23, 2018.[19] B. T. Ladd, “Best Practices Guide for Formation of Interdisciplinary Science Teams,” 2019.[20] J. Beyer, H. Strobelt, M. Oppermann, L. Deslauriers, and H. Pfister, “Teaching visualization for large and diverse classes on campus and online,” in Pedagogy of Data Visualization Workshop at IEEE VIS 2016. Baltimore, MD, USA, Oct 23, 2016 – Oct 28, 2016.[21] A. Bangor, P.T. Kortum, and J. T. Miller. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574-594.[22] J. A. Krosnick. (2018) Questionnaire Design. In: Vannette D., Krosnick J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
. Cersonsky earned her PhD at the University of Michigan, and is currently working as a Postdoc- toral researcher at EPFL in Lausanne, Switzerland. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Bringing Science Education and Research together to REACTAbstractThis “Innovation in Engineering Teaching Practices” paper will describe the student led co-curricular REACT (Research Education and Activities for Classroom Teachers) program at theUniversity of Michigan. REACT was formed in 2017 to bring K-12 math and science teachersfrom Michigan together for a one-day, interactive learning experience to help incorporate researchinto their classrooms. Teachers listen to graduate student talks, go on research lab tours and
learning, inquiry-based laboratory instruction, and any ini- tiative that empowers students to do hands-on learning. Additional service interests include teaching and leadership training for graduate students, enhancing communication education for undergraduate en- gineering students, developing evidence-based design project team formation strategies, and improving engineering design curricula.Dr. Molly H Goldstein, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Molly H. Goldstein is an engineering design educator and researcher at University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign. She previously worked as an environmental engineer specializing in air quality influencing her focus in engineering design with environmental
graduation and are designed to meet the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) requirement of a culminating major engineering design experience (ABET,2019). Capstone design courses are also considered an “high impact” instructional practice(AACU, 2008).There are many characteristics of a capstone design class that can vary substantially frominstitution to institution including team characteristics (i.e. size, organization, multidisciplinary),length of the course (one semester or multiple semesters), type of projects, and integration withindustry partners. While there are many student level surveys of senior capstone experiences (G.Padmanabhan, 2018; Saleh, 2011; Brouwer, et. al, 2011; Aidoo et. al, 2013; Nelson et. al, 2014;Shah et
. Many publications have highlighted theadvantages of getting undergraduate students involved in research outside of the classroom, fromdeveloping one-on-one relationships with research mentors to preparing for graduate school.Bendell [4] assert that ‘An immersive research experience contributes substantially to a student’spersonal and academic development, and it helps build highly practical, marketable skills.’ Tomake the lab successful in the long run, sustainability and productivity of its operations has to beof paramount importance. Haynes et al. [5] suggest that a well-functioning lab is a productive lab.They discuss the guiding principles of good lab management. Younis [6] supports the usefulnessof engineering laboratory facilities, among
10-weeksummer program where students are paired with faculty to engage in a research or design project.The student is paid a weekly stipend of $400 while being mentored one-to-one by a full-timefaculty member. Approximately 29 students took part in this program during the summer of 2019,culminating in a presentation to their peers and faculty mentors, and members of the Dean’sAdvisory Board for the school.It is hypothesized that the process and completion of the research or design project through theprogram positively impacted the students’ confidence and self-efficacy. To determine if thehypothesis is true, the students were assessed through a simple survey, the results of which arepresented. In addition, two of the 29 students were asked
taking activities or explicit prompting about empathy would impact theirreflections and empathic development.The factors for triggering empathy were the same across all the teams we looked at. There wasnot a clear indication of what specifically made the most impact. However, it is clear that humaninteraction with their teammates, mentors, community partner(s), etc. and reflection writing helpthem to articulate some level of empathy. For future research, it would be interesting to see ifthis articulation of empathy indicates an increase in their empathic development.As stated previously, in previous research on the program’s design process, we found correlationbetween empathy and students’ relationship with their team’s community partner [5
1. State name, occupation, course subject, level of students, and active learning methods utilized. How familiar are you with Peter Liljedahl’s research? 2. Describe what it was like using active learning methods in your classroom for the first time. a. What aspects of the methods were either effective or ineffective at achieving the learning outcomes for the lesson. b. How did the students respond to the methods? 3. What strategies have you used for developing classroom problems? a. [Ask this question only if the respondent notes they have used textbook problems] Do you have any recommendations or best practices in converting these types of
friends [4]. One factorwhich has been shown to help students through this transition is a sense of belonging, and linkshave been shown between summer bridge programs and increasing this sense of belonging [6].Summer bridge programs have been shown to be an effective practice for decreasing attrition inSTEM students, especially URM students [7].Mentoring and Peer NetworksA student’s level of involvement in both the academic and social realms of college can mean thedifference between staying in college and leaving [8]. Research clearly outlines that a student’sinteraction with their peers, faculty and staff is one of the strongest predictors of persistence [8],[9]. Moreover, peer and faculty mentoring can positively impact academic success
which is a high-stake design-build-test whose themevaries from term to term. This paper describes three semesters of the course: Term 1 is Fall 2018, 1Term 2 is Spring 2019, and Term 3 is Fall 2019. The course currently underway is Spring 2020and referenced as Term 4.Students are tasked with a design-build-test of a mechanical device for the end-of-term“competition” to showcase their high-stake design project. This class employs a team of 20undergraduate teaching assistants (TAs) to help facilitate various aspects of the course and tostaff the laboratory around the clock during business hours. Two to three graduate TAs are alsoassigned to the course
engines still follow the best practice designguidelines provided to the students. This comment provides a hint at an additional benefit of theassessment project. Course objectives for both the capstone design project and the earliercourses featuring internal combustion engine design shared some internal combustion engineknowledge objectives. By requiring students to 3D model conceptual cylinder heads, theybecame more engaged in the cylinder head design best practices and became more knowledgeabout engine development issues. This is reflected in the open-ended quiz questions that areoutside the intended scope of this paper. The broader take-home lesson is that the whatever 3Dmodeling assessment is performed, ideally it can be tied to other subject
mechanism forstudents to think about and describe concepts learned in the classroom differently than for otherrequirements. The scope of this paper includes the generation, implementation, and analysis ofthe napkin sketch activity in three civil engineering courses across eight different class sectionsin the spring and fall of 2019 at the U.S. Military Academy, a small, public, undergraduate-onlyfour-year college in the northeast United States. The motivation for the study stems fromevidence-based practices of re-representation from educational psychology, minute papers fromeducational research, the growing shift to computer-aided design and away from hand drawing,and recent research suggesting our engineering programs may be degrading student
recognition through interaction and negotiation the meanings with their teammembers, with the angle of the communities of practice theory. Findings could inspire theimprovement of students’ teamwork and learning experience, optimizing PBL curriculum design andincorporating effective learning activities for students’ engineering identity development.MethodThis is a pilot study to optimize the methodology and research design for a continuous exploration ofstudents’ engineering development through teamwork in PBL. Methodologically, a qualitativemethod is used in this study. Teamwork observation was conducted for an initial understanding ofstudents’ teamwork experiences. Main source of qualitative data in this study was collected throughsemi-structured
diversity on team effectiveness and the relationship between them in practice of teamformation and mentoring with pedagogy related to team-based learning or project-basedlearning. How to effectively access the benefits of cultural diversity and overcome theconcomitant barriers remains unanswered and further research attention is needed to guideteaching and mentoring.We found that gender diversity could have a negative impact on team effectiveness. Whileinstructors could consider addressing this when assigning students to teams, Schneid et al. [25]recommends that instructors instead make efforts to interrupt negative social categorizationphenomenon that can be introduced by gender diversity (such as women being compelled totake on clerical roles
throughoutthe US which includes incorporating deep and engaging mathematical content as well as the useof variations to traditional calculus courses (e.g., calculus for physics, stretched out calculus).In further research [9] in a national study of precalculus through calc 2 programs has shownthat course variations can help support student success outcomes, and level the playing fieldfor students with less mathematical preparation. Additionally, there is emerging evidence thatcourse variations that holistically target students with less preparation can support students indeveloping productive dispositions to mathematics [10]. Yet these previous studies which focuson national trends fail to capture the impact and implementation considerations of
over a decade of professional experience designing embed- ded electronic hardware for industrial, military, medical, and automotive applications. Ryan is currently pursuing a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University. He previously earned his MS in Systems Engineering from the University of Saint Thomas and his BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Minnesota. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Student-Developed Learning Objectives: A Form of Assessment to Enable Professional GrowthAbstractThis Evidence-Based Practice paper proposes a unique and flexible form of assessment that helpsprepare students for a changing
. She previously served as the Associate Director of the Center for Assessment and Research Studies at JMU. Her areas of research include assessment practice and engineering education research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Scaffolding and Assessing Sustainable Design Skills in a Civil Engineering Capstone Design CourseAbstractAs educators seek to incorporate sustainability into engineering courses, appropriate assessmenttools are needed to capture the impacts on student development. In particular, methods forassessing student sustainable design skills are lacking in the literature. As a result, we have beenengaged in a multi-stage process to develop and
patients. She is also interested in Engineering Education research, and currently she serves as the Director of Mechanical Engineering S-STEM Scholarship Program at UMBC.Jamie R Gurganus, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Jamie Gurganus works in the MechanicalEngineering Department at UMBC, focusing in the field of Engineering Education. She serves as the Associate Director of Engineering Education Initiatives for the College of Engineering and IT at UMBC and as Co-Director of Advancing Excellence in P12 Engineering Education (AEEE). Her research is focused on solving problems relating to educating engineers, teach- ers, and the community. She seeks to identify best practices and develop assessments methods that
postdoctoral appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Johns Hopkins University. Her current research explores the interplay between phase or morphological evolution and material functionality in structural materials under extreme conditions. She also maintains interest in engineering education, specifically in outreach and design thinking. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #29797Prof. Robert Maass, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Robert Maass received a triple diploma in Materials Science and Engineering from the Institut National Polytechnique
on a scale from 1(poor) to 3 (very good). If no information was provided the sub-score was zero. We discussed anydiscrepancies in rating between researchers to reach a consensus on scores. The sub-categoryratings totaled an overall quality score for each design idea, out of 12 points.ResultsA survey was sent out to collect data to better understand the impact that engineering projectshave on their design abilities. In the survey, students were asked to develop a design based on thegiven prompt, described by answering prompts in a 9-box engineering design canvas. This canvaswas used with the intention of guiding students through fully developing an idea. Students’designs were then evaluated using four metrics: quantity, variety, novelty, and
all technical areas of the facility. During her tenure, the brewery saw dramatic increases in productivity improvement, increased use of automation systems, and significant cost reductions in all areas including utilities where they received the internal award for having the best utility usage reduction for 2014. Since joining Ohio State, Aimee has joined the American Society of Engineering Educators and has served in all leadership capacities in the Engineering Economy division (treasurer, program chair, division chair, and past chair). Aimee is also part of a core group of Ohio State faculty working on a BSET degree at the Regional Campuses and is passionate about teaching engineering using application and wicked
they could design mightplay a role in helping the university achieve the SDGs, even Goals that may initially appear notto pertain to them. To do that would require some research and imagination on their parts. Although some students resisted working with the SDGs, the course evaluations suggestthat integrating them into the course themes and assignments generally increased students’perception of the course’s value and contribution to engineering education and practice. Inresponse to a question that asked students to identify aspects of the course that most helped theirlearning, students frequently commended the strength of the curriculum and the course’s focuson “real-world” challenges and applications for engineering knowledge
Paper ID #29719Science Fiction as an Entry Point for Ethical Frameworks in Engineeringand Computer Science EducationDr. Valerie H. Summet, Rollins College Dr. Valerie Summet is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science at Rollins College, a liberal-arts school located in Winter Park, FL. Her research interests include human-computer interaction and CS education. She earned a BS in Computer Science from Duke University and an MS and PhD in Computer Science from the Georgia Institute of Technology.Prof. Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering
projects, and can createcommunities for students. To ensure positive impacts to students, much more research is neededto improve these spaces making them effective for all students. Network analysis enablesproblem understanding and solution generation at a systems level. A systems-level analysis of anetwork of industries, for example, (as opposed to designing each industry individually) was ableto reduce the overall environmental impact of all industries in the network without increasing the © American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 2020 ASEE Conferencecost of the network (thereby maintaining profits) [1-3]. Similar system-analyses of waterdistribution networks and power grids
Paper ID #29680Exploring Literature on how Instructor Feedback Impacts STEM StudentMotivationCassie Wallwey, The Ohio State University Cassie Wallwey is currently a Ph.D. student in Ohio State University’s Department of Engineering Educa- tion. She is a Graduate Teaching Associate for the Fundamentals of Engineering Honors program, and a Graduate Research Associate working in the RIME collaborative (https://u.osu.edu/rimetime) run by Dr. Rachel Kajfez. Her research interests include engineering student motivation and feedback in engineering classrooms. Before enrolling at Ohio State University, Cassie earned her B.S. (2017
has longitudinal,positive impacts on students’ success as they navigate through their undergraduate experiencestoward engineering and computer science degrees.Motivation and overviewThere is a critical need for more students with engineering and computer science majors to enterinto, persist, and graduate from postsecondary institutions. Increasing the diversity inengineering and science is also a profound identified workforce desire.1,2 According to nationalstatistics, the largest group of underrepresented minority students in engineering and scienceattend the Nation’s public higher education institutions, thereby often designating such highereducational venues as minority serving institutions (MSIs).3, 4,5Our research would not be so vital
Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the director of the Dynamic and Smart Systems Laboratory at Tennessee Technological University. Dr. Anton received the B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Michigan Technological University (2006), and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (2008 and 2011, respectively). Following his graduate work, Dr. Anton held a two year postdoctoral position at Los Alamos National Laboratory. The central theme of his research involves characterizing the dynamic response of smart material systems for energy harvesting, structural health monitoring, sensing, and actuation. By combining expertise
of career preparation.SignificanceURM students will increase their self of belonging to STEM professions and begin to see acareer/workforce pathway. Empowerments such as these have shown to increase studentretention within a major and have positive self-efficacy impacts [31], [32]. Based on the shiftingtrends in STEM student demographics (Error! Reference source not found.), changes in STEMeducation and specifically, engineering education, will be required to ensure the retention ofunderrepresented minorities and women in these fields. Based on the results of this three-yearstudy, best-practices will be identified and presented to allow for implementation at otheruniversities.References[1] S. Garcia-Otero and E. O. Sheybani, "Retaining
system.Ms. Abigail T Stephan, Clemson University Abby is a doctoral student in the Learning Sciences program at Clemson University. Broadly, her research interests include intergenerational learning in informal settings, self-directed learning, and cultural influ- ences on the learning process. Abby currently works as a graduate assistant for the General Engineering Learning Community (GELC), a program that supports first-year engineering students in their develop- ment of self-regulation and time management skills, effective learning strategies, and positive habits of mind.Laurel Whisler, Clemson University Laurel Whisler is Assistant Director and Coordinator of Course Support Programs in Clemson Univer- sity’s
, creativity, and design. After graduation he started research with the Air Force in the field of Human Reliability Analysis. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Wrong Theory Protocol: A Pre-Ideation Technique to Enhance Creativity and EmpathyAbstractThe purpose of this paper is to introduce a new design methodology—The Wrong TheoryProtocol (WTP)—to generate more empathetic and creative ideas. Our first ideas are seldom ourbest ideas. Many turn to brainstorming/ideation techniques, yet struggle to come up with ideasthat help them make progress. Fixation can make it challenging to have insight that is genuinelynew. Inspired by the idea