, courses tailored to enhancing pedagogical skills in such areasbecome valuable. As such, teacher professional development programs and courses that focus onteaching engineering with real-world problems emerge as catalysts for transformative teachingpractices. In the context of this study, we delve into a 3-hour graduate course entitledNanoEnvironmental Engineering for Teachers (NEET) offered free of cost at Rice University,Arizona State University, Yale University, and the University of Texas at El Paso under theNanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment(NEWT). The NEET class is designed for AP Environmental Science, Environmental Systems,Biology or Life Sciences, and K-12 STEM teachers to learn about water
also be used to assess ABET outcomes for communication and teamwork,indicating their use for assessing students’ abilities to apply technical knowledge to solveproblems collaboratively while also communicating those solutions effectively.Based on a 2013 review of engineering education scholarship, when faculty assigned teamprojects, they primarily targeted outcomes based in teamwork, design, and communication, withsome focus on innovation, lifelong learning, ethics, and motivation [8]. In a breakdown of theteamwork outcome, researchers found a focus on global/cultural competence (for both teammembers and clients), project management, and interdisciplinary teamwork, as well as somefocus on societal concerns, distributed teamwork, leadership
from the traditional productdevelopment process, which focuses on optimized designs for individual products. Productfamily planning places a much higher demand on management of information of multiple typesand from multiple sources. In response, researchers at four universities are collaborating on thedevelopment of an information technology infrastructure to support product platform planning.This is a relatively new development in engineering design that is typically not part of theundergraduate education; therefore, we see an intrinsic relationship between the need forintegrating the development of research directly with educational enhancements to teach studentsabout these concepts. This paper describes an undergraduate research/learning
focused on the design and implementation of a course using a student-led laboratory method which supports the development of authentic and courageous leaders. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 How Do Human Interaction Labs Contribute to Engineering Leadership Development?AbstractThis paper outlines the impact of a small group experiential learning course (Human InteractionLab) that cultivates authentic engagement between participants. Unlike many experientiallearning environments, this course is fundamentally learner-centered, where students designateboth the content of discussion and the norms that dictate
Engineering and for itsBachelor of Science in Computer Engineering for six years with no interim reports. Accordingto the University Dean for the College of Engineering, this is the best ABET accreditation that anengineering college can receive. As a result of the visit, CoE also intends to address the ABETquestion, paraphrased as: where to do you see your graduates three to five years beyondgraduation?To help address the above ABET question, CoE’s long-term vision is to graduate students whohave visionary leadership to create value and innovative solutions not only for themselves butalso for their employers and for the benefit of society.Based on the recent experience with entrepreneurial-minded learning (EML), CoE believes thisteaching approach
have not benefited from it [28]. It is not the purpose of this paper to revisit thislong history of tension between basic and applied research but to signal the push for ‘researchtranslation’ by development agencies like USAID, the emergence of certain forms of researchtranslation in academic circles (mainly as a translation of basic research into innovation andentrepreneurship), and the implications of these developments in the formation and training ofengineering graduate students committed to ECD.While some form of research translation can be implied from NSF’s broader impacts Criterion 2,the agency has struggled with the applicability of basic research throughout its history, as ‘basicresearch’ standing depends heavily on its alleged
Mechanical Engineering Technology Program. She holds a Ph.D. from Purdue University in Mechanical Engineering Technol- ogy, focus on Digital Manufacturing. Her research is focused on mechatronics, digital manufacturing, digital thread, cyber physical systems, broadening participation, and engineering education. She is a Co-Director of Mechatronics and Digital Manufacturing Lab at ODU and a lead of Area of Specializa- tion Mechatronics Systems Design. She worked as a Visiting Researcher at Commonwealth Center for Advanced Manufacturing in Disputanta, VA on projects focusing on digital thread and cyber security of manufacturing systems. She has funded research in broadening participation efforts of underrepresented
McKilligan, Iowa State University Dr. McKilligan is an Associate Professor of Industrial Design. She teaches design studios and lecture courses on developing creativity and research skills. Her current research focuses on identifying impacts of different factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different univer- sities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site
AC 2007-2793: CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION: CORE CAPABILITIES FOR 6 -12 ENGINEERING TEACHERSJohn Hansen, The University of Texas-Tyler John W. Hansen is a Professor of Technology at The University of Texas at Tyler. He is the Founder and Executive Director of the Ingenuity Center. The mission of the Ingenuity Center is to enhance the understanding of technological activity in individuals and organizations and to conduct research on the understanding of a technologically literate and creative citizenry. A graduate of the University of Minnesota, Dr. Hansen is active in developing the standards and instructional resources required to support the development of a technologically literate and
committee. The facilitator also reminded the committeemembers to be respectful of what is and was within the control of the advisory committee.The committee provided considerable input that was distilled to the following vision.Vision • Our University is the BEST place for women in engineering and computing because it leverages world class best practices to recruit, retain, and graduate women, setting alumni up for lifelong success. • On our journey to achieve equity for women, the Women’s Advisory Committee continues to be a resource to the administration, faculty, students, and graduates. • Recruitment Vision: Incoming classes in the college include women at world class levels of representation, • Retention Vision
of Graduate Professional Studies, Pennsylvania State University, where she concentrated on problem solving in science and engineering and completed her professional paper on the creative style of products of invention. Page 13.1094.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Sorting Out “Creativity” in Design AssessmentAbstractThis paper describes the early development of a practical framework for the assessment ofproducts of design that is aimed at resolving some of the confusion surrounding “creativity”within that field. In particular, key concepts from problem solving theory are used to
Paper ID #41143Motivating Students to Engage, Collaborate, and Persist with Classroom PodcastCreationDr. Thomas Lucas, Purdue University Dr. Lucas’ primary goal as a professor is to engage with students in the classroom and inspire them to develop their passion, understanding, and appreciation for STEM-based research and industry roles. This is accomplished by providing well-crafted and innovative learning experiences in engineering technology courses and through extracurricular outreach. His research background is in 3D (out-of-plane) micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) sensor and actuator design. His current teaching
educational efforts in pedagogical content knowledge are guided by a research theme centered in student learning of engineer- ing design thinking on the secondary level. Nathan was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Factors Impacting Engagement and Achievement in a First-Year Design Thinking
', Business Journal for Entrepreneurs, 2015 (2015).6 Entrepreneurship Education, 'A Guide for Educators', European Commission–DG Enterprise & Industry, Brussels (2013).7 Wendy EF Torrance, 'Entrepreneurial Campuses: Action, Impact, and Lessons Learned from the Kauffman Campuses Initiative', Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper (2013).8 Lara Hulsey, Linda Rosenberg, and Benita Kim, 'Seeding Entrepreneurship across Campus: Early Implementation Experiences of the Kauffman Campuses Initiative', Available at SSRN 981057 (2006).9 Alberta Charney, and Gary D Libecap, Impact of Entrepreneurship Education (Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership Kansas City, MO, 2000).10 Kwabena Nkansah
-mentoring. Incorporation of engineering design experiences across the undergraduatecurriculum with linkages to the university’s engineering innovation laboratory for access toindustry projects contributes to increased student retention and persistence to graduation.CASCADE uses promising practices from research to create a retention program that includesintegrated curriculum, peer-mentoring, learning communities, and efforts that build innovationand creativity into the engineering curriculum. CASCADE vertically aligns 32 problem-baseddesign efforts from the first-year to senior-year (capstone) courses. Research on engineeringstudent learning communities indicates increased retention and student satisfaction with theirfirst-year experience 18, 33
. Robin D Anderson, James Madison University Robin D. Anderson serves as the Academic Unit Head for the Department of Graduate Psychology at James Madison University. She holds a doctorate in Assessment and Measurement. She previously served as the Associate Director of the Center for Assessment and Research Studies at JMU. Her areas of research include assessment practice and engineering education research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Validating a Sustainable Design Rubric by Surveying Engineering Educators: Comparing Professional Viewpoints with Established Sustainability
Paper ID #40500Entrepreneurial Mindset & Innovative Thinking SkillsDr. Abdullah Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Dr. Abdullah Konak is a Distinguished Professor of Information Sciences and Technology at the Penn- sylvania State University, Berks. Dr. Konak also teaches graduate courses in the Master of Science in Cybersecurity Analytics and Operations program at the College of Information Sciences and Technology, Penn State World Campus. Dr. Konak’s primary research interest focuses on modeling, analyzing, and optimizing complex systems using computational intelligence combined with probability
demonstrations and inspiring new STEM majors.Another team studied the principles of solar photovoltaics and practiced installation ofthese systems, then went on to take the NABCEP solar installer certification exam with a63% pass rate. Students in the role of TAs for the Energy Academy and PREP oftenbecame interested in exploring teaching, and they could choose to take up a TeachingInternship which placed them in a local middle or high school classroom assisting a scienceor math teacher there.Longitudinal support for students in the program and for all those in a STEM major wasprovided through the MESA Study Center. MESA, for Mathematics, Engineering &Science Achievement, is an equity STEM transfer program at the heart of which is a StudyCenter open
assessmenthas a long history in higher education, with well-documented benefits to student motivation,knowledge retention, academic performance, and reflective and metacognitive skill development[48], [49], [20], [50]. The present paper provides an account of the design, implementation, andstudent reception of peer oral exams in an undergraduate computer programming course forengineers, and explores the potential educational benefits and dimensions of the assessmentpractice in relation to 21st-century skill development.Related research and practiceLearner-centered educationA push toward learner-centered education has been a signature of educational trends inpedagogical practice over the past two decades [7]–[9]. Instructional innovations
Research Scientist at the Stanford Center for Innovations in Learning (SCIL) and is a member of the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education Academic Pathways Study research team. Helen earned her PhD in Communication with a minor in Psychology from Stanford University in 1998. Her current research interests focus on the application of Folio Thinking pedagogy and practices in engineering education and the design and evaluation of social software and innovative learning spaces to support portfolio-related activities and student learning in higher education.Lorraine Fleming, Howard University Lorraine Fleming is professor and former Chair of the Department of Civil Engineering at
– The IOT PlatformThe Environmental Sensing Data Network (ESDN) [8] is an infrastructure and a service developed andmanaged by the Center for IOT Engineering and Innovation (CIEI) [9] within the department ofTechnology Systems in CET. The main mission of ESDN is to enable the concept of Campus as a Lab[10], a platform facilitating easy deployment and management of networked sensors, to facilitate datacollection and data analytics in support of research and education. ESDN was designed to accommodatefour specific use cases: 1. Users, scientists, and educators can deploy sensors that do not have wireless communications options. CIEI developed a small form factor communications shim which intermediates and processes communication
framework to integrate marketing’sfocus on the customer, research, information technology, and the core benefit into the innovationprocess with the engineer’s focus on function and technology. The contributions marketing andengineering make to each phase of the product innovation process are emphasized. The secondtheme is iteration and adaptation. As marketing and engineering develop information about theproduct and its potential market, the design and marketing plan must change. Suggestions aremade for improving the courses based on what has been learned and where the program is going.I. Introduction Before the winter2003 semester Engineering 610, Engineering Design, was taught nottaught with any links to a marketing course. The course
recent graduates’experiences as well as those of other difficult-to-access, perhaps underexplored, populations ofengineers. Introduction and BackgroundSchool-to-work transitionsResearch on engineering practice has emerged as a major focus within the engineering educationcommunity (Korte, Brunhaver, & Sheppard, 2015; Lutz, 2017; Stevens, Johri, & O’Connor, 2014).And while engineering degree programs are designed to prepare graduates for the realities ofmodern practice, research suggests that a significant gap remains between what engineers aretaught in school and what they do at work (Korte, 2011).An important aspect of engineering practice, then, involves the school-to-work transition for
reference.They then design a poster discussing their research into the assigned topic. While MRS providesa PowerPoint Poster template, there is no specific format for the poster and students areencouraged to present their material that best fits their research. Students are also encouraged toremember that posters are a visual experience so font size, organization, and graphics are allimportant at conveying your point and that language needs to be concise. The poster mustinclude the following sections as a minimum: • Background: Give an overview of the relevant history or technical details that inform the problem you are interested in. • Thesis/Problem Statement: What specific aspect of the topic is your group focusing on? Make an
equipmentfailures.Although it is too early to assess the impact of the research experience on these students’ careers,the experience appears to have been a success. All four students reported a greater depth ofunderstanding of the concepts taught in electromagnetics and communications courses.Additionally, students gained valuable experience in developing and carrying out fieldexperiments—sometimes in less than ideal conditions—and as a result of this experience, somestudents expressed a desire to pursue a graduate degree. Designing this research project alsoprovided several valuable lessons to the instructors which will aid in the further development ofhands-on learning activities for electromagnetics and communications courses. Page
closely to benchmark progress towards set goals.Time management, resource allocation, budgeting and timely evaluations of unanticipatedproblems, are processes that researchers must manage effectively in order to sustain a lastinginteraction with industry and government agencies that, in turn, can enhance the engineeringeducation process.V. Corporate and Academia Culture Adjusting to Address Issues of Mutual Interest .While Industry may expect that all changes in culture and business practices should take placein academia, on the other hand, academic institutions expect from industry, respect for theirmission and the appreciation that it is because universities operate as they do, that original ideasare explored and innovation is promoted
. Hiring the Next Generation of Faculty, volume 2010(152). New Directions for Community Colleges, 2011. [4] M Bernardine Dias, Brett Browning, G Ayorkor Mills-Tettey, Nathan Amanquah, and Noura El-Moughny. Undergraduate robotics education in technologically underserved communities. In Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 1387–1392. IEEE, 2007. doi: 10.1109/ROBOT.2007.363178. [5] Michael Rosenblatt and Howie Choset. Designing and implementing hands-on robotics labs. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications, 15(6):32–39, 2000. doi: 10.1109/5254.895856. [6] Glen R Rasmussen. An evaluation of a student-centered and instructor-centered method of conducting a graduate course in
Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education frame- work. Mr. Yeter plans to graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his in-depth research on Engineering Ed- ucation. He is one of two scholarships awarded by NARST (National Association for Research in Science Teach- ing) to attend the ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) summer research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in August 2016. In addition, he has been named as one of 14 ence in Cesk´ Jhumki Basu Scholars by the NARST’s Equity and Ethics Committee in 2014. He
AC 2007-645: SUSTAINING MANUFACTURING WITH INNOVATIVERECRUITMENT STRATEGIESTruc Ngo, San Diego City College Dr. Truc Ngo holds a Ph.D. degree in Chemical Engineering, earned at Georgia Tech in 2001. During her time at Georgia Tech, she has published multiple research papers in major professional journals, including American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) Journal, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Journal of Supercritical Fluids and Green Chemistry. She was a National Science Foundation Research Fellow, President’s Fellow and the Recipient of Waldemar Ziegler Best Paper Award. Dr. Ngo has also spoken at many national and international conferences in the past ten years. For her
panel brings together a group of men with diverse backgrounds and experiences to discusstheir perspectives and offer practical skills for men to effectively serve as advocates for genderequity. This paper augments the panel and captures the backgrounds, experiences, perspectives,and recommendations of the panelists, thereby providing a lasting resource for those unable toattend the panel or future interested individuals. The information we present targets men andadministrators, who will better understand the barriers to advocacy, learn best-practices ofeffective advocacy, and hear first-hand experiences of successful advocacy.BackgroundMany factors – systemic and non-systemic, conscious and unconscious, policy and climate – cannegatively impact