talks at a Center-sponsored, all-day summer research symposium whichincluded participants from the Center’s other summer research experiences, includingundergraduates, veterans, and high school students.Design of the Evaluation Program Evaluation methods focused on gathering data to measure the following RET outcomes: ● Knowledge of sensorimotor neural engineering skill sets, including knowledge of careers in neural engineering, knowledge of innovative practices in neural engineering, and knowledge of the role of neuroethics in neural engineering. ● Perspectives of program structure and impacts, student learning, and teachers’ own professional development. The evaluation was designed and conducted by the Center for
concept for a deployable building, further exposes students toadvanced geometric configuration and visualization procedures.Advanced tools for the study and visualization of complex architectural and structuralsystems, such as parametric form development and advanced visualization procedures,including kinematic simulations are gradually added to the material covered by the course.In addition, students are introduced to new research on computer visualization methods,and on geometrically changing structures, conducted in academic research centers worldwide.b) Strengthen interdisciplinary approach to design projects Deployable structures in general, and tensegrity structures in particular, offer an idealexample, where geometric configuration needs
Paper ID #42584Board 235: Design and Implementation of a Professional Development Coursefor Interdisciplinary Computational Science Graduate StudentsProf. Satchi Venkataraman, San Diego State University Satchi Venkataraman, Ph.D., is a Professor of Aerospace Engineering. He has served as Graduate Advisor for the Aerospace Engineering program (17 years) and as an Associate Director at the Computational Sciences Research Center at San Diego State University (11 years). His expertise is in computational mechanics and optimization applied to design of lightweight and durable composite aircraft structures. He has extensive
Conference & ExpositionCopyright @ 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”Engineering Ethics Workshop: The ERC offers a very popular workshop onengineering ethics to provide the students with resources for understanding andaddressing ethically significant problems that arise in their research and their work asprofessional engineers.Communications Workshop: The communications workshop offered to the REUstudents each year includes communication skills involving poster making andpresentations, writing abstracts and papers, resume and cover letter writing. The mostpopular portion of the workshop is a segment on best practices for presenting scientificmaterial to various audiences.Engineering Graduate School Seminar: At the beginning of the
Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. He currently serves as the Graduate Program Chair for the Engineering Education Systems and Design Ph.D. program. He is also the immediate past chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and an associate editor for the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for Engineering Education and Outreach.Dr. Medha Dalal, Arizona State University Medha Dalal is a postdoctoral scholar in
and oral communications skills and should therefore beinvestigated further for these outcomes.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work funded by a grant received from the Engineering InformationFoundation.The authors would like to thank Dr. Eric Beckman, who co-instructed the two class sections ofthe Introduction to Chemical Product Design course. The authors would also like to thank andacknowledge the support received from the University of Pittsburgh Engineering EducationResearch Center (EERC) and the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering.References1. Proske, A., Roscoe, R., & McNamara, D. (2014). Game-based practice versus traditional practice in computer- based writing strategy training: effects on motivation
) at Montana State University hosted a three-yearResearch Experience for Teachers Program in Innovative Transportation Systems (ITS-RET)during the summers of 2018, 2019, and 2021. WTI is a multidisciplinary research center focusedon rural transportation challenges and solutions. The research projects spanned a variety of topicareas including sustainable infrastructure materials and design; transportation design andoperations for safe, active, and livable communities; and advanced transportation technologies.The overarching theme was on rural applications. Similarly, the recruitment of programparticipants targeted teachers from rural, geographically isolated schools with presumably morelimited access to professional development and hands-on
is part of the development team for Clarkson’s First Year Engineering/Interdisciplinary course described in this paper. Her current research interests include the implementation and evaluation of evidence-based effective learning practices in STEM education, environmental education, and energy education.Dr. John C. Moosbrugger, Clarkson University John C. Moosbrugger, PhD, is a Professor of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering and Associate Dean for Academic Programs for the Wallace H. Coulter School of Engineering at Clarkson University.Prof. Peter R Turner, Clarkson University Currently Dean of Arts & Sciences having previously served as Chair of Mathematics and Computer Science, and before that on the
proven theories and effective practices for instilling global competence. Most programs are thoughtfully designed and carefully implemented, but they are seldom rigorously and scientifically evaluated for their educational impact. Does learning a second language really matter? How long and what kinds of international experiences are best? Should international coursework be required? What subjects are needed and when should they be taken? Increasing the knowledge base of proven theories and effective practices for instilling global competence in engineering graduates, indeed all graduates, needs to be a major priority [p. 41].These problems in the current efforts in preparing students for the global
Engineering from Alfred Univer- sity, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. He currently serves as the Graduate Program Chair for the Engineering Education Systems and Design Ph.D. program. He is also the immediate past chair of the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN) and an associate editor for the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE). Prior to joining ASU he was a graduate student research assistant at the Tufts’ Center for
Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The DeFINE Program: A Clinical Immersion for Biomedical Needs Identification I. IntroductionThere is a need for biomedical engineering students to more fully engage in the problemidentification and needs-finding stages of the biomedical device design process throughexperiential learning and immersive experiences. Many publications have documented theimportance of immersion outcomes in design, technology commercialization, and overall studentlearning.Kline et al. documents eight best practices for technology commercialization projects that fosterinnovation education and fit a variety of innovation stages that might vary per student design.1Zappe et al. agrees
Paper ID #13507Integration of academic advising into a first-year engineering design courseand its impact on psychological constructsDr. William H Guilford, University of Virginia Will Guilford is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He is also the Undergraduate Program Director for Biomedical Engineering, and the Associate Dean for On- line Innovation. He received his B.S. in Biology and Chemistry from St. Francis College in Ft. Wayne, Indiana and his Ph.D. in Physiology from the University of Arizona. Will did his postdoctoral training in Molecular Biophysics at the University of
. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She enjoys serving as a ”communication coach” to students throughout the curriculum, and she’s especially excited to work with first year and senior students, as well as engineering project teams, as they navigate the more open-ended communication decisions involved in describing the products of open-ended design scenarios.Mark Mills, UM, Center for Academic Innovation Mark Mills is a Data Scientist with the Center for Academic Innovation at the University of Michigan. He is responsible for leading analysis across the Center in support of its mission to leverage data for shaping
engineering design. Frameworks centering GIDBEA, namely inclusive design,universal design, and design justice were introduced, challenging students to consider howtechnical and emergent biases arise in their work as engineers and educators [21]. UGTAs wereplaced into small groups of approximately UGTAs to discuss the following questions: • How do you define the practice of design? • Think about who is designing for whom. How and why does this matter? • What are examples of bias and exclusions in engineering design?With an introduction to these design frameworks, UGTAs then analyzed engineering projectsthat applied the above frameworks using asset-based community development and participatorydesign. This discussion then led to a reflection
degree program will be designed to prepare the recipient for a career in engineeringeducation at the undergraduate or post-graduate level. Students with expertise in qualitative andquantitative research methods will be well-positioned to work for K-12 schools, communitycolleges, and universities as well as other nonprofit and for-profit organizations (includingtesting organizations, foundations, governmental organizations, etc.) as faculty members,researchers, assessment and accreditation coordinators, policy makers, program officers,curriculum designers, corporate trainers, and directors of teaching/learning centers, diversityprograms, or outreach programs.Students pursing a Ph.D. in engineering education will be advised by a graduate
Jacobs Excellence in Education Award, 2002 Jacobs Innovation Grant, 2003 Distinguished Teacher Award, and 2012 Inaugural Distinguished Award for Excellence in the cate- gory Inspiration through Leadership. Moreover, he is a recipient of 2014-2015 University Distinguished Teaching Award at NYU. In 2004, he was selected for a three-year term as a Senior Faculty Fellow of NYU-SoE’s Othmer Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies. His scholarly activities have included 3 edited books, 7 chapters in edited books, 1 book review, 55 journal articles, and 109 conference papers. He has mentored 1 B.S., 16 M.S., and 4 Ph.D. thesis students; 31 undergraduate research students and 11 under- graduate senior design project teams
students need for four individual assignments and two group assignments. In theinterest of clarity for the user, the guide does not include specific resources for all assignmentsthat occur throughout the semester. Instead, the team identified the best candidates forbibliographic instruction relative to timing during the semester, the knowledge practices neededto complete an assignment, and skills needed across the entire course (see Appendix 2). Forexample, the course coordinator had identified poor student performance in using crediblesources as a major problem, so identifying sources and assessing credibility is emphasizedthroughout the redesigned Research Guide.Tabs were created for individual assignments as follows:• Review of an engineering
faculty enhance the content of undergraduate educationin ways that will better prepare tomorrow's graduates for careers in a global environment and,to have faculty observe the Boeing environments, processes, and procedures with ‘freshperspectives.’ Faculty will use their expertise to help identify areas for possible improvementsand document their observations at Boeing.” Overall, the program was very valuable for meprofessionally. Boeing also received valued feedback on their operations. Some of theFellows’ observations led to constructive suggestions offered to help the Welliver programprocess improve. The paper will also outline how the Welliver program has impacted myteaching in my subsequent courses and how I am able to share my experiences
serves as Director of the Center for Research in SEAD Education at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Dr. Donna M Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Donna Riley is Kamyar Haghighi Head of the School of Engineering Education and Professor of Engi- neering Education at Purdue University
associated with Penn State and Virginia Tech. She earned her BA from Stanford University and an MBA from Northeastern University.Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group Thema Monroe-White is a senior evaluation and research consultant at SageFox Consulting Group. Thema worked as a researcher and evaluator in the areas of mental health, STEM education and commercializa- tion. She has taught in the K-12 environment, served as an instructor and invited guest lecturer for courses in leadership, statistics and cross-cultural psychology at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Thema completed her Master’s Degree in Developmental Psychology at Howard University and her PhD in Sci- ence, Technology and Innovation Policy at
attempt at providing a critical experience, with perhapsan economic and time-commitment advantage over a summer-long internship or a global designexperience.After considering the different ways that students understand human-centered design, andconsidering different approaches for providing learning experiences that help students learnhuman-centered design, we need appropriate assessment methods to measure students’understanding of human-centered design if we are going to answer the question: can a week-longimmersive design experience impact students’ understanding of design?InstrumentOur research group previously developed and pilot-tested a design task as a tool for eliciting astudent’s understanding of human-centered design [17]. In another
AC 2012-3761: CAPSTONE DESIGN FACULTY MOTIVATION: MOTIVA-TIONAL FACTORS FOR TEACHING THE CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSEAND MOTIVATIONAL INFLUENCES ON TEACHING APPROACHESCory A. Hixson, Virginia Tech Cory A. Hixson is a graduate student in engineering education at Virginia Tech. Previous experience is in audio/visual engineering and K-12 math/science education. His research interests are in faculty motiva- tion, entrepreneurship, design education, K-12 engineering/STEM education, and research to practice in engineering educationDr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center
to Chinese officials and Tibetan villagers to ascertain what direction the programshould take to best support the target community. The travel team then would conduct on-siteassessment tasks and build a solid foundation for continued program implementation.The Tufts student chapter of EWB is strongly controlled by its students. Students must assumethe leadership role in project development, design, implementation and funding. Engineeringstudents took the technical lead in developing three preliminary designs of select components (asdetermined by the sponsor) of the project: a water quality assessment process, solardecontamination of medical wastes (via a modified solar cooker), and construction of acomposting latrine. Originally, the goal of
engineering design. This fosters social justice by creating individual andcommunity opportunity and redirectors the authority to design and create solutions tomarginalized learners. This study clarifies how engineering education, grounded in ourexperience in two refugees camp, can foster self-reliance in displacement by empoweringdisplaced students. Thus, this paper investigates both engineering education and social justice indisplacement and looks for places where the fields contribute to each other. In doing so, weinvestigate the following research question: How does localized engineering in displacement(LED) empower tertiary learners in displacement to become socially engaged?Research background Education is considered a critical element
Paper ID #44183Development and Impact of Research Efficacy in a Undergraduate Teaching-AssistantCertification ClassDr. Jamie R Gurganus, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Jamie Gurganus is a faculty member in the Engineering and Computing Education Program. She is the Associate Director STEMed Research in the College of Engineering and Information Technology (COEIT). She also serves as the Director for the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL) in the graduate school. Her research is focused on solving problems relating to educating and developing engineers, teachers (future faculty
innovative mind in order to be inserted in and to keep up withthe work market. Knowledge in Basic Sciences, Basic Sciences of Engineering and Specifics ofEngineering are fundamental for the training of an engineer. However, the insertion in labormarket sometimes demands some practice or experience that should also be provided by theengineering schools. Taking this into account, the Engineering Education Research Team ofCOPEC – Science and Education Research Council has designed and is implementing a programfor an engineering school which main goal is to prepare engineers for the future work market, theengineer for the future. The idea was born due to the very competitive environment thatEngineering Schools are facing recently and the fact that fewer
University of Ulster in Northern Ireland, M.Sc. (1995) in research methods in psychology from the University of Strathclyde in Scotland and a Ph.D. (2003) in psychology from South Bank University, London. She is currently Project Manager for the MemphiSTEP project at the University of Memphis,a project funded by the National Science Foundation, designed to increase the number of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics graduates. She is also a Co-PI on the Transforming a Civil Engineering curriculum through Geographic Information Systems Project at the University of Memphis, also funded by the National Sci- ence Foundation. Best has an extensive research background and served as lead researcher on a range of
, their workersare forced to adopt complex understanding and problem solving skills in technical areas.However, research pertaining to worker preparedness indicates that colleges and universities arenot adequately preparing graduates for this new work environment (Wieman, 2008)24.Manufacturing has become a field where global view and technical savvy are desirous qualitiesfor all persons involved. Since the 1980’s, manufacturing has undergone significant changes inoperational costs and product quality. The lean mangers of the 20th century are now retiring andthere are not enough new lean experts to lead US manufacturing into the next 20 years (Linford,2007)13.BackgroundResearch surrounding instructional design models has found that effective
identified by our team as having a significantwriting component. The second survey, hereafter referred to as the department survey, was givento faculty having key department administrative roles in every engineering department of theuniversity. Both surveys contained multiple-choice, select-all-that-apply, rate-on-a-scale, andshort-answer questions. The instructor survey consisted of four sections: i) participants’perceptions of writing within their discipline and expectations for their students after graduation,ii) instructional practices and assignment design related to writing, iii) participants’ perceptionsof challenges related to writing instruction, and iv) participants’ current best practices. Thesurvey contained 30 questions and took
theme centered in student learning of engineering design thinking on the secondary level. Nathan was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruc- tion. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher.Prof. Rebecca Kramer-Bottiglio, Yale University Rebecca Kramer-Bottiglio is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science at Yale University. She completed her B.S. at the Johns Hopkins University, M.S. at U.C. Berkeley, and Ph.D. at