Conference Session

Developing New Engineering Educators

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shannon L. Isovitsch Parks P.E., University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown; Laura J Dietz, University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

to educate tomorrow's engineers. ​Journal ofEngineering Education 97 (3): 239-40.Austin, Ann E. 2003. Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing new faculty to face changingexpectations in a shifting context. ​Review of Higher Education 26 (2): 119.Banik, Gouranga. 2016. “Strategies and Techniques for New Tenure-track Faculty to BecomeSuccessful in Academia ," 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans,Louisiana, ​https://peer.asee.org/25886​, p.25886.Lewis, Neal A. 2008. "The engineer as a professor: Bringing experience to the engineeringclassroom." In ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section meeting, US Military Academy at West Point (NewYork).Loendorf, W. 2004. “Transitioning From Industry To Education: The First Year,” 2004 ASEEAnnual

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ordel Brown, West Virginia University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

/quizzes include the slow response rate for students and the tediousness for instructors.Summative assessments in the form of tests and exams are not sufficient measures of students’understanding and application of knowledge 1-2. Students need continuous formative assessmentsto monitor their learning by actively evaluating their level of understanding. Additionally, thereis the present need to satisfy the dynamic technology-based demands of current engineeringstudents.In an attempt to address these challenges, a web-based audience response system was employedin an introductory engineering course at a large, land-grant university in the mid-Atlantic region.This introductory course is offered in multiple sections in the first-year engineering

Conference Session

Tips and Tricks for Assessing Student Performance

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self- and peer evaluation.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11, no. 4 (2012): 609-630.[24] Spiridonoff, Sophie. “iPeer Software: Online Rubric-Based Peer Evaluation.” In 8th Annual WebCT User Conference, pp. 10-14.[25] Magluilo, Steven, Abdullah Konak, Sadan Kulturel-Konak, Ivan Esparragoza, and G. Okudan Kremer. “PEAR: Peer Evaluation & Assessment Resource.” In Proceedings of the Spring 2015 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, Villanova University, PA, pp. 1-13.[26] Goh, G., Lai, X., & Rajapakse, D. C. (2011, May). Teammates: A cloud-based peer evaluation tool for student team projects. In Software Engineering Education and Training

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

AC 2009-795: PREVENTING AND MANAGING CLASSROOM INCIVILITIESAgnieszka Miguel, Seattle University Dr. Agnieszka Miguel is an Assistant Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Seattle University. Dr. Miguel received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2001 from the University of Washington, and MSEE and BSEE from Florida Atlantic University in 1996 and 1994. Dr. Miguel’s research interests involve electrical and computer engineering education especially active learning, image and video compression, image processing, and wavelets. Her teaching interests include MATLAB, circuits, linear systems, signal processing, digital image processing, and data compression

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven Chene Chetcuti, United States Military Academy; Hans J. Thomas P.E., U.S. Military Academy; Brent J. Pafford, U.S. Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

developed the tools to learn what they must when the time arrives that they mayneed it. It is our belief that a flipped classroom with problem solving helps reinforce their abilityto do just that.References:[1] Galgano, Francis, Bruce Keith, and Tim Judd. Educating Future Army Officers for a Changing World, ThirdEdition. West Point, NY, USA: Office of the Dean, (accessed April 8, 2013).[2] Chetcuti, Steven, Hans Thomas, and Brent Pafford. Flipping the Engineering Classroom: Lessons Learned in theCreation, Production, and Implementation. ASEE 2013 Fall Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference (2013) WashingtonD.C.[3]Shell, Amy E. "The Thayer Method of Instruction at the United States Military Academy: A Modest History anda Personal Account." PRIMUS

Conference Session

Advice from the Experts for NEEs at Small Universities

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Larson, Seattle University; Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Department at Seattle University. Dr. Miguel received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 2001 from the University of Washington, and MSEE and BSEE from Florida Atlantic University in 1996 and 1994. Her teaching and research interests include image and video compression, image processing, and wavelets. Page 12.1151.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Performing Engineering Research at Non-Ph.D. Granting InstitutionsAbstractResearch is becoming increasingly important at liberal arts colleges and masters universities.However, performing research at a non-Ph.D. granting institution has unique