and Conducting Mixed-Methods Research, 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.[28] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2015.[29] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 2014.[30] J. L. Campbell, C. Quincy, J. Osserman, and O. K. Pedersen, “Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews: Problems of Unitization and Intercoder Reliability and Agreement,” Sociol. Methods Res., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 294–320, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0049124113500475.[31] C. J. Atman, D. Kilgore, and A. McKenna, “Characterizing Design Learning: A Mixed- Methods Study
. [Online] Available:https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis-or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm[Accessed April 19, 2020].[3] National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine,Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economicfuture. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007[4] S. Q. Sheikh and E. Arvaniti, STEM Education Outreach through IEEE’s Pre-UniversityPrograms – Engaging Volunteers to benefit K-12 education and local communities, 2014 IEEEFrontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, October 22 – 25, 2014, Madrid, Spain.IEEE 978-1-4799-3922-0/14.[5] Michigan Constitution. art. I, § 26, [Online] Available:http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S
design.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Rex Hartson and Doug Bowman for their influence in theoriginal course design and guidance throughout. We also express our appreciation to thestudents who contributed to the development of this research study. Finally, many thanks toLindsay Wheeler for her guidance and reviewing of this work.References[1] J. Pirker, M. Riffnaller-Schiefer, and C. Gütl, “Motivational active learning - Engaging university students in computer science education,” in ITICSE 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference, 2014, pp. 297–302.[2] B. Simon, S. Esper, L. Porter, and Q. Cutts, “Student experience in a student-centered peer instruction
and collaborator-reported communicationand teamwork skills. The data on teamwork and communication is augmented with and comparedto Slack data.Timeline: Table 1 gives a list of codes for the time-line illustrated in Fig. 1. The time-line listswhen questionnaires were administered, when the ME students had exams, when there wereinterprofessional meetings, and when deliverables were assigned or submitted. Additionally,since two of the ME students were part of a school athletics team, the time-line also lists athleticevents that required travel as well as the end of the season. Table 1: Codes for timeline in Fig. 1 Code Description Q Administration of a questionnaire X1 Midterm exam X2 Final exam
: MIT Press, 2010.[28] Yoritomo, J. et al., “A tale of two rubrics: Realigning genre instruction through improved response rubrics in a writing-intensive physics course,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32012.[29] Ware, R. et al., “Writing across engineering: A collaborative approach to support STEM faculty’s integration of writing instruction in their classes,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/33671.[30] J. R. Gallagher et al., “A Collaborative Longitudinal Design for Supporting Writing Pedagogies of STEM Faculty,” Tech. Commun. Q., pp. 1–16, Jan. 2020
not much speed to it […] so we decided to add these, like, little pieces to act like barriers […]. So basically like the slingshot is, like, going against the force of those parts so it creates more power for the slingshot and it goes much farther and higher.It can be seen here that while the students have some insight into the process, during Q&A theyquickly grasped the concepts that they were being quizzed on by a mechanical engineering facultyand exploited the underlying guidance to appropriately demonstrate the importance of the featureto their peers, and even their teacher, as can be seen from the exchange below. Faculty: How did you come up with the idea of using the blocks? [...] And using them to add momentum? Student
., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J., & Seller, R. (2012). Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. International journal of nursing studies, 49(1), 47-53.[15] Pluye, P., & Hong, Q. N. (2014). Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annual review of public health, 35, 29-45.[16] Pluye, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., & Johnson-Lafleur, J. (2009). A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. International journal of
Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering,” Am. Sociol. Rev., vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 641–666, Oct. 2011.[6] K. L. Lewis, J. G. Stout, S. J. Pollock, N. D. Finkelstein, and T. A. Ito, “Fitting in or opting out: A review of key social-psychological factors influencing a sense of belonging for women in physics,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, 2016.[7] K. L. Lewis et al., “Fitting in to Move Forward,” Psychol. Women Q., p. 036168431772018, Aug. 2017.[8] K. Rainey, M. Dancy, R. Mickelson, E. Stearns, and S. Moller, “Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 10, Dec. 2018.[9] C. Good
, doi: 10.18260/1-2--28502.[18] Q. Li, H. Swaminathan, and J. Tang, “Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 361–376, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01033.x.[19] C. Paguyo, R. Atadero, K. Rambo-Hernandez, and J. Francis, “Creating Inclusive Environments in First-year Engineering Classes to Support Student Retention and Learning,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Seattle, Washington, Jun. 2015, pp. 26.418.1-26.418.16, doi: 10.18260/p.23757.[20] A. Sithole, E. T. Chiyaka, P. McCarthy, D. M. Mupinga, B. K. Bucklein, and J. Kibirige, “Student Attraction, Persistence and
. A. Demiranda, “Pre-Collegiate Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy of Engineering Students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 604–623, 2011.[12] A. R. Carberry, H.-S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, “Measuring Engineering Design Self- Efficacy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2010.[13] R. W. Lent and S. D. Brown, “Social cognitive approach to career development: An overview,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 310–321, 1996.[14] R. W. Lent and S. D. Brown, “Social cognitive model of career self-management: Toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span.,” J. Couns. Psychol., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 557–68, 2013.[15] N. A. Fouad and M. C. Santana, “SCCT and Underrepresented