Paper ID #32367Applying Resilience Theory to ’Bounce Forward’ from COVID-19 forEnvironmental Engineering ProgramsLt. Col. Andrew Ross Pfluger, United States Military Academy Lieutenant Colonel Andrew Pfluger, U.S. Army, is an Associate Professor and Academy Professor in the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering at the United States Military Academy. He earned a B.S. in Civil Engineering from USMA, a M.S. and Engineer Degree in Environmental Engineer- ing and Science from Stanford University, and a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines. He is a licensed PE in the
28 Mass transit 8 Ethics II 29 Route analysis and layout Traits of effective written and oral 9 30 Hoover Dam bypass communication 10 Financing infrastructure 11 Safety/licensure 31 Society and energy 12 Infrastructure Planning 32 Electricity use Energy Module 13 Resilience and
Paper ID #31625Work in Progress: An Exploratory Study of the Sustainability Mindsetthrough a Citizen Science Project in a Vulnerable Latinx CommunityDr. Azadeh Bolhari P.E., Angelo State University Dr. Bolhari is currently an Assistant Professor of Environmental Engineering at Angelo State University. Dr. Bolhari holds her PhD from Colorado State in Environmental Engineering. Her research interests include: sustainability mindset, resilient communities, citizen science, engineering identity, and retention of minorities in engineering.Dr. Daniel Ivan Castaneda, James Madison University Daniel I. Castaneda is an Assistant
sustainability. The detailsof these assignments and an analysis of student learning are provided. A second model studiedthe Flint water system disaster in the context of learning about community resilience andsystemic racism within a senior/graduate level Civil Engineering Systems course. The decades-old discriminatory practices in housing (redlining, racist mortgage covenants) were discussed.Student perspectives based on the threaded discussion posts and a written assignment provideevidence of the effectiveness of this approach for learning about how non-technical factors areimportant in determining public infrastructure performance. A third model recommends the useof environmental justice mapping tools, which may be appropriate in a broad range of
Paper ID #19381An Interdisciplinary Learning Module on Water Sustainability in CitiesDr. Steven J. Burian, University of Utah Dr. Steven J. Burian has advanced water infrastructure resiliency and sustainability through research, led multi-disciplinary water initiatives, and inspired students with his passionate approach to engineering ed- ucation. He earned a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering from the University of Notre Dame and a Masters in Environmental Engineering and a Doctorate in Civil Engineering from The University of Alabama. Dr. Burian’s professional career spans more than 20 years during which he has
the use of the lessons in the elementary classrooms during the fall semester, arepresented. Page 23.1123.2IntroductionProficiency in STEM education has been identified by the federal government and federally-commissioned committees as essential to US competitiveness in the global marketplace1. Inaddition, having a scientifically literate workforce of engineers and technicians is imperative toensure that infrastructural resources are effective and resilient enough to face dynamic andchallenging environmental and economic forces. Few examples better represent this loomingissue than our country’s aging urban water infrastructure. Outdated
“micro grids” of energy, water, and economic infrastructure and offer excellent opportunities to engage in the deployment of sustainable and resilient technologies; Unique setting for sustainable technology deployment: The warm temperatures and coastal wind/solar availability of Roatán, coupled with high energy costs, offers a perfect setting for the proposed technologies. The local community is politically stable, English speaking, close in proximity to the US, and economically and socially diverse – factors which enable rich and fulfilling contributions by student teams; Enhances and strengthens multiple existing and diverse activities: Introduces a global engineering component into existing courses
, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., & Sorensen, C. D. A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project‐Oriented Capstone Courses. Journal of Engineering Education 1987, 86(1), 17-28.4 Hossain, F., et al., Local-To-Regional Landscape Drivers of Extreme Weather and Climate: Implications for Water Infrastructure Resilience. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2015. 20(7).5. Cleaves, S., C. Massachusetts. Metropolitan Area Planning. MetroWest Corridor Partnership, Once is Not Enough: A Guide to Water Reuse in Massachusetts. 2005: Metropolitan Area Planning Council.6. Austin, D.C. and E. Lohan, U.S. Patent 2007: USA.7. Po, M., et al., Literature Review of Factors
Paper ID #31628Developing a Multi-Campus Model for REU SitesDr. Pamela McLeod, ReNUWIt at Stanford University Pamela McLeod is the Education and Outreach Director and Diversity and Inclusion Manager for the Engineering Research Center for Re-inventing the Nation’s Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt) at Stanford University. Dr. McLeod earned M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Stanford and a B.S. in Environmental Engineering from Manhattan College. Her professional inter- ests include engineering education, collaborative community development, science communication, and integrating
assess and address more successful curricular applications andteaching methods in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Departments.Currently, the senior-level course in Sustainability is required for Environmental Engineers andserves as an environmental elective for the majority of Civil Engineers. Environmental and Civilengineers at Florida Gulf Coast University share the same course template for the first two years.Performance in the senior level Sustainability in Engineering course varies even though thetopics reflect all varieties of infrastructure including energy efficiency, construction,transportation and water and waste infrastructure as well as project planning, life cycle analysesand economic topics. Students in both disciplines
, and outreach thatintegrate health, socio-economic impacts, and infrastructure design for the purpose ofdeveloping innovative solutions for sustainable smart cities and communities. Specifically, theSSCRC brings together multidisciplinary faculty with diverse expertise (green constructionmaterials; sustainable building and design concepts; social impacts of technology; modeling andsimulation; medical sociology, health informatics, and social psychology; public health,emergency preparedness and response, and community resiliency; and government and publicpolicy) to develop tools and methods for sustainable infrastructure design. With this cross-disciplinary innovation, the SSCRC provides an enabling platform to become an agent of changein
for infrastructure,22 and included clicker questions. Thesustainability concept maps were returned to the students without any comments. The thirdlecture focused on sustainability rating systems for buildings, with emphasis on LEED.41-42 Thefinal class period discussed sustainable infrastructure, resilience, and sustainable infrastructureprojects in the news.The homework assignment on sustainable engineering required the civil engineering students toapply Envision to a case study of a road project, while the architectural engineering studentsapplied LEED to a case study of an on-campus residence hall. Both groups explored howsustainable engineering could help improve the state of America’s infrastructure.7 The finalquestion required that the
theconcept of preventive environmental management, known now as circular economy defined as“decoupling economic activity from the consumption of finite resources, and designing waste outof the system”. As the Ellen MacArthur foundation suggests CE “Transitioning to a circulareconomy does not only amount to adjustments aimed at reducing the negative impacts of thelinear economy. Rather, it represents a systemic shift that builds long-term resilience, generatesbusiness and economic opportunities, and provides environmental and societal benefits” [1],(Fig. 1). The proposed idea is to refine the idea of the closed loop. The literatureThe proposed framework focuses on implementing the thought process to incorporate in tandemwith the engineering education
engineering, civil and environmental engineering,etc.), 14 were satisfied, two dissatisfied, and one neutral about the arrangement. Many cited therelated nature of certain aspects of the disciplines (e.g., water resources, infrastructure) as abenefit, with some efficiencies to be gained in faculty, facility, and course utilization as a result.In addition, many said that they appreciated the incidental exposure that both civil andenvironmental engineers got even in the non-overlapping portions of each other’s fields. Acommon theme of the stated disadvantages to such an alignment was that such programs tendedto have less emphasis on chemistry and biology because the overall focus of the department waselsewhere. Two respondents stated that civil
animals; choosing to store animals in a barn or process animals intohuman food (i.e., bacon from pigs added to eggs from chickens to create a “breakfast meal”); andselling stores to collect coins that are used to purchase infrastructure (i.e., a larger barn forstorage) as well as serving as a means of increasing the rank of the player (i.e., higher rank =more successful virtual farmer). The various steps require different amounts of time (i.e., wheatgrows faster than corn), and the value of the various products reflects typical market values (i.e.,one piece of bacon is worth more than one egg and the creation of a “breakfast meal” requiresfour eggs and two pieces of bacon). Through playing the game and developing a mass balancemodel of the game
sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Sharon A. Jones P.E., University of Portland Sharon Jones is the Dean of the Shiley School of Engineering at the University of Portland. She is a licensed civil engineer with degrees from Columbia University, the University of Florida, and Carnegie Mellon University. Her research interests focus on applying decision-making methods to evaluate sustain- ability policies with emphases on infrastructure, developing economies, and particular industrial sectors. She is also interested in engineering pedagogy