Crystal City, Virginia
April 14, 2019
April 14, 2019
April 22, 2019
Diversity and Learning Spaces, Pedagogy & Curriculum Design
CoNECD Track: Gender CoNECD Keywords: Race/Ethnicity, Gender, Disability, LGBTQIA+
Often in diversity and inclusion research, the goal is to represent the perspectives of those who are ‘not at the table,’ but seldom do research methods provide the participants an actual seat ‘at the table.’ Informed by a participatory action research approach, we partnered with study participants, positioning them as our co-researchers. Together, we employed an unconference (also known as an Open Space Technology workshop) as a research method in order to elevate the voices of study participants, provide space for them to create a meaningful network, and maximize their collective expertise. Unconferences are gatherings that have no pre-set agenda; instead participants are convened around a central theme and the agenda is collaboratively designed by the attendees. This open-ended structure allows participants to initiate sessions on topics that matter to them; engage in inquiry, reflection, and learning; and develop plans, recommendations, and a record of the proceedings as the process unfolds.
In the context of a research study, an unconference poses a high risk, high reward situation. The researcher/facilitator has very little control over the direction of the event and the types of data produced (i.e., high risk), whereas giving participants ownership and control generates insights that may be impossible to gather using other research methods (i.e., high reward). In June 2018, we held the ‘Unconference on Making Liberatory Spaces,’ bringing together representatives from diverse, inclusive, liberatory maker spaces from around the country to share their organizations’ stories and exchange best practices regarding inclusion of diverse populations in maker spaces. In this paper, we will share our planning process and the lessons we learned through planning and hosting our unconference — including event planning decisions, recruitment of participants, facilitation techniques, data collection methods, and IRB procedures — and discuss how an unconference could be employed by other researchers, especially those exploring emerging topics.
Masters, A. S., & McNair, L. D., & Riley, D. M. (2019, April), High Risk (With Hope For) High Reward: Lessons Learned from Planning and Hosting an Unconference Paper presented at 2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity , Crystal City, Virginia. https://peer.asee.org/31768
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2019 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015