research. Teachers have brought up the value of being ableto speak to these issues in supporting the concept of resiliency in their own students. As wecontinue to improve and refine the program, we are interested in gathering stronger data toexplore how these concepts are transferred to classrooms and if they indeed promote increasedlearning and interest in bioengineering.REFERENCES[1] "NGSS: Developing the Standards." https://www.nextgenscience.org/developing- standards/developing-standards (accessed April 6, 2020).[2] M. S. Garet, A. C. Porter, L. Desimone, B. F. Birman, and K. S. Yoon, "What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers," American educational research journal, vol
and engineering,” NSF 17-310, Arlington, VA, 2017 [Online]. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/ [Accessed April 9, 2020].[4] R. Stevens, J. Bransford, and A. Stevens, “The LIFE center lifelong and lifewide learning diagram,” The LIFE Center, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://life- slc.org/about/citationdetails.html [Accessed April 9, 2020].[5] T. G. Ganesh and C. G. Schnittka, “Engineering education in the middle grades,” in Engineering in Pre-college Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices, S. Purzer, J. Strobel, and M. E. Cardella, Eds. Indiana: Purdue University Press, 2014, pp. 89-116.[6] National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council, Engineering in K-12 Education
-Jan-2020].[5] Afterschool Alliance, “America After 3PM: Afterschool Programs in Demand.” [Online].Available: https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/America-After-3PM-Afterschool-Programs-in-Demand.pdf.[6] M. Frye, C. Wang, S. Nair, and Y. Burns, “miniGEMS STEAM and Programming Campfor Middle School Girls,” in 2018 CoNECD-The Collaborative Network for Engineering andComputing, Crystal City, Virginia, 2018.[7] L. Albers, L. Bottomley, and E. A. Parry, “Assessing the Impact of Active Learning onStudents in Grades 3-8 during GK-12 Outreach Program Administered Family STEM Nights,” in2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, 2011.[8] C. Vallas and P. Guan, “Adventures For Future
, 2011. 100(1): p. 186-210.8. Domínguez, U., Active Learning in Engineering Education in Spain. A Course on Machine Design. SEFI, 2007.9. Gomez, E., et al., Development and Application of a New Interactive Model for the Teaching of Manufacturing Engineering Technology. IJEE, 2008.10. Coller, B.D., An Experiment in Hands-On Learning in Engineering Mechanics: Statics. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2008.11. Pierrakos, O., M. Borrego, and J. Lo, Empirical Evidence to Support Interdisciplinary Projects in Engineering Design Experiences. AAEE, 2007.12. Nasrazadani, S., Design and Construction of a Heat Exchanger Analyzer for an Undergraduate ThermalFluids Laboratory. International
that the students’perception of their negotiation style in the pre-assessment survey does not match with thenegotiation style observed during the activity and self-reported in the post-assessment survey.Based on the feedback from industry and the prior research conducted on soft skills andnegotiations specifically, it appears that the need for an activity of this type is warranted.Reference List[1] V. Domal and J. Trevelayn, “An engineer’s typical day: lessons learned and implications forengineering education,” Proceedings, 20th Australasian Association for Engineering EducationConference, pp. 637-643, 2009.[2] S. M. Katz, “The entry-level engineer: Problems in transition from student to professional,”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 82
principles are a promising method by which to develop resilience in the form of failuretolerance for students. Future work will examine the effects of design thinking education onresilience over a longer course of time and with a larger sample of students.AcknowledgementsWe would like to thank the Kenan Institute and administrators at Forsyth Country Day Schoolfor supporting this exploratory research and the student participants in the summer program andhigh school course for their honest self-assessments and reflection.References[1] T. Newman and S. Blackburn, “Transitions in the Lives of Children and Young People: Resilience Factors,” Scottish Executive Education Department, Edinburgh, Scotland, Report ED 472 541, Oct. 2002.[2] M
climate," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, pp. 45-51, 1996.[5] C. Faber, C. Smith-Orr, C. Bodnar, A. Coso Strong, W. Lee, and E. McCave, "Best practices for developing a virtual peer mentoring community," in ASEE Annual Conference proceedings, 2017.[6] R. Pimmel, A. F. McKenna, N. L. Fortenberry, B. Yoder, and R. C. Chavela Guerra, "Faculty development using virtual communities of practice," In ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Atlanta, GA., vol. 23, p. 1, 2013.[7] L. Bosman and P. Voglewede, "How can a faculty community of practice change classroom practices?," College Teaching, 2019.[8] A. L. Pawley, A. R. Carberry, M. E. Cardella, M.-I. Carnasciali, S. R. Daly, J. L. Gorlewicz
handbook of expertise and expert performance, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 21-30.[8] G. Klein and R. R. Hoffman, "Macrocognition, mental models, and cognitive task analysis methodology," in Naturalistic Decision Making and Macrocognition, Hampshire, U.K., Ashgate, 2008, pp. 57-80.[9] R. R. Hoffman and G. Lintern, "Eliciting and representing the knowledge of experts," in Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 203-222.[10] R. R. Hoffman and J. Smith, Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.[11] S. E. Dreyfus and H. L. Dreyfus, "A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in
designThis study is grounded in an interpretivist research philosophy that acknowledges a subjective,socially constructed reality [11]. Consistent with this philosophy, we will use open-endedquestions in an interview setting to understand the participants’ realities through their ownperspectives. Throughout the research process, we will refer to Walther et al.’s qualityframework for interpretive research, which provides guiding questions to ensure quality throughall the stages of research – from “making data” to “handling data” – and across six qualityconstructs: theoretical validation, procedural validation, communicative validation, pragmaticvalidation, ethical validation, and process reliability [12]. Our considerations for each of thesequality
, “American universities and technical advance in industry,” Res. Policy, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 323–348, 1994, doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(94)90042-6.[3] National Academy of Engineering, The Importance of Engineering Talent to the Prosperity and Security of the Nation: Summary of a Forum. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2014.[4] National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.[5] National Academy of Engineering, Grand Challenges for Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science, 2008.[6] N. Henderson, M. S. Fadali, and J. Johnson, “An investigation of first-year engineering students’ attitude
: 10.1348/000709902158883.[5] A. VanScoy and M. J. Oakleaf, “Evidence vs. anecdote: Using syllabi to plan curriculum- integrated information literacy instruction,” College & Research Libraries, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 566–575, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.5860/crl.69.6.566.[6] T. P. Mackey and T. E. Jacobson, “Information literacy: A collaborative endeavor,” College Teaching, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 140–144, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.3200/CTCH.53.4.140-144.[7] M. J. Foster, S. Shurtz, and C. Pepper, “Evaluation of best practices in the design of online evidence-based practice instructional modules,” Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 31–40, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.1.007.[8] I. Datig and C. Ruswick, “Four quick
, and Robert J. Beichner. Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics 72, no. 1 2004, 98-115.Finn, B. & Tauber, S. K. (2015). When Confidence Is Not a Signal of Knowing: How Students’ Experiences and Beliefs About Processing Fluency Can Lead to Miscalibrated Confidence. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 567–586.Fiorella, L., R. E. Mayer. "Eight ways to promote generative learning." Educational Psychology Review 28, no. 4 (2016): 717-741.Holton, Douglas L., Amit Verma and Gautam Biswas. Assessing student difficulties in understanding the behavior of AC and DC circuits. 2008.Limón, M.J. and instruction, On the cognitive conflict as an
of the cornerstone course should be integrated intothe curriculum.References 1. S. Freeman, C. Pfluger, R. Whalen, K. S. Grahame, J. Hertz, C. Variawa, J. Love, M. Sivak, and B. Maheswaran, “Cranking Up Cornerstone: Lessons Learned from Implementing a Pilot with First-Year Engineering Students,” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. 2. Meyers, K., & Uhran, J., & Pieronek, C., & Budny, D., & Ventura, J., & Ralston, P., & Estell, J. K., & Slaboch, C., & Hart, B., & Ladewski, R. (2008, June), Perspectives On First Year Engineering Education Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. https://peer.asee.org
-of-things platform as teaching aids in the industrialinstrumentation course International Journal of Online Engineering, 14(12), 26 - 42.Ding, Q., & Cao, S. (2017). RECT: A Cloud-Based Learning Tool for Graduate SoftwareEngineering Practice Courses With Remote Tutor Support IEEE Access, 5, 2262 - 2271.Pearson, T. (2014). A low-cost full-featured extensible laboratory for online hardwareengineering International Journal of Online Engineering, 10(3), 24 - 30.Shyr, W.J., Su, T.J., & Lin, C.M. (2013). Development of remote monitoring and a controlsystem based on PLC and webaccess for learning mechatronics International Journal ofAdvanced Robotic Systems, 10.Nedic, Z. (2012). Demonstration of collaborative features of remote laboratory
. Examples of global seminars offered by engineering programs. For more details and amore recent listing, visit https://sites.google.com/endicott.edu/engineersabroad [2].University Program Website Example SeminarsAffiliation https://atlas.gatech.edu/index.cfm?Fu Environmental Technology, Disaster Reconnaissance,Georgia Tech seAction=Programs.ViewProgramAngul Sustainable Transportation, Sustainable Development ar&id=10176Iowa State https://www.engineering.iastate.edu/s Technical CommunicationUniversity tudyabroad
." Shock and Vibration Digest 38, no. 2: 91- 130.[2] Spencer, Billie F., Manuel E. Ruiz-Sandoval, and Narito Kurata (2004). "Smart sensing technology: opportunities and challenges." Structural Control and Health Monitoring 11, no. 4 (2004): 349-368.[3] Housner, GWea, Lawrence A. Bergman, T. Kf Caughey, Anastassios G. Chassiakos, Richard O. Claus, Sami F. Masri, Robert E. Skelton, T. T. Soong, B. F. Spencer, and James TP Yao. (1997). "Structural control: past, present, and future." Journal of engineering mechanics 123, no. 9: 897-971.[4] Spencer Jr, B. F., and S. Nagarajaiah. (2003). "State of the art of structural control." Journal of structural engineering 129, no. 7: 845-856.[5] Mahin, S. A., P. B. Shing, C. R. Thewalt and R
, E. Finley, and C. Gilman, “Veterans’ use of programs and services as they transition to civilian life: Baseline assessment for the veteran metrics initiative,” Journal of Social Service Research, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 1-15, 2020.[7] B. M. Cheung, “The relationship between perfectionism and leadership style in US military veterans,” PhD. Dissertation, Department of Professional Psychology, Chestnut Hill College, Philadelphia, PA, 2019.[8] S. Ulrich and B. Freer, “From the military to college and beyond: Growing a culturally sensitive program to support veteran success,” Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 1-11, 2020.[9] M. Beach, “The relationship among career certainty, career engagement, social support and
retention in our engineering program over time. 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Fall Conference, October 26-27, 2018 – Brooklyn Technical High SchoolReferences1. S. Sorby, “Educational Research in Developing 3-D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 31, no. 3, 2009, pp. 459-480.2. Norman, K.L., Spatial visualization – A gateway to computer-based technology. Journal of Special Educational Technology, XII(3), 1994, pp. 195–206.3. Smith, I.M., Spatial ability - Its educational and social significance. London: University of London, 1964.4. J. Wai, D. Lubinski, and C. P. Benbow, “Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its
] Tytler, R (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Australian Education Review, 51.[4] CNBC (2016). Millennials are driving the board games revival. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/22/millennials-the-board-games-revival-catan- pandemic.html[5] Eisenack, K. (2013). A climate change board game for interdisciplinary communication and education. Simulation & Gaming, 44(2-3), 328-348.[6] Fukuchi, S. G., Offutt, L. A., Sacks, J., & Mann, B. D. (2000). Teaching a multidisciplinary approach to cancer treatment during surgical clerkship via an interactive board game. The American journal of surgery, 179(4), 337-340.[7] Huang, A., & Levinson, D
, Floriday, 2019.[3] H. K. Ault and A. D. J. Phillips, "New Directions in Solid Modeling - What Direct Modeling Means for CAD Educators," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016, June.[4] D. M. Grzybowski, T. Wild and S. J. Yang, "Board # 90 : Engineering Education for Visually Impaired Students," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[5] A. Talley and K. G. Talley, "Work in Progress: Teaching Design Theory and Mastercam in a Hybrid Flipped Classroom Environment," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[6] S. Streiner, D. Davis and K. Mallouk, "Creating Engaging Escape Rooms in First Year Engineering Courses: A Pilot Study," in ASEE FYEE Conference, Penn State
used sound to map it.Retrospectively, I think that it has been worth it because it’s made me a lot more adaptable and itmade coming to college actually really easy because I already knew what it was like to start outwith no friends, no one, to have to adapt to a completely different set of rules and standards and tojust go from the start. For example, since my high school focused on science and technology, Ireally had that opportunity to sort of become a scientist. But, what I realized when working senioryear on my research project is that scientist[s] spend their whole lives delving into a problem,laying it out, describing it, but they don’t solve it at all, and I don’t think I would be able to livesuch big issues on my shoulders that I could
time recognizing that the purpose of a universitydegree is to build a strong foundation on which employers should expect they will have to dosome work with young coop students and graduates to add task-specific training.4.0 Assessment of Teamwork and Creative Problem Solving SkillsIn the following section, an example of a first effort to qualitatively assess the impact(s) ofunique elements of the Arch E curriculum delivery is described. In order to facilitate this effort, aqualitative comparison was conducted of the Arch E student performance and the performance ofstudents in other engineering programs in completing a similar task. One of the first yearmechanics courses common to all programs was used for this comparison. The same
National Science Foundation.References[1] D., Clive L., A., M. Agogino, O., Eris, D., D. Frey, and L., J. Leifer. "Engineering designthinking, teaching, and learning." Journal of engineering education 94, no. 1 (2005): 103-120[2] C., David P., and R., S. Adams. "The informed design teaching and learning matrix." Journalof Engineering Education 101, no. 4 (2012): 738-797.[3] Y. Y., Seah, and A. J., Magana. "Exploring students’ experimentation strategies inengineering design using an educational CAD tool." Journal of Science Education andTechnology 28, no. 3 (2019): 195-208.[4] M. H., Goldstein., Ş., Purzer, C., Vieira Mejia, M., Zielinski, and K. Anna Douglas."Assessing idea fluency through the student design process." In 2015 IEEE Frontiers
feedback. The authorswould also like to thank the staff of Department of the Electrical Engineering and ComputerScience (EECS) at the University of Michigan for their help in organizing the Electrify summercamp; special thanks to Silvia Dykstra for providing the pie charts in Figure-5 and 6.References[1] J. Rogelj, D. Shindell, K. Jiang, S. Fifita, P. Forster, V. Ginzburg, C. Handa, H. Kheshgi, S. Kobayashi, E. Kriegler et al., “Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5 c in the context of sustainable development,” 2018.[2] “Global ev outlook 2019: Scaling-up the transition to electric mobility,” IEA 2019, May 2019.[3] A. Daga, J. M. Miller, B. R. Long, R. Kacergis, P. Schrafel, and J. Wolgemuth, “Electric fuel pumps for wireless power
: Reconsidering structural relationships,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 499–505, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.004.[5] A. R. Carberry, H.-S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, “Measuring Engineering Design Self-Efficacy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 71–79, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01043.x.[6] K. A. Lane, M. R. Banaji, B. A. Nosek, and A. G. Greenwald, “Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV. What we know (so far),” in Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies, New York: Guilford Press, 2007, pp. 59–102.[7] W. H. Guilford, “A Skills-focused Approach to Teaching Design Fundamentals to Large Numbers of Students and Its Effect on Engineering Design Self-efficacy
expecting to graduate in Spring of 2020. He has been working with high school computer science curriculum and is an advocate for Computer Science classes in all West Virginia schools. Recently, he has been working with middle school students in an after-school program focusing on exposure to STEM topics and experiences.Ms. Isabel Barrio Sanchez, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Isabel Barrio S´anchez is a college student at West Virginia University Institute of Technology. She is currently a Junior pursuing a Mathematics major and Computer Science and Economics minors. She has been working as a middle school and high school mentor for three years. Alongside the Computer Science department at WVU Tech and
Secretary of Defense. ARM Project Management was provided by MatthewS. Fischer. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors andshould not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of either 7ARM or the Office of the Secretary of Defense of the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government isauthorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding anycopyright notation herein.References[1] Advanced Robotics Manufacturing Institute, 2020. [online], Available:https://arminstitute.org/ewd/[2] Usselman, M., & Ryan, M., & Rosen, J. H., & Koval, J., & Grossman, S., & Newsome, N.A., &
faster adaptation to nanotechnology-related industrial job positions.1. INTRODUCTIONNanotechnology is a new, fast-developing, and cutting-edge field in engineering and science. Itis is an important concept that positively affects the economy, environment, and every field ofour society. Nanotechnology is also the backbone of high-tech industries and widely used inconsumer products and industrial applications.It can be considered as industrial revolution and also the fastest growing industry in history. Inearly 2000’s United State (US) government spent more than $422 million on nanotechnologyresearch and development[1-3]. The US National Nanotechnology Initiative’s (NNI) memberagencies such as National Science Foundation (NSF), Department of
for this work was provided by the Kern Engineering Education Network (KEEN) aspart of a grant to the University of Portland.References1. Hyde, R.A., and Karney, B.W. (2001). Environmental Education Research: Implications for Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education 90(2): 267-275.2. Rugarcia, A., Felder, R.M., Woods, D.R., and Stice, J.E. (2000). The Future of Engineering Education I. Vision for a New Century. Chemical Engineering Education 34(1): 16-25.3. Felder, R.M., Woods, D.R., Stice, J.E., and Rugarcia, A. (2000). The Future of Engineering Education II. Teaching Methods That Work. Chemical Engineering Education 34(1): 26-39.4. Grasso, D., Callahan, K.M., and Doucett, S. (2004). Defining
andunderstanding of the broader context of various environmental engineering work, this study willcontinue in subsequent semesters and will include comment sections for students to provideexamples when responding to various survey statements. Additionally, in future semesters,direct measurement assessment methods (i.e., problem-solving challenges and open-endedassessment questions) will be added to this study.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) underIUSE/PFE:RED Grant No. 1623053. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of NSF.References[1] C. S. Pedersen, “The U.N. Sustainable