Paper ID #20079Measuring the Factors Associated with Student Persistence in the Washing-ton State STARS ProgramMs. Katherine C Tetrick, Washington State University Katherine directs the STARS program at Washington State University. She obtained her bachelors in mathematical sciences from Montana Tech of the University of Montana in 2013 and her masters in mathematics with a teaching emphasis from Washington State University in 2015.Dr. John B. Schneider, Washington State University John Schneider is an associate professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) and the Associate Dean for
the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Long Beach, CA.Linsey, J., Tseng, I., Fu, K., Cagan, J., Wood, K., & Schunn, C. (2010). A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(4), 041003-041001-041012.Morocz, R. (2016). Classifying and characterizing university maker space users: A foundation. (Masters), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.Morocz, R., Levy, B., Forest, C., Nagel, R., Newstetter, W., Talley, K., & Linsey, J. (2016). Relating Student Participation in University Maker Spaces to their Engineering Design Self- Efficacy. Paper presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
develop outreach programs that educate the youth about the principles of sustainability. She received a bachelor of science in Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering from UAB and is a credentialed practitioner on Envision Sustainable Infrastructure rating system (ENV SP). She is actually pursuing her masters in the field of Civil Engineering.Prof. Andrew J. Sullivan, University of Alabama, Birmingham Specializes in traffic operations and traffic control systems.Dr. Talat Salama, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Talat Salama, PE, is an Associate Professor at the Department of Manufacturing and Construction Management. Before joining CCSU, he was an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at the
Paper ID #18836”Was it Worth It?” Reassessing the Lasting Value of a LEED CredentialingCourse to its Students a Few Years After GraduationMajor Jennifer Gonser, United States Military Academy, West Point MAJ Jennifer Gonser Jeremiah Stache is an instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical En- gineering at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from the U.S. Military Academy, West Point; M.S. from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign and a Masters of Philos- ophy in Engineering from University of Cambridge, England. Her research interests include construction engineering, sustainable
, J.S. (2014) Data First: building scientific reasoning in AP chemistry via the concept development approach, J. Chem Ed., http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ed500027gDr. Carrie Obenland, Rice University Dr. Obenland is the Assistant Director for Outreach and Research at the Rice Office of STEM Engage- ment. She as her PhD in Chemistry from Rice University, as well as her Masters. Her graduate work was focused on chemical education. She earned her BS in Chemical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin.Alice Chow, Rice University Alice Chow is an Associate Director for Research and Grants for the Rice University Office of STEM Engagement. She conducts research in K-12 STEM education on topics such as
institution. Each term, the cohort conducts one round ofVAPR that includes the selection and recording of a course, pre-observation reflection, reviewby peers in the cohort, and post-observation reflection. The participating faculty primarily teachcourses within the department, but also teach engineering core courses and graduate coursesoutside of the department. The participants are all full time faculty ranging in academic rankfrom instructors to associate professors and four of nine participants are non-tenure track andonly hold Masters degrees in a variety of engineering disciplines (Table 2). Table 2. Profile of participating faculty. Participant Demographics N
, most teams used avariant of the scrum framework to manage this project. This was not too surprising since thescrum framework was the first agile approach they experienced in detail. The teams did not havean assigned scrum master to assist them. The teaching assistants played the role of customers orproduct owners.Several active learning modules were used as the students were beginning their design work.Student groups were asked to propose and assess three candidate architectures for the ATMsystem. They shared their tradeoff analyses during a whole class discussion. Students used ausability questionnaire to assess quality of the campus homepage and propose suggestions to atleast one problem area they uncovered. Student groups developed a set of
Paper ID #18595Women Building the US STEM PipelineDr. Christina L. Carmen, University of Alabama, Huntsville Dr. Carmen obtained a Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering degree as well as a Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, GA. While at Ga. Tech she worked with Dr. Warren Strahle, researching solid propellants. She obtained a Doctor of Philos- ophy in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) with a focus upon turbulent combustion modeling. Dr. Carmen is the capstone design class coordinator in the Mechanical and Aerospace
intended to provide opportunities for students to explore realistic applicationsof the circuit principles and techniques they are mastering. A final project option is also providedfor students wishing to obtain extra credit in the theory portion of the class.Table 1. Approximate proportion of five different activity modalities in each lab: Analysis using circuit theory and MATLAB, breadboarding of physical circuits, Simulation of circuits using CircuitLab, a web-based simulator, Application/Design activities to contextualize theoretical principles, and use of Instrumentation including a standard DMM and Digilent’s Analog Discovery USB oscilloscope and waveform generator
and after the trip.The 2017 j-term course Germany Today: Science, Technology & Culture13 at the University ofRhode Island took place from January 3-20. Before the group traveled to Germany, all twentyparticipating undergraduate students had to complete a mandatory three-day preparation course oncampus. The group consisted of 20 undergraduates of all class years with about one third offreshmen and sophomores, and another third of juniors who will go on their year of studying andinterning abroad this coming Fall. Furthermore, two graduate students who had already spent theirsenior year abroad in Germany, completed the dual Bachelor degree in an engineering disciplineand German, and are now enrolled in the dual master program between URI and
for wakeboard/ski boats. Mr. Georgeou earned a Master of Science in Technol- ogy, concentration in Mechanical Engineering Technology in 2006. While attending graduate school, he taught as an adjunct faculty member in Chandler Gilbert Community College’s Automated Manufacturing Systems program. Before attending graduate school Trian worked for Hasport Performance as a manufac- turing engineer where he designed and manufactured aftermarket motor mounts for import automobiles. He earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Manufacturing Engineering Technology in 2003 from ASU. Currently Trian teaches courses for the IME department in computer-aided-design (CAD), manual ma- chining processes, fixture design, computer
Master of Science in Technol- ogy Leadership and Innovation from Purdue University with a thesis investigating middle school engi- neering self-efficacy beliefs. His research interests are engineering self-efficacy, creativity, and decision making.Dr. Dawn Laux Dawn Laux is a Clinical Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer and Information Technology (CIT) at Purdue University. She has been with the University since 2007 and is responsible for teaching database fundamentals courses and introductory technology courses. Laux has 10 years of industrial experience in the information technology field, and her research area of interest includes technology readiness, the social impacts of technology, and
.The EWB Research Program is a project-based service-learning initiative to support capstonecourses6. EWB-A works with its partners and volunteers to identify projects suitable for finalyear engineering undergraduate or masters coursework students. These are not the firstpriorities for the partners, as those are the focus of volunteer placements, but commonmotivations for partners proposing and supporting projects include: 1. time available, partners are typically focused on implementation and on the ground work with very limited time for research, feasibility studies or design improvements. 2. additional expertise, both in terms of undertaking quality research and depth of specialist engineering knowledge. 3. access to
Paper ID #15605How Can Maker Skills Fit in with Accreditation Demands for UndergraduateEngineering Programs?Mr. Aubrey Wigner, Arizona State University Aubrey Wigner is a PhD candidate in Human and Social Dimensions of Science and Technology at Ari- zona State University. He has an undergraduate degree in Chemical and Biochemical Engineering and a Masters in International Political Economy of Resources, both from the Colorado School of Mines. His research focuses on integrating Makerspaces and Hackerspaces with higher education to enhance learning through hands on interdisciplinary practices. He is also interested in how
nature of PCK.Prof. Robert J Culbertson, Arizona State University Robert J. Culbertson is an Associate Professor of Physics. Currently, he teaches introductory mechanics and electrodynamics for physics majors and a course in musical acoustics, which was specifically de- signed for elementary education majors. He is director of the ASU Physics Teacher Education Coalition (PhysTEC) Project, which strives to produce more and better high school physics teachers. He is also director of Master of Natural Science degree program, a graduate program designed for in-service science teachers. He works on improving persistence of students in STEM majors, especially under-prepared students and students from under-represented
Paper ID #16964Leadership in Practice: A Model for Building Strong Academic Foundationsin a Residential Learning CommunityMs. Noel Kathleen Hennessey, The University of Arizona Noel Hennessey is the Coordinator for Outreach, Recruitment and Retention in the College of Engineer- ing at the University of Arizona. She is responsible for first-year experience through residential education, student development and retention, and designing outreach activities and events for undergraduate recruit- ment. Noel earned a Master of Arts degree in Higher Education from the University of Arizona in 2015 and is currently pursuing a
field of computing.Mr. Andrew Jackson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Andrew Jackson is currently pursuing a PhD in Technology through Purdue’s Polytechnic Institute. His previous middle school teaching experience informs his role as a graduate teaching assistant for TECH 120, an introductory course in design thinking. He recently completed his Master of Science in Technol- ogy Leadership and Innovation from Purdue University with a thesis investigating middle school engi- neering self-efficacy beliefs. His research interests are engineering self-efficacy, creativity, and decision making.Prof. Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nathan Mentzer is an assistant professor in the College of Technology
awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Mr. Siqing Wei, Purdue University, West Lafayette Siqing Wei received bachelor degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is in the dual program to obtain master degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Ph.D degree c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25751in Engineering
Practice, pp. 2-10, Jan. 2006.[16] A. L. Gerhart, “Shock and Awe- Methodology for Recruiting Students,” Proceedings of the2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2253, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20-23,2004.[17] J. Lowman, Mastering the Techniques of Teaching, 2nd Ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bassof John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995.[18] K. Mangan, “The Personal Lecture,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, December 4,2016, http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Personal-Lecture/238559, [Accessed March 22,2019].[19] ESCALA HSI Summer Faculty Institute, Workshop Notes and Handouts, Santa Fe, NM,August 6-9, 2018.[20] J. P. Hannus and A. C. Estes, “Keep Them on the Edge of Their Seats: Bringing Drama intothe Engineering Classroom,” Proceedings
divisive classroom environmentswhere students are made to feel a sense of alienation in the absence of significant priorexperiences with engineering and design. A key preliminary quantitative dataset comes fromstudent self-reports of both prior experience and perceived future need in their degree programsbeyond the first year. At the beginning of the semester, students responded individually toprompts for experience and perceived need within five key areas of expertise in the classroom:teaming, computer drafting, building, programming, and wiring. Subsequent to recording theirindividual responses, charts were placed on the board and students were provided with coloreddots so they could transfer their information onto a classroom master list
workshops are led by writing specialists who present talks and organize activitiesregarding best practices in Writing Studies and pedagogy [14: pp. 69-71]. While we believe inthe utility of WAC work, it is not without faults. Generally, traditional WAC models have led tocritiques that such work reduces exceptionally complex pedagogical practices for teachingwriting to simple strategies that can be mastered in a short time [15] – an ironic critique, giventhat WAC proponents hope to challenge overly simple notions of writing. Walvoord et al., [14]have warned against more stabilized “WAC orthodoxy.” Others critical of WAC have likened itspractitioners to missionaries, delivering “good” writing pedagogy to those who attend workshopswith little or no
Paper ID #21090Evaluation of Suffolk University’s Electrical Engineering S-STEM Programat Year 4Lisa Shatz, Suffolk University Professor of Electrical Engineering, Suffolk University Professor and Chair of Electrical Engineering, the Benjamin Franklin Institute of Technology PhD, Massachusetts Institute of Technology MS, Mas- sachusetts Institute of Technology BS, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMs. Kerrie Pieloch , Suffolk University Ms. Kerrie Pieloch is a clinical psychology Ph.D. candidate at Suffolk University. She received her Masters of Science in clinical psychology in May of 2015. Her clinical work focuses on
toimplement an intrusive advising strategy, along with mandated enrollment into particularsections of Physics and Calculus courses for all SEECS students. [7], [8].STEM-PASS is a rather new initiative at Gannon University, wherein extensive tutoring isprovided to students enrolled in designated class sections. Paid upper-class students who havepreviously mastered the course are tasked with sitting in on the lectures, taking notes about thematerial and professor priorities, and providing one-on-one or small-group tutoring to studentsregistered in the course. The student is paid for 10 hours per week, nominally on a work-studybasis, and provides tutoring during prearranged hours. It is up to the course instructor todetermine how “mandatory” it is for
., Tufts University Amy L. Freeman holds a Master of Science degree in Engineering and a Ph.D. in Workforce Education. She has a been a practitioner of engineering education 17 years and is a member of several organizations and networks that support access and inclusion to STEM education. Dr. Freeman served as Assistant Dean in the College of Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University, and provided administrative direction for the Center for Engineering Outreach and Inclusion through cultivation of partnerships with corporations, alumni, university constituents and organizational alliances. Currently, she is Associate Provost and Chief Diversity Officer at Tufts University.Dr. Ryan Scott HasslerMark William
3.28 .95 7 12. No outside labs in crappy weather 3.28 1.70 7Conclusion and Future DirectionsWe have made progress across numerous goals from developing the STEM Success andOrientation course, assigning faculty mentors to our first SSA cohort, to developing CUREs forchemistry and engineering courses. We are currently developing an application model for ourfour summer research scholarships that will involve student-faculty collaborations at WCC andthe nearby regional university. The university is a four-year masters-granting institution with astrong record of undergraduate and graduate research across the STEM disciplines. Some keyactivities that we are now focusing on
Paper ID #22917A Cross-Institution Collaboration: Analysis of Power Electronic Technolo-gies for Solar Panel ArraysMs. Jill Davishahl, Bellingham Technical College Jill Davishahl is a faculty member in the engineering department at Bellingham Technical College where she teaches courses ranging from Intro to Engineering Design to Engineering Statics. Outside of teaching, Jill is working on the design and development of a Bachelor of Applied Science in Engineering Technol- ogy and is currently PI on an NSF funded ATE project grant in renewable energy. She holds a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the
.[27] E. A. Cech, S. Farrell, and T. J. Waidzunas, "How do LGBTQ faculty and students fare in US engineering education? Report from a survey of seven engineering colleges and programs," in ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[28] E. A. Cech, T. J. Waidzunas, and S. Farrell, "The Inequality of LGBTQ Students in U.S. Engineering Education: Report on a Study Comparing LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ Students in Eight Engineering Programs," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017 (in review).[29] A. R. Smith, "Making their own way: How gay male students experience the STEM fields," Master of Arts, Educational Administration, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, 2014
Laboratory for Instruction in Engineering”, Proceedings of the 9th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Seville, Spain, 2016.[18] A. Maxwell, Z. Jiang, and C. Chen, “Mobile Learning for Undergraduate Course through Interactive Apps and Novel Remote Shake Table Laboratory”, Proceedings of 124th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[19] IBM SPSS Software. “IBM Analytics.” IBM.com. http://www.ibm.com/analytics/us/en/technology/spss/ (accessed March 25, 2017).[20] Witt-Rose, D. L. "Student self-efficacy in college science: An investigation of gender, age, and academic achievement." Master Thesis. University of Wisconsin-Stout, WI, 2004.[21] D. Cervone, "Thinking about self
that could be applied to masters degrees Require third year student mentees to agree to serve as mentors in their fourth year to second year students Develop the program so that practicing engineers benefit more directly in terms of credit for continuing professional development.References[1] N. J. Balster, C. Pfund, R. Rediske, and J.L. Branchaw, "Entering Research: A course that creates community and structure for beginning undergraduate researchers in the STEM disciplines", Life Sciences Education, vol. 9 (2), p 108-118. doi: doi:10.1187/cbe.09-10- 0073, 2010.[2] L. Hui, N. Mickleborough, and B. Chan, "Service Leadership Community: A seedbed for nurturing a service leadership mindset
and/or graduate students to clarify class concepts and work on specifichomework problems. Similarly, subject-area tutoring allows students to regularly meet with thesame tutor to master academic material. At SI, students are matched with undergraduates whohave already received an “A or B” in the course and can aid current students with course work.Enjoyment for these academic enrichment services were fairly low with 39.6% (SI) and 36.7%(Math Lab) of attendees citing high enjoyment. Although fewer students took advantage ofSubject-Area Tutoring, reported enjoyment was higher (48.1%). Follow-up interviews areneeded with a sample of those students who indicated only medium or low impact for theseservices to identify strategies for improvement.2