University’s Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence and Educational Innovation, where he consults with faculty, graduate students, and post-docs to design, implement, and assess research projects that relate to teaching and learning in their classrooms. He also contributes to a variety of program-level assessment projects on the CMU campus. Mike’s training includes an M.A. and Ph.D. in Social Psychology from the University of New Hampshire, as well as an M.Ed. in sport and performance psychology from Springfield College. His interests include the science of learning, research methodology, and data analysis. Prior to joining the Eberly Center in 2017, Mike worked as the Teaching and Learning Research Coordinator at the Center
, usually on Monday. ● Reinforcement/Kahoot! – The students would be given extra practice problems that are similar to in-class examples and homework problems to reinforce the concepts. Occasionally these problems would be administered through Kahoot! with prizes for students who performed best. ● Test Prep - Mock exams and timed challenge problems, usually given within the week before a major exam in engineering or math.The fall quarter provided the students with thirty-five SI session opportunities with winter andspring providing twenty-five and twenty-three, respectively. Over the full academic year,seventy-nine two-hour sessions were made available to the students with thirteen (spring) tofourteen (fall and winter) students
experimental group. The approach for this subject, detailed in Mora et al.23, was based on projects with the aim of performing a final measure at the laboratory. Familiarization of students with the concepts needed for performing the Page 24.1029.6 final practice was achieved through applying challenge based learning (CBL) where students had research for finding creative answers to several questions relating their subject.• In the third experience a complete implementation was adopted, affecting all matters and every enrolled student. In this case, the approach was mainly problem-based, as students had to
the way inclusion is culti- vated in engineering through the implementation of novel technologies and methodologies in engineering education. Intrigued by the intersections of engineering education, mental health and social justice, Dr. Coley’s primary research interest focuses on virtual reality as a tool for developing empathetic and in- clusive mindsets among engineering faculty. She is also interested in hidden populations in engineering education and innovation for more inclusive pedagogies.Katreena Thomas, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Katreena Thomas is a graduate student at Arizona State University in the Engineering Education Systems and Design Doctoral program. She is a member of the
National Science Foundation Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (NSF IUSE) program.REFERENCES[1] D. Wood, H. Marie, F. Aqlan, J. Brockman, K. L. Meyers, and D. Lapsley, "Replicating a Community-Engaged Educational Ecosystem: First Year Findings," presented at the American Society of Engineering Education, Baltimore, MD, June 25-28, 2023, 2023.[2] "The state of American jobs," ed: Pew Research Center, Washington, District of Columbia, 2016.[3] L. Cancado, J. Reisel, and C. Walker, "Impacts of a Summer Bridge Program in Engineering on Student Retention and Graduation," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 19, no. 2, 2018.[4] D. Wood, A. Gura, and J. Brockman, "Critical Findings in the Development of the Community
software, Distributor Sales and Branch Management, and Transportation Logistics. His research interests include improvement of supply chain efficiency through the application of technology and best practices for logistics and in- ventory management. Dr. Angolia is highly engaged with regional and national companies in recruiting students from ECU for both internships and full time positions. In addition to a PhD from Indiana State, he holds a Master of Engineering degree from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and professional certifica- tions of CPIM and CSCP from APICS, The Association for Operations Management, and a PMP from the Project Management Institute. Dr. Angolia also conducts consulting projects and
pervasive computing of the IoT. There is a growing imperative to incorporate cybersecuritytraining for both cyber-physical systems (CPS) and IoT technologies into EE education. Astechnologies like smart grids, control systems, and IoT devices become increasingly integral toindustrial innovation, it is essential to educate future engineers on designing, analyzing, andsecuring these systems against cyber threats. Recognizing and addressing vulnerabilities ininterconnected smart grid systems and IoT networks is crucial for maintaining security andeffectiveness. Ensuring the security and IoT networks is paramount, as vulnerabilities in theseinterconnected systems can have far-reaching consequences. To meet this demand, variousinnovative approaches and
. Solnosky is also a licensed Professional Engineer in PA. Ryan’s research interests include: integrated structural design methodolo- gies and processes; Innovative methods for enhancing engineering education; and high performing wall enclosures. These three areas look towards the next generation of building engineering, including how systems are selected, configured and designed.Prof. M. Kevin Parfitt, Pennsylvania State University M. Kevin Parfitt is an award winning teacher in the Department of Architectural Engineering at Penn State. He has over 38 years experience teaching courses ranging from Freshman Seminar to the 5th-Year Senior Thesis (Capstone experience). He is also the AE faculty coordinator for the annual AE
Center for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching (CEUT). With the support of the Provost’s Office and CEUT, she is directing the Earth Sustainability project and the Living in the 21st Century liberal education program. The Earth Sustainability project is a holistic learning program that is designed to foster student intellectual development within a learning community. Dr. Bekken has a Ph.D. from Stanford University.Sean McGinnis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Sean McGinnis is the Director of the Virginia Tech Green Engineering Program and a research faculty jointly appointed in Materials Science and Engineering and Biological Systems Engineering. Dr. McGinnis
Technologies and Systems (CTS), 2016 International Conference on, 2016, pp. 158–164.[3] Institute of Education Sciences, DOE and National Science Foundation, “Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development,” Aug. 2013.[4] J. Kim-Han, “Leadership and Innovation: Social Networks for Change,” The Claremont Graduate University, 2016.[5] R. E. West, “What Is Shared? A Framework for Understanding Shared Innovation within Communities,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 315–332, 2009.[6] B. Oldenburg and K. Glanz, “Diffusion of Innovations,” in Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice, 4th ed., K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, and K. Viswanath, Eds. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2008.[7] A. L
specialists had 89,500jobs in 2016, with 10-year job outlook of 11% growth; this is better than EnvE at 53,800 jobsand 8% growth rate [33, 34]. However, there are many more degree programs and graduates inEnvSci, increasing competition for those jobs. As well, EnvE graduates can often take EnvScijobs, should they choose to do so.Thus, previous research points to a variety of factors that impact students decisions about whichcollege majors they choose to enroll in, and factors that may impact their persistence. However,it is unclear the extent to which these factors are important to the pathways of students withinitially strong interests in both environmental issues and engineering. In particular, there is alack of strong information about persistence
financial need who arepursuing associate, baccalaureate, or graduate degrees in STEM. It also helps the institutionsdevelop and implement activities that support their recruitment, retention and graduation in STEM[7]. Many institutions have applied funds from this program either exclusively or along with otherfinancial resources to support academically talented low-income students.Although research supports the positive impact of financial support on recruitment, academicperformance, retention, and graduation rates of STEM students [6], [8]–[14], financial supportalone is not enough for student success and retention. In one S-STEM program, scholars rankedthe program components in terms of importance to them remaining in a STEM major. Although itis
ASEE, she is a member of the First-year Programs Division, the Women in Engineering Division, the Educational Research and Meth- ods Division, and the Design in Engineering Education Division. She is also a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and is the Faculty Adviser for SWE at VT.Prof. Thomas D. Walker P.E., Virginia Tech Thomas Walker is currently First-year Director for the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Tech, where he has taught for 23 years. His area of interest is innovation and reform in engineering education using appropriate educational technologies.Dr. Vinod K. Lohani, Virginia Tech Vinod Lohani is a professor at Virginia Tech’s Engineering Education Department. His research
), Director of BrazilianNetwork of Engineering (RBE/SP), Secretary of Santos region of SBPC - Brazilian Association for theAdvancement of Science, Former Dean of International Relations of SENAC School of Engineering andTechnology, Former Head of Department and Graduation Coordinator of University Center of Lusiada, FormerCouncilor of Urban Development City Council (CMDU), Former Councilor of Economics Development CityCouncil (CMDE). He is Member of IGIP (International Society for Engineering Education), SEFI (EuropeanSociety for Engineering Education), INTERTECH (International Council for Engineering and TechnologyEducation) and ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education). Dr. Claudio da Rocha Brito has received a
. Developing master’s degrees in areas at the intersection of industry needs to generate employability and student interest. 3. Developing innovative and fun learning spaces and experiences for students (and faculty) to gain knowledge, practice skills and develop institutional values. 4. Implementing a continuous quality improvement culture, and assessing outcomes to grow and expand. 5. Drawing students capable and interested in completing an engineering degree, particularly underrepresented minorities and women who, for a multitude of reasons unrelated to skill and ability, are choosing other paths. 6. Offering a learning experience that is more engaging and responsive to student learning styles (mix of
(traditional ‘apprentice model’) research capstone experiences.ii. Introduction to Engineering.Offered for the first time this year, this course leverages evidence-based practices fromengineering education to engage students in hands-on experiences and learning, modeled on thesuccessful coffee-based class pioneered at UC Davis [57] and used at several other universities(Tufts University, 2020; Virginia Commonwealth University, 2020). It is intended to enhancestudent retention, as seen in other well-designed first year engineering courses [58], [59]. Inaddition to providing students a glimpse into the various concepts in engineering, the course wasdeveloped to create a sense of community and also provide a support structure for studentswanting to
logistics to reach out to more students.” R.P., a recent chemical engineering graduate shares,“Disability inclusion programs have been a huge part of my C.R., a graduate in environmental science reveals, “Atcareer, mainly due to the people I have met, the network I the Access Technology Center at the University ofhave formed, and the opportunities I had to learn/grow. Washington, the accessible-computing guru showed meThey have allowed me opportunities to connect deeply with scads of accessible-computing tools, which was comfortingindividuals in my fields of interest to really learn what I because I don’t know how I’ll use a computer with all theneeded to in order to succeed. For example, the USBLN's
an Associate Professor of Higher, Adult and Lifelong Education at MSU. She was the project and curriculum coordinator for an NSF Combined Research and Development Project. Dr. Amey was a team leader on an NSF project to identify best practices in undergraduate engineering, mathematics, and science education. She studies administration and leadership in post-secondary education, organizational change, and systemic reform.We use these brief case descriptions because they represent well do cumented case studiesdiscussed and analyzed in past national, state and local workshops moderated by the authors (seeBibliography for more details).Case I—Innovative Course DevelopmentA regional university has an accredited engineering program
“Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright . 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”7. Kenny S. S.: The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities; Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching8. The Action Agenda for Engineering Curriculum Innovation Program; National Science Foundation, Directorate of Engineering, Division of Engineering Education Centers (NSF 99- 169)9. Wulff W.A.: The Urgency of Engineering Education Reform; ASEE 2002 Conference Plenary Address.10. Hoit M
the portfolio for thepurposes of grading. Also, students readily see the value of cultivating their leadership skills,and therefore student buy-in is high.IntroductionIt has been widely emphasized that the engineer of today and of the future needs much more thantechnical competence to successfully face the challenges and opportunities of a globalized,competitive economy. James J. Duderstadt, director of the University of Michigan’s MilleniumProject, a research center that explores the impact of emerging technologies on society, said “Inaddition to analytic skills, which are well provided by the current education system, companieswant engineers with passion, some systems thinking, an ability to innovate, an ability to work in
number refusing to make the needed effort.8. Assignments where students must explore far outside what is covered in each course, including venturing into resource areas where we have not introduced any material.9. Multi-week assignments requiring innovation and conceptual design to set the context for engineering science work. In other words, the numbers are not conveniently given to allow formula substitution, but students have to think about magnitudes, find validating information and techniques to reduce uncertainty, and have a choice of methods.10. Usage of course material in the context of research projects and developing technical papers11. Long-term projects involving successive teams of undergraduates without loss of
mentioned above? Theauthor’s answer, based on her experiences from the last eight years of teaching at Elizabethtown College,has to do with the concept of the computing project and the way how these projects are created. 2Obviously, university students develop a taste for research, not only in practice-oriented issues, but also intheoretical concepts related to the respective project area. Their projects are comprehensive and thecomplexity involved is high. Usually, the number of projects is reduced to one per course and someinstructors do not even assign such projects in computing disciplines. The project results are due at theend of the
California Institute of Technology (GALCIT). (Note: in 1961 GALCIT was renamedthe Graduate Aeronautical Laboratory, keeping the acronym intact.) Stanford’s drivingforce in aeronautics research was Dr. William Durand. Durand managed to get Stanfordto build a wind tunnel suitable for testing propellers. As a result, some of the mostsignificant work for the NACA was being performed at Stanford. Stanford asked for$330,000 and received $195,000 which was funded simultaneously with Caltech so theschools would not compete for students if one received funds before the other. The University of Michigan was selected because of its advanced program inaeronautics. Aeronautics was its own department in 1916 and they were the first toaward degrees in
internship.Extramural/International Reach of the CurriculumThe curriculum that has been developed was designed to incorporate the necessary aspects ofmany fields and provide a comprehensive education for future tissue engineers. We believe thatthis new and innovative program in Tissue Engineering research may become a national modelfor interdisciplinary teaching in the field. Many of the co-authors of the curriculum serve asadvisors to NSF sponsored centers for engineering research and education and/or departmentalvisiting committee members at schools with significant NSF funding. Through formal andinformal presentations, the curriculum will be described and discussed. We believe the impact ofour proposed program will be high and far reaching.The incorporation
hundred ninety eight faculty members responded, across 119institutions, for an institutional response rate of 43%. All major engineering disciplines wererepresented.Findings from this study provide empirical evidence for the concern many engineering educationfaculty members have about how best to respond to evaluation expectations and opportunities.Although the McKenzie et al. study focuses on a specific component of engineering education,the capstone design course, it is reasonable to assume that faculty would respond similarly ifasked the same questions about other aspects of engineering education programs.The National Science Foundation (NSF) has provided powerful stimulus for renewal efforts inengineering education through competitive funding
size from 500 to small threshold(s) that actually reflect current demographics of small companies to include 5, 10-25 and 50 Maintain funding level for NSF-ATE programs and target additional funding for innovative Regional and National Centers in advanced manufacturing, to include significant funding for advanced manufacturing equipment and faculty training Sponsor a joint research project on the state of manufacturing education in coordination with the National Governors Association Adopt the metric systemState and Local Levels Encourage a deeper understanding of the role and economic impact of advanced manufacturing programs in K-12 education, especially with guidance counselors and
to increase renewable energy use in the Island. A contribution towards addressing part of the challenges facing PV energy is to reduce the time and costs related to administrative processes, interconnection, as well as addressing planning and zoning issues. As a follow-up to the ARET study Dr. O’Neill and Dr. Irizarry led a rooftop solar challenge project under DOE’s SunShot Initiative. Three graduate students and six undergraduate students participated in this project. The team identified, analyzed, and provided best practices that could overcome processing and planning obstacles that impede a faster growth of rooftop PV systems. All the recommendations presented in the final report would have a great impact on Puerto Rico’s PV market; for
Manufacturing & Mechanical Engineering Technology department at RIT. She serves as the Faculty Associate to the Provost for Women Faculty and is co-PI for RIT’s NSF ADVANCE project. Her research interests include: characterization of biodegradable plastics and environmental consideration in materials selection for production design, the impact of technology paired with active learning pedagogies on student learning, and effective strategies for increasing gender diversity in STEM disciplines.Prof. Maureen S. Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Maureen Valentine, P.E., has been a faculty member at RIT for more than 23 years. She held the position of Department Chair for the Department of Civil Engineering
from Dickinson College.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah E. Zappe is Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State University. In her current position, Dr. Zappe is re- sponsible for supporting curricular assessment and developing instructional support programs for faculty in the College of Engineering. In her research role, Dr. Zappe is interested in the integration of creativity into the engineering curriculum, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Dr. Zappe holds a doctorate in edu- cational psychology specializing in applied testing and measurement. Her measurement interests include the
of a Communication Lab (Comm Lab), a co-curricularintervention designed to provide peer-to-peer writing and communication support to engineeringand science students. At its core, the Comm Lab is a STEM-specific writing center wherestudents can meet face-to-face with a peer knowledgeable in their discipline to get feedback onSTEM writing and communication genres. On the organizational level, however, the Comm Labis distinguished by its emphasis on adaptation of structure and services to the desired institutionalcontext. Thus, our research asks which features of the Comm Lab can or should be adapted innew institutional contexts and which features must be retained across contexts to make iteffective. By answering this question for our specific