Reliability coefficient (KR21): 0.9264 0.9428 Range: 205 193 Interquartile range: 29 33Table 2. Descriptive/demographic data for the ADDA AAD certification exam.The exam is a criterion referenced exam in that the exam taker must respond correctly to 300 ofthe 400 items (75%) to be certified. Achieving the 75% threshold is not require for each of the 20competencies, however. For program assessment, the exam can be used as a
:(please include the specific geographic location(s))What motivated you in college? What motivates you at ? What mattersWhat did you aspire to become? to you?What mattered to you? What do you aspire to become? What was it like coming to the fromWhat was it like coming to from your your high school and/or community, socially andhigh school/community socially and academically? How academically? How did you manage each aspect of thedid you manage each aspect of the transition
color ball in the same color or creating tube for each animal. patterns 1Links to the activities which include pictures and descriptions will be provided when paper is unblinded. References[1] J. Wing, “Computational Thinking,” Commun. ACM, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 33–35, 2006.[2] W. Sung, J. Ahn, and J. B. Black, “Introducing Computational Thinking to Young Learners: Practicing Computational Perspectives ThroughEmbodiment in Mathematics Education,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 443–463, 2017.[3] S. P. Jones, “Computing at school in the UK : from guerrilla to gorilla,” Commun. ACM, no. April, pp. 1–13, 2013.[4] A. Dasgupta, A. M. Rynearson, S. Purzer, H. Ehsan, and M. E. Cardella
coordinatestudent travel to non-U.S. locations for periods of several weeks to a semester for immersiveexperiences under the mentorship of appropriate collaborators.Historically, the IRES program has funded international cohort experiences where IRES studentsare recruited and prepared by the U.S. PI(s), then travel to the foreign site to conduct researchunder the direct supervision of foreign research mentors. Although the National ScienceFoundation amended its award process in 2018 to include two additional types of IRES programsaimed at graduate students, this work-in-progress paper focuses solely on the international cohortexperience, what the NSF now calls Track I: IRES Sites (IS). This model engages a group ofundergraduate and/or graduate students in
Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State Uni- versity in 2006 and received her M.S. from Ohio State in 2007. In 2012, Krista completed her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering at Ohio State. Her engineering education research interests include investigating first-year engineering student experiences, faculty experiences, and the connection between the two.Dr. Kathleen A Harper, The Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She received her M. S. in physics and B. S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph. D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of
which random distribution suits best for their decision making, and how thedeparture of one node will become the arrival of the tandem nodes. Wa S AD Wa S D A Figure 3: A Tandem Queue model used for training students3.3. Input and Output Data ModelData models are vital to any simulation study. There are two significant parts of data that must beworked, understood, and documented: the inputs data and the outputs (or result). Each part needsto be studied, analyzed, and determined. The results need to be documented for the implementationof the model. Data models of the Healthcare Clinic of Figure 1 include:Input Data: • Arrival rate of the patients
drafts. In these sessions, the instructor reviews the paper whilemeeting with the student(s) and provides vocal comments in real time; the papers are notseparately marked up and returned. Students have one additional week to make revisions andsubmit the final versions. For the design project report, peer review/feedback is conducted. Inaddition to the checklists and sample materials provided, the instructor shares with the studentsthe rubric he employs in grading their reports. On average, the students’ performance in writtencommunication has increased by over 25% based on end of term grades. Once successfullycompleted, the students satisfy the W-course Curriculum requirement.Fourth yearIn the senior year lab, emphasis is on conveying results
Assistance in Areas of National Need (GAANN) under Award No. P200A180031.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Energy or theU.S. Department of Education.The authors would like to thank Dr. James Freihaut for his advice during the development of thepresented Excel tool.References[1] V. Jones and J. H. Jo, “Ubiquitous learning environment: An adaptive teaching system using ubiquitous technology,” in Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference, 2004, vol. 468, p. 474, [Online]. Available: https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/perth04/procs/jones.html.[2] T. L
.xSteif, P. S., & Dantzler, J. A. (2005). A statics concept inventory: development and psychometric analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 363–371. doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2005.tb00864.xSteif, P. S., & Hansen, M. A. (2007). New Practices for Administering and Analyzing the Results of Concept Inventories. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 205–212. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00930.xSteif, P. S., Lobue, J. M., Kara, L. B., & Fay, A. L. (2010). Improving Problem Solving Performance by Inducing Talk about Salient Problem Features. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(2), 135–142. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01050.xStanger-Hall, K. F. (2012). Multiple-choice exams: An
] Toyosaki, S., Pensoneau-Conway, S. L., Wendt, N. A., & Leathers, K. (2009). Community autoethnography: Compiling the personal and resituating whiteness. Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies, 9(1), 56-83.[8] D. T. Rover, "Taking our Own Advice: Team Teaching," Academic Bookshelf, ASEE Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 2002, pp. 265-266.[9] S. Brunhaver, M. Lande, S. Sheppard, and E. Carryer, "Fostering an enterprising learning ecology for engineers," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 28, 2012.[10] V. Troen and K.C. Boles, The Power of Teacher Teams - With Cases, Analyses, and Strategies for Success, SAGE Publishing, January 2012.[11] American Society for Engineering Education