interdisciplinary groupof undergraduate engineering students as a UD SoE sponsored capstone design project. Many ofthe students on the team that designed the ETHOS program had participated in internationalservice through UD’s Center for Social Concern. Although these experiences were veryrewarding, the service projects the students participated in did not directly make use of theirengineering skills. Furthermore, while participating in these service projects, the studentsidentified many needs that could be addressed through engineering solutions. The students spenttwo semesters researching and designing the program, making initial contacts with potentialplacement partners and assessing the feasibility of the program from a university
engineering. During his thirty years plus at Houston Community College, he has formed collaborations across the country that have provided the opportunity for HCC students to participate in innovative research and materials programs. A significant number of these students have completed their undergraduate education, entered and finished their graduate education, and transitioned to careers. Mr. Sheinberg has Bachelor’s Degrees from the University of Texas (Austin) and University of Houston and a Master’s Degree from the University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences (Houston). He serves on numerous regional, state and national committees. He is married to Beth Finefield, and they reside in Kingwood, TX.Dr
. (2017b). Preliminary Findings on Software Engineering Practices in Civic Hackathons. 2017 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on CrowdSourcing in Software Engineering (CSI-SE), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSI-SE.2017.5Gama, K., Alencar Gonçalves, B., & Alessio, P. (2018). Hackathons in the formal learning process. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education - ITiCSE 2018, 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197138Gary, K. (2015). Project-Based Learning. Computer, 48(9), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2015.268Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research
Practices Our AMP has generated a wealth of curriculum and research projects which we now proposeto innovatively disseminate. For example, through our existing and well-institutionalizedsummer bridge programs we have developed condensed courses in Calculus, Biology, Physics,Organic Chemistry, and technical English for incoming freshman and community collegestudents who hope to major in mathematics and science-related fields. These courses focus onkey material in gate-keeping courses which are required early in their college careers. Throughdocumentation in final project reports, course syllabi, texts, problem sets, and other forms thesematerials are catalogued and now will be made available to interested faculty through the Internetor by
interest is in the areas of embedded systems, robotics, computer vision, integrated circuit optimization, and engineering education. Dr. Yelamarthi is a member of the Tau Beta Pi engineering honor society and Omicron Delta Kappa national leadership honor society and a senior member of IEEE.Dr. Eron E. Drake, Central Michigan University Eron Drake received her Ed.D. degree in Education education with an emphasis on curriculum and in- struction from Central Michigan University in 2009. She also holds an M.B.A. from Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI. She is currently the Assistant Director of the Faculty Center for Innovative Teaching at Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI, and has over eleven years of
Higdon Distinguished Educator Award.Prof. Jeffrey F Rhoads, Purdue University at West Lafayette Jeffrey F. Rhoads is a Professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University and is affiliated with both the Birck Nanotechnology Center and Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at the same insti- tution. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees, each in mechanical engineering, from Michigan State University in 2002, 2004, and 2007, respectively. Dr. Rhoads’ current research interests include the predictive design, analysis, and implementation of resonant micro/nanoelectromechanical systems (MEMS/NEMS) for use in chemical and biological sensing, electromechanical signal processing, and computing; the
collaborations and opportunities for their graduate students. • Proposal writing workshops; workshops on how to start a large research center. • Joint poster sessions with local agencies to stimulate research collaboration. • Provide leadership and organizational support for national initiatives to enhance COE faculty advancement. Leadership for national level faculty development initiatives including NSF Days at home university, providing logistical and event support for faculty running national workshops. Teaching • Faculty support through coordinating graduate student teacher assistant training. Teaching professors learning community: lunches and roundtable discussions to develop solid connections for non
individual student and the institution. At the institutional level it is understoodas a mechanism that contributes to reducing attrition rates and enhancing recruitment plans butthere is a scarcity of empirical research related to PhD programs to understand this phenomenon.Contemporarily, Di Pierro [15] conceptualized doctoral mentoring as part of an institution’spragmatic retention plan to counter economic losses, potential loss in Carnegie classification, andvoids in research. Thus, mentoring should not be thought of as a disjointed obscure process, butone that is integrated and benchmarked as part of an institution’s best practices particularly forunderrepresented populations. For individual students mentoring often times is described as akey
modalities for the transfer and co-creation ofknowledge, requirements, and possibilities for change in operational models and tapping into theboundary-breaking opportunities fostered by digital ways of teaching and learning. This studyaims to provide a future-proof pathway for the engineering education ecosystem to better equip itfor solving real-world problems with a multi-disciplinary approach to create new value forsociety. In the process, the study also sheds light on relevant new research avenues.1. IntroductionNeeds-driven innovation (also known as needs-based innovation) has been in use in the field ofBio-design for nearly 20 years now. [1]. One of these innovation techniques is framed through a'why or what and how' approach by Kate
applicable history, culture, and constraints, or the full extentof contributions of existing faculty. Web sites now make it easy for applicants tofamiliarize themselves with the university and current professors’ professional histories(for example, research record or teaching innovations), and if not meeting the newperson’s standards, it is possible for him/her to develop a marginal superiority complex.If perceiving approval from the chair or dean, they may, with good motives, propose newideas, proposals, and concerns about the status quo. They may consciously orsubconsciously try to mold the program into the image of their preceding institution(s).However, they may be perceived by senior faculty as not showing respect and deference.This causes
associate professor at Arizona State University in the Fulton Schools of Engi- neering, The Polytechnic School. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred Univer- sity, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. He currently serves as the Graduate Program Chair for the Engineering Education Systems and Design Ph.D. program. He is also the immediate past chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and an associate editor for
engineering activities into the literature they are already using intheir classrooms. We also aim to empower students as budding engineers, creating thespace for them to be agentive in identifying and pursuing the problems they want tosolve, rather than presenting them with pre-determined design tasks. We are currentlyimplementing our IEL approach in fifteen classrooms (Grades 3, 4, and 5) in rural,suburban, and urban schools in Massachusetts. Although our research team is analyzing Page 25.549.2data through multiple lenses, the focus of this paper is to demonstrate how a literarycontext fosters student engagement in engineering practices, highlighting what
, solar heatgain coefficient, visible light transmittance, and U-value.As part of a NSF International Research Experiences for Students (IRES) project a team ofgraduate and undergraduate students at a major U.S. university worked with L&T’s designengineers at the Center for Excellence and Futuristic Design (CEFD) in conducting all thenecessary calculations to determine the annual cooling loads for each of the glass-frame-shadingcombinations. The goal was to tabulate all the necessary values and calculations into an Excelspread sheet and then develop a simple interface –using Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) –for L&T’s architects. The program accesses a hidden database that allows the architects tosimply select their desired values for
. She served as the founding Director of the Rose-Hulman Center for the Practice and Scholarship of Education, and is currently the Associate Dean of Learning & Technology as well as a founding member of the team that annually delivers Rose-Hulman’s ’Making Academic Change Happen’ workshop. Kay C has received a number of awards for teaching, research, and mentoring, including the Louisiana ”Professor of the Year” award from the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, a CA- REER award from the National Science Foundation, the Tulane University ”Inspirational Undergraduate Professor” award; the Tulane University President’s Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching; the Graduate Alliance for
Mathematics (STEM) Approach. Sense Publishers. 2013. 4. T. Barrett, M. Pizzico, B. Levy, and R. Nagel, “A review of university maker spaces,” in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2015. 5. V. Wilczynski, “Designing the Yale center for engineering innovation and design,” http://venturewell.org/open2014/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/wilczynski.pdf. 6. P. Bilkstein, Digital Fabrication and ’Making’ in Education: The Democratization of Invention. Bielefeld: Transcript Publishers, 2013. 7. B. O’Connell, “Going from curious to maker: New user experiences in a university makerspace,” VentureWell, 2015. 8. L. E. Carlson and J. F. Sullivan, “Hands-on engineering: Learning by doing in the
Conference on Neural Networks. His research interests are: applications of neural networks, fuzzy logic controllers, and design of fuzzy logic controllers for industrial applicationsDr. Mequanint A. Moges, University of Houston, College of Technology (CoE & CoT) Mequanint Moges earned his Ph.D. from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. He received his B.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Addis Ababa in Ethiopia and M.Sc. degree in Communication Systems from the University of New South Wales in Australia. His research interests are in the areas of wireless sensor networking, load scheduling in parallel and distributed systems and
, problem-solving,design, project execution and management skills to real-life civil and environmental engineeringproblems. The capstone experience has morphed over the past 20 years from a single projectcompleted by the entire graduating class in small teams to multiple projects with separatestakeholders for each capstone team. The current structure is a two-course sequence thatincorporates several pedagogical approaches to help students apply and hone their professionalskills. Standardized or common grading rubrics, guidance, and assessment tools have beendeveloped and used uniformly by all capstone groups under the direction of faculty advisors and acourse coordinator. These guidelines include mandatory weekly progress meetings with
(2nd ed.). Oxford Press. 4. Leidig, P. A. & Oakes, W. C. (2021-a). Model for Project-Based Community Engagement. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.24908/ijsle.v16i2.14809 5. Howe, S., and J. Goldberg. (2019). Engineering capstone design education: Current practices, emerging trends, and success strategies. In Design education today: Technical contexts, programs and best practices, edited by D. Schaefer, G. Coates, and C. Eckert. Springer.6. Leidig, P. A., Khalifah, S. M. & Oakes, W. C. (2023). Capstone design in engineering community engagement course. Journal of Civil Engineering
and therefore is potentially very useful in careers of the students post graduation. Specific lab activities were developed to help students learn the program. In the firstthree years of the curriculum development (2013 - 2015), an introductory SW lab utilizedtutorials native to SW. Students completed the tutorials in a computer lab with help from theinstructors and teaching assistants (TAs), and then they practiced their new skills by creating apart according to the information provided in an ASTM standard. In 2016, a new SWIntroductory Lab was developed specially to teach the student the key tools and features that theyneed for labs and the design project. The students were also instructed to learn on their own withresources such as
desirable, especially where instructors model a correction andrequest that students themselves make the remaining corrections.In addition to asking students to revise based on instructor feedback, engaging in peer review canbe beneficial, especially for the peer-reviewer [6]. Likewise, written and oral feedback from apeer learning facilitator or graduate teaching assistant can help students learn [3], even withdifficult writing tasks such as argumentation and synthesis [23].In the current study, we consider different variants of feedback-and-revision, as implemented bythree different engineering faculty in laboratory courses.MethodologyStudy design & research questionsIn this study, we developed and evaluated the impact of a collaborative
graduation rates. Available at https://www.sariweb.ucdavis.edu/gradrates/CSRDE_Transfers_ForWebDisplay.pdf.[6] P. Golding, O.H. Salcedo, M.T. Pitcher, O.A. Perez, M. Olmos and T.Badillo, (2015) “Sharing Best Practices Toward Seamless Transfer of Engineering Students.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education’s 122nd Annual Conference and Exposition.[7] P. Wong and B. Pejcinovic, (2015) “Teaching MATLAB and C Programming in First-year Electrical Engineering Courses Using a Data Acquisition Device.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education’s 122nd Annual Conference and Exposition.[8] T.M. Bayles, (2016) “A Chemical Engineering Success Course for Transfer Students
fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on engineering as an innovation in P-12 education, policy of P-12 engineering, how to support teachers and students’ academic achievements through engineering, the measurement and support of the change of ’engineering habits of mind’ particularly empathy and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning. Page 24.528.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Enhancing the STEM Curriculum Through a Multidisciplinary Approach that Integrates Biology and Engineering
readiness levels of students in learningenvironments by integrating best practices that can address these issues in the context of SEcourse work.We create a clear case for change within the SE education pedagogy, and a research method toachieve the objective is outlined. The SE course curricula, current standards, and intendedlearning outcomes are examined which enables us to outline the changes required.Recommendations and suggested methods to help close the gaps are outlined.IntroductionMany industrial and academic oriented studies have examined software developmentperformance over the last 30 years. Theoretic and practice oriented experts recognize that severalreasons exist for the sub-optimal performance. While much of the failure can be
2and Chemical processes/Industries will be part of this job loss and gain [36]. Figure 1: Machine Current ReachBuilding AI architecture and acquiring skills needed for AI will help both the industry and engineersto keep innovating and solving problems. ML, deep learning (DL), and big data are important partsof AI. In chemical engineering, Al has been used in fault detection, chemical substance detection,modeling, optimization, and material design as a catalyst. Solving nonlinear function approximationand nonlinear classification problems in an automated manner, using the backpropagation learningalgorithm was a breakthrough that fostered much research in AI. The objectives of this paper are toexplain AI in
Paper ID #27129Ethical Education in Engineering: A Pedagogical Proposal Based on Cogni-tive Neurosciences and Adaptative Complex SystemsDr. Luis Fernando CruzDr. Wilfrido A. Moreno, University of South Florida Wilfrido Moreno received his BSEE, M.S.E.E & Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Uni- versity of South Florida (USF), Tampa – Florida in 1983, 1985 and 1993 respectively. He is currently a Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering at the University of South Florida, Tampa – Florida. Dr. Moreno is a founding member of the former Center for Microelectronics Research, (CMR- 1988), which is
has received numerous national and international awards. He is an elected Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Management and serves as an Associate Editor for the Engineering Management Journal . Prior to his academic career, Schell spent 14 years in industry where he held leadership positions focused on process improvement and organizational development.Dr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University Bryce E. Hughes is an Associate Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University. His research interests encompass diversity and equity in engineering education, with a focus on LGBTQ students. He was recently awarded an NSF CAREER grant to study the experiences of LGBTQ under- graduates in
CT in K-12 and higher education. From this effort, over 20different definitions and frameworks for CT have emerged. Although the availability of literatureon CT has been increasing over the last decade, there is limited research synthesis available onassessing CT better. Besides, it is known that in higher education designing assessments for CT ischallenging and one of the primary reasons is that the precise meaning of CT is still unknown.This research paper, therefore, presents a systematized literature review on CT frameworks andassessment practice. We search three different databases and review 19 journal articles that addressCT assessment in higher education to answer the following two research questions: 1) What doesthe literature
level course.OPSE 301 and 402, which include integrated laboratory components, are intended for upperlevelundergraduates. OPSE 601, which emphasizes small group projects in each faculty member'sresearch lab, is designed for advanced undergraduate and new graduate students. Detailed courseand laboratory descriptions may be found at URL:http//www.njit.edu/Directory/Centers/OPSE.I. MotivationA 1994 NSF workshop on "Optical Science and Engineering: New Directions and Opportunitiesin Research and Education" recommended an emphasis in optics research and education because Page 2.119.1"Optical Science and Engineering is an enabling technology--that is, a
support their arguments on a particular case. Open-ended discussion and electronicdialogues have also been effective and beneficial because they stimulate debates while thestudents are exploring various ethical issues in their independent coursework.3 Electronicdialogues provide a forum to extend the debates beyond the regular class time.3Even though students have been exposed to the library research during their freshman designExperience, without intervention they tend to rely more on freely available web sites to obtainsupporting material for their assignments and debates. The Drexel Engineering Curriculum(tDEC) design program for freshman involves about 600 students in approximately 120 teamsworking on different design projects. While
Paper ID #43480Board 247: ECE-WisCom: Enhancing Student Performance and Persistencethrough a Wisdom CommunityDr. Hilda Cecilia Contreras Aguirre, New Mexico State University Hilda Cecilia Contreras Aguirre, EdD is a STEM education researcher at New Mexico State University. She focuses her research on qualitative/mixed methods studies addressing minority and underrepresented student college performance and persistence through high-impact practices, particularly in STEM disciplines. Her main lines of inquiry examine best practices in mentoring and promotion of undergraduate research in STEM. She also collaborates with the