Business Development Center (SBDC), EconomicDevelopment Commission of the Space Coast, NASA Office of Technology Commercializationat KSC, and other local partners, neighboring universities and colleges, plans to dramaticallyreduce this problem by methodical research and facilitation of best practices for technologytransfer and commercialization leveraging a unique educational program in experientialentrepreneurship and technology commercialization.SCION Objectives:The SCION Partnership objectives are to:1) Develop education and experiential entrepreneurship programs to promote technology Page 11.1243.11commercialization and entrepreneurship
, three doctoral programs have been launched at Boise State University. Thefirst doctoral program established was in Electrical and Computer Engineering, selected becauseof the need for a trained workforce in the region. The other two doctoral programs, MaterialsScience and Engineering, and Computing, were from the start designed as interdisciplinarydegree programs. That is, they were designed for the participation of not just program facultywithin the division, but for the participation of program faculty with related research interests inother departments at the university. This paper presents the steps taken to launch the programs,lessons learned in initiating and administering the programs, best practices undertaken, andchallenges faced by
engineering degree from the ETSII (Industrial Engineering School) of the Madrid Polytechnic University (UPM) and a doctoral engineering degree from the same Univer- sity. He has received the Extraordinary Doctoral Award in the UPM and the Viesgo 1988 Award to the Doctoral Thesis improving the Scientific Research about the Industrial Process Electricity Application, as well as the 1997 and 1999 years UNED’s Social Council Award for the Best Didactic Materials in Exper- imental Sciences and the 2001 Award for the Innovative Excellence in Teaching, Learning & Technology from the Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning. He works as researcher, coordinator and director in different projects, ranging from
immediately upon graduation. While excellent for its intended purpose of ‘scientific discovery’, investigation, and ‘inquiry’, the National Collaborative Task Force concludes that traditional research- oriented M.S. and Ph.D. graduate education does not meet the full professional spectrum of educational needs or reflect the ‘engineering method’ of creative engineering practice for the majority of the nation’s engineers, who are not pursuing research-careers of scientific investigation and inquiry, but rather who, as working professionals, are pursuing the creative practice of engineering in industry for technology-development and innovation. For these engineers, a different approach and educational method is needed
definition ofbroader impacts the first few weeks of class helped me set up a good foundation for the rest ofthe course.’‘I thought the class participation very beneficial and should be required. We were able to notonly practice talking about our research to others but we were able to see how we progressedthroughout the semester.’Summary and outlookThe initial offering of the course in Spring 2016 attracted 13 engineering graduate students fromfour disciplines and introduced them to the notion of broader impacts and underscored the valueof engaging in activities to achieve specific societal outcomes. Student feedback from this initialoffering was very positive. The course has already achieved impact by enabling students toimplement their project
theliterature [33] – [35]: “I will try to get in an industry for some exposure and then will get into Graduate Studies. “I want to have a job experience before go to higher studies. I may go in to financial field as well.”Students seemed to tie their experiences to job interests, whether before or after graduate school,and types of job (e.g., research, design, innovative, and start-up). For example, one nationalstudent said: “This [program] challenged me to find my passion in specific fields ofengineering.” Another international student mentioned his long term career goals as “Engagingin research and entrepreneurship.”The results support previous findings about the effectiveness of REUs in increasing interest ingraduate
engineering course innovations. She has worked extensively in the design of assessment tools for course methods and activities. She is a faculty development consultant with previ- ous experience in instructional design, and the instructor of the Graduate Assistant Seminar for training engineering teaching assistants at Penn State. Page 24.189.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Applying Research-Based Principles and Theory to Practice: The redesign of a graduate teaching assistant training seminarAbstractWhat do Graduate Student Instructors (GSI) expect from a
Engineering Educa- tion. She is also an Adjunct Assistant Professor, teaching courses in design and creativity, and a Program Manager at the Center for Research in Learning and Teaching in Engineering. Her research focuses on the investigation of design approaches and ideation, ethnography in design, foundations of innovation, creative processes, and engineering practitioners who return to academia for a PhD. Many of her stud- ies involve multiple disciplinary professional and educational contexts and she often collaborates across disciplines, working with scholars in engineering, education, industrial design, and psychology. She also brings a research lens to understanding how to support successful translation of
, it also takes a very talented leader to blend the voice of the customer with thevoice of the business to create a true culture of innovation. This type of culture is especiallyimportant to product design, as well as to the sustainability of further growth as technology-based organizations dominate industrial productivity.2.1 Building a Culture of InnovationIn today’s innovation-driven economy, the vast majority of engineering innovations are needs-driven and market-focused, requiring deliberate engineering problem-solving and responsibleleadership. Today the practice of engineering for creative technology development and Page
Paper ID #15980Design, Implementation, and Outcomes of a Comprehensive Professional De-velopment Program for Post-Graduate Studies in EngineeringProf. Laleh Behjat Dr. Laleh Behjat is an associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Calgary. Her research interests include designing computer chips, electronic design automation and developing software for computer hardware. She has won several awards for her work on the development of software tools for computer engineering. In addition, Dr. Behjat has a passion for increasing the statues of women in Science, technology
male-dominated norms30. These data does not refute those claims, but offers a deeper understanding ofdisciplinary identity for graduate students. Over three-quarters of the total themes for biomedicalengineering are focused on intellectual merits despite the clear linkage for most biomedicalresearch to impact the lives or well-being of whole groups of people. One reason for thisdiscrepancy may be that they felt like the broader impact to affect humans was so obvious theyneed not discuss it explicitly within the paragraphs that discuss explicit impacts of the projects.Another alternative explanation is a potential need to maintain engineering “rigor,”understanding that human-centered research may be considered outside the typical
between U.S.engineering graduate education and the creative practice of engineering ─ has contributedto a long-term underdevelopment of the nation’s graduate engineers for technologydevelopment and innovation, reflected in a long-term decline of our core competence forengineering innovation of new technology which has been a contributing factor to thenation’s long-term decline of U.S. competitiveness. It is now evident that one-size ofgraduate education for the nation’s academic scientific researchers, who are pursuingcareers of scientific discovery and inquiry at research universities, and that of graduateeducation for the nation’s graduate engineers who are pursuing professional careers ofadvanced engineering practice for technological
States invested wisely in research-oriented graduate education and has become preeminent in basic university research that advances science and benefits the scientific workforce for discovery. But a parallel investment and balanced emphasis has not been made in professional graduate engineering education during this same time frame to support the continued development of the U.S. engineering workforce in industry for technology development and innovation. One-size in graduate education doesn’t fit all. Excellence in basic research and in the practice of engineering for world-class technology development and innovation are two very different pursuits. A disconnect has existed between U.S. graduate engineering education and
Engineers (NSPE), theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), and that used in industry and government service.II. National Collaborative: Purposeful Advancement of ProfessionalGraduate Education for Creative Engineering Practice and Technology InnovationInitiated in 2000 by leaders of the ASEE-Graduate Studies Division, College Industry PartnershipDivision, and Corporate Members Council, the National Collaborative Task Force on EngineeringGraduate Education Reform is a coalition of innovative faculty, academic leaders from research andcomprehensive universities, and engineering leaders from industry who are working together to respondto the urgency for reshaping engineering graduate education to better serve the needs of the modernpractice of
with f2f students as the primary audience. Online students to be observers rather thanfull participants in the course.This paper looks at reversing that model by creating courses where the online student experienceis the starting point for course design. The authors researched best practices in online educationto reinvent lectures, assessments, and interactions and used a Backwards Design approach toreinvent a graduate level materials science course. The process developed became known as theDesign for Online (DFO) model.Lectures were pre-taped in a studio and broken into smaller digestible chunks. Each of the videoswas based upon clearly identified outcomes that focused on higher order thinking as defined byBloom’s Taxonomy. In order to
Leadership and Team Performance: The Mediating Roles of Cognitive Trust and Collective Efficacy.” SAGE Open 3(3): 1–10.33. Somerville, Mark, and Jessica Townsend. 2015. “A Student-Centered Approach to Designing Teaming Experiences.” Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2015–Febru(February): 1–2.34. Bradley, Bret H, Heather J Anderson, John E Baur, and Anthony C Klotz. 2015. “When Conflict Helps: Integrating Evidence for Beneficial Conflict in Groups and Teams under Three Perspectives.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 19(4): 243–72.35. Chan, Joel, Steven P. Dow, and Christian D. Schunn. 2015. “Do the Best Design Ideas (Really) Come from Conceptually Distant Sources of Inspiration?” Design Studies 36(C
Paper ID #15171The inGEAR Program: Recruiting International Graduate Students throughUndergraduate Research InternshipsDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Initiatives at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engi- neering from the University of Michigan. She has published more than two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing
design andimplement a new model of advanced professional graduate education for the nation’s engineers inindustry that fosters ‘lifelong learning’ and professionally-oriented, practice-centered engineeringgraduate education that supports: All nine levels of engineering practice for the purposeful generation, development, and innovation of useful technology for competitive advantage to the engineer’s company or to meet meaningful societal needs ─ from the beginning growth levels of entry-level engineering at project level through the senior engineering growth levels of chief engineer responsible for corporate technology policy making, leadership and execution. The modern paradigm of the practice of
improvement and shared best practice (3) Build on the formidable strengths of a combined teaching faculty from regional universities and from experts in regional industry across the nation (4) Build on the silent successes / attributes of high-quality programs for working professionals which have been already proven across the United States (Council of Graduate Schools) (5) Build on the strengths of an experienced student body of practitioners who are growing as innovators and engineering leaders at the cutting edge of technology development to sustain U.S. preeminence (6) Build the Graduate Centers in partnership with regional industry and the practicing profession in engineering for success and continuous
Engineer) applies standard practices/techniques under direction of an experienced Engineer. Appendix B The Modern Paradigm of the Practice of Engineering for Creative Technology Development and Innovation Responsive to Real-World Needs of Industry and Society_____________________________________________________________________________________ Needs Engineering Technology ↓↑ Directed Basic Scientific Research to gain a better understanding of natural phenomena when needed or anticipated during the
postgraduate degrees.However, creative/innovative engineers will, and must, enhance their skills beyond their highest attaineddegree.Engineering leaders must be developed who will, in turn, guide other engineers to develop innovativenew designs, and who will lead the development of products providing what the customer wants andneeds. Management styles that will both encourage innovation, and meet the basic human needs ofengineers are needed. This will include the adoption of cutting-edge concepts and best practices fromother nations. This, in turn, will lay the groundwork for turning theory into practice. Engineers must alsodrive changes in their fields. The field of engineering is changing so rapidly, that an engineer must keepup with the rapid
Paper ID #9815Translational Engineering Skills Program (TESP): Training innovative, adap-tive, and competitive graduate students for the 21st century work forceDr. Elena Nicolescu Veety, North Carolina State University Elena Veety received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, in 2011. Her research focused on liquid crystal polarization gratings for tunable optical filters and telecommunications applications. Since 2011, she has been a Teaching Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Carolina State University. Currently, she is the Assistant
AC 2011-517: PROJECT-BASED RESIDENCY COURSE FOR ONLINEGRADUATE PROGRAMBimal P. Nepal, Texas A&M UniversityDr. F. Barry Lawrence, Texas A&M University Dr. Barry Lawrence holds the Leonard and Valerie Bruce Leadership Chair, the Program Director of the Industrial Distribution Program, Director of the Thomas and Joan Read Center, and Director of the Global Supply Chain Laboratory at Texas A&M University. As a faculty member of the Industrial Distribution Program he is involved in graduate, undergraduate, and professional continuing education teaching activities, funded research projects, publications and in- dustry presentations. His teaching activities surround classes in manufacturer/distributor
of them, and they were, basically kind of boring, so we left.”For Roberto, initial training is required, but it did not have a great impact. The required initialtraining parallels the findings in the follow up to the Boyer Report where it was found that 70%of research universities provide mandatory initial training for their GTAs.30 If other GTAs holdthe same reaction to this training as Roberto, it is logical that GTAs do not seek out additionaltraining after their initial teaching and learning center training due to poor experiences. Perhapsprograms such as the one discussed by Crede, Borrego, & McNair13 where GTAs are selected fora teaching community of practice are needed to encourage additional training beyond therequired
students’ experience and degree completion. Such challenges havehighlighted the need for further discussion and reform in graduate education. One such examplewas a workshop with graduate students, administrators, faculty members, and postdoctoralresearchers that culminated in suggestions for engineering graduate education: (1) clarifyexpectations, (2) attend to the community, (3) organize the research group for mentoring, and (4)structure student development toward independence [8].A civil engineering research group at a public research-intensive university developed a retreat tosupport socialization, address the aforementioned challenges, and integrate best practices ingraduate education while also drawing on organizational change and workforce
AC 2011-2275: CIRTL: IMPACTING STEM EDUCATION THROUGH GRAD-UATE STUDENT PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENTJustin P. Micomonaco, Michigan State University Page 22.325.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning: Impacting STEM Education through Graduate Student Professional DevelopmentAbstract This paper summarizes findings of a national, multi-institutional effort to reform STEMundergraduate education through the implementation of graduate student professionaldevelopment programs focused on improving teaching practice
AC 2012-5293: EXAMINING THE EXPLANATORY VARIABLES THATIMPACT GRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENT ENROLLMENTDr. Manoj K. Jha, Morgan State University Manoj K. Jha is professor and Founding Director of the Center for Advanced Transportation and Infras- tructure Engineering Research (CATIER) in the Department of Civil Engineering at the Morgan State University, Baltimore, Md., USA. He obtained a Ph.D. in civil engineering with transportation special- ization from the University of Maryland, College Park in 2000; a M.S. degree in mechanical engineering from the Old Dominion University in 1993; and a B.E. degree in mechanical engineering from the Na- tional Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India, in 1991. He also attended the
otheracademic institutions adopting AM education curricula.Current Progress: The Advent of AM Graduate ProgramsGraduate programs dedicated to Additive Manufacturing have seen a measured growth in the lastthree years. The Pennsylvania State University’s Masters of Science in Additive manufacturingand design program is considered to be the first of its kind in the USA. The course offers an onlineoption as well for professionals intending to continue education. The students find benefit inlectures from industry experts from Center of Innovative Materials Processing through directdigital deposition (CIMP 3D) and Applied Research Laboratory [13]. The University of Marylandalso offers a graduate program in Additive manufacturing and students use resources
Technology (PCAST. ) “Transformation and opportunity: The future of the U.S. research enterprise”, Report to the President, 2012.[5] C. Wendler, B. Bridgeman, R. Markle, F. Cline, N. Bell, P. McAllister and J. Kent. Pathways Through Graduate School And Into Careers. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 2012.[6] H. S. Barrows, Practice-Based Learning: Problem-Based Learning Applied To Medical Education. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University, 1994.[7] H. S. Barrows, How To Design A Problem-Based Curriculum For The Preclinical Years. New York, NY: Springer, 1985.[8] I. Choi, Y. C. Hong, H. Park, and Y. Lee, “Case-based learning for anesthesiology: Enhancing dynamic decision-making skills through
given research field. • Design of an experimental plan.The endearing premise of this proposal-based qualifying exam was that writing a researchproposal is a learning tool that teaches tangible research skills which students do not gain in theirtraditional graduate coursework. This semester-long course included incremental milestones forthe student and regular feedback from the instructors. The final product of the course was a 15page NSF style research proposal and a 20-minute oral presentation on the proposal before afaculty committee selected by the course instructors. All performance evaluations wereincorporated into a final grade for the course. Of the 6 students enrolled in the course in Summer2009, three were chemical engineering