sensors and data logging tools. When they have mastered the use of the data-‐-‐-‐logging feature, students use the tool to gather data related to the locomotion of their robot over different surfaces. Students record data taken using the light sensor to determine friction and moments of slippage. Students are able to calculate velocity and use this information to determine the efficiency of locomotion. In Investigation 5, students begin to redesign their robot to increase its locomotive efficiency. With the focus solely on redesigning the foot of their robot, the students begin working with
learningoutside of their discipline even after leaving the academic environment 1-7. As Duderstadt arguesin his response to the Engineer of 2020, each of these positive outcomes helps to produceengineers who are better equipped for a changing professional environment, in which the abilityto quickly master and respond to new technologies in collaborative often global workenvironments may be more important than the basic engineering skills taught within the currentundergraduate curriculum 2.While the benefits of a liberal education may be clear, the practicality of providing theseopportunities while competing with the time constraints of the core curriculum is a challenge.Canada’s accreditation criteria stipulates a minimum of 225 academic units (one AU
Texas, ArlingtonProf. Stephen P Mattingly, University of Texas, ArlingtonZiaur Rahman, The University of Texas at Arlington Ziaur Rahman received his Bachelor of Science (B. Sc.) degree in Civil Engineering from Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology, Dhaka, in June 2007. After completing his Bachelor degree, he started his graduate studies in Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Arlington in August 2008. He completed his Masters of Engineering (M. Eng.) degree under the supervision of Dr. Siamak Ardekani. He continued his graduate studies as a Ph. D. student under the supervision of Dr. Stephen Mattingly in Fall 2010. The author’s research interests include Incident Management, Operations and
backgroundIt is known that engineers need to possess strong visualization and problem solving skills, yet the Page 24.835.2K-12 education system fails to implement visualization and practical problem solving lessonsinto the curriculum thereby decreasing interest in engineering and science. This problem isfurther compounded by the lack of hands-on extra-curricular activities that spark interest inscience and engineering while improving the troubleshooting and practical skills of the students.In fact, our young generations are mastering the usage of keyboards, mice, and touchscreensmore than their predecessors with disregard to machine shops skills
- (Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico)Dr. Tony Lee Kerzmann, Robert Morris University Tony Kerzmann received both a Bachelor of Arts in Physics from Duquesne University and a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in 2004. After graduating, Tony Kerzmann enrolled in graduate school at the University of Pittsburgh where he graduated with a Master in Science and a Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering, in 2007 and 2010, respectively. Currently, he is an assistant professor at Robert Morris University, where his research goals include, hybrid concen- trating photovoltaic systems, energy system life cycle assessment, sustainable product development, and active learning
it? Is there any kind of natural filtration using the natural sands and gravels in the area? What are the instruments used in testing water pollution? Page 25.13.10 What are your findings and recommendations?Multiple Invite and interview a chemist from the Water DistrictPerspectives Show video clips on different water filtration processes Students will identify 3 things learned from these video clips Update the Generated Ideas Master List Some hazardous elements in drinking water Tolerable limits of chemical water
Paper ID #6294Assessing Metacognitive Awareness during Problem-Solving in a Kinetics andHomogeneous Reactor Design CourseDr. Nelly Ramirez-Corona, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Dr. Nelly Ram´ırez-Corona is currently a full-time professor of Chemical Engineering at Chemical, En- viromental and Food Engineering Department, Universidad de las Am´ericas at Puebla, M´exico. Her teaching experience is in the area of Process Dynamics and Control, Kinetics, Catalysis and Reactor Design. She did her undergraduate studies in Chemical Engineering at the Universidad Aut´onoma de Tlaxcala, M´exico, and his Master and Doctoral
simply be what they observed others doing, but they must reflect on what theothers were thinking at the time. For example, what are the middle school or high school studentsthinking, what are their teachers and parents thinking? This is a key development for ourstudents to master. For example, when involved in design work, engineers should considermultiple perspectives in the actual design.RESULTSReflective writing was a key component of the course, and it appears that it had an impact on thestudents. Students are more aware of their attitudes and can think about engineering in broadercontext. Several students have commented on how this class made them more aware of howengineering can impact their community as well as how to present engineering
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, where she also serves as director of the Master of Public Policy program. Elizabeth received her B.A. in Geology from Carleton College in 2001. She received her M.A. and Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Colorado, Boulder, in 2003 and 2007 respectively. Elizabeth’s research interests center around collaboration and leadership in environmental policy and research methodology. Elizabeth is a member of the Faculty Advisory Board of the Liberal Arts/Engineering Studies program at Cal Poly. Page 23.216.1 c
2011-2012 Engineering Fluid Mechanics and CE Materialsclasses at FGCU as well as data from the 2012 CE Materials class at Rowan University.MethodsIn order to structure a new approach in the classroom to incorporate and assess LLL, theauthors asked the following questions: What are the students’ background, knowledge, and understanding to LLL? When and how should the students be exposed to LLL concepts in the curriculum? Should undergraduate students master their LLL skills while completing their undergraduate degree or later in their career through continuing education and/or advanced degrees in engineering or related fields? What is the faculty and administrators role in meeting the ABET criteria, especially
, quality assignments to developcommunications skills.Authenticity as a Value in Learning and Education Page 23.234.3Authenticity in student courses is a long-held value in education. Some of the earliest models forhigher education were based on an apprenticeship and job-training approach in which pupilspracticed the skills and techniques of their trade under the supervision of a master. Studentstoday continue to desire educational experiences that provide experience with “real-world”problems, and are relevant to their future careers. Modern systems of higher learning typicallycombine experiential or applied learning experiences with more general
, 15 graduated Page 23.248.8(one left LSU without earning a degree). All graduating students except one completed a B.S. inbiological engineering; the other student completed a degree in biological sciences and iscurrently enrolled in medical school. Of the 14 biological engineering graduates, 9 are currentlypracticing engineers. The other five entered graduate or professional school and are currentlyenrolled/employed as follows: two postdoctoral Fellows; one Ph.D. student, one masters student,and one student in medical school. The three students who were assigned to the team throughthe LSU Chancellor’s Future Leaders in Research Program had
/Higher_education/Activities/Bologna_Process/Bologna _Declaration.asp13. “Realising the European Higher Education Area”, Communiqué of the Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education in Berlin on 19 September 2003, http://www.bologna-berlin2003.de/pdf/Communique1.pdfALEXANDER M. SHVAIGER, PH.D. is a professor in the Engineering Graphics Department at the Page 10.953.15Southern-Ural State University of Russia. After earning his masters degree in 1971 he worked as an engineer at theDepartment of Equipment and Technology for processing of metals by pressure. In 1977 he submitted his Ph. D.dissertation on the theme
Applications, McGraw-Hill, NewYork.2. Hodge, B. K., and Taylor, R. P., 1999, Analysis and Design of Energy Systems, 3rd ed, Prentice-Hall, UpperSaddle River, NJ.3. “Flow of Fluids,” Technical Paper 410, 4th printing, 1957, Crane Company, Chicago.4. Haaland, S. E., 1983, “Simple and Explicit Formulas for the Friction Factor in Turbulent Flow,” Trans. ASME, J.of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 103, No. 5, pp. 89-90.B. K. Hodge serves as the TVA Professor of Energy Systems and the Environment and is a Giles Distinguished Page 10.102.14Professor and a Grisham Master Teacher at Mississippi State University. He was the 1999-2000
where students enjoy “hands-on” experiences through laboratory experiments andcomputer simulations and illustrations. In general, most students in sciences and engineeringhave difficulty in mastering fundamental concepts and basic principles; one possible reason forthis deficiency in student learning may be that the classical lecture-mode of teaching by itself isnot sufficient for students to grasp basic concepts. When learning advanced materials, it isimportant for students to develop physical visualization and conceptual understanding of thematerial structure at several levels (microstructure, constituents, and lay-up assemblies) and theirproperties and behaviors (orientation-dependent properties due to anisotropy.3.3 Discussion model
specialists,some students pursuing masters or undergraduate degrees, some technical specialists, and facultymembers from Geographical Information Systems (GIS), Computer Science (CS) and Physics.This combination of permanent research staff, faculty members from different disciplines and thepractical problems associated with the operation and development of the DNR coastalobservation network creates a productive research environment to foster undergraduate research.In the past years this cooperation has been very successful in furthering undergraduate researchbased on this model. In particular, since the projects include faculty from diverse fields, studentsfrom different fields, including Mathematics, can join the group and work on projects that
realized how their broad liberal arts education developed their critical thinking and sensitivity. • Engineering advising issue. A presentation was given during a Faculty meeting about “Taste of Engineering” and was met with great enthusiasm. Some faculty gave professional support, volunteering to be consultants for students as they researched their topics. Others offered their classes as “labor”. For example, a Masters of Library and Information Studies professor offered to make related topics projects for her graduate library search classes. Other professors, particularly those from Social Work and Occupational Therapy, were intrigued with the whole engineering process. The idea of making
AssociateProfessor in Mechanical Engineering at National Central University in Taiwan. His research interest is themodeling of micro flows and microfluidic application. He has been involved in the research of interdisciplinaryengineering education research team since 1997.Pei-Fen ChangPei-Fen Chang received her Master degree in Counseling from the College of Education at Virginia Tech of theUnited States in 1992 and also received her Ph.D. from the Teaching and Learning program in the College ofEducation at Virginia Tech in 1996. She is the faculty of the Graduate Institute of Learning and Instruction atNational Central University in Taiwan. Her research interests focus on engineering accreditation criteria, facultydevelopment, and technological creativity
Session 1351 ORGANIZING THE DEPARTMENT FOR GENERATIONAL TEACHING & LEARNING OF ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE John O. Mingle, Ph.D., J.D., Tom C. Roberts, P.E. Kansas State UniversityAbstractModern times mean the cybernetic revolution, which is composed of the latent information age,the rising knowledge age, and the future wisdom age. These changes will make current engi-neers trained only in information obsolete – replaced by computers. Therefore, to prepare engi-neers for the future, engineering faculty must master knowledge teaching.Students will be members of the
the team members report on their actions – this keeps them in the game and motivates them to do a better job since they are reporting on their own work.The answer to number 2, concerning non-performers and their elimination is a delicate one.While remaining positive, the leader must tell them that their actions are hurting the team. Theleader must offer solutions and in the case of an academic team, it may be necessary to “help”the non-performing team members to re-evaluate their goals. It is possible that they shouldconsider the Masters rather than a Doctorate. These are difficult discussions to undertake butthey are necessary. Trying to carry a person who cannot perform research or write can reallybecome a time sink and will disrupt a
Teaching, (3):2-8, 1993.7. Chickering, A.W. & Ehrman, S.C. Implementing the seven principles: technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, October 1997.8. Herrmann, N. The whole brain business book, McGraw Hill, New York, 1996.9. Lumsdaine, M. & Lumsdaine, E. Creative problem solving - Thinking skills for a changing world, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1995.10. www.ncsu.edu/effective_teaching/ILSdir/ilsweb.html11. Engineering Council of South Africa (ECSA). Standards for accredited university engineering Bachelors degrees. Documents PE-60 and PE-61. www.ecsa.co.za12. Carr, A. & Steyn, T. Master grapher for windows. Oxford University Press, Cape Town, 1998.13. Greybe, W., Steyn, T. & Carr, A. Fundamentals of 2-D function graphing – A
technical disciplines should not only be domain expertsbut also skilled communicators proficient at understanding and dealing with global issues, ethicalchallenges, and complex problem-solving. MIT’s service learning program was created to helpeducate students in real-world contexts that enable them to experience and master these areaswithin and beyond a subject domain. In this work, we will describe the efforts of MIT’s servicelearning program with respect to one particular class: Product Engineering Processes, betterknown at MIT as 2.009.2.009: Product Engineering Processes2.009 is a one semester course, offered once a year in the fall term and is the required senior-level product design class in the mechanical engineering department (ME) at MIT
Street, New York, NY, 10014[10]. Ledeen, Michael “Machiavelli on Modern Leadership” 1999, St. Martin Press, 175 fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010[11]. “John Wooden: Values, Victory and Peace of Mind” videotape production by Steve Jamison.[12]. “Shakelton’s Antarctic Adventure” 2001, videotape Production by WGBH Educational Foundation Biographical InformationGEORGE SUCKARIEHGeorge Suckarieh is a Full Professor of Construction Management at University of CincinnatiCollege of Applied Science. Dr. Suckarieh received a PhD in Civil Engineering and a Masters inBusiness Administration from The Ohio State University. He is the director of the HonorsProgram at the College of Applied
78aligning results from the Block #2 exam 60 %with the performance on the Final 64Examination. Analysis indicates a marked 40 %increase in student proficiency exceedingthe 78th percentile. Although some isolated 20 %student scores were below acceptable levels,the overall results testify to a success for thestudents in mastering this learning objective. Block #2 Final Exam ExamStudents are also required to completeindividual questionnaires to subjectively Figure 6. Comparative Results forreport their own perception of mastery for Block #2 Learning Objective #1b
Department of Engineering at Baylor University. He received hisB. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy, his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University,and his DPhil. at the University of Oxford, UK. At Baylor he teaches courses in laboratory techniques, fluidmechanics, thermodynamics, and propulsion systems, as well as freshman engineering.STEVEN EISENBARTHSteven Eisenbarth is Associate Dean of the School of Engineering and Computer Science at Baylor University. Hereceived his B.S. in Mathematics and Physics from Albertson College of Idaho and a Masters and Ph.D. in Physicsfrom Baylor University. He teaches courses in electrical and computer engineering including embedded computersystems design, computer organization, electrical
Master PlanningCommittee on campus to gain their approval. The team was able to gain the support of bothcommittees and their encouragement to move ahead with project plans.The team also presented to several engineering and service societies, including: AIChE8, IEEE9,ASCE10, ASME11 and GEO12. The team received support from several members of IEEE andASCE to help with the construction of the system. ASCE also adopted the project as a serviceproject for the society. With support from these societies, the team continued to progress.Overall, the team has been very successful in its attempt to gain the support of the broadercampus community, but it has added a few months to the overall planning process. It hasbecome clear that many people are involved
limit any increase in faculty teaching loads.Current Four-Year CurriculumRose-Hulman is a four-year, private, non-sectarian college of engineering, science, andmathematics located in Terre Haute, Indiana. Undergraduate enrollment for the 2004/05academic year is 1,765. The most recent freshman class of 473 students had a median SAT of1,300 with 92 percent graduating in the top 20 percent of their high school class. The CivilEngineering Department is an undergraduate focused engineering program with an enrollment ofapproximately 120 students and six faculty. The Department offers a minor in environmentalengineering and a Masters of Science in environmental engineering. The graduate program has acurrent enrollment of two students.The civil
by the instructor.We used instructor lectures to teach communication topics in one quarter. We divided theselected topics from Communicate! into twelve mini-topics that could be covered infifteen to twenty minutes. The instructor then delivered the contents one piece at a timebetween Week 3 and Week 9. To reinforce student learning, these contents were coveredin homework assignments, in-class quizzes, and exam questions.This approach worked well in covering all important topics thoroughly because theinstructor had full control of the lecture contents. However, communication topics werenon-technical in nature. Even though good communication skills were hard to master,communication theories on paper were relatively easy to follow. When
, hands-on learningexperiences in science, mathematics and engineering’[4]. In order to accomplish the inquiry-based, hands-on learning goal, the Center’s Project Development Team (PDT) proposed a newinstructional system design model during the summer of 1995[5-7]. An essential element of thedesign is the use of a summarizing activity that allows the students to reinforce and transfercompetencies mastered in previous learning tasks to a new problem-solving context[8, 9] . Theintent of the transfer activity is to stimulate students to make connections and generalizationsabout the competencies learned after applying them in a new way. The transfer activity reflectsreal world problems in order to provide student motivation and to enhance the
Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990.8. Wankat, P.C. and F.S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering, McGraw Hill, New York, 1993. available at https://engineering.purdue.edu/ChE/News_and_Events/Publications/teaching_engineering/index.html9. Seymour, E., and N. M. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Westview Press, Boulder Colorado (1997).10. Lowman, J. 1995. Mastering The Techniques of Teaching, Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco, CA.11. Prados, J.W., “Engineering Education in the Unites States: Past, Present, and Future,” Proceedings, International Conference on Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Barzil, Aug 1998, paper 225.12. Grinter, L. E., “Report on the Evaluation of Engineering Education,” Engineering