survey, re-formulate the question, propose a solution,an improvement, or an updated approach, design/build/implement the proposed approach, andpresent to others. In this cycle, the search for discovery and innovation materializes.This preliminary work investigates the use of research materials, introduction of practices, andthose performing this kind of work in the classroom, at every level. This study is done at a largeresearch institution where research is pervasive throughout and there are many engineeringtechnology students. Researchers chose the Student Perception of Research IntegrationQuestionnaire (SPRIQ) to assess student perception of research in their learning environment.The first step in assessing the implementation of CR in a
Paper ID #39219Board 311: Impacts of the ProQual Institute: Building Communities ofTechnical Stem Faculty for Long-Term Engagement in Educational ResearchDr. John Ray Morelock, University of Georgia Dr. Morelock is an Assistant Professor of Practice with an emphasis on engineering education research, and the Associate Director of Educational Innovation and Impact for UGA’s Engineering Education Trans- formations Institute (EETI). In addition to coordinating EETI’s faculty development programming, Dr. Morelock conducts research on institutional change via faculty development, with an emphasis on innova- tive ways to
, Uniqueness, Dimensionality, Directionality, Consolidation, Segmentation, Modification, Similarity and Experimentation. The material in the course will be complemented with activities from the “Projects”, “Competitions”,and “Challenges” modules. The second course is a multi-disciplinary class titled: Innovative Design in Practice. This courseconsists of project-based learning in subjects related to information technologies (IT). The project aims atlearning the development of an innovative data system for an existing real-life application. Participantswill learn and apply necessary basic programming skills/knowledge to explore and implement innovativesolutions. A typical process of developing an information system, often called the
Paper ID #34160Decades of Alumni: What Can We Learn from Designing a Survey to Exam-inethe Impact of Project-based Courses Across Generations?Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis. From 1999-2008 she served as a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading the Foundation’s
new perspectives about mentorship.This first year of the Engineering MFP focused on providing practical resources for students andsurveying faculty members to evaluate their mentorship perspectives. The upcoming year willfocus on the opposite; a survey will be created to evaluate the advisor-student relationship fromthe mentee’s point of view, and practical resources for faculty will be implemented.IntroductionRecognizing the importance of students engaging in healthy, stable mentoring relationshipsduring graduate school, Purdue launched the Mentoring Improvement Initiative in January 2022.This initiative aims to pursue evidence-based and culturally responsive research and training forfaculty, students, and staff at the university over the
from 2016 to 2018. His research interests mainly focus on higher education administration, comparative higher education and higher engineering education.Min Zhao, Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University Miss. Min Zhao is a postgraduate student who is majoring in the Curriculum and Instruction at the Graduate School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China. Her research interests mainly focus on EFL teaching and learning, and higher engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Research on the Power of Quality Assurance in Engineering Department: Case of Worcester Polytechnic InstituteAbstractWith the advancement
in a course titled Capital-Formation DesignTheory in Practice (ENGR 306). ENGR 306 is co-taught by Dr. Ade Mabogunje, a seniorresearcher in the Stanford Center for Design Research in partnership with Phil Wickham,founder and managing director of Sozo Ventures and former executive chairman and alum of theKauffman Fellows Program. The design of ENGR 306 re-envisions the Kauffman Fellowscurriculum by addressing the interests and needs of undergraduate and graduate students whowish to create new companies, transition organizations, solve a societal or educational problem,and/or learn more about the venture capital process and industry.ENGR 306 focuses on innovation and innovators. While the following metaphor uses a formulato describe the
for Engineering Education, 2011 Navy Metrology Engineering Center STEM Outreach through the STEP Program: Challenges, Lessons Learned and Application to DoD StrategyBackground:The United States and especially the Department of Defense (DoD) has historically reliedheavily upon scientists, technologists, engineers and mathematicians to innovate, design, produceand maintain a technically superior capability to defend and advance the interests of the UnitedStates, both at home and globally. The United States maintained a leading edge technologicadvantage through and beyond World War II until it was stunned by the Soviet Union‟s launchof Sputnik 1 on October 4, 1957. Sputnik 1 was the first artificial
graduate student at Virginia Tech (2011-2017), he worked at the Center for Human-Computer Interaction under the guidance of Dr. Doug Bowman, researching the impact of audience interaction using serious games and VR on young student audiences visiting informal learning spaces. His teaching experience involves being an Adjunct faculty member and a Visiting Assistant Professor at Virginia Tech, serving as a Teaching Assistant in multiple CS courses, and teaching diverse audiences about IT and New Media Technologies. His dissertation received the Out- standing Research award for 2017-2018 from the CS department at Virginia Tech. Panagiotis has also extensive experience as a Senior Interactive Systems Designer and
Team Roller Coaster Construction w/challenges Team demonstrations Discuss Engineering Design Process and best practices for team work Lego build session with partially built kitsSaturday Lunch at Grace Watson Student Dining HallAfternoon Robotics Lab Tour/demonstration Learn NXT Software with Team Leader Simple robotic challenges to navigate vehicle Engineering Design Process with homework to “design” demonstration on Arena SchematicSunday Overview of dayMorning Teams collectively work to make one demonstration design Design and Build utilizing Amusement Park Arena
“special-purpose”organizations within the university. Based on finding of this research, there wasconsiderable resistance to establishing a formal organizational structure such as a center,at least early on. Many felt that organizational structures could threaten the nimblenessand flexibility to respond to opportunities despite the benefit of administrative support. There was strong support for establishing a “hatchery” environment for students Page 22.287.14to gather and explore ideas of innovation. This hatchery could be tied to special-purposehousing. It would include meeting spaces equipped with materials and supplies to supportcreative
and at the technology research center at The University of Texas at Austin. He earned his doctoral degree from Virginia Tech and authored numerous publications in Problem Solving, Sustainability, and Innovation.Dr. Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Purdue University, West Lafayette Michael J. Dyrenfurth is a professor of Technology Leadership and Innovation in the College of Tech- nology at Purdue University. He is a member of the ASEE and he has served on the Board of the ETD and as program chair for the CIEC in New Orleans (2008). Previously he completed a four year term as Assistant Dean for Graduate Studies in Purdue University’s College of Technology. His scholarship agenda focuses on technological innovation
students’ global competencies within the IRiKA program? 3. How do undergraduate and graduate engineering students differ in global competency development in the context of international research experience? The first research question addresses the core of the study's motivation. It seeks to explore thedirect impact of IRiKA. This inquiry is supported by literature highlighting the importance ofinternational experiences in enhancing cross-cultural skills and global awareness in engineeringeducation [6], [25]. This question aims to empirically examine how participation in a structuredinternational program like IRiKA contributes to developing global competencies, which areincreasingly recognized as crucial for engineers in a globalized
’ research and practice, which informs howthey teach a project management course for experienced, practicing engineers as part of theMaster of Engineering Management (MEM) program [1] at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.This paper significantly updates and expands upon a paper presented to the ASEE EngineeringManagement Division at the ASEE 2016 Conference [2]. Key features of the subject program follow: Students • All students are practicing engineers, working full-time, as they pursue their graduate studies. All entering students must have at least two years of professional practice. At present, students average about eight years of preceding professional experience, with some having
). Through structured case studies, this papertends to develop entrepreneurial ecosystems for engineering education.3.1 Case Study of Zhejiang University (ZJU)Located in the historical and cultural center Hangzhou, ZJU is a distinct and internationallyrenowned comprehensive research university. Ranking 141 in ESI's latest data in March 9, 2017,ZJU ranked 102 in 2017 Research Ranking of Global Universities (RRGU) and 3 in mainland China.After decades of educational reform, experimentation, and practice, ZJU has established anentrepreneurial ecosystem with specialized education model that highlights interdisciplinarity,professional and “public innovation and entrepreneurship”.3.1.1 An Interdisciplinary Model for Engineering Education InnovationThe
. In thisdesign process, instructors include team-building activities at the beginning of the semester andfollow an iterative design process that centers around stakeholders at every phase of the designprocess. Teamwork and uncertainty are implied, but not formalized attributes of the designprocess.In Human-Centered Design [15], we find that teamwork is highly encouraged, which shouldimpact the innovation of the final design. For example, IDEO provides a human-centered designtoolkit [12] and summarizes the phases of the design process as “Hear, Create, Deliver”. It thenadvocates multidisciplinary teams as a best practice, which may mean 3 to 8 teammates, keepinga gender balance, and disciplinary and educational backgrounds. This methodology
Improve Urban Infrastructure. Thestructure and organization of this course are documented in this paper for other instructors toreplicate the best practices for creating this type of curriculum.Literature ReviewNew York University was recently added to the Vertically Integrated Projects consortiuminitiated at Georgia Tech. Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) are 1 credit hour team researchproject-based courses that undergraduate students can take for 3 (a minimum requirement) to 6consecutive semesters. VIP focus on multidisciplinary and multiyear learning that supports longterm team building to promote leadership and innovation. VIP are intended to focus on largescale design and discovery projects that support research at the hosting university
regionalnetwork for manufacturing education at different levels, at times and locations best suited to newand incumbent technicians and engineers. To meet this goal, the following objectives have beenestablished for this project:1. Establish a replicable 3-step active learning model, consisting of Exploration, Dialog, and Application steps, for engineering technology and engineering students involving conceptualization, design, implementation, and dissemination. Page 7.936.2 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó2002, American Society for
report and presentation. Page 8.515.5The first KSB that the students covered was KSB T-1, The Informed Design Cycle. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationStudents were given the steps in the informed design cycle model which included: ClarifyDesign, Research and Investigate, Generate Alternative Designs, Choose Optimal Design,Develop a Prototype, Test and Evaluate and Redesign. At this point the students wereasked to create some hand sketches or CAD drawings of their own possible designs andshare them with
Paper ID #17882Ascertaining the Impact of P:12 Engineering Education Initiatives: StudentImpact through Teacher ImpactDr. Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado, Boulder Marissa Forbes is a research associate in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the Univer- sity of Colorado Boulder and lead editor of the TeachEngineering digital library. She previously taught middle school science and engineering and wrote K-12 STEM curricula while an NSF GK-12 graduate engineering fellow at CU. With a master’s degree in civil engineering she went on to teach advanced placement and algebra-based physics for the Denver
the Department of Mechanical Engineering at North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro. For the past twenty five years he has been working in the area of performance evaluation and modeling of poly- meric composites and ceramic matrix composites. He has worked with several federal laboratories in the area of fatigue, impact and finite element modeling of woven composites including US Army, US Air force, NASA-Langley Research Center, National science Foundation, Office of Naval Research, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. In addition he has collaborated with Rice University, Texas A&M University, Tuskegee University, Air Force Institute of Technology, University of Dayton, Florida State University
serving in Minority Serving Institutions in developing STEM educational tools and resources for teachers to implement in their classrooms. Dr. Garc´ıa’s research agenda is geared towards community and educational change by creating healthy, equitable, and culturally responsive learning environments for traditionally underserved populations. Dr. Garc´ıa. earned both his bachelor’s and master’s degrees from the University of Texas R´ıo Grande Valley, formerly University of Texas Pan American and holds a doctorate degree in School Improvement from Texas State University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Innovations in Engineering Education for
AC 2011-928: USING HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY TO PROMOTE ANUNDERSTANDING OF THE IMPACT OF ENGINEERING SOLUTIONSAMONG ENGINEERING STUDENTSMichael Geselowitz, IEEE History Center Michael N. Geselowitz is Staff Director of the IEEE History Center. Immediately prior to joining IEEE in 1997, he was Group Manager at Eric Marder Associates, a New York market research firm, where he supervised Ph.D. scientists and social scientists undertaking market analyses for Fortune 500 high-tech companies. He is also a registered Patent Agent. He holds S.B. degrees in electrical engineering and in anthropology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and M.A. and Ph.D. degrees in anthropology from Harvard University. His
2006-952: CURRICULUM DESIGN FOR THE ENGINEER OF 2020: AUNIVERSITY COMMUNITY CREATES A PUBLIC AFFAIRS CURRICULUMFOR ENGINEERING UNDERGRADUATESWendy Harrison, Colorado School of Mines WENDY J. HARRISON is Professor of Geology and Geochemistry at the Colorado School of Mines, and is the Principal Tutor and Interim Director of the McBride Honors Program in Public Affairs for Engineers. She teaches in the geological sciences at both undergraduate and graduate levels as well as interdisciplinary courses at CSM. She has been awarded federal grants for innovative approaches to teaching undergraduate analytical methods in mineral and rock characterization, and has been a workshop leader in NSF’s funded “On the
as a part of the strategic P12 STEM initiative, he prepares Engineering/Technology candidates for teacheMs. Adrie Koehler Doctoral Student, Learning Design & TechnologyMr. Shawn Farrington, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Shawn Farrington is a Senior Lecturer in the Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University. He co-coordinates a first-year Design Thinking program and teaches several of his own sections. Shawn is also an Educa- tional Psychology Ph.D. candidate at Purdue. HisElnara Mammadova Elnara is a Graduate Research Assistant in the Technology, Leadership and Innovation program at Purdue University. She is dedicated to her research on fostering inclusivity in the curriculum and ensuring digital
family support services, identifying and disseminating best practices and policies. A graduate of Williams College, she Holds an Ed.M from Harvard University and a PhD in in Educational Psychology from Boston College and has taught courses and workshops in applied research to faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates at Boston College and Wheelock College. Page 13.30.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 A Decade of Technological Innovation: A Retrospective View of the First Decade of the NCIIAAbstractThe role of entrepreneurship in engineering, science
design thinking. To clarify how the best answerscontains a conversational storytelling theme whether for an interview, discussing aresearch project, or teaching a new class, we begin by offering the methods of the coursethrough which planned prompts/questions are utilized as a tool to encourageconversational storytelling. Then the theory and practice of conversational storytelling inthe classroom setting contains an entrepreneurial parallel that is organized around adiscussion of four concerns. Finally, implications are considered.Method The mixed-methods of socio-cognitive psychology, design thinking, andprojective cues30 used in this work fulfill multiple purposes. Projective cues refer to thediagnostic imagination prompts directed at
increase retention of underrepresented students. Thisallowed multidisciplinary collaboration for diversity of thought.IntroductionWith funding from the NSF Division of Undergraduate Education (EHR/DUE) of an S-STEMgrant, researchers at the University of Arkansas aim to increase the number of low-income studentswho graduate with a STEM degree and who have training in innovation. As a first step, a 2-weekbridge program was designed and implemented for the first-year scholars.Assessment of the bridge program will be presented. Some data highlights on the 3-credit hourcourse include: 96% of participants felt that the class was valuable in developing theirunderstanding of innovation and appreciating the importance of innovation; 88% felt it helpedthem
; Heggelund, M. (2008). Toward a global PhD? : forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide. Seattle: Center for Innovation and Research in Graduate Education, University of Washington : In association with University of Washington Press. 3. Nerad, M. (2004). The PhD in the US: Criticisms, Facts, and Remedies. Higher Education Policy, 17, 183- 199. 4. Golde, C. M. (2006). Preparing Stewards of the Discipline. In C. M. W. G. E. Golde (Ed.), Envisioning the future of doctoral education : preparing stewards of the discipline Carnegie essays on the doctorate (pp. p.450 cm.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint. 5. Austin, A. E., Sorcinelli, M. D., & McDaniels, M. (2007). Understanding New
sponsoring industry. This reform would provide a mechanismfor “doing-centered learning”, growth, and continuous professional development to enhance creative engineeringleadership and innovation in industry. This requires a professionally oriented curriculum of innovative graduatestudies specifically designed to permit full-time employment in industry; to be concurrent with the engineeringleader’s creative engineering practice in industry, and; to be conducive to the manner in which advanced engineerscontinue to learn, grow, and develop in needs-driven creative technological innovation in industry.To provide for evolutionary improvement, the program of professionally oriented graduate studies would berenewed on a dynamic basis, ensuring that it is