physical activity levels to travel modes, transportation mobility for the transportation disadvantaged, and the development of planning and transit performance measures for access to opportunities, integrating sustainability into the engineering curriculum and creating an engi- neering sustainability minor. He has published several articles in the Transportation Research Record, other journals and conferences on these and other related topics. He is currently serving on the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Committee on Aircraft/Airport Compatibility and is a past member of the TRB Committees on Traffic Flow and Characteristics and Transportation Network Modeling. Stephen is also a member of the Ameri- can Society
experimental and theoretical STEM research. Additionally, students were expected toselect a future research topic with the assistance of an active faculty researcher who was willingto serve as a mentor; design and present a research prospectus, complete a mini review of literaturerelevant to their chosen research topic; and to make preliminary plans for starting the researchproject in the following semester.Although designed with the best of intentions, the course ran into substantial institutionalroadblocks that prevented its continuation. The paper concludes with a summary of the discussionsheld with stakeholders about the course, its goals, and its challenges, and the evolution from acourse-based strategy into a more institutionally viable
derived quantities such as volumetric ormass flow rate. Students work with a number of types of probes (Kiel probes, pitot-static tubes),measurement systems (square edge orifice plate, venture tube), and experimental equipment tomake these measurements. The students use National Instruments data acquisition and controlhardware and LabVIEW software extensively in the lab portion of the course.This two credit course, one credit lecture and one credit lab, places a high level of emphasis oncritical thinking and originality through several open-ended laboratory assignments and a groupproject. These activates focus on planning an experimental program, designing the measurementsystem, reducing the data, and interpreting the results. Students will
was matched based on complementing skills andinterests. Creating such collaborative teams was intended to promote both horizontal and verticallearning in an interactive environment, thus laying the pathway to mold independent researcherswho are also team players. During this time, they were immersed in hands-on researchexperiences comprising of a transformative research project, capsulated technical sessions andcomplementary lab practice, field tours, research seminars, and professional developmentworkshops; this on-site experience was supplemented with a 1-year follow-up for continuedinteraction, growth, and guidance for pursuing advanced study. Student deliverables includeddissemination of research results, and a follow-up plan tailored to
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Competitive Activities on Engineering Students’ Entrepreneurial IntentionAbstract:An increased number of technological innovation and entrepreneurial competitiveactivities have been organized in engineering schools and beyond to raise students’entrepreneurial awareness and cultivate relevant skills. In this study, a mixed method researchbased on Planned Behavior Theory is being used to explore the outcomes of innovation andentrepreneurial competitions, in particular the influence of engaging in these competitiveactivities on engineering students’ entrepreneurial intention. This work-in-progress firstreports the construction of a customized survey, in particular the process of identifying
20 5.00% Drawing Identification-Architectural Numbering-Drawing Management 30 7.50% Dimensioning and Notations 25 6.25% Floor Plan Layout-Relationships-Identification and Terminology 20 5.00% HVAC-Plumbing-Electrical Plans-Identification and Terminology 25 6.25% Roof Plans-Identification and Terminology 15 3.75% Elevations 15 3.75% Framing-Framing Plans-Identification and Terminology 20 5.00% Foundation Plans-Identification and Terminology
desire to properly address these challenges in my new work environment, I lookedfor frameworks to help organize thoughts, plans, and goals in order to be solutions oriented andforward thinking. Solution-focused therapy, while primarily applied in the field of psychology,has also been applied to organizational studies and workplace culture as it emphasizes coaching,finding cooperation, feedback, conflict resolution, and situation management [1]. Thisframework provided a method to rank problems, identify factors outside of my or my unit’scontrol, and craft solutions [2]. This model was originally appealing because it provided aframework for discussing these problems with my entire unit; by emphasizing solutions,cooperation, and feedback, the
, jigs, fixtures, and other mechanical devices used in manufacturingenvironments and being able to read and interpret manufacturing documentation such as blueprints, technical drawings and diagrams, production plans, tooling plans, quality plans, andsafety plans. One of the key outcomes of TEC333 is that students can apply appropriate datumreference frames to designs. Students are asked to demonstrate their understanding of the datumreference frame concepts in several ways throughout the course on a pretest, tests, onlinequizzes, modeling & drawing assignments, measuring assignments, and the final exam. Specificexamples include labeling a datum reference frame origin on a given drawing, sketching datumfeature symbols on a drawing given
systems” that will addressmajor societal needs and challenges of the 21st century. NEET alumni will be prepared towork as entrepreneurs, innovators, makers, and discoverers, through learning and practicingthe NEET Ways of Thinking: cognitive approaches that help students think, plan, and learnmore effectively and efficiently on their own and within teams. Student enrollment in theprogram steadily increased from 28 in Fall 2017, through 52 in Fall 2018, to 83 in Fall 2019,making the program significantly larger than most new academic programs in the past, andlarger than many majors. Starting in Fall 2018, NEET began to pilot the Ways of Thinking(WoT) through cross-school initiatives at MIT, where faculty and colleagues in the School ofHumanities
Tecnologico de Monterrey. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MODEL TO ENHANCE ACADEMIC QUALITY IN ENGINEERING PROGRAMSAbstractOne of the main challenges in all areas of education is to ensure that the academic quality of theteaching – learning process is enhanced continuously. In this work, we present a continuousimprovement process based on Deming´s Plan-Do-Check-Act (also known as PDCA) continuousquality improvement model which was implemented in the School of Engineering and Sciencesat Tecnologico de Monterrey campus Puebla. This model encompasses a one-year cycle, it startsin August and ends in July. Faculty of the Academic Departments participate in the
Engineering Education, 2020 An EML Project on Steel Beam DesignAbstractStudents get to know how to apply the AISC requirements for the design of steel beams in thefirst steel design course. This is usually done through straight forward and predefined problemsand parameters, which is not always the case in the real world. The current paper describes atwo-week-long project on the addition of a balcony to the new engineering building at OhioNorthern University. The purpose of the project is to help students get more familiar with thetypical loading and framing plans of steel structures, the design process, and improve theirentrepreneurial mindset by applying Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN)learning objectives on
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Collaboration and Design Practices in First-Year Project-Based EngineeringFostering first-year project-based learning (PBL) environments helps to engage students inengineering design practices and broaden their participation pathways in engineering fields [1].PBL collaborative design activities provide unique opportunities for students to develop,negotiate, and finetune designs. These design activities represent several engineering procedures,from planning projects and improving a production process to developing new materials [2].However, the collaborative design process in PBL is not well understood. Although researchershave conceptualized engineering design process among engineering
bring students from across the country to auniversity campus for the summer. These students learn how to conduct real research in theirdiscipline by actually doing it, under the supervision of a faculty mentor. Many students whoparticipate in REU programs remember these programs long after the program is complete. TheREU experience of working with a faculty mentor on bona fide research is undoubtedly key tothe educational and career planning benefits that students enjoy. The best REU experiencestypically don’t happen by accident. They must be deliberately planned. Despite the importanceof this component of REU programs, minimal literature related REU social programs exists.This paper considers what makes a strong REU social program.1
resulting in a diverse group of faculty participants from approximately 30schools. Aside from travel and lodging support for the duration of the workshop, no other financial incentiveswere provided to participants.Experienced engineering faculty serve as facilitators whoplan, coordinate, and deliver the workshops and otherexperienced engineering faculty serve as coaches whoengage with participants at and after the workshop for oneyear. Coaches may attend all or part of a workshop or joinvirtually, most typically at the end of the workshop to learnparticipant plans for their project, module, and/or activity.In each workshop, scheduled for three days, the facultyparticipants were trained on both evidence-basedpedagogical tools and methods to
: • System dynamicsRequirements & • Develop Business • SIPOC (behavior, systemArchitecture requirements • Value Chain & Functional Decomposition elements) • Develop system requirements • Use Case Diagram • Cybernetics • Develop measurement plan Requirements: (information flow) • Develop a quality • Customer requirements • Systems thinking
faculty in engineering educationresearch, regardless of institution type. While only a small fraction of CAREER proposals arerecommended for funding, former EEC deputy director Sue Kemnitzer frequently remindedapplicants that the process of applying for a CAREER award has value in itself. By this claim,she included the self-reflection on a faculty member’s research agenda, a plan to integrate theresearch and education activities throughout the individual’s career, and the discussions heldbetween the early career faculty member and their department chair, senior mentors, and, insome cases, deans and other constituencies. These key activities provide many opportunities forfaculty development and encouraging growth in all aspects of faculty life
possible effectiveness of an intention intervention in the relationship betweenmotivation and course performance. Planning is a self-regulatory strategy involving a mentalsimulation of concrete actions in future situations. By simulating future events, individualswould be able to anticipate possible obstacles and make pre-planned, more realistic strategies.This active mental representation thus leads people to have greater accessibility to the plans andact as planned [21]. Therefore, by planning, students may devote more time to study and findmore effective ways to perform better in the course even if their motivation to go to college islow.MethodsThe engineering majors at Miami University have several required courses that they take in theirfirst
their own by supporting themselves, pursuing education, and planning theirown adventures 5 . She used the admiration of the public to spark discussion about femininity, equalopportunity regardless of gender, woman’s rights, and equality 4 .Edward Elliott, President of Purdue University, was impressed by Earhart and realized she wouldbe the perfect role model for the female students his institution. After much discussion and severalvisits to the institution, Earhart, in 1935, joined the staff as a Counselor in Careers for Women andtechnical advisor in the Department of Aeronautics. Before officially starting, Earhart created anddistributed a survey to measure female students’ interest in pursuing a career and how they wouldbalance that pursuit
standardization) from 1990 through 1994. He has been active in SONET’s National and International Standardization since 1985. In addition, Rodney has published numerous papers and presentations on SONET. Rodney began his career with Fujitsu Network Communications in 1989 as the Director of Strategic Plan- ning. He also held the positions of Director of Transport Product Planning, Vice President of Business Management, Senior Vice President of Sales Management, Senior Vice President of Manufacturing, and Senior Vice President of Business Development. Before joining Fujitsu, Rodney worked for Bell Labora- tories, Bellcore (now Telcordia), and Rockwell International. He earned both his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in
Tennessee atChattanooga--that this positive evaluation took place in the first semester in which the new criteriawere effective is regarded as particularly notable. While an earlier version of this work describedthis process as a partially implemented strategy [1], the plan has now been completely detailed,implemented, and validated by the ABET visit which found no shortcomings. This paper describesthe assessment processes, along with the two-year cycle of the assessment schedule, and givesexamples of assessment artifacts and rubrics. The paper also describes some common assessmenterrors and misconceptions, and recommendations on how to avoid them. While each programshould thoughtfully develop its own assessment plan based on its curriculum, its
experience of the new doctoral students and postdoctoralresearchers. Given the high attrition rates in graduate education, the retreat was also designed tofoster retention by integrating attributes of the Workforce Sustainability model.The retreat was framed around four objectives: (1) build community, (2) communicate groupnorms and expectations, (3) develop individual strategic plans, (4) and introduce research skills.The retreat encouraged individual and collective reflection on goals, deliverables, andexpectations. The experience was guided by the notion of beginning with the end in mind and, inthis case, meant aligning individual professional development plans with that individual’s long-term career goals and vision of the research group. The
process to beperformed in the organization for the institutionalization of a process:1. Establish an Organizational Policy 7. Identify and Involve Relevant Stakeholders2. Plan the Process 8. Monitor and Control the Process3. Provide Resources 9. Objectively Evaluate Adherence4. Assign Responsibility 10. Review Status with Higher Level Management5. Train People 11. Establish a Defined Process6. Control Work Products 12. Collect Process Related ExperiencesInstitutionalization of ABET Metrics at California State University, FullertonData plays a key role in any improvement effort since it shows the areas that
tenure at ETSU, he has authored several papers, taught numerous courses, and presented at professional meetings. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 A Graduate Program Review and Lessons Learned Mohammad Moin Uddin and Keith Johnson East Tennessee State UniversityAbstractThe Department of Engineering, Engineering Technology and Surveying at East Tennessee StateUniversity offers a graduate program – MS in Engineering Technology. The program has twoconcentrations – Engineering Technology and Entrepreneurial Leadership. The EngineeringTechnology concentration is for students who plan to become, or are now, involved insupervising or
offered in a lecture/discussion format, with all students completing the same set ofrequired assignments. The lecture consisted of guest speakers providing information aboutengineering departments, specific opportunities and the field more broadly. Despite beingpresented with information about the available learning experiences, enrolled students indicateda lack of confidence in making educational decisions [14]. In addition to the lecture, upper-levelstudents mentors led weekly discussions (15-25 students per discussion) on topics such asstrengths, identity and values, which are necessary to support the development of future plans[15] and thereby an integral component of experiential learning.In early 2020, we piloted a new model for the course
software of the mechatronic device will be highlighted in thispaper. Initial plans of growing turnips with the FarmBot were unsuccessful due to the severity ofwinter weather. The project team has completed building a hoop house around the FarmBot toextend the growing season. Immediate installation plans for powering the FarmBot with solarpanels and wind turbines and meeting its irrigation needs through rainwater harvesting are inprogress.1.0 IntroductionFarmBot efforts at the University of Maryland Eastern Shore(UMES) are integral to smartagriculture and precision farming efforts[1,2] funded by the National Institute of Food andAgriculture(NIFA) and Maryland Space Grant Consortium. Smart agriculture endeavors havebeen ongoing for several years now
particular in support of the data-driven and self-driven management of large-scale deployments of IoT and smart city infrastruc- ture and services, Wireless Vehicular Networks (VANETs), cooperation and spectrum access etiquette in cognitive radio networks, and management and planning of software defined networks (SDN). He is an ABET Program Evaluator (PEV) with the Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC). He served on many academic program design, review and planning efforts. He serves on editorial boards of multiple journals including IEEE Communications Letter and IEEE Network Magazine. He also served as chair, co-chair, and technical program committee member of multiple international conferences including IEEE VTC
students “work as an engineer,” the courseinstructors took a backward design approach to redesign this course. First, learning outcomesfor the course were redefined to highlight problem-solving skills, which are essentialoutcomes according to the ABET criteria. Second, a comprehensive assessment plan wascreated to measure student progress in each of the learning outcomes. Rubrics-based gradingfocuses on assessing five dimensions of student work: the solution’s efficacy, quality oftechnical writing, oral communication, completion of prototypes, and testing plans and results.Finally, the newly developed learning outcomes and assessment plan were aligned withlearning activities in the course, including design, prototyping, testing, as well as
; accountability from theirpeers; dedicated time and space to work on their new ideas. For a course redesign plan facultyhad to develop student-learning outcomes, an assessment plan, and an implementation plan forthe course changes. In addition, for fully participating, faculty received a summer salarysupplement and an additional supplement after implementing the class changes and assessing thesuccess of those changes.Twenty faculty participated in the summer 2019 program with 95% of the workshop participantsmeeting all of the summer program requirements, including presenting their work/plans at thefinal summer meeting. During the 2019-2020 academic year, faculty implemented their coursechanges and were required to submit a final deliverable focusing on
. Teresa Lee Tinnell, University of Louisville Terri Tinnell is a STEM Education Curriculum and Instruction PhD Candidate and Graduate Research As- sistant at the University of Louisville. Research interests include: interdisciplinary faculty development, first-year engineering student retention, STEM teacher education, and collaborative, team-based learning experiences.Dr. Thomas Tretter, Thomas Tretter is professor of science education and director of the Gheens Science Hall & Rauch Plan- etarium at the University of Louisville. His scholarship includes collaborative efforts with science and engineering faculty targeting retention of STEM majors in entry-level STEM courses.Dr. Marie Brown
techniques, and the infusion of globalperspectives that includes how different regions of the world are addressing climate change andadaptation planning, has been particularly enriching to the student experience. The authorsdiscuss how CGA has incorporated climate science into engineering education and how thecourse provides exposure to best practices used in civil engineering to promote infrastructureresiliency in a changing environment.Key words: Climate Education, Civil Engineering, ResiliencyIntroductionThe United States Coast Guard Academy (CGA), located in New London, Connecticut is thesmallest of the United States military academies with approximately 1000 cadets and its missionis to educate, train and develop leaders of character who are