Institute of Medicine, Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2011.[2] B. M. Ferdman. (2013, 1 December 2015). Diversity at work: the practice of inclusion in diverse organizations.[3] Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 1-24.[4] Cech, E. A., & Rothwell, W. R. (2018). LGBTQ Inequality in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(4), 583-610.[5] Patridge, E. V., Barthelemy, R. S., & Rankin, S. R. (2014). Factors impacting the academic
populations as well as many technical and non-technicalextracurricular opportunities. The survey will be sent to all undergraduate engineering studentsclassified as sophomores or juniors in the semester of the initial survey administration. The surveywas piloted with a group of undergraduate and graduate engineering students at this university infall 2019 and early spring 2020. The initial survey administration was conducted in spring 2020.Survey Measures. The survey will capture the types and extent of student involvement in variouscategories of extracurricular activities [25]–[27]. Students will select their involvements from alist of types of involvement (e.g., ambassador program, engineering/technical/design, professionalsociety, identity-based
simulated classroom environments can be used to help inservice and preservice elementary teachers learn to lead argumentation discussions in science and engineering.Dr. Jamie Mikeska, Educational Testing Service Jamie Mikeska is a Research Scientist in the Student and Teacher Research Center at Educational Testing Service (ETS). Jamie completed her Ph.D. in the Curriculum, Teaching, and Educational Policy graduate program at Michigan State University in 2010. Her current research focuses on three key areas: (1) de- signing, developing, and conducting validation studies on assessments of content knowledge for teaching (CKT) science; (2) examining and understanding validity issues associated with measures designed to
, draws attention to the importance of using courseassignments early in an engineering curriculum to help students appreciate and attend to socialand ethical in addition to environmental and economic aspects of sustainable development. The instructors discussed above successfully integrated learning modules on sustainabledevelopment into required technical courses in civil and environmental engineering. Myendeavor to reorient the patent assignment in STS 1500 around the SDGs builds on and extendsthe learning goals discussed in these studies by applying them to a non-technical engineeringcourse in STS specifically devoted to introducing students to social and ethical aspects ofengineering practice. Like these scholars, I hoped that aligning
scale.unit operations lab. Figure 2b shows the new teaching environment, which we will designate asMIL for the maker/innovation lab (known to our students as the Meldrum Innovation Lab).UOL has been used for our unit ops laboratory and senior capstone labs for decades, and is likelysimilar to many unit ops chemical engineering laboratories across the country. It contains onelarge lab area which houses pilot-scale pieces of unit ops equipment. The space also includes acollection of smaller satellite laboratories: a wet lab, analytical lab, biochemical engineering lab,and reactor laboratory. Just down the hall from this space was a small room housing our 3Dprinters. The design course that is the test course for this paper was shoehorned into this
be given to different students, but the values used in the problem were changed.The video review modules were used to supplement face-to-face classroom time. The leadinstructor for the course organized the approximately 10 review sessions and determined whichknowledge area(s) would be covered that particular week. Students met once a week for twohours to go over the assigned knowledge area(s). Ideally, the faculty member who recorded thevideo segments came to the class that week and reviewed areas that students struggled with andanswered questions. This pairing of self-directed video study with face-to-face classroom timeallowed the student to fully review the knowledge area and have any concerns resolved.Although this project was geared
Paper ID #29146WIP: Exploring Pedagogical Alternatives for Incorporating Simulations inan Introductory Power Electronics CourseMr. Mohamed Khaled Elshazly, University of Toronto Mohamed Elshazly is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Toronto Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE). He is currently engaged in developing support simulations for teaching introductory power electronics to undergraduate ECE students, as well as providing techni- cal support. Mohamed’s main research interests are numerical simulations and computational materials science, focusing on quantum mechanical
placement scores of Group 1 unexpectedly decreased, which pose a new and interesting research question on the value of motivation that will be further studied and discussed separately. Group 1 and 3 are excluded from the analysis of the Engineering Summer Bridge results. ALEKS Math Semester(s) of No. of Students GPA Math SAT Fall 2019 Placement recommended Placement Pre- Pre- Post
receiving a doctoral degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of British Columbia for research on colloidal ink particle detachment mechanisms during paper recycling, Dr. Nesbit obtained a Bachelor or Arts degree in History and a Bachelor of Applied Science in Chemical Engineering, then worked as a research engineer studying novel methods of chlorine dioxide production. Dr. Nesbit is dedicated to the development and delivery of sustainability education. She has developed and taught several undergraduate and graduate courses that focus on the context of engineering decision-making. In 2010/11, she was awarded an inaugural Sustainability Teaching Fellowship at the University of British Columbia. Dr. Nesbit’s
) development,” Education Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, 2008. 7. J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, 1991. 8. S. R. McKay, L. Millay, E. Allison, E. Byerssmall, M. C. Wittmann, M. Flores, J. Frattini, B. Kumpa, C. A. Lambert, E. A. Pandiscio, and M. K. Smith, “Investing in Teachers’ Leadership Capacity: A Model from STEM Education,” Maine Policy Review, pp. 54 – 63, 2018. 9. G. V. Caprara, C. Barbaranelli, P. Steca, and P. S. Malone, “Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level,” Journal of School Psychology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 473 – 490, 2006. 10. D
, vol. 94, no. 1, p. 121, 2005.[21] R. Mishra, S. Barrans and C. Pislaru, "Imparting psychomotor skills to the learners using computer aided instructions in Engineering Education," in V International Conference on Multimedia and Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Lisbon, Portugal, 2009.[22] S. A. Sorby, "Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 459-480, 2009.[23] K. Tonso, "Teams that work: Campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 25-37, 2006.[24] J. Trevelyan, "Technical coordination in engineering practice," Journal of Engineering
oral discussions. Thissurvey also revealed that respondents who considered themselves good communicators alsobelieved that “their skills differentiate them from the pack,” while those respondents who are notcomfortable with public speaking (including speaking during meetings) believe “they areconsidered less competent technically.” [1] In 2003, Ford and Riley presented a summary ofother studies that “suggest that oral and written communication skills are one of the primaryfactors required of new graduates ultimately affecting their success in the workplace.” [2]However, engineering students often perceive that the writing instruction they experienced inhigh school, or in English or Composition courses at the University level, is not applicable
. Further, enacting these skills inthe context of the SDGs provides students with a framework to explore their role in addressingmultidisciplinary, complex challenges. This work in progress paper lays out a curriculumintended for upperclassmen engineering students to develop sociotechnical skills and criticallyengage with the SDGs.Course pilot design and curriculumThe course learning objectives include: 1. Identifying the role of engineers in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and the 5 Ps. 2. Identifying personal values and perspectives on the role of engineers and technology in society. 3. Understanding of complex problems in the US and globally. 4. Understanding that engineering as a social process, engineering both
girls who alsohad a passion for engineering. Meeting the other Ambassadors in video discussions in early falland then being at the SWE Conference a short time later boosted her confidence in herself assomeone who could be an engineer. One of her peers gained confidence at the SWE Conferenceas well. She was bolstered by meeting female college students majoring in Engineering andfemale adult professionals working in Engineering at SWE. As she described it, she came to seeher future self in them. “I've gotten more excited about just my identity as an engineer.”One Ambassador described gaining confidence because she was taking on the role of teachingand guiding other girls in learning about engineering. She felt motivated because she knew
: 1) Development of a solution based on a well-specified theory of action appropriateto a well-defined end user; 2) Creation of measures to assess the implementation of thesolution(s); 3) Collection of data on the feasibility of implementing the solution(s) in typicaldelivery settings by intended users; and 4) Conducting a pilot study to examine the promise ofgenerating the intended outcomes [22].Theory of ActionHuman capital theory is a theory of investment in human capital, or the abilities and skills,acquired through investment in education and training, of any individual, that enhance potentialincome earning [23]. Human capital models examine how students make cost–benefit analysesand subsequent decisions on whether to attend and persist
Paper ID #30728Poverty and Guidance: Challenges and Opportunities in MathematicsPreparation for EngineeringDr. Eliza Gallagher, Clemson University Dr. Gallagher is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with joint appointments to Mathematical Sciences and Education & Human Development. Her research interests include student cognition in mathematics, development of teacher identity among graduate teach- ing assistants, and curricular reform to foster diversity and inclusion in STEM fields. She is co-PI on an NSF INCLUDES Design and Development Launch Pilot, ”Statewide
engineering settings.MethodsThis study analyzes student survey data using statistical methods in a quantitative researchdesign. Students in seven, large undergraduate engineering courses representing four differentengineering majors self-reported demographic information and emotional engagement as part ofa larger study that explored different factors which may inform student engagement inengineering classrooms.ParticipantsThe sample population in this study consisted of 781 undergraduate engineering studentsrecruited in the last two weeks of the term. Self-reported ethnicity included Asian (47%), Black(3.5%), Hispanic (3.5%), White (41%), Pacific-Islander (less than 1%), Native American (lessthan 1%), and Other (3%). 24% of the sample were female, 75
Paper ID #30769Transforming an Engineering Design Course into an Engaging LearningExperience using ePortfoliosMiss Taylor Tucker, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Taylor Tucker graduated from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a Bachelor’s degree in engineering mechanics and is now pursuing a master’s in Curriculum and Instruction through the Digital Environments for Learning, Teaching, and Agency (DELTA) program. She is interested in engineering design and lends her technical background to her research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring how to improve ill-structured tasks for
theprogram level, i.e., outcomes expected at graduation time, and others at the course level, i.e.,outcomes expected at the time of clearing a course. Unfortunately, still, the terminology can beconflicting here with some acronyms having more than one usage and different terms being usedfor the same idea. We introduce the main terms next. • Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)—Program learning outcomes are statements that de- scribe what the knowledge, skills and attitudes students should have at the time of graduation from an engineering program. PLOs are discipline agnostic. These are also referred to as Graduate Attributes (GA) (see Table VI for the Washington Accord’s recommended GAs). The term PLO also has synonyms
circuit concepts but also using the appropriate metrics andcommunication style tailored for the audience for us to further identify potential misconceptionsthat students, teachers, or both of them share.MethodologyThis pilot study was a result of our ongoing interest in pinpointing misconceptions amongelectrical engineering students; thus, the development of our own instrument. There is not muchresearch in the use of concept inventory for instructors because concept inventories, as anassessment tool, is supposed to be designed by the instructors for the students. However, wesought to validate and use this instrument adaptively for both students and teachers who areinvolved in the learning and teaching of these engineering concepts. For this pilot
system as a whole—is going to be necessary for making sustainableand significant impacts on human health going forward [1,4,10-11].The application of multi-scale systems bioengineering approaches to biomedical researchrequires knowledge of human physiology/pathology, in addition to quantitative skills in mathand engineering [4,12-14]. More importantly, however, it requires the ability to integrate thesesubjects in a meaningful way [15]. Within both the biotechnology sector and in academia, thedemand for graduates who possess expertise in the generation of high-throughput data—as wellas the modeling skills needed to analyze/predict pathological states and identify viabletherapies—has increased dramatically [2,4,16].In terms of STEM pipeline
Work on Research Self-EfficacyWhile no instrument for EERSE currently exists, multiple efforts have been undertaken to measureresearch self-efficacy in general [13-20]. These measures typically describe research as beingcomprised of the conceptualization of a study; a literature review; the design and implementationof the study; data collection, analysis, and interpretation; writing and the presentation of the results.Notably, however, the vast majority of this research focuses exclusively on the research self-efficacy of students participating in graduate or undergraduate research. These studies also do notinclude engineering or engineering education students, with a few exceptions [18-20].Instruments to study the research self-efficacy of
the second set of interviews will focus on cultural adjustments(for Moroccan participants), member-checking, and clarification. We also piloted interviewswith existing Moroccan students from older cohorts. We examined existing survey instrumentssuch as [20], [21] to develop our interview protocol. For example, using the survey in theBlumenfeld study as a guide, we are asking expectancy-value specific questions such as: “Doyou feel that you are giving up anything by choosing the engineering path?” For an affirmativeanswer, the follow-up question is: “What things could you be doing instead?” For a negativeresponse, the follow-up question is “Perhaps giving up time spent on your hobbies? Or timespent with family?”[20].ConclusionThis research
Paper ID #30488First Impressions: Engaging First-Year Undergraduates in ChemicalEngineering DesignTommy George, Harvard University Tommy George is a graduate student at the John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at Harvard University. He is currently working towards a PhD in Engineering Science with a research focus in renewable energy storage, and he graduated from Tufts University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering. Tommy worked with the Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach throughout his undergraduate studies, developing ongoing interest in the design of engaging engineering learning
ready for Calculus the following fallwithout the need for a summer course or delaying their studies unnecessarily.This Integrated Precalculus I course was offered as a pilot program in 2017 and has now beenoffered for three consecutive years. Only students in the STEM majors of engineering,economics, chemistry, computer science, kinesiology, and mathematics are currently allowed totake the course as they all require some sequence of mathematics that involves courses that areonly offered once a year. This is an ongoing project as we are still evaluating the course throughstudent success in subsequent mathematics courses, retention in the major and at the university,and time to complete the mathematics sequence. We are in phase one of conducting
system models, whichare the core skills that engineers and scientists develop. The Mobile Studio I/O Board, a personalelectronic instrument, was used as the technology to support the ECP. It is a portable,inexpensive, but highly useful hardware platform, which recreated a classroom or laboratoryenvironment e.g. at home. When coupled with the Mobile Studio Desktop software, the systemduplicated a large amount of the hardware often used to teach electrical engineering, computerengineering, physics and K-12 technology-oriented courses.There was a lot of refinement of the project through pilot studies and subsequent results showedthat the use of personal electronic instruments increases the level of student engagement andmotivation [2], [3]. Prior