at the natural intersections of learning within the continuum of content areas, educational environments, and academic levels [6].The absence of such pedagogical practices presents a key problem for promoting studentdevelopment of higher order thinking skills necessary for critical thinking and problem solving(CT and PS) in the context of the 21st century needs. Engineering in K-12 provides theopportunity to bring together the science and mathematics content and practices within thecontext of design-based authentic problem-solving. Researchers [7] argue that a sequenced andcohesive K-12 engineering program would be a reasonable option to encourage and preparestudents to STEM career pathways and prepare them for a successful
Amir Kabir Univer- sity of Techonology (biomedical engineering) and a Ph.D. degrees from the University of Conecticut (mechanical engineering). She also received a certificate in college instruction from the University of Connecticut. Her current research involves modeling and simulation of protein molecules as nano bio robots with applications in new drug design. The other aspect of her research is engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Best Practices in Encouraging STEM Majors Among Grade 6-12 StudentsThe world is always in need of people who are interested and knowledgeable in STEM topics.Engineering Ambassadors is
interests focus on early P-12 engineering education and identity development.Ms. Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University, West Lafayette Hoda is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in me- chanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing informal setting for engineering learning, and promoting engineering thinking in differently abled students in informal and formal settings.Dr. Abeera P. Rehmat, Purdue University, West Lafayette A Post-doctoral Research Associate at Purdue
Paper ID #31726Building the Bioengineering Experience for Science Teachers (BEST)Program (Work in Progress, Diversity)Dr. Miiri Kotche, University of Illinois at Chicago Miiri Kotche is a Clinical Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and cur- rently serves as Director of the Medical Accelerator for Devices Laboratory (MAD Lab) at the UIC Innovation Center. Prior to joining the faculty at UIC, she worked in new product development for medi- cal devices, telecommunications and consumer products. She also serves as co-Director of the Freshman Engineering Success Program, and is actively
improving the culture and environment of undergraduate education experience for all students, particularly those from underrepresented groups.Mrs. Risa D Hartman, The University of Texas at Austin, NASCENT Center Risa Hartman oversees multiple Education and Outreach programs at the University of Texas at Austin. Her roles include: Staff Education and Outreach Director for the Center for Dynamics and Control of Materials, a Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) and as the Pre-college Ed- ucation Director for the NASCENT Engineering Research Center focused on nanomanufacturing. She manages programs in the areas of graduate student traineeship and career development, undergraduate research, Research
Paper ID #27409Identifying Phenomena and Developing Sustainable Engineering EducationalModules that Integrate STEM Education Best Practices and Next GenerationScience Standards for Middle School Science TeachersMr. Michael Lorenzo Greene, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Michael Greene is a PhD Student at Arizona State University. He is pursuing his degree in the Engineering Education Systems and Design program, concurrently while pursuing a Master’s degree in Engineering. Michael graduated with his B.S. in Mechanical engineering from University of Pittsburgh in April of 2018. His research interest lies in diversity
. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Ed- ucation and Outreach.Stephanie B. Adams c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Three ERCs and a National Network Node: Assessing Engineering Outcomes for Middle School Students
talks at a Center-sponsored, all-day summer research symposium whichincluded participants from the Center’s other summer research experiences, includingundergraduates, veterans, and high school students.Design of the Evaluation Program Evaluation methods focused on gathering data to measure the following RET outcomes: ● Knowledge of sensorimotor neural engineering skill sets, including knowledge of careers in neural engineering, knowledge of innovative practices in neural engineering, and knowledge of the role of neuroethics in neural engineering. ● Perspectives of program structure and impacts, student learning, and teachers’ own professional development. The evaluation was designed and conducted by the Center for
Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. He currently serves as the Graduate Program Chair for the Engineering Education Systems and Design Ph.D. program. He is also the immediate past chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and an associate editor for the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Education and Outreach.Dr. Medha Dalal, Arizona State University Medha Dalal is a postdoctoral scholar in
findings at the end of the summer experience.Year 3The focus of the final year of the research methods course was the preparation of students for theculminating summer research experience with a STEM faculty mentor. Course activities weredesigned to allow students to gain a greater understanding of and practice in: 1) formulatingresearch questions, 2) developing experimental designs, 3) creating and testing researchhypotheses and 4) data collection and analysis. Students were tasked with integrating both thescientific method and engineering design process in the modeling, design and testing of amousetrap car. Students explored the effect of wheel size, type and number, center of gravity, massand friction on mousetrap car performance. Participants
Paper ID #27558Using Human-Centered Design to Drive Project-Based Learning in a HighSchool Summer STEM Course (Evaluation)Mr. Austin C. Wong, The Cooper Union Austin Wong is a graduate of Cooper Union with a BA and MA in Mechanical Engineering. The research he is doing pertains to the advancement of STEM education with the help of rapid prototyping at a high school and college level. He is a high school STEM teacher at Grace Church High School, and developed curriculum for the high school physics, robotics, CAD, and engineering classes he teaches and is also the director of the Design Lab at Grace Church School. He also
Arizona University PhD in STEM Education, University of Arizona, Tucson MA in STEM Education and Environmental Learning, UA, Tucson BS in Communications and Language Arts, Emerson College 25+ years in STEM education in research and evaluation, program and curriculum design, teacher professional development, STEM-Ed Leadership, writing and editing.Lori Rubino-Hare, Northern Arizona University Lori Rubino-Hare, M.Ed., taught elementary and middle school for 13 years. She has been a Profes- sional Development Coordinator at the Center for Science Teaching and Learning at Northern Arizona University since 2008. She has been active in science education reform efforts and has worked on numer- ous grant-funded projects
Paper ID #23677A Study of the Attitudes and Practices of K-12 Classroom Teachers who Par-ticipated in Engineering Summer Camps (Evaluation)Dr. Amber L. M. Kendall, North Carolina State University Amber Kendall is the Coordinator of STEM Partnership Development at The Engineering Place at North Carolina State University. She recently received her PhD from Tufts University, where she worked as a graduate research assistant with the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. She graduated from North Carolina State University as a Park Scholar with a BA in Physics, and spent several years teaching physics to high-school
Paper ID #29194Teacher Leader Engineering Network (TaLENt): A Collective Impact Modelfor K-12 Engineering Teacher Leaders (Work in Progress)Christina Anlynette Crawford, Rice University As Associate Director for Science and Engineering of the Rice Office of STEM Engagement, Christina leads the NanoEnvironmental Engineering for Teachers program. In this capacity, she guides Houston area secondary science teachers in weekly meetings on Rice’s campus to ”best practices” in educational pedagogy. She currently has a B.S. in Biology from Texas A and M Corpus Christi, an M.S.Ed from the University of Houston, and is a Ph.D
Paper ID #33519Motives, Conflicts and Mediation in Home Engineering Design Challengesas Family Pedagogical Practices (Fundamental)Dr. Jungsun Kim, Indiana University Bloomington Jungsun Kim, Ph.D. is a research scientist at Indiana University in Bloomington. Her research focuses on how students can consistently develop their talents throughout their educational experiences and in what ways parents, school, and community support students from underrepresented groups support it.Dr. Soo Hyeon Kim, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Soo Hyeon Kim is an assistant professor of Library and Information Science at School
often meet the curriculum content and practice goals better thansingle-subject lessons. Engineering, as a key component of STEM education, offers hands-on,designed-based, problem solving activities to drive student interest and confidence in STEMoverall. However, K-12 STEM teachers may not feel equipped to implement engineeringpractices and may even experience anxiety about trying them out in their classrooms without theadded support of professional development and professional learning communities.To address these concerns and support engineering integration, this research study examined theexperiences of 18 teachers in one professional development program dedicated to STEMintegration and engineering pedagogy for K-12 classrooms. This
simulated classroom environments can be used to help inservice and preservice elementary teachers learn to lead argumentation discussions in science and engineering.Dr. Jamie Mikeska, Educational Testing Service Jamie Mikeska is a Research Scientist in the Student and Teacher Research Center at Educational Testing Service (ETS). Jamie completed her Ph.D. in the Curriculum, Teaching, and Educational Policy graduate program at Michigan State University in 2010. Her current research focuses on three key areas: (1) de- signing, developing, and conducting validation studies on assessments of content knowledge for teaching (CKT) science; (2) examining and understanding validity issues associated with measures designed to
that were remarkably good.One of the best is shown here as Figure 1, depicting an engineer working on a computer,performing calculations on a white board, and displaying a design drawing on an easel. Thecoffee cup and what might be a diploma hanging on the wall really added to the accuracy of thepicture. Figure 1. Sample illustration submitted in response to the survey prompt “Draw an engineer doing their work”.Overall, the survey responses indicate a quantifiable impact that the “4th Grade Engineering”sessions and in-class STEM activities were having on students’ perceptions and understandingsof the engineering profession. Compared to the students that were not exposed to those sameengineering elements, their understanding of engineering
Director for NASA MUREP Aerospace Academy program at ECSU. His areas of interests include embedded systems design, cloud instrumentation, remote computing applications, UAS applications research, mobile robotics, and innovative uses of educational technologies. Dr. Rawat may be reached at ksrawat@ecsu.edu.Ms. Robin Renee Mangham, Elizabeth City State University ROBIN R. MANGHAM is currently a lecturer in the Aviation Science Program at Elizabeth City State University (ECSU). She earned a Master of Aeronautical Science from Embry Riddle Aeronautical Uni- versity in 2012. Areas of interest include education technology, human factors in aviation, and unmanned aircraft applications research. Ms. Mangham may be reached at
, and 2012 Inaugural Distin- guished Award for Excellence in the category Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 9 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 62 journal articles, and 154 conference pa- pers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 35 M.S., and 5 Ph.D. thesis students; 58 undergraduate research students and 11 undergraduate senior design project teams; over 500 K-12 teachers and 118 high school student researchers; and 18 undergraduate GK-12 Fellows and 59 graduate GK-12 Fellows. Moreover, he di- rects K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach programs that enrich the STEM
Prominence” and PI for the NSF-funded STEP 1b program ”Convincing Outstanding-Math-Potential Admits to Succeed in STEM (COMPASS)”. She is currently a Co-PI for the Girls EXCELling in Math and Science (GEMS) and WISE@UCF industry funded women’s mentoring initiatives. Through iSTEM Dr. Dagley works to promote and enhance collaborative efforts on STEM education and research by bringing together colleges, centers, and institutes on campus, as well as other stakeholders with similar interest in STEM initiatives. Her research interests lie in the areas of student access to education, sense of community, retention, first-year experience, living-learning commu- nities, and persistence to graduation for students in science
a PD program. From middle schools in NewYork City (NYC), 23 teachers were recruited and engaged to learn and practice the design,development, and implementation of robotics-based STEM lessons for classroom usage. The threeweeks long eight-hours per day PD program, conducted at the NYU Tandon School ofEngineering, was led by engineering and education faculty who mentored graduate students andpostdoctoral researchers to: develop robotics-based STEM lessons, conduct the PD sessions, andsupport varied instructional and feedback activities during the PD. The PD program included anarray of foundational learning theories, robotics fundamentals, and robotics-based math andscience lessons. Each morning and afternoon session included a short formal
traditionally held in person, provide K-12STEM teachers and community college STEM faculty with the following: 1) engineeringresearch experiences in center research labs, 2) guidance in developing engineering contentcurricula based on center research, and 3) follow-up support for translating research experiencesinto classroom practice [3]. Sustained follow-up with the teachers throughout the academic year,in addition to a plan for evaluating program impact are also included in the program.In K-12 classrooms, engineering education can prepare learners to use higher-order thinkingstrategies in order to solve ill-structured, real-world problems [4]. Engineering relies primarilyon problem solving; engineers seek to solve problems that present in many forms
. Her work dwells into learning in informal settings such as summer camps, military experiences, and extra-curricular activities. Other research interests involve validation of CFD models for aerospace applications as well as optimizing efficiency of thermal-fluid systems.Dr. Melissa L. Whitson, University of New Haven Associate Professor of PsychologyDr. Daniel Patrick Schrage, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Schrage is a professor in the School of AE at Georgia Tech and the Director of the Vertical Lift Research Center of Excellence (VLRCOE). Over the past 30 years he has established the graduate pro- gram in Aerospace Systems Design and helped focus it for student lifelong learning which has included
Schools of Engi- neering, The Polytechnic School. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred Univer- sity, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. He currently serves as the Graduate Program Chair for the Engineering Education Systems and Design Ph.D. program. He is also the immediate past chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and an associate editor for the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining
questions:How are school counselors prepared to offer advisement for engineering career preparation? Inwhat ways and to what extent do school counselors interact with students to impact pre-collegepreparation for post-secondary engineering study and careers? In an effort to establish baselinedata to answer these research questions, a professional development for school counselors wasoffered at Stony Brook University to provide preliminary training in STEM preparation for post-secondary academic success. Data were collected from a group of participants to understandingcurrent counseling practices and how university-based training might improve their knowledgebase to impact student participation and preparation for STEM in higher education.Study Design
directors of utilizing student long-term tracking methods forevaluating program effectiveness. With access to a large-scale state-level student database, this studylooks at RET programs' long-term impact in Texas on high school student graduation rates andundergraduate STEM major selection rates. Using the Texas Education Research Center database, wewere able to identify RET teachers’ students stretching back to the inception of the NanotechnologyRET at Rice University and examine the RET program's impact on a large scale.The purpose of this study was to compare high school student graduation rates and undergraduateSTEM major selection rates across gender, race, and ethnicity to a comparison sample. Thecomparison determined the Rice University RET
Chicago area, 2) the Junior Research Scientists program funded by After School Matters of the city of Chicago, to promote STEM for high school students and 3) a collaboration with the Center for College Access and Success – Northeastern University to promote STEM learning in their Upward Bound Math & Science program, also oriented for high school students. More information regarding the mentioned programs can be find at www.scientistsfortomorrow.org c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Assessment of the Impact of Summer STEAM programs on High School Participants’ Content Knowledge and Attitude towards STEAM CareersAbstractFor the past five
State University Kurt Becker is the current director for the Center for Engineering Education Research (CEER) which examines innovative and effective engineering education practices as well as classroom technologies that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects exploring engineering design thinking. His areas of research include engineering design thinking, adult learning cognition, engineering education professional development and technical training. He has extensive international experience working on technical training and engineering educaton projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Department of Labor, USAID
century skills: why students need them and ideas for practical implementation," Kappa Delta Pi Record, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 78-83, 2013.[9] E. N. Veety, M. C. Ozturk, R. S. Engel, C. A. Vallas, M. M. Manfra, T. Snyder, C. Wang and V. Misra, "Translational Engineering Skills Program (TESP): Training innovative, adaptive, and competitive graduate students for the 21st century work force," in 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2014.[10] "TeachEngineering: STEM Curriculum for K-12," [Online]. Available: https://www.teachengineering.org/design/designprocess.[11] A. Y. Alqahtani and A. A. Rajkhan, "E-Learning Critical Success Factors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Analysis of E-Learning Managerial