, workshops, design challenges, andpresentations that illuminated presumptions and prejudices through a technical, ethical, social, and legal lens(complete list of activities in Appendix C). Following lectures, participants did hands-on AI case-studies. In additionto the week-long group case studies, the mid-week project was a large collective case study on AI’s uses for theprediction of antibiotic resistance conducted by Concordia University. At the end of the week-long program, therewere group presentations and roundtable discussions. This allowed for a variety of perspectives to emerge ondifferent topics, time for questions, and inspiration for post-program plans.Participants have generally deemed the program delivery to have been strong and the
improvement in student learning, however it had itsown issues, the most troubling being the long waits that the students tended to encounter whentrying to get their pre-labs checked. The following is the Reflection section from the FCAR: What worked well: Needing to get the pre-labs 100% correct helped the students understand the concepts better and certainly made the post-labs drastically better. I felt that the students learned more and fewer were just going through the motions when doing the experiments. My post-lab grading time was cut to almost nothing. The field trip was great. What didn’t work as well: I spent A LOT of time checking and re-checking pre-labs and helping students. The lines were long
’ approach toprocess safety judgements [34], [36]. There were five senior-level chemical engineering studentsrecruited from a process safety course at a mid-Atlantic institution for this pilot. Due toscheduling complications, only three students completed all phases of the data collection process.The participants were selected at random after they filled out an interest and consent form. Theirdata has been de-identified as part of the analysis process and pseudonyms were assigned to thestudents (Alex, Bradley, and Charlie). These students were all male, senior-level chemicalengineering students. The selected participants then completed the three-phase pilot researchstudy that took place over the course of the spring 2022 semester. IRB approval was
system of their choice. Engineering and Race in the USA was selected for study due tothe unique content and the first author’s familiarity with the course and the professor, which ledto increased access to data and participants [58]. Engineering students whose racial identities have been historically marginalized and first-generation students enroll in this elective course in higher proportion than is representative of theuniversity at large. Specifically, students were 19% Asian, 25% Black or African American, 19%Hispanic, 31% White, and 6% multi race. Half the class was female and the other half weremale. The course was taught at a mid-Atlantic university at which 24% of undergraduateengineering students are Asian, 5% are Black or
sin The freshmen can experimentally test their model in lab by lifting different weights (Fload) andcomparing the calculated deltoid force, Fdeltoid, with an estimate based on the cross-sectional areaof their deltoid muscle. Although there is some variation in published values, a reasonable valueof maximum muscle force per unit area is 30-40N/cm2. A cross-sectional picture of the armthrough the deltoid, something many of the students get to see in an imaging lab, can provide anestimate of the cross-sectional area of the deltoid, and consequently maximum deltoid force [15].The arm model demonstrates that based on the free-body diagram, the deltoid muscle force issignificantly greater than the load that can be lifted. For a cylindrical model
recordedstudent activity; they coded the qualitative data, including detailing how they developed thecoding scheme and how reliable their coders were. For instance, one study found that studentsspent more time engaged in mathematical and graphical modeling than physical modeling, incontrast to previous research findings, but seldom used mathematical modeling to inform theirdesigns, echoing findings in the previous section about the challenges to integrating engineeringand mathematics content successfully [72]. In a study of high school students who hadcompleted engineering courses, student design process was compared to expert design process,finding that the students spent significantly less time gathering information, making decisions,and evaluating the
engineering design (e.g., designthinking, engineering epistemology, teamwork and equity). Our peer educators move betweenthese two activity systems: one is the field site for their teaching responsibilities within one of~15 sections of a first-year engineering design course (UMD ENES100), and the second is anengineering-design focused pedagogy seminar (UMD EDCI488E). The co-occurence of theseexperiences in the same semester allows our peer educators to have firsthand experiencesworking with students while trying to make sense of key ideas from education theory andresearch. Details of the design of the pedagogy seminar and the design course context areprovided in Quan et al. (2017), and the design of ENES100 course is presented in Calabro,Gupta, &
is definitely women doing the most work though, at least trying to hold it to ahigher standard. And, I’m not saying, I have worked with guys in my group that do want tohold it to a higher standard, but this might just be because there’s been more men in my groupthan women. But as much as the men are like being lazy or won’t show up to groups or thingslike that, but the women are always, there always trying to do the best work, always takingover the other sections that people forget about.”In interpreting peer microaggressions some Black students noted that for many students in theCollege, they served as their one “Black friend.” One student stated: “… a lot of our peers haven’t been exposed to black people throughout their
they need and which cabinet it might be in, Jesse navigates thefabrication lab with confidence.The fabrication lab is one of several makerspaces in the engineering department of this large,comprehensive, mid-Atlantic public university where engineering students can work oncurriculum-required building projects or just hang out with other engineering students. Othermakerspaces in the engineering department serve different functions. The prototype lab is filledwith craft materials that make useful aids for conceiving and communicating designs. There’sanother makerspace with 3D printers that is a popular spot for students to study while themachines work quietly in the background. Aside from students in these spaces, there are staffmoving about and
-institutional study of students’ transitions fromtheir capstone (senior) design experiences into engineering work [21-24]. The sections belowdescribe the sites, participants, data collection, and data analysis.Site DescriptionsThe research study involves four different universities: two large public comprehensiveuniversities (one in the mountain west and one in the mid-Atlantic), one small public technicaluniversity in the southeast, and one small private college in the northeast. Three have a year-longcapstone design program and one has a four-semester design sequence that spans the junior andsenior years. All focus heavily on industry-sponsored projects; three also include faculty-sponsored and national-competition projects. All emphasize
of technologists downstream from the designer. (Further relevant aspects,primarily trade-offs, of this are discussed in the section on concurrent development.)Perseverance, likewise, is also an essential characteristic of engineers as well as artists. Forartists, the very process of nurturing a vision from conception to execution is often a matter ofperseverance. Obstacles include the financial difficulty of obtaining materials. This may rangefrom the metal sculptor’s purchase of raw materials and tools to the musician’s purchase ofappropriate gear or rental of studio space. Once those resources are present, for the lone artist,there is the challenge of mastering all the techniques and tools necessary to realize a vision, andfor the artist
ecosystem at a time is also beneficial for distilling meaning from as tudy using Ecological Systems Theory[9]to understand an already complex set of systems such as those associated with interdisciplinary graduate education.MethodsProject Background econdary data for this study came from an interdisciplinary graduate certificate program calledSthe Interdisciplinary Disaster Resilience (IDR) program. The IDR program was located in a land-grant university in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. It was funded through the National Science Foundation Research Traineeship (NRT) program and grew out of an existing collaboration that created a university-funded interdisciplinary graduate program. As mentioned, though
informing mechanisms to helpteachers realize the vision set forth in the NGSS, increase science achievement, and foster STEMinterest and a STEM identity among students. MethodsContext and ParticipantsParticipants included 27 grade K-8 teachers in a mid-Atlantic state. These teachers representedthe first of two cohorts involved in an NSF funded project designed to support ETS instruction.Baseline data was collected on these teachers prior to professional development between Januaryand April 2020. Participants were primarily White (n = 20) and female (n = 23). Teachingexperience ranged from one to thirty-four years (M = 12.6; SD = 10.0). All participants held adegree in education and none had a degree in
TechnologyDr. Eric J. AlmDr. Alison F Takemura, US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute Alison loves wading into a good science story. Her first was her MIT doctoral thesis project, unlocking the gastronomical genome of a Vibrio bacterium. For some of the Vibrio’s meals, she collected seaweed from the rocky, Atlantic coastline at low tide. (Occasionally, its waves swept her off her feet.) During grad school, Alison was also a fellow in MIT’s Biological Engineering Communication Lab. Helping students share their science with their instructors and peers, she began to crave the ability to tell the stories of other scientists, and the marvels they discover, to a broader audience. So after graduating in 2015 with a
student outreach, recruitment, retention, and strategies that aim to increase graduation rates andreduce achievement gaps for women, under-represented minority students, and students from under-resourced communities.About ASEE Zone IV: Founded in 1893, ASEE is a non-profit multidisciplinary organization that promotesexcellence in instruction, research, public service, and practice to further engineering and technologyeducation. Zone IV, the largest of ASEE's regional groups, includes three sections: Pacific Southwest (Arizona,California, Hawaii, and Nevada), Pacific Northwest (Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, andCanada-Alberta, British Columbia and Saskatchewan), and Rocky Mountain (Colorado, South Dakota, Utah,and Wyoming).Program
ASEE 2010 ZONE IV CONFERENCE MARCH 25-27 RENO, NEVADA PROCEEDINGSEDUCATING ENGINEERS IN THE WILD, WILD WEST HOSTED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO SPONSORED BY THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST, PACIFIC SOUTHWEST, & ROCKY MOUNTAIN SECTIONS OF ASEE TABLE OF CONTENTSFRIDAY, MARCH 26, 2010CONCURRENT SESSIONS, 8:30-10:00 A.M.Session DM: Designing and Manufacturing“Bicycle Frame Building for Engineering Undergraduates” Kurt Colvin & Jim Kish .............................................................................................................................. 1“GIRLS SEE Summer Camp: An Event