. degrees in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University in 1989 and 1991. He is a past Chairman of the ASEE CE Division and is a recipient of the ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Distinguished Educator Award, the Premier Award for Excellence in Engineering Education Courseware, and the EDUCOM Medal for application of information technology in education.Catherine Bale, U.S. Military Academy Catherine Bale is an adjunct professor at Mount Saint Mary College in Newburgh, New York. She teaches English and Communications classes and has coordinated the West Point Bridge Design Contest since 1997. Page 11.547.1
://www7.nationalacademies.org/ocga/testimony/gathering_storm_energizing_and_employing_america2.asp, accessed September 2011.[20] Rogers, C. and Portsmore, M., “Bringing Engineering to Elementary School”, Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, Vol. 5, no.3/4, pp. 17-28, Jul-Dec 2004.[21] Shields, C., “Engineering our Future New Jersey Elementary School”, Proceedings of the 2006 Mid-Atlantic Section Conference of ASEE, 5p, 2006, accessed on line at http://www.ciese.org/papers/2006/ASEE_paper_G.doc, February 2008.[22] Sullivan, J., Davis, S., deGrazia, J., and Carolson, D., “Beyond the Pipeline: Building a K-12 Engineering Outreach Program”, Proceedings of the 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education
currently focusing efforts on developing laboratory experiments inheat transfer, process control, and biochemical and biomedical engineering at Rowan. Stephaniewon the ASEE Outstanding Campus Representative Award in 1998, and she will serve asNewsletter editor of the Mid-Atlantic Section of ASEE beginning in June, 1999.C. Stewart Slater is Professor and Chair of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. Hereceived his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. from Rutgers University. Prior to joining Rowan he wasProfessor of Chemical Engineering at Manhattan College where he was active in chemicalengineering curriculum development and established a laboratory for advanced separationprocesses with the support of the National Science Foundation and industry. Dr. Slater's
, technoeconomics, and life cycle assessment. She leads the Sustainable Design and Systems Medicine lab (https://yenkiekm.com). Her teaching methodology to incorporate computational tools for explaining theoretical concepts led to her selection as one of the 20 Outstanding Young Chemical Engineering Educators by CACHE (Computer Aids for Chemical Engineering) Committee in 2019. Her ongoing research on machine learning, graph theory, water treatment, solvent recovery, optimizing lube-oil operations, and water utilities energy and asset management are funded by the USEPA, NSF, ExxonMobil, AstraZeneca, Atlantic County Utilities Authority, and American Water. She has won the 2022 AIChE Environmental Division Early Career Award, the
they built a collaborative environment. At the same time, students wrote reflections on the different activities that they participated in. We identified three themes from the memos and student reflections: self-awareness, professional exploration, and collective collaboration. These themes were further mapped onto specific components of the course design to better understand their pedagogical impact. While this study is context-specific, the approach and findings are relevant to a range of educational contexts seeking to support student development through collaborative, cohort-based models.Context his study took place in an ECE department at a liberal arts university in the Mid-Atlantic
was reported as tepid at best.Mirza reported a hybrid instruction method where there was a combination of virtual face to facemeetings, asynchronous lectures, and live video during synchronous lab sections [16]. Onestudent from each lab group was physically present in lab while the others were tuning in live butremotely. The students watching the lab virtually were reported to be disengaged and notparticipating in the activity. Although this allowed students to experience physicalexperimentation in turns, it did not seem to promote complete engagement. Other researchersfound that the shift to virtual labs caused students to question the quality of their education [17].Several authors also attempted to use kits that were mailed to the students
2006-2603: MIND LINKS 2006: RESOURCES TO MOTIVATE MINORITIES TOSTUDY AND STAY IN ENGINEERINGMaria Petrie, Florida Atlantic University Page 11.931.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 MIND Links 2006: Resources to Motivate Minorities to Study and Stay In EngineeringAbstractMIND is the acronym for the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) MINoritiesin Engineering Division. The MIND Links project gathers useful web links and information onresources that would allow minority students and minority faculty to find and take full advantageof the myriad of programs and information designed to promote their participation in
anduniversity has their own culture, the paper focuses on the aspects of the process that are mosttransferable to other institutions.Private, mid-Atlantic, Liberal Arts CollegE (PALACE) is a medium-sized, elite, primarily-whiteliberal arts institution that is located in a rural area in the mid-Atlantic region. PALACE issimilar to many other liberal arts universities, but has three colleges including arts & sciences,engineering, and management. The College of Engineering has six departments that offer a setof engineering programs that do not differ greatly from those at other universities. Eachdepartment currently has a great deal of autonomy regarding their curriculum within the structureof the University.Two aspects of PALACE’s structure are
and experiences shape their decisions whether to persist inengineering.Research Methods and ParticipantsThe Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE) is a multi-year study ofundergraduate engineering education. One facet of this research is the Academic PathwaysStudy (APS), which follows a cohort of students enrolled in four different universitiesnationwide from the freshmen through senior years.13 Identified by pseudonym, theseinstitutions are Mountain Technical Institute (MT or Mountain Tech), a small public universityspecializing in teaching engineering and technology; Oliver University, a private, historicallyblack mid-Atlantic institution; University of West State, a large public university in theNorthwest; and
with a specialization in Leadership Studies at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. She obtained a Master of Science in Leadership Education for the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in 2007 and a Bachelor of Science in Criminal Justice from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in 1999. She has also served in various management and program development roles for non-profit and educational agencies in the Mid-Atlantic Region and Mid-West.Dr. John SuttonLyn Ely Swackhamer, RMC Research CorporationLance C. Prez, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lance C. Prez has been a faculty member in the Department of Electrical Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) since August 1996. He currently also holds the position of
, which we utilize to gather data for this study. The setting for thisstudy is an ABET accredited Mechanical Engineering program [16] at a public land and seagrant university in the Mid-Atlantic US with a mid-sized course enrollment (ca. 140 students peryear).Course and Design Project Descriptions“Machine Design” is typically a one or two semester course sequence, usually occurring in thejunior year, that builds upon the fundamentals taught in Statics, Dynamics, and Solid Mechanicswhile also serving as preparation for Senior/Capstone Engineering Design experiences[17,18,19]. Thus, these courses provide a key stepping stone from a more structured learningenvironment to a more open-ended workplace-like environment that serves as a culmination
particularly useful prompting question was: “Why?”Research QuestionsWe investigated three research questions for this study: 1. How do kindergartners engaged in an engineering design challenge analyze (i.e., diagnose and/or explain) their design failure experiences? 2. Do kindergartners whose designs fail choose to persist by trying again? 3. How do kindergartners whose designs fail apply testing results and failure analysis when creating their next design attempt?ContextParticipants and SchoolsWe recruited participants from five kindergarten classrooms across three schools within a schoolsystem in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Adamsville Elementary is a Title I schoolin an urban area with about 500 students. Blakely
Doctoral Universities: Very High Research Activity (n=9). The institutionswere geographically dispersed, including the Northeast (n=4), Midwest (n=4), South (n=4), West(n=4), and Mid-Atlantic (n=1).Data CollectionThe semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually and recorded with the participants’consent. The interviews were conducted between Fall 2016 and Fall 2017. Thus, the changes tothe ABET criteria were under consideration during this period and were approved in October2017. The revised criteria went into effect during the 2019-2020 cycle. The broad aim of theinterviews was to understand the participants’ practices and perspectives related to ethics,including the influences that shaped their teaching. Examples of interview questions
designinstructor had assigned the problem the student worked on, design artifacts (e.g., design brief,final report, etc.) were only collected from the student.ParticipantsParticipants for this study came from a Mid-Atlantic University with a large engineering college.Both participants were from chemical engineering. The first participant was a senior student whohad recently completed a one semester capstone design course offered by the chemicalengineering department. The second participant was the design instructor for the chemicalengineering capstone course. The design instructor has a B.S., M.S., and PhD in chemicalengineering and twenty years of industry experience before teaching at the university.Problem ContextThe problem both participants mapped
multidisciplinarity of a team drives communication andargumentation decisions. This study investigated how team multidisciplinary (denoted“disciplinary diversity” of the design team) affects the communication strategies employed bysenior-level engineering design students at a large, public university.MethodsContext and Data Collection. This study was conducted on transcripts of student presentationsgiven for the Fall 2019 Senior Design Showcase at a large R1 university in the Mid-Atlantic UnitedStates. The Senior Design Showcase projects were scoped to solve real-world engineeringproblems experienced by industry sponsors. One of the core components of the Senior Designcurriculum is that teams are multidisciplinary (i.e., the teams include students from
instrument which has already been cross-validated with numerous data fromcollege-students [2], [3]. In this study paired t-tests and repeated measures ANOVA wasimplemented to compare students’ scores at three different points in time: pre-course,post-course and post-trip. Details of the data collection, survey and data analysis are provided inthe following sections.SamplingThe RSAP program in this study is located at a large R1 university in the Mid-Atlantic region.The participants are first year engineering students in their second semester and are part of thegeneral first-year engineering program in the university. The RSAP program includes asemester-long on campus-course followed by a two-week module in different internationaltracks. The
). Biology teachers’ perceptions of subject matter structureand its relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 301-325.17 Sanders, L.R., Borko, H., & Lockard, J.D. (1993). Secondary Science Teachers’ Knowledge Base WhenTeaching Science Courses in and out of Their Area of Certification. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 30(7), 723-736.18 Macalalag. Jr, A., Brockway, D., McKay, M., McGrath, E.. (2008). Partnership to Improve StudentAchievement in Engineering and Science Education: Lessons Learned in Year One.. Paper Presented at theAmerican Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Mid-Atlantic Section Conference, October 2008,Hoboken, N.J.19 Hotaling, L., McGrath, B., McKay, M., Shields, C
Outstanding Teaching Award,” and the 2012 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Region ”Distinguished Teacher” Award. He teaches courses in both analog and digital electronic circuit design and instrumentation, with a fo- cus on wireless communication. He has more than 15 years experience in the development and delivery of synchronous and asynchronous web-based course supplements for electrical engineering courses. Dr. Astatke played a leading role in the development and implementation of the first completely online un- dergraduate ECE program in the State of Maryland. He has published over 50 papers and presented his research work at regional, national and international conferences. He also runs several exciting summer camps geared towards
of the US involvement.MethodsParticipantsThe students that participated in this study were all interviewed in the second semester of theirfirst year at the aforementioned Mid-Atlantic university. The study institution is a primarilySTEM focused university. The participants were from three disciplines: three from Biochemistryand six each from Chemistry and Chemical Engineering for a total of fifteen students. All self-reported demographic information can be found in Table 1 below, along with the pseudonymsassigned to each participant. Pseudonym Discipline Race Sex Seojun Biochemistry Asian Male Catalina
. Customizable slides, maps and data downloads to assist in visualizing sea level rise are also available. o Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) model – a numerical model sponsored by the National Weather Service that can estimate storm surge heights. o USGS Coastal Storm Modeling System (CoSMos) – a tool “developed for hindcast studies, operational applications and future climate scenarios to provide emergency responders and coastal planners with critical storm-hazard information to improve public safety, mitigate damages and more effectively manage and allocate resources.” [4] o U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) North Atlantic Coast
provide value to the engineering innovation andentrepreneurship education fields.ConclusionThe development of the entrepreneurial mindset in both engineering and business undergraduatesis beneficial for their future career prospects. Entrepreneurial mindset can provide students withthe necessary knowledge and skills that will help them in their professional careers including theability to recognize opportunity, manage ambiguity, and persist through failure. To measureundergraduate students’ knowledge and perception of entrepreneurial mindset, a concept mapstudy was performed at a mid-size Atlantic University. The maps were graded independently byresearchers using both the holistic and traditional scoring methods.When the grading methods were
leadership, the Women in Engineering Pro- gram received the 2008 National Engineers Week Introduce a Girl to Engineering Day Award. She is the principal investigator for a National Science Foundation’s Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Talent Expansion Program (STEP) grant called the Successful Engineering Education and Development Support (SEEDS) Program. SEEDS extends successful women in engineering retention programs to all first-year and new external transfer students in the Clark School. Paige is the co-lead for the Mid-Atlantic Girls Collaborative (MAGiC), a regional collaborative within the NSF-funded National Girls Collaborative Project which brings together girl-serving organizations across
Critical Thinking in Engineering Undergraduates. Creat Educ. 2017;08(09):1495-1522. doi:10.4236/ce.2017.891057. Liu Z, Schönwetter DJ. Teaching creativity in engineering. Int J Eng Educ. 2004;20(5):801-808.8. Robinson K. Out of Our Minds: The Power of Being Creative. 3rd ed. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2017.9. Bruhl J, Klosky JL. Inclusive Teaching: A Call for Creativity (WIP: Work in Progress). In: ASEE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference. New York, NY: American Society for Engineering Education; 2019.10. Walesh SG. Introduction to Creativity and Innovation for Engineers. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.; 2017.11. Dieter GE, Schmidt LC. Engineering Design. 5th ed. New York
Context and ParticipantsThis pilot study was conducted at a small, mid-Atlantic, private college (Elizabethtown College)that is starting up a new “incubation” location in Vermont (The Greenway Center for Equity andSustainability in Engineering). The engineering program at the incubation campus was designedaround evidence-based practices with proven effectiveness at supporting the success ofunder-represented students, including: ● strong mentorship, ● hands-on and problem-based learning, ● supportive and mastery-based assessment, and ● a mission-driven focus (sustainability) ● close connection to business and industry applicationsLearning was organized around a series of projects with real world applications. Each of theseprojects
systematic review,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 28, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7.[16] H.-Y. Lee, P.-H. Chen, W.-S. Wang, Y.-M. Huang, and T.-T. Wu, “Empowering ChatGPT with guidance mechanism in blended learning: effect of self-regulated learning, higher-order thinking skills, and knowledge construction,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, p. 16, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4.[17] Z. Zhang and Y. Chang, “LEVERAGING GENERATIVE AI TO ENHANCE ENGINEERING EDUCATION AT BOTH LOW-LEVEL AND HIGH-LEVEL STUDY,” in 2024 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Conference Proceedings, Farmingdale State College, NY, New York: ASEE Conferences, Oct. 2024, p. 49450. doi: 10.18260/1
teachingpractices. By addressing these factors, the model highlights the importance of both cultural andindividual factors in shaping teaching identity.MethodologyData CollectionThis study is part of the Gateway2STEM project, an effort aimed at making active andcollaborative learning the default method of instruction in large introductory courses in Physics,Mathematics, and CS at a public R1 university in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Aspart of the project, graduate students serving as first time GTAs in these three departments attendeda two-day workshop before the start of the Fall 2023 semester. The goal of the workshop was toprovide preparation before the GTAs, most of whom had no formal teaching experience, enteredthe classroom for the
-person, hybrid, andonline/asynchronous courses are discussed.Our Roles and Institutional PositionalityThis work is a result of a highly productive collaboration between the teaching and learningcenter and the college of engineering’s office of outreach, student success, and engagement(formally the office of diversity, outreach, and inclusive learning). The contentdeveloper/facilitator is the assistant director in the teaching and learning center and also holds aPhD in engineering. This programming was developed at a large research university in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States that is considered a minority-majority institution. Thepolitical context in the state is complex and the governor directly appoints the trustees for
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Empowering Undergraduate Motivation Through Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning: Insights from Self-Determination Theory Abstract This Full Empirical Research Paper aims to showcase the findings from the first year ofan interdisciplinary project-based learning course in the Department of Engineering Education ata large mid-Atlantic research university. Both literature and industry have expressed the need forundergraduate students to gain experience in interdisciplinary environments and prepare for theirpost-graduate careers, whether they aim to continue their education or enter industry aftercompleting their bachelor’s
operations.An initial assumption was that interested students might already have some extent of spaceoperations knowledge taken from a U.S. perspective, so looking at the industry from theEuropean side of the Atlantic, seemed to be a good way to provide additional perspective.The use of the Handbook of Space Technology proved to be both bad and good. It was bad fromthe perspective that since the sections of the book were provided by so many differentcontributing authors, the focus, continuity of level of detail, and style were not sufficientlyconstant for the interested neophyte beginning study in this discipline. Additionally, manycontributing authors provided an inconsistent of presentation of formula variables and theirdefinitions. The book was good
. The plan lists the project activities planned for the semester within aperiod of 15 weeks. Each activity is assigned to particular members of the group to be completedwithin a time limit. This way a work plan is developed and tasks are distributed among groupmembers. Each student takes responsibility in team efforts to complete the assigned tasks. Figure2 shows an example of the Management Plan.The Management Plan describes and specifies the activities, procedures, and resources requiredto build the overall system prototype. It includes the group information such as the groupmembers, student IDs, initials, project title, group advisor, semester and academic year, andprogress report number. At the same time, it involves two sections titled