outreach activities are run by faculty and students involved inacademic clubs (Innes et al. 2012).An ideal STEM education experience would be incorporated as required coursework to engage awide-range of students and be mutually beneficial for both college and elementary students.Service learning is one such instructional approach that allows college students to apply theory ina real-world context while benefitting the community and has been linked to improved academicclimate, conceptual understanding, and interest in engineering careers for college students(Hayford et al. 2014). Service learning has also been shown to be more attractive and beneficialto female and URM students in engineering (Duffy, Barrington, & Heredia Munoz, 2011;Carberry
engineering technology for elementary students Abstract Mentoring is being prevalently used in higher education. Traditionally, these programsare unidirectional that includes forward knowledge transfer. The internal mechanism of howto form an effective mentoring relationship between mentors and mentees is unclear. This pilotstudy focused on Person-Environment (P-E) fit perspective and zeroed in on how the mentor-mentee relationship affect mentees’ self-efficacy. We conducted semi-structured interviews withthree mentees to explore how P-E fit affected their self-efficacy. This qualitative study is a pilotstudy, future data collection and analysis will continue
Poly PomonaMechanical Engineering Department’s YouTube Channel as an open educational resource [23].The title, length, and description of each episode are listed below: • Episode 1, What’s it like to be an early career engineer? (1 hr, 12 min) Two former mechanical engineering students from Cal Poly Pomona discuss their experiences working in industry during the past four years • Episode 2, What is Civil Engineering? (38 min) Two Cal Poly Pomona civil engineering faculty members discuss fundamental information about their discipline and the career paths available to civil engineers • Episode 3, What’s it like to be an engineering instructor? (1 hr, 21 min) Two engineering faculty members discuss their path to
together to explore human, technology and society interactions to transform civil engineering education and practice with an emphasis on understanding hazard recog- nition, competencies, satisfaction, personal resilience, organizational culture, training, informal learning and social considerations. The broader impact of this work lies in achieving and sustaining safe, produc- tive, and inclusive project organizations composed of engaged, competent and diverse people. The SRL is supported by multiple research grants, including a CAREER award, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Simmons is a former project director of the Summer Transportation Institute (STI) at South Carolina State University and
from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, and a Ph.D. degree in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University. Dr. Main examines student academic pathways and transitions to the workforce in science and engineering. She was a recipi- ent of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Award, the 2015 Frontiers in Education Faculty Fellow Award, and the 2019 Betty Vetter Award for Research from WEPAN. In 2017, Dr. Main received a National Science Foundation CAREER award to examine the longitudinal career pathways of engineering PhDs.Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is
and explorations of engineering students’ pathways in industry support theneed to determine how to better prepare students to incorporate stakeholder considerations intodesign. In an IEEE Spectrum article titled “What keeps engineers from advancing in theircareer,” Hinkle [8] outlines four pieces of advice for early career engineers, one of which isto Know your stakeholders. This can be much more difficult than knowing your customers, who are a subset of your stakeholders. The broad definition of a stakeholder is anyone who is affected by your work in any way, or who affects your work in any way. Think about that, and you’ll start to realize the impact you are having on the world. It’s probably much bigger
position of authority within the group [8].The review paper on engineering leadership development programs by Crumpton-Young, et al.showed common agreement between professional engineers and engineering students about whichskills are most useful for an engineer in a leadership position [9]. But their work showed that thereis a need for richer qualitative data, which our study may be able to help provide. One such studyis by Cox et al., who asked engineering faculty members to assess students strengths, weaknesses,and future learning opportunities [10]. While leadership skills of engineering students maydevelop in many contexts, Knight, et al (2017) found that curricular emphasis on leadershipdevelopment is more reliable than student engagement in
skills, their personal and interpersonal development, andthe ethical implications of our discipline and its role in society. This course is intended to deepen theinternship experience and to provide a vehicle for professional growth by exploring important questionsin an authentic context. In this project, we study how this combination of an immersive internshipexperience and its companion course shifts students’ perspectives on their studies and future careers. In this paper, we consider the offering of the course in Summer 2018 (enrollment 108 students). Thesestudents were all undergraduate CSE majors. For the majority of these students (104 students), theirsummer internship was their first time working at the company hosting their internship
theimplementation of the lessons or skills. Additionally, the research team anticipated that positioningteachers and students within a team would reveal various actions that teachers might take as theywork with their students.During the first two weeks of the workshop, engineering graduate students under the supervisionof an engineering faculty introduced relevant robotics concepts, robot components, and robotprogramming to the participants. In addition to learning about how to design, build, and programa robot, participants were introduced to some ideas of entrepreneurship and how to present theirengineering products to businesses. The ultimate goal of the workshop was that teachers andstudents learn about engineering practice and how its product can be
application of EWB-USAprojects in the classroom is described in this paper to illustrate the mechanics of applying the co-creation framework in a particular instance, but does not reduce the suitability of this model forother design challenges such as the ASCE Concrete Canoe Competition, the ASME HumanPowered Vehicle Challenge, the RoboCup games, or the iGEM competition.2.2 Staff/Course InstructorsHumanitarian Design Projects is led by a member of the SEAS faculty and is supported by aninstructional staff of undergraduate students, each of whom is a leader and/or an experiencedparticipant of an EWB-USA project team.The course’s success in advising technical projects across a large range of disciplines is due to thecombination of the head instructor’s
team. This structure, combined with long-term participation,enables an organizational structure to the teams. Students begin early in their academic programin a supportive, apprenticeship, mentor/mentee role in which they learn from more seniorstudents. Over time, students grow into leadership roles, sustaining peer-to-peer learningrelationships with newer members. Through long-term engagement, students have time to gaininsights and develop proficiency with the various yet interrelated activities of engineering designon a project that has real-world implications.The VIP team objectives range from faculty-embedded research and discovery efforts toentrepreneurial and service product development to industry-sponsored design competitions.Students
tosupport the development of self-understanding needed to make academic and personal decisions.During Fall 2018 and Fall 2019, the course enrolled 300-350 students each semester and utilizeda single lecture, single discussion session format each week. The lecture portion of the coursewas led by two faculty instructors and focused upon faculty presentations intended to introducestudents to different engineering disciplines, majors and careers, along with guestpresentations/panels intended to explore broader perspectives of engineering and the engineeringstudent experience. The discussion portion of the course, led by upper-level undergraduateengineering students, focused on the introduction of experiential learning opportunities, as wellas topics
prototyping, testing, and ongoing ideation of programmatic changes andimprovements.IntroductionInternships have been shown to be of great value for both student learning and career attainment.They allow students to build the real-world skills and perspective necessary to engage effectivelywith their own education [1]. There is also evidence to show that they contribute to greater careerengagement later in life [2] and that having an internship is one of the top qualifications thatemployers look for in new graduates [3]. At the University of Colorado Boulder specifically,87% of AY 15-18 Mechanical Engineering graduates who completed an internship rated theirexperience as “extremely useful,” “very useful,” or “useful” [4]. Despite those clear benefits
environments. Reasons such as this have created a shortage of qualified workforce to conduct the much-needed research and development in these areas. This paper describes our experience with mentoring a cohort of ten high achieving undergraduate students in Summer 2019 to conduct engineering HPC research for ten weeks in Clarkson University. Our mentoring activity was informed and motivated by an initial informal study with the goal to learn the roles and status of HPC in engineering research and what can be improved to make more effective use of it. Through a combination of email surveys, in-person interviews, and an analysis of faculty research profiles in Clarkson University, we learn several characteristics of their research
members (our department or from anotherengineering program), and often industry mentors representing the sponsoring company. Some ofthe faculty advisors are professional engineers serving as adjunct faculty. Course includes projectmanagement, team dynamics, laboratory and field tests and writing workshops. Over the courseof the two semesters, students are asked to develop of a broad range of product or service ideasthat are eventually narrowed towards a specific, well-developed, and workable prototype. This istaking place through several steps, such as: idea presentation, sketch model, mock-up review,assembly model, technical review, prototype testing and final presentation. An end-of-year seniordesign year the students display final deliverables
for the Center of Enhancement for Engineering Diversity where she taught a seminar for first-year female engineering students and coordinated precollege outreach events. As a researcher, she has previously served as a Graduate Research Assistant on the VT PEERS project studying middle school students reg- ularly engaging in engineering activities. In addition, she dedicates her spare time to exhibiting at the Virginia Tech Science Festival and hosting several sessions for the Kindergarten-to-college (K2C) Initia- tive.Dr. Jacob R Grohs, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Jacob Grohs is an Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with Affiliate Faculty status in Biomedical
chose that discipline in the firstplace. For many students, this begins well before they even apply to a university. Students mightchoose STEM due to alluring job prospects, pressure or encouragement from family members, orthe recommendations of an instructor or counselor. Others might be following a passion forscience or math, or using their undergraduate program as an intermediate step in their journeytowards an advanced degree [3], [4]. Of primary interest for this analysis is the influence ofperson-to-person interactions that fostered students’ interests in STEM. These interactions can beparamount in initiating and developing students’ feelings of belonging within their eventualdisciplinary community.One approach to improving the retention
University Fullerton, the Office of the Vice Provost for Graduate Education at Stanford University, the School of Medicine at Stanford University, and the School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Dr. Carol B. Muller, Stanford University Carol B. Muller is the Executive Director of WISE Ventures, an internal initiative at Stanford located in the Office of Faculty Development, designed to communicate, build networks, and help amplify existing and seed new and needed ventures across the Stanford campus to advance equity in science and engineer- ing. She also serves as executive director for Stanford’s Faculty Women’s Forum. A longtime university administrator, educator, and social
experience to several cornerstone design experiences which provide students with theopportunity to do several larger design projects throughout their undergraduate careers [7,8]. Anincreasing amount of technical courses have also begun leveraging design projects in addition to,or instead of, traditional end of semester evaluations in an attempt to give students differentkinds of opportunities to apply and demonstrate their engineering knowledge [9,10].While the value of design projects in engineering curricula is accepted by most institutions, theactual design of these experiences is not necessarily straightforward [11]. Designing finalprojects in a way that authentically requires students to apply their technical knowledge whilesimultaneously
Harden’s curriculum map different biological topics such as hypertension are nested inside amore general topic such as cardiovascular systems 14 .Graph-based methods and hierarchies quickly provide an overview of the curriculum but theydon’t often consider the paths that students take through the curriculum (as measured by studentlearning data) or the temporal aspects such as when in their academic careers students are takingeach course. Including student data is important because the intended curriculum is not alwaysfollowed by students as prescribed. In our review we found two examples that consider thecurriculum temporally. Trimm et al. show students’ risks of not graduating over the course of thecurriculum 26 . Plaza et al. compare
am interested in the design and optimization of intelligent decision support systems and persuasive technologies to augment human proficiencies. My research over the last few years has focused on the development of machine learning methods that personalize the human learning process and enhance the efficiency of task completion and decision making.Dr. Omar Ashour, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College Dr. Omar Ashour is an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at Pennsylvania State University, The Behrend College. Dr. Ashour received the B.S. degree in Industrial Engineering/Manufacturing Engi- neering and the M.S. degree in Industrial Engineering from Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST) in
a course, the survey was completed by the lead faculty member(i.e., the course director)). Part I of the survey asked faculty to report the total number oftechnical communication events for their course. These were binned into the followingcategories: lab reports, technical reports (i.e., those ≤ 5 pages in length), full reports (i.e., those >5 pages in length), oral presentations, and other. Part I of the survey also asked whether eachevent was an individual or a team assignment, and the percentage of the total course grade thateach event contributed. Part II was a slightly more detailed examination of each graded event andwas only completed by the 11 required environmental engineering courses that are organic to ouruniversity’s
2004, she been a member of the NSF-funded MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research
described above… capitalize on what currently exists and integrate those experiences. 3) Provide a progression of leadership responsibility. Practicing following and practicing leading go hand-in-hand. Good leaders are good followers first. 4) Early leadership experiences provide a personal readiness for leadership development. Provide those experiences early in the developmental process, prior to rigorous leadership coursework. 5) Create a cycle for challenges, support, and assessment. Leadership development is not a spectator sport. Students must wrestle with challenges to build their leader identity. 6) Encourage or force students to develop a mentor relationship with a faculty member or seasoned engineer. A
academic and campus life at theuniversity. In addition to providing an exciting enrichment experience to students, pre-collegeprograms help Northeastern University to attract top high schoolers around the globe to campusand excite them about the university’s unique learning model and ample opportunities at theundergraduate level. The programs allow students to learn from Northeastern University facultymembers, explore and live on campus, and get a sense of the experiential style of a Northeasterneducation. The APCP are two-week residential programs. From approximately 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM,Monday-Friday, students work in the classroom with a faculty lead and their teaching team tolearn about their specific areas of interest. During evenings and
students without early exposure to real-worldapplications of their major, that give positive insight into potential careers, do not always connectwith upper-classmen to use as successful peer role models. This research has shown that accessto peer role models increases academic persistence [1], [2]. It has also been shown that retentionof URM and women is increased through project-based learning or experiential learningpedagogies and techniques[3]-[9].Moreover, URM students often have a limited perspective of their contributions to improvingtechnology due to social issues such as a lack of exposure to engineering and science professionsand having personal role models in their local community who are scientists or engineers.Furthermore, when URM
group lasted one hour and fifteen minutes and included students responding toquestions and also an interactive session where students worked in teams to develop an idealfirst-year engineering course. Questions for the focus group were developed based on figure 2,where we present the major topics explored during the session.Data analysis was conducted by two members of the research team using the thematic analysisapproach outlined by Robson and McCartan [14]. Thematic analysis uses individual experiences,interpretations, realities, and discourse as avenues for exploring the group to which theindividual belongs [24], [25]. For this study, thematic analysis provided a means to understandhow senior engineering students from multiple engineering
undergraduateengineering students showed that, even though most students identified as being extrinsicallymotivated by grades, the teacher played an important role in influencing intrinsic motivation byinspiring students to learn content for the benefit of themselves 12 . Through the development ofactivities and delivery of content, teachers must consider the students’ personal connections withthe content in order to influence motivation. Student engagement is often directly linked to aconnection with real-world applications and purpose, allowing students to investigate questionsthat are relevant to them 9 13 . If students have a say in the nature of the project or task, the studenttends to be more motivated to complete the assignment 14 . When students see a
instructor of the NDSU Pre-Engineering Education Collaboration (PEEC) during their sum- mer camps. Throughout her Ph.D. work and professional career she has focused on serving underrepre- sented populations through summer camps targeting Native American high school students, working with New American populations locally to engage them with the outdoors, and developing curriculum for sum- mer camps at regional tribal colleges. In the future, she will be working with faculty and local hospitals to develop a distance education curriculum to better meeting the needs of the NDSCS Emergency Medical Services program as they look to better serve students abroad.Ms. Megan Even, ND EPSCoRDaniel John Luecke, North Dakota State
theyprogress through the undergraduate curriculum [1-2]. This has direct implications for thediversity of engineering students and workforces. Research with civil, environmental, andmechanical engineering students also finds that student perceptions of the connection betweensocial responsibility and engineering shape their decisions to stay in their majors, and thatwomen are more likely to leave engineering when they view those connections to be lacking andencounter decontextualized technical courses and unsupportive environments [2-3]. Engineeringeducators frequently invoke research findings that women and racial/ethnic minorities are moresensitive to social justice concerns and more likely to pursue engineering careers with an explicitsense of