this time, the researcher made a judgment about the student’s voiceprojection. Quieter students were asked to wear a lapel microphone. Audio/video recording wasdone to capture the participants as they verbally worked through the problem, as well as, to showwhat participants were reading, drawing, and so on. The documents used in administering theproblem were colored to help the observer differentiate between information (blue), problemdefinition (yellow) and student work (white).Three hours were allotted for students to complete the design task, although the average studentcompleted the problem prior to the administrator stopping the session. During the participant’sdesign session, a member of the research team acted as the administrator of
). Students describeddistinctions between engineering innovation and other engineering work (e.g.., “routine” courseprojects, internships, research experiences). They did so primarily by identifying characteristicsof innovative solutions and, in some cases, features or outcomes of the processes that led to thosesolutions. The learning related to this theme often involved moving from a self-identified naïveunderstanding to a more informed understanding. The more informed understanding generallyconnected to features of projects that students had personally led or participated in.Table 2. Elements Comprising the Definition Theme Element Description Balances needs of many Recognizing that innovation involves many stakeholders
after receiving a diploma, or about a quarter of the time needed to gain thoseskills [4]. At the same time, businesses have expectations that employees will come in with skillsthat will allow them to compete, and recent graduates are not equipped with competencies tomeet those expectations [5, 6, 7], leaving many students with loan debts and dismal prospects forthe future.How can current and future students be prepared for “jobs that do not yet exist, to usetechnologies that have not yet been invented, and to solve problems that we don’t even know areproblems yet” (p.2) [8]? Researchers and practitioners suggest that rapid changes in anengineering world require a new prospective on the profession, and particularly education. It isduring their
studiesthat result in instruments known as concept inventories [3], [4]. During development of conceptquestions, attention is paid to presenting a clear and concise question that typically focuses on asingle concept. Wording and pictorial representations play a key role in creating a “good”concept question.As part of this movement, thousands of ConcepTests are available at an online platform knownas the Concept Warehouse [5]. The ConcepTests provide multiple choice questions that typicallydo not require calculations. But they also provide the opportunity for students to enter writtenexplanations for their answers, which is extremely valuable for student metacognition [6], [7],[8], and instructor ability to gain insight into student reasoning [9], [10
is a strategy that can connect students on what can seem dauntingly large andlonely university campuses 22. Learning communities can be organized around common interestsand curricula. “These can be used to build a sense of group identity, cohesiveness, anduniqueness … and to counteract the isolation that many students feel” 23.Networking mentoring has a long, rich tradition within academe as a strategy for bringingwomen together for their mutual benefit and support 24, 25. Defined as “an ever-changing seriesof dyadic contacts in which each person plays the role or mentor or mentee to differing degreesin each dyad” networking mentoring is an empowering strategy that has been successful inassisting women with academic progress both as faculty
contribution to the multi-disciplinary team lies in qualitative methodologies, cultural theory and the belief that outliers offer great insight into the workings of power. Her research interests include cultural theory, the cultural/historical construction of women’s identities and roles in past and present societies, and most recently, equity issues surrounding gender and underrepresented populations in engineering education. She can be contacted at cynthia.e.foor-1@ou.edu.Dr. Rui Pan, University of Oklahoma Dr. Pan is currently working as a postdoctoral research associate in the Research Institute for STEM Education at the University of Oklahoma. She received her Ph.D in Engineering Education, M.S. in Statistics and B.S
, and the connection between the two. In this way, a deductive boundarywas set, and then data analysis within that boundary proceeded in an inductive manner.Data AnalysisThe analysis team consisted of two graduate students (counseling psychology PhD students) andtwo professors (counseling psychology professor, chemical engineering professor). The firstgraduate student was a cisgender, Black woman. The second graduate student was a cisgender,White woman. The first professor was a cisgender White man, and the second, a cisgender Whitewoman. The research team followed Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six steps for conducting thematicanalysis [17]. First, all researchers independently engaged in familiarization and immersion byactively reading and re
addition, Professor Walton received MSU’s Teacher-Scholar award in 2010 and was a 2010-2011 MSU Lilly Teaching Fellow.Amanda M Portis, Michigan State UniversityEldred H. Chimowitz, University of Rochester Eldred Chimowitz is a professor of chemical engineering at the University of Rochester. He teaches courses in process design and control to undergraduates and statistical mechanics and thermodynamics to graduate students. He is the author of a textbook titled: ”Introduction to Critical Phenomena in Fluids” which was published by Oxford University Press in 2005. It was nominated for an American Associa- tion of American Publishers Award for Excellence in Scholarly Publishing. Jennifer Condit who helped prepare this
opportunities forundergraduates. These educational and exploration opportunities will bring the latest researchand technology in Electronic Imaging Systems to undergraduate and graduate students inComputer Science, Electrical and Computer Engineering and Optics. The educational programsdeveloped under this initiative will act as a model for other universities and institutes around thecountry. 1. Imaging In the Information Age Images have become the single most important communication medium in theInformation Age. There is no aspect of private or professional life that is not affected by the useof sophisticated imagery. Commercial, consumer, medical and scientific imaging systems willconstitute one of the largest growing sectors of the
argument, and he made plans and tookaction to close the gap.Goal setting and monitoring in the portfolio studio also enabled students to look across theirgoals and determine if they complemented one another. Jessica had a chance to consider herpersonal and professional goals and saw a potential conflict. Rather than change her goals, sheworked on her self-confidence, which she felt was a critical component in the achievement ofthose goals. It remains to be seen how Jessica will find a balance between her personal andprofessional goals and/or remake those goals to suit her needs better.Many students have goals that are lofty but lacking in detail. Goal setting and monitoring in theportfolio studio enabled Nolan to clarify his goals and plan
successful interactions and learning outcomes.1-3 One important challenge centers onthe interactions between students from groups negatively stereotyped as poor performers inengineering (e.g., women and under-represented racial minorities) and others. A body of researchin psychology indicates that students from these marginalized groups may have qualitativelydifferent group work experiences compared to others, which may contribute to their self-selection from engineering and thus their group’s under-representation in engineering fields.Recent research suggests that the negative experiences of people from marginalized groups onengineering student design teams can influence many factors that contribute to persistence andsuccess, such as development of
professor gave these instructions: “You should be at least as formal as the client. If he has a coat and tie, you keep your coat on. If he is in a shirt and tie, you can take off your jacket.” This posed dilemmas for women that did not exist for men.” [60, p. 163-164] “On the surface, formal lines of communication, such as orientations, graduate advisors Engineering and handbooks purporting to facilitate women becoming graduate students are not Preparation always reliable. The alternative, which no one explicitly states, is to engage in the informal (gendered roles and track through establishing social networks and building social capital.” [61, p. 145] implicit/explicit
theseareas to better tune future engineering courses and curricula based on the experiences of thesestudents. Page 24.1291.15Through these interviews, it was clear that a student’s identity as an engineer and as a member ofsociety plays a large role in their responses. It is planned for the rest of the study to observehow this identity changes due to certain factors such as classes and extracurricular activities. Itis believed that the way students perceive themselves in this balance described by the Ethic ofCare will have a major impact on the degree to which they incorporate engineering and socialresponsibility in their futures.Limitations of the
often encounter in their communities. These students' low sense of belonging and self-efficacy are critical factors for not choosing computing as a career path and retaining computingdisciplines [3, 6, 7, 8]. Research [2, 3] also indicates that attracting and retaining underrepresentedstudents, including women, is challenging without role models and mentoring. Studies [5] alsofound that mentoring is the most effective intervention to improve the self-efficacy ofunderrepresented students, leading to their commitment to pursue computing careers. Our previouswork [1] also found that mentoring helps improve students' sense of belonging, self-efficacy, andcomputing identity. In this study, we investigate whether course-level-specific mentoring is
engineering. Dr. Walther’s research group, the Collab- orative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic interdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineering, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering edu- cation, the professional formation of engineers, the role of empathy and reflection in engineering learning, and student development in interdisciplinary and interprofessional spaces.Dr. Nicola W. Sochacka, University of Georgia Dr. Nicola Sochacka is the Associate
evidence-based approaches to improve the engineering education environment. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering While Black: Exploring the Experiences of Black University of Florida Undergraduate Engineering Students Using PhotovoiceAbstractBlack engineering students attending a predominantly white institution (PWI) must often navigateunwelcoming and hostile environments on their journey to degree attainment. Despiteencountering such adverse circumstances, these students persist to graduation, albeit at lower ratesthan their white counterparts. Addressing this discrepancy is a critical factor in improving diversityin the workforce. This
, but for Black and Brown students, this becomes increasingly rare due to the inability tofind members with both gender and racial identities. The lack of congruency between mentor andmentee shared racial and gender identities often results in the missed opportunity to acknowledgestructural racism that persist in STEM educational and professional context [23].2.4 Faculty SupportAnother aspect of the support systems for a STEM-enabling campus environment is facultysupport. As the curriculum implementation personnel, they play a significant role in arousinginterest in the courses they offer [28], [29]. Faculty have a direct interaction with students thatoccurs both inside the classroom through structured teaching and outside of the classroom in
among female students in constructionmanagement programs and found that having a sense of community and belonging was the mostimportant factor in retaining women [1 and 9]. Almost 90% of students cited this as an influence [1],which is consistent with previous research that found that a positive peer network and culture is essentialfor retaining students [1; 10 , and 11]. Shane and colleagues contended that social support is mosteffective when it balances integration into the community and development of one’s own identity [11]. Asense of community can be fostered through both formal and informal activities [11]. Groen, Simmons,and Turner found that the development of professional networks, often through formal networkingactivities, provided
attrition rate in such offerings is substantial. Inchemical engineering, it is not uncommon for students who have done well in freshmanyear to struggle with their first chemical engineering course: mass and energy balances(MEBs). This difficulty is curious, as the course is based largely on concepts firstencountered in high school chemistry (conservation of elemental mass, stoichiometry)and first year physics (conservation of energy). The central intellectual activity for our MEB course, using the now classic text1by Richard Felder and Ron Rousseau(F & R), is reading problem statements, creatingprocess flowsheets and solving the associated algebraic equations which result. Thegeneral solution approach is efficiently described as a series
of creating inclusive environments, providingsupportive role models and mentors, and addressing barriers to cultivate a strong STEM identityamong diverse student populations. STEM identity is a broad and evolving concept, and researcherscontinue to explore new aspects, interventions, and strategies to foster a positive STEM identityamong individuals. These endeavors seek to be inclusive of individuals with a variety of identitiesand past experiences, who can bring a diverse range of thought to STEM disciplines in order tocreate better outcomes and creative solutions (Rodriguez et al., 2019). Research on the transferpathways of community college students to four-year universities within STEM fields is crucial toensure successful transition
not for profit boards. His interests include the integration of faith in all types and aspects of business including engineering and architecture, and the use of business in international community development.Tyler Scott Helmus, Calvin College TYLER S. HELMUS is a student currently enrolled in Calvin College’s engineering program. He expects to graduate in 2012 and hopes to attend graduate school after. research interests include robotics and control systems.Steven H. VanderLeest, Calvin College STEVEN H. VANDERLEEST is a Professor of Engineering at Calvin College, Vice-President of Re- search & Development at DornerWorks, Ltd., and partner at squishLogic LLC. He obtained the M.S.E.E. from Michigan
communitycollege. To make students feel included and comfortable, it is important for [the four-yearinstitution] to create a welcoming campus environment” (p. 196). This suggests that the four-year institution plays a significant role in retaining students and helping them through thetransfer adjustment process.Another factor that plays a role in the adjustment process is student identity, particularly forstudents broadly classified as Black. However, understanding the transfer student identities ofBlack undergraduates is another understudied area. Current literature often does notdisaggregate the experiences of traditional Black STEM four-year college students from BlackSTEM community college transfer students, nor Black undergraduates born and raised in
outcomes that exceed those of the sameindividuals working in isolation. However, engineering graduates (and faculty) typically receivelittle instruction on how to develop a team from its formation to a state of high performance.Consequently, engineering student teams seldom perform to a level they could, and graduates areill-prepared for a work environment in which they are expected to be members of productivecross-functional teams. This paper presents a conceptual framework for teamwork and definessix key principles embodied in this framework. It offers definitions of teamwork performancesfor both individuals and the entire team in four areas of performance: team relationships, jointwork products, individual work products, and knowledge assets. A
+ focus reading group for STEM students to further connect them with their identity, and is passionate about understanding and dismantling the systems in engineering that marginalize students.Prof. Henry Grady Rylander III P.E., The University of Texas at Austin Dr. Rylander is a professor of biomedical engineering at the University of Texas at Austin, and the Harry H. Power Professor in Engineering and a William J. Murray, Jr. Fellow in Engineering. Dr. Rylander is a co-director, with Dr. Mia K. Markey, of the Department of Biomedical Engineering’s Imaging Science and Informatics Portfolio program, a comprehensive imaging science training program for doctoral stu- dents funded by a Ruth L. Kirschstein National
from Purdue University. Her research characterizes front-end design practices across the student to practitioner continuum and studies the impact of developed front-end design tools on design success.Ms. Leah Paborsky, University of Michigan Leah is a graduate from the University of Michigan with a B.S.E. in Mechanical Engineering and minor in Space Sciences and Engineering. She served as an undergraduate research assistant in the Daly Design and Engineering Education Research Group focusing on engineers’ beliefs about social aspects of engineering work. She is currently pursuing a M.S. in Aerospace Engineering Sciences at University of Colorado- Boulder.Dr. Sara L. Hoffman, University of Michigan Sara Hoffman
that only 27% of U.S. college undergraduatesmet all of these “criteria,” and that truly traditional college students were becoming the“exception rather than the rule” [1].Who are nontraditional undergraduates?Several scholars have theorized the differences between traditional and other, so-called“nontraditional,” undergraduates. In fact, the term “nontraditional undergraduate” has proveddifficult to define clearly due to the multi-faceted ways in which contemporary students differ.Early theorists critically questioned the notion of the traditional/nontraditional binary andsuggested that being nontraditional a) intersects with other gender, racial, ethnic, andsocioeconomic identities and, therefore, cannot be defined solely by membership within
automatically enrolled in their first-year seminar section with their PA groupbefore they enroll in other courses. In the third year of the engineering seminars (2016-2017),registration for other classes by peer advising group at the same time during orientation wasimplemented. This has allowed PAs to aid their students in the course registration process andhas led to many students in the same group enrolling in the same section of large first-yearcourses - an inadvertent benefit.Initial content for the engineering seminars was determined largely by the new student office, buthas evolved through the years to include a balance of academic (academic strategies, majorselection) and student affairs (wellness, consent, identity) content. Initially in 2014
human who plays an active and pri-mary role in making the final decision. Such a process is called assisted requirements tracing(ART).8 Recent studies on students’ ART performances5, 8 clearly showed the challenges inthat students invariably made errors of omission (threw out correct links) and errors of com-mission (added incorrect links). Dekhtyar et al.8 conducted a statistical analysis of the fac-tors affecting ART performance, though all the participants were students enrolled in Soft-ware Engineering courses. Our work, reported, in this paper extends the body of knowledge inART by making a head-to-head comparison between students and software professionals.Preparing graduates for a smooth and successful transition toward their roles in
should be addressed nationally.IntroductionSTEM (i.e., science, engineering, technology, and math) fields are critical to the advancement ofthe United States in the global economy. Therefore, it is important that institutes of highereducation support students succeeding in STEM education by completions of STEM degrees.Advancing STEM education plays a fundamental role in improving student learning in STEMfields and, in turn, can enhance the production of STEM graduates. By investigating STEMeducation at colleges and universities, we can expose areas of needed improvement and enableprograms to become more effective and efficient. If the field of engineering wishes to broadenparticipation, it is imperative that such efforts include institutions
between in-personone-on-one meetings and small group meetings (up to 5 students). Students were allowed toself-assign to any available time slot on a first-come, first-serve basis. However, they could notsee the identities of other assigned members. The faculty set various options for the duration ofthe meetings. At the end of each meeting, the students were asked to complete the survey again toreflect on their experience. Overall, 40 students participated in the survey. Next, the IndependentSamples t-Tests, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Chi-square test and Kruskal-Wallis H test wereconducted using IBM SPSS [6] to determine if there were significant differences inresponses.FindingsFindings on preferred meeting formatFirst, we examine the