example, it would beuseful to know what aspects of the project they found the most challenging and why.Future WorkOutcomes of the pilot study provide insight into student’s technical problem-solving andtinkering self-efficacy. Due to limitations with survey completion (e.g., not all studentscompleted pre and post and not all survey items were included), instructor plans to conduct alarger more comprehensive study in spring 2020. In addition, given the focus on a maker-inspired pedagogy, there is a need to provide students with engaging low-stake opportunities tocreate and share projects early on to better develop their technical confidence. 11References
Development of Veteran Friendly, Military Technology and Instrumentation Mechanical Engineering CourseAbstractThe University of North Carolina at Charlotte developed a veteran friendly, military technologyand instrumentation course as part of their ongoing efforts to recruit and retrain members of themilitary community and to expand the military science and technology workforce. The largerproject included four interrelated initiatives (e.g., systematic veteran recruitment activities,specialized mentoring support for student veterans) and institutional data analysis on veteranrecruitment and graduation. ENGR3999 (pseudonym) was originally planned to link priormilitary experience of veterans to what they learn in academic courses and to
a more basic level. Forexample, it is less likely in an introductory Physics course for an instructor to assume studentsalready know what a gravitational force is and how it acts on a body, whereas in Statics it isoften assumed to be known. It may be true, then, that students who are taking Physics as acorequisite with Statics may struggle in Statics with concepts that are not explained in Physicsuntil a later time. Table 2 below provides information on the planned topics for a ten-weekcourse in Statics and Physics I to provide a basis for comparison. Table 2. Comparison of topics in Statics and Introductory Physics Statics Physics I Week 1
machine design presented in this paper willbenefit technicians, electricians, and manufacturing workers by providing a user- friendly and low-cost efficient device that will accurately and efficiently cut one wire. The automated industrialwire cutting machine also decreases manual labor; as a result, it increases productivity.There are cost-effective ways to improve this prototype that can increase productivity even moresignificantly. Even though the machine prototype was only able to cut and strip one wire at a time,it is more accurate and efficient than most machines in the market at a fraction of the price. Asmentioned in the future work section there is a plan to make it a 4-wire machine that will beat anycompetitor in the market. It is hoped
plan for the Fluid Mechanics coursewas developed considering the objectives and clear outline for student learning. The survey used16 questions with a five-point Likert scale and the overall responses were analyzed to determinethe effectiveness of the integration. The results of the survey are summarized below: • There was a consensus in the support of our use of the software • The support is readily available from the students to integrate CFD, EFD, and AFD with the general theoretical lectures and coursework in Fluid Mechanics. • The results indicate that students will not only benefit their learning and improve their general overall understanding but can impact the student’s potential job opportunity
which are currently considered equallyimportant as technical skills. A study by Hansen and Hansen included the following as the mostcritical employability skills by the employers: communication (listening, written and verbal);analytical/research abilities; computer/technical literacy; flexibility/adaptability/managingmultiple priorities; interpersonal abilities; leadership/management aptitudes; multiculturalsensitivity/awareness; planning/organizing; problem-solving/reasoning/creativity; and team work[23]. International collaboration for students encourage students to gain insight towardsprofessionalism; reliability; ability to cope with uncertainty; work under pressure; capability tocommunicate and interact with others, either in teams or
spendingover 6 hours creating the team assignments in Fall 2019. We were able to provide the same data tothe junto application, and obtain results in less than 10 minutes. For this team assignment, theinstructor did not use GPA or the option to select partners. The average satisfaction of the teamsgenerated “by-hand” was 13.11, whereas the average satisfaction from junto was 13.05. Theseare very similar numbers, however junto would have saved the instructor over 5 hours of work.The instructor is currently gathering data for this one-year course (surveys, reports, and studentperformance) and has plans to use junto next year.Conclusionsjunto sought out to introduce an accessible, portable, quick, and efficient tool for the capstoneteam formation
achievement level for the use of the more recent technology (i.e., the cloud-based SRS) inthe subject section. Nevertheless, two-sample t-tests showed that the differences in theachievement level were not statistically significant: p-values = 0.157, 0.101 and 0.471 for costestimating, engineering economy, and project planning and control, respectively (Table 3).Hypothesis H2 was therefore not supported.Table 3. Summary of t-tests on actual learning Description Cost estimating Engineering economy Scheduling/control Control Subject Control Subject Control Subject Mean 0.859 0.833 0.810 0.838 0.820 0.834 Variance
developmental platform and themodeling of the VR framework as applied to a PEM fuel cell to enhance performance. Studentsexplore concepts as parametric characterization of the thermochemical system. VR technology willenable students to explore new ways to implement their knowledge practically, enhancinginformation retention, and promoting critical thinking. Moreover, this Virtual Reality LearningEnvironment (VRLE) is used to bridge the gap between the theoretical approach and experimentalactivities in face-to-face learning. While still a work in progress, the module is proposed to be beta-tested in the months tocome and potentially fully implemented during the next academic year. Partial results andassessment plans are described in the final
evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Military Veteran Students’ Pathways in Engineering Education (Year 6)AbstractThis National Science Foundation (NSF) Research in Engineering Education (REE)-fundedproject
DIVERSE MINDSAbstract:The use of course management systems have resulted in a growing trend among faculty to provide studentswith course materials to augment lectures. This can include lecture notes, example problems orsupplementary reading. In engineering courses, instructor-provided notes are often handwritten -- even inonline courses. There is an assumption that handwritten notes are preferred by students and have apedagogical benefit over typed notes.Access to course materials for students with disabilities is also improving due to advancements in bothtechnology and awareness. Students with disabilities often receive custom accommodation plans for coursework when the original class format does not adequately support their learning. In courses
weighing the triple bottom line of engineering solutions in global, economic, sustainability, economic, and environmental, and societal contexts social impacts5. An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a Collaborate with others in the collaborative and inclusive environment, establish accomplishment of lab activities, goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives but specifically the term project6. An ability to develop and conduct appropriate Interpretation of acquired data, experimentation, analyze and
and action items taken. ii. A weekly prioritized to-do list. iii. A weekly list summarizing goals achieved during the previous two weeks including the time spent (in hours) working (how much of the to do list was completed?) iv. Notes from outside research. v. Notes of how to accomplish a task. vi. Calculations, graphs (handmade and/or computer generated), drawings. vii. Drawings and schematic diagrams, including changes or updated versions, with detailed explanations of what was changed or updated. viii. Test plans, collected data, analyses, and conclusions regarding testing
University of Texas at Austin in Environmental Engineering. Most recently, he graduated with his Ph.D. from the Colorado School of Mines in Civil and Environmental Engineering. He teaches Water Resources and Planning, Environmental Science, and Environmental Engineering Technologies.Dr. Michael A. Butkus P.E., United States Military Academy Michael A. Butkus is a professor of environmental engineering at the U.S. Military Academy. His work has been focused on engineering education and advancements in the field of environmental engineer- ing. His current research interests are in physicochemical treatment processes with recent applications in drinking water disinfection, lead remediation, sustainable environmental engineering
/programming plants/factories disciplines thermodynamics energy production prototyping communications recycling yield diagrams agriculture byproducts safety nuclear energy economics product/factory lifecycle environment/sustainability fuel social considerations carbon capture energy balance biofuel material balance cosmetics process Design fertilizers process Control consumers project planning/management energy usage/conversion heat transfer
the lab course or have prior experience in orderto have a better chance of succeeding. Both prior programming experience and lab enrollmentprovide additional practice to students, which in turn increases ability in programming andperformance in the course overall.7. RecommendationsThe student’s ability to choose to take their programming course with or without lab grants thestudent more options when planning their college experience, allowing for a more effectivecourse load. For example, we find that students with prior programming experience who alsoenrolled in the lab did not perform much better than those with experience who did not enroll inlab. Therefore, if a student has prior knowledge in programming, they can be advised that the
graphics communication: Irwin, 1995.[5] X. Danos, "Curriculum Planning for the Development of Graphicacy," Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, vol. 18, 2013.[6] E. Fry, "Graphical literacy," Journal of Reading, pp. 383-389, 1981.[7] G. P. Adanez and A. D. Velasco, "Predicting academic success of engineering students in technical drawing from visualization test scores," Journal of Geometry and Graphics, vol. 6, pp. 99-109, 2002.[8] C. L. Miller and G. R. Bertoline, "Spatial Visualization Research and Theories: Their Importance in the Development of an Engineering and Technical Design Graphics Curriculum Model," Engineering Design Graphics Journal, vol. 55, pp. 5-14, 1991.[9
complexitiesaround teaching need to be accounted for and further addressed in planning of and evaluation ofprofessional development programs aimed at shifting pedagogical practices.AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge support of this work by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No. 1524527. References[1] Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers’ approaches to teaching. Higher Education, 32(1), 77–87. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3447897[2] Felder, R. M., & Brent. R. (2016). Teaching & learning STEM: A practical guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.[3] Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1996
https://youtu.be/vQq197MKJE0 2nd Order ODEs https://youtu.be/qK0Qadbo6Ks Higher Order ODEs https://youtu.be/Dv1a6-ECrtU Coupled ODEs https://youtu.be/4zChOlO0yy4 ODE Example https://youtu.be/xdUKI94G-zs Simulink ODEs https://youtu.be/rBISJtVXSYANote that videos labeled as “Mystery Problem” are in depth examples intended to illustrate how anexpert attacks a programming problem, including the planning and debugging process.
, universities can adjust the mix of elements basedon their existing infrastructure and policies. Engineering advantage universities canfocus on adjusting the resource allocation of human capital resources, while acomprehensive university needs to fully guarantee the academic resource, avoid thedependence of a single resource element, and realize "diversified and balanced"resource allocation.4.2 Policy suggestionThis exploratory study analyzes the diversity of factors influencing the performanceof science and technology innovation in China's world-class universities, and putsforward 3 suggestions to university policymakers from the middle level:(1) To reasonably plan the academic resources in the school according to the publicpolicies and institutional
participation andinvolvement of each student in the self-driven learning and self-driven practicing. After five daysof self-learning and practicing, on Day 6, the professor held a question and answer session tosolve the problems students might encounter during the self-learning process. Then, there weretwo more days for the students to finish their PowerPoint slides preparation in a form of anorganization and information flow they prefer. In addition, students needed to prepare ahomework he/she planned to assign to the class, which was used to test the conceptsunderstanding of the rest of students. On Day 8, a name was drawn randomly in the beginning,and that student performed as the instructor during this Flip Classroom session. That one studentgained
.[2] S. Cerri, “EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION SKILLS FOR ENGINEERS,” pp. 625– 629, 2000.[3] G. Tryggvason and D. Apelian, “Re-Engineering Engineering Education for the Challenges of the 21st Century,” JOM, no. 1, p. 1610, 2006.[4] T. J. Kennedy and M. R. L. Odell, “Engaging Students In STEM Education,” Sci. Educ. Int., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 246–258, 2014.[5] Society of Manufacturing Engineers Education Foundation, “Manufacturing Education Plan: Phase 1 Report—Industry Identifies Competency Gaps Among Newly Hired Engineering,” 1997.[6] A. L. Darling and D. P. Dannels, “Practicing engineers talk about the importance of talk: A report on the role of oral communication in the workplace,” Commun. Educ
to Student Success in Engineering Education," European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(4), 368-381 (2017)[19] Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N.M., "Talking about Leaving: Factors Contributing to High Attrition Rates among Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Undergraduate Majors," Final report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation on an ethnographic inquiry at seven institutions. Boulder: University of Colorado Bureau of Sociological Research, 1994[20] Jones, B.D., Paretti, M.C., Hein, S.F., and Knott, T.W. “An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First- Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans,” Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 319-336 (2010)[21] Lent
understanding of the procedures and objectives. Inorder to keep students as engaged as possible, the labs are designed to only take ~ 1.5 – 2 hours,with efficiency increased by using prelab assignments to ensure that appropriate planning hasbeen completed prior to attending. In addition, a lab notebook is required to document allexercises with an emphasis on data integrity, and ethics of recording and presentation. Althoughanalysis associated with most lab exercises is done within the lab group, the analysis from fourexercises is done individually. Combined with individual effort from the lecture portion of thecourse, 50% of the grade is individual while 50% is team based. This helps to ensure thatstudents are not simply carried by their teammates.1
sensor with a partner.Learning unfamiliar content or developing a new skill such as coding can make participants feelvulnerable, however, by working with a partner, learning can become more fun and less scary. Wenoticed that when participants programmed the BBC micro:bit with a partner, they tackled challengesmore confidently and celebrated successes together. It is notable that in our trainings, initial codingexperiences did not need to be time intensive to impact participant confidence. Providing a 30-minutecoding session with sufficient facilitator support provided ample time for participants to build confidencein their ability to code using a block-based coding platform.Future DirectionsWe plan to focus our future efforts on enhancing
: Turning Good Ideas into Great Results.” Quality Press.Kerzner, H. (2009). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling (10th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.[5] Seemiller, C. & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z Goes to College. San Francisco, CA.: Jossey-Bass.[6] Twenge, J. (2017). iGen. New York, NY.: Simon and Schuster Inc.[7] American Psychological Association (APA), (2018). Stress in America: Generation Z. Stress in America Survey.
% of teachers plan on offering self-directed learning experiences and thatinstructors should focus on engagement tactics to encourage GenZ students to be activeparticipants in learning. Pearson [9] showed that 67% of GenZ students consider college to be animportant stepping stone for future success. The study also showed that 82% of the students useYouTube and that 59% prefer YouTube or apps to printed books for learning. Although GenZstudents are digital natives, 78% consider teachers to be very important to learning anddevelopment, but that 71% were more likely to figure out problems on their own first.Engineering educators are beginning to adapt to learning strategies of GenZ students. Moore, etal. [10] discuss five areas for successfully
, interview prep,resume and cover letter review, goal setting, and being held accountable for those goals thestudents found to be beneficial to their confidence during the job search. Areas for improvementinclude having the learning coaches do more groundwork, like forming relationships with morecompanies to pave the way for interviews, driving students to do more networking, and assistingstudents with goal setting earlier.Future WorkThis is a work-in-progress paper which is in the early stage of data collection. One round of datahas been collected which is represented in this paper. Our future work plan consists of threesteps: 1) increase the survey frequency to three times: the first week, the ninth week, and theeighteenth week and include the
explanations for this imbalance, including female STEM facultymembers’ willingness to dedicate time to planning more extensive student-centered instructionbecause they see it as more valuable than do male faculty members [20], [21]. Further, studentsmay reach out to their female professors more than their male professors for assistance [22]. Insum, female professors typically spend more time on teaching and advising duties than maleprofessors [6], [23].The aforementioned research generally discloses that female STEM faculty members are lessoften found in leadership positions; may not be receiving equivalent resources, networking, orencouragement to complete research; and are typically spending more time teaching and advisingstudents. Less known is the
respect for a person beforeaccepting them as a leader, which implies that acceptance of the group is foundational toleadership. He said: “I gained good leadership experience interfacing with the adults and planning some events for the troop. And in high school I was on my basketball team and I was one of the senior captains. That was also a leadership experience. Even though I wasn’t the best basketball player, you have to really earn respect to be given that title. Respect is critical in the acceptance of a leader.”College ExperiencesWe are also interested in how college experiences affected the development of the student leaders.We asked them about meaningful activities that helped them to develop their skills as a