Two Institutions," in ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, 2013.[10] M. Johnson and Y.-H. Lu, "Teaching Software Engineering Through Competition and Collaboration," in ASEE Annual Conference, Chicago, 2006.[11] J. Tuya and J. Garcia-Fanjul, "Teaching requirements analysis by means of student collaboration," in Frontiers in Education, San Juan, 1999.[12] M. Cohn, "Advantages of the “As a user, I want” user story template.," Mountain Goal Software, 25 April 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.mountaingoatsoftware.com/blog/advantages-of-the-as-a-user-i-want-user- story-template. [Accessed 15 1 2020].[13] K. Wiegers, "10 Requirements Traps to Avoid," The Startup, 22 11 2019. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/swlh/10
. Järvelä, and H. Järvenoja, “Capturing temporal and sequential patterns ofself-, co-, and socially shared regulation in the context of collaborative learning,” ContemporaryEducational Psychology, vol. 49, pp. 160-174, Apr. 2017.[22] J. Zheng, W. Xing, and G. Zhu, “Examining sequential patterns of self-and socially sharedregulation of STEM learning in a CSCL environment,” Computers & Education, vol. 136, pp.34-48, July 2019.[23] L. L. Wu, R. Cassidy, J. M. McCarthy, J. LaRue, and G. Washington, “Implementation andimpact of a first-year project-based learning course,” in Proceedings of 2016 American Societyfor Engineering Education Annual Conference, June 26-29, 2016, New Orleans, LA. ASEE[24] L. L. WU, C. Fischer, F. Rodriguez, and G
://peer.asee.org/17318[10] Slater, C. S., & Savelski, M., & Hesketh, R. (2006, June), Green Engineering DesignThrough Project-based Industrial Partnerships Paper presented at 2006 Annual Conference &Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. https://peer.asee.org/168[11] Yousuf, A., & Mustafa, M., & De La Cruz, A. (2010, June), Project-based Learning Paperpresented at 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky.https://peer.asee.org/16081[12] Rossmann, J. S., & Stewart-Gambino, H. (2019, June), Cornerstone Design forSociotechnical "Grand Challenges" Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition , Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32551[13] Elzey, D. (2006, June), Teaching Intro To Engineering In Context
courses heavily focus on gravity systems’ analysis and design. All students were 4th yearstanding in 5-year program. None of the students in either offering had taken either classespreviously and all were architectural engineering majors with a structural focus. Also, the sameset of students were mandated to take both classes in their 4th year. As such, the student populationis identical from one class to the next which allowed for identical teams in both semesters. Thisresearch study has had two deployed iterations, the first was in the 2017-2018 academic year whilethe second was in the 2018-2019 academic year. The evaluation included student survey data ontheir experiences that was correlated to assessment grades.Course Structure CompositionThe
: Engineering De- sign Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?,” and is a Co-PI on the NSF Revolutionizing Engineering Departments grant ”Additive Innova- tion: An Educational Ecosystem of Making and Risk Taking.” He was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014, and received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from President Obama in 2017. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work In Progress: Building a Bridge Between Hackathons and Software Engineering Capstones Through Adaptive ExpertiseAbstractAs hackathons become more
://www.nestgenscience.org/. [Accessed: 09-Jan-2018].[2] “PLTW Engineering (9-12),” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.pltw.org/our- programs/pltw-engineering-curriculum. [Accessed: 22-Nov-2019].[3]Davis, D. C., Beyerlein, S. W. and I. T. Davis, Development and use of an engineer profile, Proc. American Society for Engineering Education Conf., Portland, OR, June 2005.[4] Ennis Jr., C. W., and Gyeszly, S. W. (1991). Protocol analysis of the engineering systems. Res. Engineering Design, 3, 15–22.[5] Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., and Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes. Admin. Sci. Quart., 21, 246–275.[6] Volkema, R. J. (1983). Problem formulation in planning and design. Management Science
tenure-line black engineering faculty in research-intensive (R1) institutionsIntroduction and Rationale for the StudyThe American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) dubbed the 2014-2015 academic yearas the Year of Action in Diversity. Supporting this significant event and recognizing the urgentneed of increasing diversity, deans of engineering schools across the United States signedpledges to act on four major diversity initiatives. One of these initiatives addresses thecommitment of developing and implementing proactive strategies for increasing therepresentation of women and underrepresented minorities within the engineering professoriate[1]. One general measure of success outlined in the pledge is a “notable increase” in
University of Science and Technology in Summer 2019. On the industry side, she was once a trainee user interface designer at a big data product development group of a technology company in Chongqing, China.Dr. Panagiotis Apostolellis, University of Virginia Panagiotis Apostolellis is a full-time Assistant Professor in the Computer Science Department at the University of Virginia. He received his PhD in Computer Science & Applications from Virginia Tech in 2017. He also holds a MSc in Computer Science from Virginia Tech and an MSc in Human-Centered Sys- tems from the University of Sussex (UK). Additionally, Panagiotis has a Graduate Certificate in Human- Computer Interaction from Virginia Tech (2015). While a
and Diversity Impacts across Three Engineering Research Centers," in Frontiers in Education Conference, Cincinnati, OH, 2019.[5] D. M. Pai, R. G. Liles, C. Lambeth, P. N. Kumta,, H. S. Borovetz, S. K. Pixley and J. Sankar, "Bootstrapping a new graduate curriculum through an Engineering Research Center," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, B.C. Canada, 2011.[6] P. Hirsch, D. Kelso, B. Shwom, J. Troy and J. Wal, "Redefining Communication Education for Engineers: How the NSF/VaNTH ERC is Experimenting with a New Approach," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, 2011.[7] T. Dahlberg, T. Barnes, A. Rorrer and E. Powell, "Improving retention and graduate recruitment through immersive
, “Motivation in transition: Development and roles of expectancy, task values, and costs in early college engineering,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 111, no. 6, p. 1081–1102, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000331[12] Shell, F. Duane and J. Husman. "Control, motivation, affect, and strategic self-regulation in the college classroom: A multidimensional phenomenon." Journal of Educational Psychology vol. 100 no. 2, p. 443+, 2008.[13] J. Rohde, A. Kirn, and A. Godwin, “Engineering Allies: The Personalities of Cisgender Engineering Students,” Proceedings of the 2017 Annual American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, June 25 – 28, 2017.[14] J. Husman, and W. Lens, “The Role of the
. McPherson, "Using Everyday Objects to Engage Students in Standards Education," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Erie, PA, 2016: IEEE.[8] D. Solomon, Y.-T. Liao, T., and J. T. Chapin, "Maximizing the Effectiveness of One- time Standards Instruction Sessions with Formative Assessment," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019: ASEE.[9] K. A. Kozak, "Standards, Standards, Where might you be?," in 2014 ASEE North Midwest Section Conference, 2014.[10] L. R. Musser and T. W. Conkling, "Characteristics of Engineering Citations," Science & Technology Libraries, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 41, 1996.[11] R. J. Rodrigues, "Industry Expectations of the New Engineer," Science &
journals and conference proceedings and a few books to his credit. Jayanta is a member of ASEE, ASME and VDI (Germany). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020WIP PAPER: Integration of Mechanical Properties of Materials in an Undergraduate Course onManufacturing Processes for Both Mechanical and Industrial Engineering StudentsBy: Jayanta Banerjee (ASEE Life Member)Mechanical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez (UPRM)Draft Paper: (For ASEE Materials & Manufacturing Joint Session)Abstract: At the University of Puerto Rico’s Mayagüez campus in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, acourse on Manufacturing Processes (INME 4055) is offered
Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics and engineering education departments. She is currently a member of the ASEE Board of Directors’ Advisory Committee on P-12 Engineering Education.Mr. Paul Alan Clingan, The Ohio State University Senior Lecturer Department of Engineering Education American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: Parsons Problems as a Tool in the First-Year Engineering ClassroomIntroductionTeaching coding in a common first-year engineering program presents a variety of challenges.Students arrive with varied coding experience
. Stirgus, M. Nahagi, J. Ma, R. Jardat, L. Strawderman, and D. K. Eakin, “Determinants of Systems Thinking in College Engineering Students : Research Initiation,” ASEE, 2019.[19] O. Rompelman and J. De Vries, “Practical training and internships in engineering education: Educational goals and assessment,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 173– 180, 2002.[20] K. Davis, A. Salado, and T. A. McDermott, “Lessons Learned from a First Attempt to Teach Systems Engineering as a Studio Art Class,” ASEE, 2019.[21] D. Halsmer, R. Leland, and E. Dzurilla, “A Laboratory-based Course in Systems Engineering Focusing on the Design of a High-speed Mag-lev Pod for the SpaceX Hyperloop Competition,” ASEE, 2017.
Mechanical Engineering Design Sequence,” in Annual Conference & Exposition, ASEE 2013, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, June 23-26, 2013, pp. 23.789.1 – 23.789.13. 4. Kiefer, S. “Project Oriented Course in Mechatronics,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, 2004. 5. Fritzing. (2019). Potsdam, Germany: Interaction Design Lab Potsdam.
the author’s focus on the use of computer technology in theclassroom. The techniques are guided notes, peer discussions (using Piazza), and gamification(using Kahoot!). The efficacy of the techniques in increasing student engagement with the coursematerial and student understanding is self-assessed through a survey administered to the studentsat the end of the Fall 2019 semester. This assessment method is limited due to the small samplesize studied (nine students), however, the data suggests that the use of these strategies may behelpful in student education. From the assessment, it was found that guided notes wereconsidered helpful by students, and they were particularly helpful for studying. Online discussionusing Piazza was not appreciated
. Al-Obaidi, “CDIO Curriculum for Mechanical EngineeringUndergraduate Course,” J. Engineering Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 251 – 259,2011.[11] J. Kadlowec, K. Bhatia, T. Chandrupatla, J. Chen, E. Constans, H. Hartman, A. Marchese,P. von Lockette, and H. Zhang, “Design Integrated in the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum:Assessment of the Engineering Clinics,” J. of Mechanical Design, vol. 129, pp. 682 – 691, July2007.[12] L.L. Pauley, J.S. Lamancusa, and T.A. Litzinger, “Using the design process for curriculumimprovement,” in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2005.[13] “Best Undergraduate Engineering Programs,” usnews.com, U.S. News & World Report,2019.[14] ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission
Wiley & Sons, 2007.[19] N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, 2007.[20] L. Ljung, System identification toolbox, The Matlab user’s guide , 1988.[21] "MATLAB R2019a," The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, 2019.[22] Z. Z. A. Z. M. a. E. S. Zhang, " Project-based Robotics Courses for the Students of Mechanical Engineering Technology," ASEE 126th Annual Conferece & Exposition, 2019.Appendix A Course SurveyRating Scale Questions:1. The procedures for the lab were clear and easy to follow. ____2. The prelab helped prepare for the work to be done in the lab. ____3. Lab procedures and expected learning outcomes were relevant and valuable. ____4. I feel
(ASEE) published a special education researchproject dedicated to retention related issues of engineering students in 2012 [1, 2]. This ASEEretention project collectively invited around 60 universities to share their perceptions on thistopic and, specifically, asked for a focus on exploring the best practices and strategies forretaining students in Engineering, Engineering Technology and Computing programs [1, 2]. Themain focus of this study is to find the reasons why 40 to 50% of engineering freshmen had eitherswitched or withdrawn from the engineering major. The study indicated that it is mainly due topoor teaching and advising, difficulty of the engineering curriculum, and lack of “belonging”within engineering [2, 3]. Furthermore, these
, 2001.[27] S. K. Hargrove and L. Burge, “Developing a six sigma methodology for improving retention in engineering education,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, 2002.[28] C. R. Bego, J. L. Hieb, and P. A. S. Ralston, “Barriers and bottlenecks in engineering mathematics: How performance throughout a math sequence affects retention and persistence to graduation,” in October 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2019.[29] T. L. Tinnell, C. R. Bego, and P. A. S. Ralston, “An Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration to Understand First-Year Engineering Retention,” in Proceedings of the 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019.[30] L. Linnenbrink-Garcia et al
-NativeContent, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, 2014.[27] Edgcomb, A., F. Vahid, R. Lysecky, A. Knoesen, R. Amirtharajah, and M.L. Dorf. StudentPerformance Improvement using Interactive Textbooks: A Three-University Cross-SemesterAnalysis, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, 2015.[28] Coral. http://corallanguage.org/. Accessed: April 2020.[29] R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation forStatistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2019.
(establishing classroom norms during the first week of class; growth mindset video and activity; interactionwith the instructor).In addition to completing the surveys, students in the Fall 2019 sections of the class (including the controlgroup) were required to complete an open-ended reflective writing assignment on their experience in theclass. This assignment was added to the class by the researchers in order to gather additional qualitative datato help verify the survey results. I would like each of you to write a short paper responding to the following two questions: 1. Considering all you have learned and experienced this quarter, what will you take with you into the future? 2. What (if any) particular aspects of this
Evidence-based Teaching and Learning Practices into the Core Engineering Curriculum," Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[17] A. P. Samaras, M. Hjalmarson, L. C. Bland, J. K. Nelson, and E. K. Christopher, "Self- Study as a Method for Engaging STEM Faculty in Transformative Change to Improve Teaching," International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 195-213, 2019.[18] L. A. Baker et al., "Cottrell scholars collaborative new faculty workshop: Professional development for new chemistry faculty and initial assessment of its efficacy," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 91, no. 11, pp. 1874-1881, 2014.[19] A. F. McKenna, B. Yalvac, and
on chemical reaction kinet- ics and computational science and engineering. She received an NSF CAREER Award in 2019.Dr. Daria Khvostichenko, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Dr. Khvostichenko developed a fascination for science and engineering in middle school and it has only grown since. Dr. Khvostichenko has two PhD degrees, in Chemistry and in Chemical Engineering. Her research interests spanned colloid and interface science, computational chemistry, phase behavior of complex fluids, and microfluidics. During her years in academia she mentored multiple undergraduate and graduate students and participated in community outreach programs. Dr. Khvostichenko presently leads a data analytics team for
communities in Alaska. Her passion for understanding the intersectionality of engineering and society was fostered through her involvement in Cal Poly’s Engineers Without Bor- ders Student Chapter and work for the California State Water Quality Control Board. Her interests have also been shaped by her involvement with the UN Major Group for Children and Youth (MGCY) and her participation in the 2017, 2018, and 2019 UN Science, Technology, and Innovation for the SDGs Multistakeholder Forums.Dr. Rebekah Oulton P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Rebekah Oulton is an Associate Professor at California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo, in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Paper ID #29705The Implementation of BIM application in University Teaching: Case Studyof Construction Management ProgramDr. Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University Dr. Sanjeev Adhikari is faculty from Kennesaw State University. Previously he was faculty at Morehead State University from 2009 to 2016 and faculty at Purdue University – Indianapolis from 2016 to 2019. He has completed Ph.D. degree in civil engineering, focusing on construction management from Michigan Technological University in 2008. He has an extensive teaching background with a total of 18 years academic experience at five different universities. He
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020Using Case Studies and Educational Technology to Teach Structural Analysis and Designto Construction Engineering and Management UndergraduatesAbstractDuring the Fall 2019 semester, 19 construction engineering and management undergraduatestudents were enrolled in one four-credit course that combined structural analysis and design,which has typically been taught as two separate courses for civil engineering students. To engagethe students and increase subject mastery, case studies and MasteringEngineering™ are used.The main objective of this study is to examine relationships of student learning when analyzingand calculating design loads on structural members
Superior Technico, Lisbon, Portugal (2011-2013). He also worked as a Lecturer in the Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Engineer- ing, Prime University, Dhaka, Bangladesh from 2014 to 2015. He is a member of the IEEE, ASEE, and IEEE Power Electronics Society.Dr. Rajab Challoo, Texas A&M University-Kingsville Rajab Challoo received his B.S. (1983), M.S. (1985), and Ph.D. (1989) in Electrical Engineering from the Wichita State University, USA. He is currently a Professor of Electrical Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. His research interest includes control systems, robotics and smart grid. He is a registered professional engineer in Texas. He has been involved in several research projects funded by
prevalent in Physics, as Force Concept Inventories(FCI), [1]–[4] and in Statics [5]–[8]. Not many concept inventories have been created to focus on thetopic of Dynamics. Expanding on the success of the FCI, Gray et al. [9] have created and are fine tuning aDynamics Concept Inventory (DCI) test. The test examines 11 different concepts over a 29-questionmultiple choice exam and since its inception, has been analyzed to have “adequate” reliability [10]. Inaddition, there has also been some work to investigate a shortened version of the same DCI [11]. In this study, the DCI was implemented at the very beginning (pre-course) of two Fall Dynamiccourses (in 2018 and 2019) at a public university and then again at the very end of the same course(post
quality: A collaborative inquiry across multiple methodological perspectives,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 398–430, 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20170.[13] J. Roy, “Engineering by the numbers,” ASEE, Jul. 2019. Accessed: Nov. 30, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.asee.org/documents/papers-and-publications/publications/college- profiles/2018-Engineering-by-Numbers-Engineering-Statistics-UPDATED-15-July- 2019.pdf.[14] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.Appendix A: Quality Considerations Quality construct as defined by Walther et al. [12] Study considerations Theoretical